[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992454] Re: iptables: segfault when renaming a chain

Hello, As noted in the bug description, it is important to know that from Jammy onward, the only way to exercise the bugfix is to use iptables-legacy and not iptables which uses a newer library. It also mitigates the impact on newer releases unless the -legacy version is being used. ...Louis

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992454] Re: iptables: segfault when renaming a chain

Hi Robie, This version of the package has been in Lunar since end of last year so I assume that it has been largely in use since then. ..Louis -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iptables in Ubuntu. https

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992454] Re: iptables: segfault when renaming a chain

Hello, Thank you for your help in uploading & fixing the DEP8 tests. I have tested the packages in -proposed using the test script in the SRU description for : - bionic - focal - jammy - kinetic. I confirm that the new package fix the problem in those distros. Thanks. ** Tags removed:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992454] Re: iptables: segfault when renaming a chain

Hello, thanks for the update. Will test when they show up in proposed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iptables in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992454 Title: iptables: segfault when renaming a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992454] Re: iptables: segfault when renaming a chain

Hello, Is there any chance of seeing this fix being SRUed to the stable releases ? Kind regards, ...Louis -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iptables in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992454 Title

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992454] Re: iptables: segfault when renaming a chain

Great ! I appreciate your help on this. ...Louis -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iptables in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992454 Title: iptables: segfault when renaming a chain Status

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992454] Re: iptables: segfault when renaming a chain

Hello, Sorry for the late response. It is most probably a mistake from my part. Let me know if you want me to upload a corrected debdiff. Regarding focal, since it was added by upstream, I thought that it would be better to add it as well. Kind regards, ...Louis -- You received this bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992454] Re: iptables: segfault when renaming a chain

Debdiff for Bionic ** Patch added: "iptables_1.6.1-2ubuntu2.1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iptables/+bug/1992454/+attachment/5629161/+files/iptables_1.6.1-2ubuntu2.1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992454] Re: iptables: segfault when renaming a chain

Debdiff for Jammy ** Patch added: "iptables_1.8.7-1ubuntu5.1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iptables/+bug/1992454/+attachment/5629163/+files/iptables_1.8.7-1ubuntu5.1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992454] Re: iptables: segfault when renaming a chain

Debdiff for Focal ** Patch added: "iptables_1.8.4-3ubuntu2.1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iptables/+bug/1992454/+attachment/5629162/+files/iptables_1.8.4-3ubuntu2.1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992454] Re: iptables: segfault when renaming a chain

Here are the debdiffs for Bionic, Focal and Jammy. I will let the sponsor worry about the numbering for Kinetic & Lunar -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iptables in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992454] Re: iptables: segfault when renaming a chain

** Description changed: + [ Impact ] + * An explanation of the effects of the bug on users + This is the description for the upstream fix of this bug[1] : This is an odd bug: If the number of chains is right and one renames the - last one in the list, libiptc dereferences a NULL pointer.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992454] Re: iptables: segfault when renaming a chain

Hello, I was waiting for the kinetic upload to get through and I have the debdiffs ready for the SRU. I'll take care of that & the SRU template in the coming days. ...Louis -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscr

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992454] Re: iptables: segfault when renaming a chain

Here is an autopkgtest run with the latest patch : Removing autopkgtest-satdep (0) ... autopkgtest [14:09:03]: test command17: chmod +x ./iptables/tests/shell/testcases/iptables/0007-zero-counters_0

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992454] Re: iptables: segfault when renaming a chain

Slightly modified debdiff which will only run the tests once. ** Patch removed: "iptables_1.8.7-1ubuntu7.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iptables/+bug/1992454/+attachment/5623037/+files/iptables_1.8.7-1ubuntu7.debdiff ** Patch removed: "iptables_1.8.7-1ubuntu7.debdiff"

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992454] Re: iptables: segfault when renaming a chain

Hello, Thanks for picking this up. Reference to the test was added to debian/test/control & test ran fine as we can see in the logs : Removing autopkgtest-satdep (0) ... autopkgtest [17:00:57]: test command18: chmod +x

