[Expired for ibus (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: ibus (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ibus in Ubuntu.
[Expired for whoopsie (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: whoopsie (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to whoopsie in Ubuntu.
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: gtk+3.0 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gtk+3.0 in Ubuntu.
the report seems to be rather with the gtk fileselector
** Package changed: nautilus (Ubuntu) => gtk+3.0 (Ubuntu)
** Summary changed:
- nautilus window "open file" cannot be maximized
+ gtkfileselector window "open file" cannot be maximized
--
You received this bug notification because you
You have been subscribed to a public bug:
When I do "Open file" from within any application, the nautilus window appears
but it doesn't have the "maximize" button and also the double-click on its
titlebar does nothing.
I must resize it manually by dragging each border...
In the previous
with newest Mesa version 19.0.8-0ubuntu0~18.04.3 from oficial (non-ppa)
bionic-updates repository is problem gone
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1835622
Title:
Maciej, that looks like javascript polkit and I believe we're staying on
the pre-javascript version of polkit.
Thanks
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to policykit-1 in Ubuntu.
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted systemd (237-3ubuntu10.32) for bionic
have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
gvfs/1.36.1-0ubuntu1.3.3 (ppc64el)
linux/unknown (ppc64el)
Please visit the excuses page listed below and
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted systemd (237-3ubuntu10.32) for bionic
have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
gvfs/1.36.1-0ubuntu1.3.3 (ppc64el)
linux/unknown (ppc64el)
Please visit the excuses page listed below and
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted systemd (237-3ubuntu10.32) for bionic
have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
gvfs/1.36.1-0ubuntu1.3.3 (ppc64el)
linux/unknown (ppc64el)
Please visit the excuses page listed below and
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted systemd (237-3ubuntu10.32) for bionic
have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
gvfs/1.36.1-0ubuntu1.3.3 (ppc64el)
linux/unknown (ppc64el)
Please visit the excuses page listed below and
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted systemd (237-3ubuntu10.32) for bionic
have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
gvfs/1.36.1-0ubuntu1.3.3 (ppc64el)
linux/unknown (ppc64el)
Please visit the excuses page listed below and
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted systemd (237-3ubuntu10.32) for bionic
have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
gvfs/1.36.1-0ubuntu1.3.3 (ppc64el)
linux/unknown (ppc64el)
Please visit the excuses page listed below and
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted systemd (237-3ubuntu10.32) for bionic
have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
gvfs/1.36.1-0ubuntu1.3.3 (ppc64el)
linux/unknown (ppc64el)
Please visit the excuses page listed below and
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted systemd (237-3ubuntu10.32) for bionic
have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
gvfs/1.36.1-0ubuntu1.3.3 (ppc64el)
linux/unknown (ppc64el)
Please visit the excuses page listed below and
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted systemd (237-3ubuntu10.32) for bionic
have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
gvfs/1.36.1-0ubuntu1.3.3 (ppc64el)
linux/unknown (ppc64el)
Please visit the excuses page listed below and
can you try with?
$ aplay /usr/share/sounds/freedesktop/stereo/service-login.oga
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1852018
Title:
Audio Stops Playing
tried that and the sound ends too quickly for me to delete the file and
test
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1852018
Title:
Audio Stops Playing Briefly
Installing ncsd worked well for me as well.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1745664
Title:
[regression] systemd-logind crashed with SIGABRT in
Verified in bionic with 237-3ubuntu10.32
Dnssec and not are now consistent, tested general functionality with
dnssec=yes and not set as well.
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-bionic
--
You received this bug
Unfortunately it isn't that easy in my case. I need to have every action
attempted logged. That will still give it to me, but modifying what's
happening by changing what's being requested.
