Public bug reported: Is there a reason to restrict interface's name in ufw? Should ufw accept what iptables accept as iface name?
I've a vpn with lot of nodes, its iface name contain a '-' so cannot use ufw on it. I've found the check here and cannot found a reason for it: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~jdstrand/ufw/trunk/view/head:/src/common.py#L300 thanks ** Affects: ufw (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ufw in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1719211 Title: Bad interface name Status in ufw package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Is there a reason to restrict interface's name in ufw? Should ufw accept what iptables accept as iface name? I've a vpn with lot of nodes, its iface name contain a '-' so cannot use ufw on it. I've found the check here and cannot found a reason for it: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~jdstrand/ufw/trunk/view/head:/src/common.py#L300 thanks To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ufw/+bug/1719211/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