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992454] Re: iptables: segfault when renaming a chain

Here is the debdiff for upload to Kinetic. ** Patch added: "iptables_1.8.7-1ubuntu7.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iptables/+bug/1992454/+attachment/5622997/+files/iptables_1.8.7-1ubuntu7.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992454] Re: iptables: segfault when renaming a chain

** Description changed: This is the description for the upstream fix of this bug[1] : This is an odd bug: If the number of chains is right and one renames the last one in the list, libiptc dereferences a NULL pointer. Commit 97bf4e68fc0794adba3243fd96f40f4568e7216f fixes this bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992454] Re: iptables: segfault when renaming a chain

In Progress ** Changed in: iptables (Ubuntu Bionic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Louis Bouchard (louis) ** Changed in: iptables (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Louis Bouchard (louis) ** Changed in: iptables (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Louis Bouchar

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992454] [NEW] iptables: segfault when renaming a chain

Public bug reported: This is the description for the upstream fix of this bug[1] : This is an odd bug: If the number of chains is right and one renames the last one in the list, libiptc dereferences a NULL pointer. Commit 97bf4e68fc0794adba3243fd96f40f4568e7216f fixes this bug upstream. This

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1805183] Re: systemd-resolved constantly restarts on Bionic upgraded from Xenial

Ok, I'll have a look at it; I only backported the Eoan fix to Bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1805183 Title: systemd-resolved constantly restarts on

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1844467] [NEW] Ubuntu now does not restart after being suspended.

Public bug reported: When I installed UNBUNTU and was suspending my computer, it came back. Now he won't call again after I have suspended him. I had some problems with this installation due to intermittent hardware issues (power supply and bad contact on SATA hard drive connection). Will I

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1842124] [NEW] Making Backup HD NTFS

Public bug reported: Falhou devido a um erro desconhecido. Traceback (innermost last): File "/usr/bin/duplicity", line 1555, in with_tempdir(main) File "/usr/bin/duplicity", line 1541, in with_tempdir fn() File "/usr/bin/duplicity", line 1393, in main do_backup(action) File

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1805183] Re: systemd-resolved constantly restarts on Bionic upgraded from Xenial

For Info, I'm repearing an SRU upload for Bionic hopefully available by End Of Day ** Description changed: [Impact] Log noise due to needless restart of resolved on lease expiry, maybe loss of cached state? + Application that require Name Resolution may fail while the service is being

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1805183] Re: systemd-resolved constantly restarts on Bionic upgraded from Xenial

** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Bionic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Louis Bouchard (louis) ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notificatio

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1834112] [NEW] the mouse stopped responding to commands

Public bug reported: the mouse stopped responding to commands ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04 Package: xorg 1:7.7+19ubuntu7.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.18.0-24.25~18.04.1-generic 4.18.20 Uname: Linux 4.18.0-24-generic x86_64 .tmp.unity_support_test.0: ApportVersion:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1831959] Re: The ecran freezed when I was seeing a youtube video.

The youtube video is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=soB_zeZhVc0 freezed 00:22:23 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1831959 Title: [nouveau] The screen froze

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1831959] [NEW] The ecran freezed when I was seeing a youtube video.

Public bug reported: The ecran freezed when I was seeing a youtube video. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04 Package: xorg 1:7.7+19ubuntu7.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.18.0-21.22~18.04.1-generic 4.18.20 Uname: Linux 4.18.0-21-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.6

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1831339] Re: Backup Unbuntu ERROR undefined

add. Traceback (innermost last): File "/usr/bin/duplicity", line 1555, in with_tempdir(main) File "/usr/bin/duplicity", line 1541, in with_tempdir fn() File "/usr/bin/duplicity", line 1393, in main do_backup(action) File "/usr/bin/duplicity", line 1511, in do_backup

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1831339] [NEW] Backup Unbuntu ERROR undefined

Public bug reported: Backup Unbuntu ERROR undefined ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04 Package: xorg 1:7.7+19ubuntu7.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.18.0-20.21~18.04.1-generic 4.18.20 Uname: Linux 4.18.0-20-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.6 Architecture: amd64

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1830980] [NEW] The connection was interrupted by attack.