So, if a normal user attempts something, the best case is for it to ask
for the users password and fail when
In /etc/systemd/system/systemd-logind.service comment out
IPAddressDeny=Any
this work around has been working for us for about a 10 months now
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
Not sure whether removing files that came with distro packages is the
best idea long term. I think a better option would be to drop in a
custom rule that runs before the default ones. As usual ArchWiki has
some examples:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Polkit#Administrator_identities
> I'm currently traveling for work, but will verify the fix this evening
hopefully.
Thanks - I did a quick verification but it would be good if you could
verify it works for you as well.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is
with testcase setup from description, system A is -remote and system B
is -d
ubuntu@lp1847527-remote:~$ dpkg -l systemd|grep ii
ii systemd240-6ubuntu5.7 amd64system and service manager
ubuntu@lp1847527-d:~$ dpkg -l systemd|grep ii
ii systemd240-6ubuntu5.7 amd64
And this also helps here?
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/9431#issuecomment-412195708
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1745664
Title:
[regression]
As an addition... If I remove the 51-ubuntu-admin.conf file, when I run
`snap install blender --classic`, it pops up a dialog box asking for the
"Administrator" password.
Entering roots password will install it.
This is the behaviour wanted. Not install it with only the users
authentication.
--
Does this workaround help here as well?
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/9431#issuecomment-412195708
Essentially, replace IPAddressDeny=any with just "IPAddressDeny="
** Bug watch added: github.com/systemd/systemd/issues #9431
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/9431
--
You
I'm currently traveling for work, but will verify the fix this evening
hopefully.
Thanks
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019, 10:41 Dan Streetman
wrote:
> @drdabbles can you please verify the fix in systemd in proposed
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
>
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
** Description changed:
[impact]
upstream commit 7fdb237f5473cb8fc2129e57e8a0039526dcb4fd broke remote journal
upload, because it added a check to verify the Content-Length header, but the
upload may use Transfer-Encoding of 'chunked' which does
not specify Content-Length.
[test
That's what I want though. I want control through sudoers, not polkit.
The file: /etc/polkit-1/localauthority.conf.d/50-localauthority.conf ... still
contains:
```
[Configuration]
AdminIdentities=unix-user:0
```
I don't know why you need to say root is an admin, but whatever it's
there... And
Having no group listed by default would means admin users wouldn't be
able to use polkit which is not what we want.
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/polkit/polkit/issues/24 discusses a bit
the group checking logic
** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** Bug watch
Verified in disco with, ii systemd
240-6ubuntu5.8
Dnssec and not are now consistent, tested general functionality with
dnssec=yes and not set as well.
** Tags removed: verification-needed-disco
** Tags added: verification-done-disco
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
According to that commit, it's not yet enough.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to nspr in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1851695
Title:
DEP8 failure/regression in nspr on arm64 and armhf
Status in
Hello Timo, or anyone else affected,
Accepted libdrm into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdrm/2.4.99-1ubuntu1~18.04.1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Timo, or anyone else affected,
Accepted libdrm into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdrm/2.4.99-1ubuntu1~18.04.1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Thank You!!!
Can you set it like:
```
[Configuration]
AdminIdentities=
```
So *nothing* is considered an Admin?
That file has `unix-group:sudo;unix-group:admin` ... by default from
what I can tell. But at least that I know this thing exists and hey, you
can elevate privileges without being in
Hello Timo, or anyone else affected,
Accepted llvm-toolchain-9 into bionic-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-
toolchain-9/1:9-2~ubuntu18.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new
The polkit definition of the admin group is in
/etc/polkit-1/localauthority.conf.d/51-ubuntu-admin.conf
Did you update that file to reflect that your admin group has a
different naming?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is
The above still stands... but that isn't it for `snap` ... I changed all
the `isIngroup("sudo")` to use `sudoA` since that's the actually group
that's in sudoers...
And snap is still letting me install the blender snap in `--classic`
mode. So How do you find out what polkit rules are running
llvm-toolchain-9, libdrm uploaded to the queue
** Description changed:
- PLACEHOLDER
+ [Impact]
+
+ These are needed for 18.04.4 images.
