[Touch-packages] [Bug 1607666] Re: sudo fails with host netgroup returned from freeipa

2017-02-03 Thread Florian Apolloner
Sorry, cannot confirm on yakkety since we do not deploy there yet. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to sudo in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1607666 Title: sudo fails with host netgroup returned from

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1607666] Re: sudo fails with host netgroup returned from freeipa

2017-01-20 Thread Florian Apolloner
Can confirm that it works, just pulled it on our machines. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to sudo in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1607666] Re: sudo fails with host netgroup returned from freeipa

2017-01-14 Thread Florian Apolloner
Can confirm that this seems to work for us. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to sudo in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1607666 Title: sudo fails with host netgroup returned from freeipa Status in sudo

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1646256] Re: Update sudo for proper support of netgroups

2016-12-08 Thread Florian Apolloner
Seems to be a duplicate of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sudo/+bug/1607666 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to sudo in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1646256 Title: Update sudo for proper

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1607666] [NEW] sudo fails with host netgroup returned from freeipa

2016-07-29 Thread Florian Apolloner
Public bug reported: Sudo currently fails to validate netgroups against host netgroups returned from the sss plugin, see https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/6139 for the glory details. This was fixed in sudo 1.8.17 (https://www.sudo.ws/repos/sudo/rev/2eab4070dcf7 to be exact), which I'd very