Public bug reported: The connection was interrupted when the web page had already been loaded. I suspect an attack has reversed page loading. I believe it is because of an Unbuntu security flaw that has been exploited. This text was generated by the Google translator. The connection was made in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1830489] [NEW] I don't Know

Public bug reported: When the OP Unbuntu 18.04 inicializate! ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04 Package: xorg 1:7.7+19ubuntu7.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.18.0-20.21~18.04.1-generic 4.18.20 Uname: Linux 4.18.0-20-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.6 Architecture: amd64

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1829806] [NEW] I don't Know

Public bug reported: Don't have details about the issue! ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04 Package: xorg 1:7.7+19ubuntu7.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.18.0-20.21~18.04.1-generic 4.18.20 Uname: Linux 4.18.0-20-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.6 Architecture: amd64

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1758331] [NEW] IPv6 Route to OpenVPN Server is not created

Public bug reported: Hi, When the OpenVPN server pushes routes that overlaps with the openvpn server IP, it should add a route to the OpenVPN server. This seems to get done, but it fails: NetworkManager[1031]: [1521794922.6687] platform: signal: route 6 added: 2a00:x:x::3/128 via

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1746949] Re: Terminal lags (low FPS) the whole desktop when fast output

The following commit fixes the issue for 90%: https://git.gnome.org/browse/vte/commit/?id=809e79770 its not as fast as it was on X, but its useable now :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gtk+3.0 in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1746949] Re: Terminal laggs (low fps) the whole desktop when fast output

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778926 might be related ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #778926 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778926 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gtk+3.0 in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1725644] [NEW] package linux-firmware 1.169 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

Public bug reported: Error appears during upgrade from 17.04 to 17.10 ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.10 Package: linux-firmware 1.169 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.13.0-16.19-generic 4.13.4 Uname: Linux 4.13.0-16-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_uvm nvidia_drm

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1725643] [NEW] package linux-image-4.13.0-16-generic 4.13.0-16.19 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with return code 1

Public bug reported: Fail occurs during upgrade from 17.04 to 17.10 ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.10 Package: linux-image-4.13.0-16-generic 4.13.0-16.19 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.13.0-16.19-generic 4.13.4 Uname: Linux 4.13.0-16-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_uvm

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1725638] [NEW] package linux-image-generic 4.13.0.16.17 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with return code 1

Public bug reported: Error appears during system upgrade from 17.04 to 17.10 ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.10 Package: linux-image-generic 4.13.0.16.17 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.13.0-16.19-generic 4.13.4 Uname: Linux 4.13.0-16-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_uvm

Re: [Touch-packages] [Bug 1692981] Re: package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting con

Thanks, it worked for me too. On 04/08/17 14:55, Jeremy Gabriel wrote: > Did you run the dpkg -l | awk '/^iH/ { print $2 }' command that Seth posted > earlier in the thread? If so, you need to run the reinstall line for any > package listed. > > Unfortunately that's the limit to what I will be

Re: [Touch-packages] [Bug 1692981] Re: package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting co

Thank you, Seth. De : boun...@canonical.com de la part de Seth Arnold <1692...@bugs.launchpad.net> Envoyé : mardi 20 juin 2017 21:57:21 À : jeanlouisschm...@live.be Objet : [Bug 1692981] Re: package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1692870] Re: gzip compression broken in UniFi (built-in tomcat)

I tried to simulate the issue with Tomcat 7.0.77 (which is the version UniFi uses), but I was unable to simulate this on Ubuntu 17.04. The 'use-dso' patch that I removed in the debdiff, just point to an empty file. So no use that file is in the deb. Thanks ** Description changed: - [Impact] +

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1697072] [NEW] package libssl1.0.0:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu9.3 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso instalado el script post-installation devolvió el código de salida de error 1

Public bug reported: imposible via synaptic either ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.10 Package: libssl1.0.0:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu9.3 Uname: Linux 4.9.10-040910-lowlatency x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.3-0ubuntu8.3 AptOrdering: libssl1.0.0:i386: Install libssl1.0.0:amd64: Install