+
+ [Test case]
+
+ Boot a daily image, see that it still has the necessary stack installed
+ and working.
+
+ Check upgrade from stock bionic.
+
+
the requirement for policykit (and dropping of gksu/gksudo) came with
the switch to gnome upstream, its a hard requirement for the desktop
nowadays.
while the default here might be wrong (and should be reviewed by someone
from the desktop team), this is definitely not a snapd related bug. i
added
LGTM on bionic
ubuntu@srv-ywz63:~$ dpkg -l systemd | grep ii
ii systemd237-3ubuntu10.32 i386 system and service manager
ubuntu@srv-ywz63:~$ journalctl -b -u systemd-resolved | grep Started
Nov 14 17:05:43 srv-ywz63 systemd[1]: Started Network Name Resolution.
Nov 14 17:05:44
That particular issue is gone, but there are others now
# systemctl list-units --failed
UNIT LOAD ACTIVE SUBDESCRIPTION
● sys-kernel-config.mount loaded failed failed Kernel Configuration File
System
● systemd-modules-load.service loaded
I don't have any specific hint for what to look at in the journal no,
just hints of what the problems could be. You can switch drivers in
software-properties-gtk
** Changed in: xorg (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
I think I may have found it It looks like policykit has some rules
with entries like:
```
subject.isInGroup("sudo")
```
That's ... broken. Just being in the `sudo` group should *NOT* let me
install software or elevate my priviledges, *ESPECIALLY* if the user
isn't actually in the sudoers.
with dnsmasq server setup to provide dhcp with 1m lease timeout, just
run dhclient on test system:
ubuntu@lp1805183-d:~$ dpkg -l systemd|grep ii
ii systemd240-6ubuntu5.7 amd64system and service manager
ubuntu@lp1805183-d:~$ journalctl -b -u systemd-resolved | grep Started
Nov 14
Oliver,
> if you are marked as admin in the policyKit setup
Where do you find this? Where is the definition for what `auth_admin`
does located? From the freedesktop site it *seems* that it's an
"Administrative user," which to me is sudoers. As the system admin I'm
not defining an admin user
** Tags added: regression-update
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1851806
Title:
'module'
I looked at the policy used by PackageKit. I believe gnome-software uses
it as a backend, so can you try installing something that is
specifically not a snap?
At this point, all snapd does is ask PolicyKit whether given the policy,
the user can install a package. PolicyKit responds with yes,
Here's a reproduction of the error:
bcurtiss@bcurtiss-laptop:~$ ipython
Python 2.7.12 (default, Oct 8 2019, 14:14:10)
Type "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
IPython 2.4.1 -- An enhanced Interactive Python.
? -> Introduction and overview of IPython's features.
policyKit does not involve sudo in any way, it uses systemd-logind from
the session to elevate privileges. if you are marked as admin in the
policyKit setup you will indeed be able to do admin things no matter
what is written in sudoers ;)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
I'm not exactly sure how to reproduce this bug, but I did encounter the
same issue. It looks like the bug was recently introduced in this
commit:
https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/commit/?h=applied/ubuntu
/xenial-security=ecd7418b02911c6649b69a592cca74cfbac8813d
```
@@ -510,22
the 'storage' autopkgtest passes on all archs now.
other systemd autopkgtests still fail on ppc64el, but systemd tests have
always failed on disco ppc64el so those failures can be ignored.
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-disco
** Tags added: verification-done
@drdabbles can you please verify the fix in systemd in proposed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847527
Title:
Backport systemd-journal-remote fix PR
ubuntu@lp1849733-d:~$ dpkg -l systemd|grep ii
ii systemd240-6ubuntu5.7 amd64system and service manager
ubuntu@lp1849733-d:~$ telnet toomany100.ddstreet.org
telnet: could not resolve toomany100.ddstreet.org/telnet: Temporary failure in
name resolution
ubuntu@lp1849733-d:~$ dpkg -l systemd|grep ii
ii systemd240-6ubuntu5.7 amd64system and service manager
ubuntu@lp1849733-d:~$ dig +noanswer +noedns toomany.ddstreet.org
;; Truncated, retrying in TCP mode.