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1692870] Re: gzip compression broken in UniFi (built-in tomcat)

** Description changed: - Hi, - - Since I upgraded from Ubuntu 16.10 to 17.04, my Guest portal for my - UniFi system was broken (https://www.ubnt.com/download/unifi/). + [Impact] + Since I upgraded from Ubuntu 16.10 to 17.04, my Guest portal for my UniFi system was broken

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1692870] Re: gzip compression broken in UniFi (built-in tomcat)

** Patch added: "New version with patch included." https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zlib/+bug/1692870/+attachment/4881920/+files/fix_deflateParams.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1692870] [NEW] gzip compression broken in UniFi (built-in tomcat)

Public bug reported: Hi, Since I upgraded from Ubuntu 16.10 to 17.04, my Guest portal for my UniFi system was broken (https://www.ubnt.com/download/unifi/). Curl gave me the following response: # curl - --compress localhost:8880/guest/s/default/ * Trying ::1... * TCP_NODELAY set *

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1638695] Re: Python 2.7.12 performance regression

** Changed in: python2.7 (Ubuntu) Assignee: Louis Bouchard (louis) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python2.7 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1638695 Title: Python 2.7

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1654600] Re: unattended-upgrade-shutdown hangs when /var is a separate filesystem

** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Xenial) Assignee: Louis Bouchard (louis) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Yakkety) Assignee: Louis Bouchard (louis) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Zesty) Assignee: Louis Bo

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1654600] Re: unattended-upgrade-shutdown hangs when /var is a separate filesystem

Test performed for verification-done for : - Xenial - Yakkety - Zesty 1) Installed unattended-upgrades from -proposed 2) Verified the status of the unattended-upgrades service. All displayed : # systemctl status unattended-upgrades ● unattended-upgrades.service - Unattended Upgrades Shutdown

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1654600] Re: unattended-upgrade-shutdown hangs when /var is a separate filesystem

** Tags removed: sts-sru-needed verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1654600 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1654600] Re: unattended-upgrade-shutdown hangs when /var is a separate filesystem

=> In Progress ** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu) Assignee: Louis Bouchard (louis) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/b

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1654600] Re: unattended-upgrade-shutdown hangs when /var is a separate filesystem

Brief update to tell everyone that I have a fix ready for all stable releases. I will update it to Artful soon and the SRU will follow soon. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1642767] Re: starting any container with umask 007 breaks host system shutdown. lxc-stop just hangs.

My previous comment is unclear, the two problems are: 1. 'lxc' directories below '/sys/fs/cgroup/' are created according to the umask setting 2. then mounting '/sys/fs/cgroup/systemd' in the container hangs (and attempts to reboot or shut down the host system fail, a hard reset is required).

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1642767] Re: starting any container with umask 007 breaks host system shutdown. lxc-stop just hangs.

I was able to reproduce this bug on Debian unstable (lxc=2.0.7-2, libpam-cgfs=2.0.6-1, systemd=232-22, linux-image-4.9.0-2-amd64=4.9.18-1 or even using 4.11.0-rc6-1, libpam-cgm not installed, cgmanager not installed) with Debian Jessie unprivileged container (created using download template [1]).

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1654600] Re: unattended-upgrade-shutdown hangs when /var is a separate filesystem

Targetting Zesty as the fix will come after release so as a SRU. ** Also affects: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Zesty) Importance: High Assignee: Louis Bouchard (louis-bouchard) Status: In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1654600] Re: unattended-upgrade-shutdown hangs when /var is a separate filesystem

** Tags added: sts-sru-needed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1654600 Title: unattended-upgrade-shutdown hangs when /var is a separate

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1668639] Re: Add a trigger to reload rsyslog when a new configuration file is dropped in /etc/rsyslog.d

Too late now for sponsorship to Zesty. Since it will come with the next rsyslog merge in 8.24.0-1, well go forward with the SRU post-merge of the next rsyslog -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsyslog in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1679623] [NEW] Zesty : VPN connections appear grayed out - impossible to launch VPN connection from nm-applet

Public bug reported: nm-applet display each configured VPN connection as greyed out so it is impossible to launch any of the openVPN connection from the network indicator. It is still possible to enable the VPN connection using : $ nmcli conn up {VPN} ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu

Re: [Touch-packages] [Bug 1438510] Re: [REGRESSION] bluetooth headset no longer supports a2dp in 16.04 xenial and 16.10 yakkety

adset so I'd be more than happy to help you tests. Kind regards, ...Louis -- Louis Bouchard Software engineer, Cloud & Sustaining eng. Canonical Ltd Ubuntu developer Debian Maintainer GPG : 429D 7A3B DD05 B6F8 AF63 B9C4 8B3D 867C 823E 7A61 -- You received this bug no

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1654600] Re: unattended-upgrade-shutdown hangs when /var is a separate filesystem

A quick update on this issue. I have a solution ready to fix this. Unfortunately it requires changing the WantedBy= statement, which triggers a deb-systemd-helper bug : https://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=797108 This has the effect of leaving the service disabled after upgrade.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1447715] Re: dhclient -6: Can't bind to dhcp address: Cannot assign requested address

** Tags removed: sts-sru ** Tags added: sts-sru-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ifupdown in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1447715 Title: dhclient -6: Can't bind to dhcp address: Cannot assign

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1642903] Re: introduce disk/by-id (model_serial) symlinks for NVMe drives

** Tags removed: sts-sru ** Tags added: sts-sru-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1642903 Title: introduce disk/by-id (model_serial) symlinks for NVMe

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1647485] Re: NVMe symlinks broken by devices with spaces in model or serial strings

** Tags removed: sts-sru ** Tags added: sts-sru-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1647485 Title: NVMe symlinks broken by devices with spaces in model or

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1665018] Re: client tools ignore -h option without port number

** Tags removed: sts-sru ** Tags added: sts-sru-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cups in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1665018 Title: client tools ignore -h option without port number Status

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1648901] Re: SPNEGO crash on mechanism failure

** Tags removed: sts-sru ** Tags added: sts-sru-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to krb5 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1648901 Title: SPNEGO crash on mechanism failure Status in krb5 package

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1583801] Re: No sound via headphones (headset) when Ubuntu boots with them plugged in

Same here on a XPS 15 9550 running ubuntu 16.10. This issue occurs randomly at boot for a while now (6 months+). Sometimes multiple reboot are needed to get the headphone to work. I tried rebooting alsa or pulse audio and other tricks like alsamixer. But somehow, I found out that suspend/resume

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1654600] Re: unattended-upgrade-shutdown hangs when /var is a separate filesystem

Here is a recap of my work and current status : #1) when a system has a separated /var, the unit will hang since it is looking for /var/run to be present and it has been unmounted. #2) when using Unattended-Upgrade::InstallOnShutdown "true"; the upgrade never completes as the query to the online

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1654600] Re: unattended-upgrade-shutdown hangs when /var is a separate filesystem

Here is a recap of my day of work : The unattended-upgrades.service unit never runs the ExecStop because it is not enabled as we see here : # systemctl status unattended-upgrades.service ● unattended-upgrades.service - Unattended Upgrades Shutdown Loaded: loaded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1654600] Re: unattended-upgrade-shutdown hangs when /var is a separate filesystem

** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => In Progress ** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: Fix Committed => Triaged ** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Yakkety) Status: Fix Committed => Triaged -- You received this bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1654600] Re: unattended-upgrade-shutdown hangs when /var is a separate filesystem

@sergei-franco: >From what I can tell, it works for you because changing the unit the way you did simply disable execution of the unit. When running with such a configuration either on Xenial or Zesty, I do not see any mention of "Unattended Upgrades Shutdown" in the console output. When

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1654600] Re: unattended-upgrade-shutdown hangs when /var is a separate filesystem

;true", it will still fail as the network will no longer be available when it gets to access the archive so this must also be fixed. ...Louis ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-failed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seede