; <<>> DiG 9.11.5-P1-1ubuntu2.5-Ubuntu <<>> +noanswer +noedns
Hello Che, or anyone else affected,
Accepted systemd into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/237-3ubuntu10.32 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Marc, or anyone else affected,
Accepted systemd into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/237-3ubuntu10.32 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Steve, or anyone else affected,
Accepted systemd into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/237-3ubuntu10.32 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello jrb0001, or anyone else affected,
Accepted systemd into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/237-3ubuntu10.32 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Neil, or anyone else affected,
Accepted systemd into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/237-3ubuntu10.32 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Bruno, or anyone else affected,
Accepted systemd into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/237-3ubuntu10.32 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Dan, or anyone else affected,
Accepted systemd into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/237-3ubuntu10.32 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Dan, or anyone else affected,
Accepted systemd into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/237-3ubuntu10.32 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Dan, or anyone else affected,
Accepted systemd into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/237-3ubuntu10.32 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Public bug reported:
[impact]
the patch contains a typo, or mis-backport, including both the function
definition line as well as a function definition macro, i.e.:
int config_parse_resolve_support(const char *unit, const char *filename,
unsigned line, const char *section, unsigned
** Package changed: xubuntu-default-settings (Ubuntu) => apport (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1850161
Title:
Suggestion: Configure apport (?) to
You have been subscribed to a public bug:
- Regarding XUbuntu 19.04
- apport version: 2.20.10-0ubuntu27.1
Current behaviour:
==
Core dumps of custom software (e.g. self-created software) are not created by
default.
(It says "core dumped", but actually nothing was created. This
I can possibly try 19.10 later, however at the moment I only have my LTS
laptop to test with.
Just to ensure we've covered any variations, here is a redacted version
of my connection file, in case I have missed anything.
[connection]
id=Vxxx
uuid=----
type=vpn
Public bug reported:
Description:Ubuntu 16.04.6 LTS
Release:16.04
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: dictionaries-common 1.26.3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-66.75~16.04.1-generic 4.15.18
Uname: Linux 4.15.0-66-generic x86_64
ApportVersion:
** Tags removed: need-duplicate-check
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dictionaries-common in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1852578
Title:
package dictionaries-common 1.26.3 failed to
Thanks for the patch, I tried it and suggest the following instead
(removing the "_" and everything beyond in the Version string) so that
it actually keeps its behaviour for versions prior to 1.94 and in
addition to that I encountered a third location where $Socket::VERSION
is being used inside
Also happening on OpenSUSE Tumbleweed 20191101
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1609700
Title:
username is not saved in openconnect connection
Seems to be an issue with the graphics drivers.
Is it easy to uninstall 100% and go back to default drivers if wanted?
Like to have as clean installation as possible but if this helps I might
give it a try.
https://askubuntu.com/questions/1185491/ubuntu-19-10-freezes-and-lags-
reguarly
--
You
The verification of the Stable Release Update for klibc has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
This bug was fixed in the package klibc - 2.0.6-1ubuntu3
---
klibc (2.0.6-1ubuntu3) eoan; urgency=medium
* Pull upstream fixes for losetup issues raised with gcc-9 (LP: #1850184):
- loop-header.patch: Switch to using the kernel's UAPI exported loop.h
- loop-fixes.patch: Fix
Problem is still present. Happened when running ClamAV, that took up a
lot of memory so that's one thing to change but I had the same setup in
19.04. Can also appear in FireFox (70.0.1, used a lot) when using
Twitter. Perhaps a js running away? Will take a closer look in the
console next time. I
79 matches
Mail list logo