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1654600] Re: unattended-upgrade-shutdown hangs when /var is a separate filesystem

@kay-diam I don't understand your statement. The unit clearly get started. This is from your log : [ OK ] Stopped target Local File Systems. [ OK ] Started Unattended Upgrades Shutdown. <<< Unmounting /run/user/1000... Unmounting /tmp... [ OK ] Stopped Apply Kernel

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1654600] Re: unattended-upgrade-shutdown hangs when /var is a separate filesystem

** Description changed: + [SRU justification] + This fix is needed to make sure that the system does not hang on shutdown when /var is a speparate file system + + [Impact] + System can hang up to 10 minutes if not fixed. + + [Fix] + Change the systemd unit's ExecStart to an ExecStop so the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1654600] Re: unattended-upgrade-shutdown hangs when /var is a separate filesystem

** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1654600 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1661611] Re: apt/unattended-upgrades stalls shutdown

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1654600 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1654600 This is a duplicate of another bug I'm working on and is caused by a systemd ordering issue. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1654600 unattended-upgrade-shutdown hangs when /var is a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1668639] Re: Add a trigger to reload rsyslog when a new configuration file is dropped in /etc/rsyslog.d

** Also affects: rsyslog (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: rsyslog (Ubuntu Yakkety) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: rsyslog (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1638695] Re: Python 2.7.12 performance regression

Here is the pastebin for better readability : http://paste.ubuntu.com/24078834/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python2.7 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1638695 Title: Python 2.7.12 performance

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1638695] Re: Python 2.7.12 performance regression

Following the results of the previous comparison, i've used Jorge's profiling example on the 'call_method' bench for trusty stock, no LTO, no PGO and Xenial stock, no PGO and no LTO. Here are the results. Notice the difference between Trusty Stock & Trusty nopgo, as opposed to the execution

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1638695] Re: Python 2.7.12 performance regression

** Changed in: python2.7 (Ubuntu) Assignee: Jorge Niedbalski (niedbalski) => Louis Bouchard (louis-bouchard) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python2.7 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1638

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1638695] Re: Python 2.7.12 performance regression

Hello, Following doko's advice, I ran a set of test with PGO & LTO optimization disabled. Here are the results : https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1tTlEOvMypwKwi99XHjvuQFE14_jpBBLy0-Mk6bjkvL0/edit#gid=1169944329 This may bring more light to the investigation as it appear that with LTO &

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1638695] Re: Python 2.7.12 performance regression

Hello, The tests are run in LXC containers on a bare metal server with two physical CPU, 6 cores, 2 threads per core (Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2640 0 @ 2.50GHz). Following's doko's advice, I have built two new versions, one with LTO optimisation disabled and the other one with PGO optimisation

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1550983] Re: Fails to start with "Couldn't open libGL.so.1" (missing dependency?)

** Tags removed: sts-sponsor -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gtk+3.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1550983 Title: Fails to start with "Couldn't open libGL.so.1" (missing dependency?) Status in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1647485] Re: NVMe symlinks broken by devices with spaces in model or serial strings

** Tags removed: sts-sponsor -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1647485 Title: NVMe symlinks broken by devices with spaces in model or serial strings Status

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1666207] Re: Unable to create VPN connection on Zesty

This is not a bug, but seems to happen when some required fields are not yet filled. While the 'remote' field can be obvious,it is much less evident when the interface refuses to allow the configuration to be saved, because the certificate provided requires a password and the password field has

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1666207] [NEW] Unable to create VPN connection on Zesty

Public bug reported: When trying to create a new VPN connection with nm-connection-editor, the new connection cannot be saved and the editor issues the following error : LC_ALL="C" nm-connection-editor Gtk-Message: GtkDialog mapped without a transient parent. This is discouraged. ** Message:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1665018] Re: client tools ignore -h option without port number

** Also affects: cups (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags added: sts-sru -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cups in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1665018 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1550983] Re: Fails to start with "Couldn't open libGL.so.1" (missing dependency?)

** Changed in: gtk+3.0 (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: gtk+3.0 (Ubuntu Yakkety) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gtk+3.0 in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1638695] Re: Python 2.7.12 performance regression

Here are the results of the comparative tests I ran : https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1MyNBPVZlBeic1OLqVKe_bcPk2deO_pQs9trIfOFefM0/edit#gid=2034603487 It confirms the assumptions but unfortunately, rebuilding 2.7.12 without the -fstack-protector-strong leads to worse performances than the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1638695] Re: Python 2.7.12 performance regression

Hello, Just to clarify something that I have just realized using : $ pyperformance run -p={some python} means that {some python} will be used to run PYPERFORMANCE, not to run the benchmarks !!! So changing -p to use different builds of python will not run proper comparaison of the different

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1654600] Re: unattended-upgrade-shutdown hangs when /var is a separate filesystem

Ok, here is how I understand the situation. According to the systemd documentation about [Unit] Before= : "Given two units with any ordering dependency between them, if one unit is shut down and the other is started up, the shutdown is ordered before the start-up. It doesn't matter if the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1654600] Re: unattended-upgrade-shutdown hangs when /var is a separate filesystem

Hello, This logic is correct. apt_pkg.get_lock(options.lock_file) is trying to acquire a lockfile (/var/run/unattended-upgrades.lock) which is only possible if no unattended-upgrade is already running. If it can acquire the lock, it means that NO unattended-upgrade is running, hence shutdown may

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1659606] [NEW] Headphones not working on Asus X540S on Ubuntu 10.16

Public bug reported: I have tried all that I can find in discussions, reinstalled, rebooted but to no avail. Headphones do not work when plugged in to jack Please advise Thank you Martin Selby ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.10 Package: xorg 1:7.7+13ubuntu4 ProcVersionSignature:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1659605] [NEW] Headphones not working on Asus X540S on Ubuntu 10.16

Public bug reported: I have tried all that I can find in discussions, reinstalled, rebooted but to no avail. Headphones do not work when plugged in to jack Please advise Thank you Martin Selby ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.10 Package: xorg 1:7.7+13ubuntu4 ProcVersionSignature:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1654600] Re: unattended-upgrade-shutdown hangs when /var is a separate filesystem

** Also affects: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Yakkety) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Louis Bouchard (lo

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1550983] Re: Fails to start with "Couldn't open libGL.so.1" (missing dependency?)

** Also affects: gtk+3.0 (Ubuntu Yakkety) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: gtk+3.0 (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

Re: [Touch-packages] [Bug 1643467] Re: Firefox 50 blocks Ubuntu 12.04 and 14.04 LTS's version of libavcodec

Thanks for all info on this matter..problem seems to be fixed. not getting warning. Louis V.Romano Jr. From: boun...@canonical.com <boun...@canonical.com> on behalf of Seth Arnold <1643...@bugs.launchpad.net> Sent: Wednesday, December 2

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1643467] Re: Firefox 50 blocks Ubuntu 12.04 and 14.04 LTS's version of libavcodec

** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu Precise) Assignee: (unassigned) => louis romano (troubleshooter1961) ** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu Precise) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1176046] Re: isc-dhcp dhclient listens on extra random ports

Notes from online discussion : == src:isc-dhcp Trusty: 4.2.4-7ubuntu12.8 -> (isc-dhcp-client) Proposal A: 4.2.4-7ubuntu12.9 -> (isc-dhcp-client, isc-dhcp-client-ddns), isc-dhcp-client Recommends: isc-dhcp-client-ddns Proposal B:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1176046] Re: isc-dhcp dhclient listens on extra random ports

** Also affects: isc-dhcp (Ubuntu Yakkety) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: isc-dhcp (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: isc-dhcp (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Released ** Changed in: isc-dhcp (Ubuntu Xenial)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1176046] Re: isc-dhcp dhclient listens on extra random ports

Here is how I understand it : In Trusty, the isc-dhcp client provides the Dynamic DNS (ddns) functionality and this one can be disabled. From Xenial onward, two separate packages provide each of the possibilities. AFAIU, the Trusty isc-dhcp package should become isc-dhcp which doesn't provide

  1   2   3   >