Thank you, LGTM!
$ dput ubuntu ../db5.3_5.3.28+dfsg1-0.8ubuntu1_source.changes
D: Setting host argument.
Checking signature on .changes
gpg: ../db5.3_5.3.28+dfsg1-0.8ubuntu1_source.changes: Valid signature from
5889C17AB1C8D890
Checking signature on .dsc
gpg:
I'm marking this WONTFIX as both builds have passed on retry.
** Changed in: vim (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: New => Won't Fix
** Changed in: vim (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages,
Thank a lot for the confirmation @Mario!
I've uploaded the fixed package to hirsute-proposed and @xnox
implemented a check in "pkgbinarymangler" to avoid such failures in the
future: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pkgbinarymangler/147
** Changed in: lvm2 (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress
That file mode must have been lost during the last merge...
I've prepared a fix for the 664 -> 755 mode change of
/usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/lvm2 available in this PPA (currently
building):
https://launchpad.net/~slyon/+archive/ubuntu/lp1915579
Could you please check and confirm if this
** Changed in: lvm2 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Lukas Märdian (slyon)
** Changed in: lvm2 (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lvm2 in Ubuntu.
Both autopkgtest regressions have turned out to be intermittent failures
and have been resolved by retriggering the corresponding tests.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1903814
Title:
[binutils] Prevent GOT access
** Description changed:
[Impact]
* In s390 kernel context, this bug manifests itself as random errors
and infinite loops.
[Test Case]
* Needs to be confirmed by IBM
* Build-time tests-suite (applied upstream) backported to Bionic in
+ ld/testsuite/ld-s390/gotreloc-1.s
** Changed in: findutils (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to findutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1915005
Title:
Please merge findutils 4.8.0
Landed in hirsute.
** Changed in: pyxdg (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pyxdg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1915347
Title:
Sync pyxdg 0.27-2
** Description changed:
[Impact]
- * In s390 kernel context, this bug manifests itself as random errors
+ * In s390 kernel context, this bug manifests itself as random errors
and infinite loops.
[Test Case]
- * Needs to be confirmed by IBM
- * Build-time tests-suite (applied
So the regression tests are looking good so far. I'm currently still
verifying that the regression with the linux kernel on Intel (404s) is
fixed with 4.15.0-136.140 (from -proposed). If that works out, I'll copy
the packages to the archive for verification by the SRU team.
I've SRU'ifyed the
Yes, the regressions seem to be unrelated to this change. Some can be
resolved by retriggering. Others might need an updated kernel package
(e.g. the 404 errors seem to be fixed in linux 4.15.0-136.140)
I've updated the patch headers a bit and re-uploaded the package using a
proper version
** Changed in: findutils (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to findutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1915005
Title:
Please merge findutils 4.8.0 from
I can confirm that the patch applies and the build seems to pass OK in a
-security enabled PPA (https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-
service/+archive/ubuntu/4439).
But it produces some test failures/regressions, which we need to work on
before we can get this moving:
** Changed in: pyxdg (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pyxdg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1915347
Title:
Sync pyxdg 0.27-2 (main) from Debian unstable
** Changed in: logrotate (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to logrotate in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1915211
Title:
Please merge logrotate 3.18.0-1
All builds in ppa:ci-train-ppa-service/4412 finished and look good.
Requesting bin-sync:
ubuntu-archive-tools$ ./copy-package -b --from
~ci-train-ppa-service/ubuntu/4412 -s focal -e 2.34-6ubuntu1.1 --to ubuntu
--to-suite focal-proposed --sponsor jawn-smith binutils
Copy candidates:
Proposed to drop the -no-pie flag at upstream s390-tools:
https://github.com/ibm-s390-tools/s390-tools/pull/106
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1907789
** Changed in: s390-tools (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Lukas Märdian (slyon)
** Changed in: s390-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in
** Also affects: s390-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1907789
Title:
2.35.50 breaks ld -no-pie
This looks kind of similar to LP: #1888726
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904549
Title:
MTU is not set on vlan interface
Status in netplan:
New
Status
** Changed in: klibc (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to klibc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1900124
Title:
Please merge klibc 2.0.8-1 (main)
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~slyon/ubuntu/+source/klibc/+git/klibc/+merge/392775
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to klibc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1900124
Title:
Test builds:
https://launchpad.net/~slyon/+archive/ubuntu/klibc/+packages
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to klibc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1900124
Title:
Please merge klibc 2.0.8-1 (main)
** Patch added: "3-klibc_2.0.8-1ubuntu1.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/klibc/+bug/1900124/+attachment/5425988/+files/3-klibc_2.0.8-1ubuntu1.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to klibc
** Patch removed: "klibc_2.0.8-1ubuntu1.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/klibc/+bug/1900124/+attachment/5422924/+files/klibc_2.0.8-1ubuntu1.debdiff
** Patch added: "2-klibc_2.0.8-1ubuntu1.debdiff"
** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1888726
Title:
systemd-udevd regression: some
I am able to reproduce the problem on Groovy (netplan.io
0.100-0ubuntu5).
Using the "Type=!vlan" filter, which netplan already applies for some
bridge/bond scenarios, I was able to get the vlan20 interface from
'degraded / pending' into 'degraded / configured', state and systemd-
Public bug reported:
Please merge klibc 2.0.8-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
Most of the Ubuntu patches have been accepted upstream.
** Affects: klibc (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Lukas Märdian (slyon)
Status: In Progress
** Tags: ftbfs
** Changed
Adding a (preliminary) patch, which needs to be adopted to my latest
changes in klibc 2.0.7-1ubuntu6 (i.e. the gcc10-fcommon patch must be
dropped as well), once HH is open.
** Patch added: "klibc_2.0.8-1ubuntu1.debdiff"
Oh.. I wasn't really aware of that (-1 = all) and it looked so similar.
Right, so we still somehow need to find a proper reproducer...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to accountsservice in Ubuntu.
By chance (while developing some netplan code), I seem to have found a
reproducer for this bug... I don't know what is going on, but calling
the 'Trigger' method from the attached 'dbus.c' file will kill the GDM
session in a reproducible way.
The invalid `kill(-1, SIGINT);` of line 21, seems to
** Changed in: netplan
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1803203
Title:
Support preferred_lft for IPv6 addresses
Status
sensible-utils 0.0.13 migrated from -proposed
** Changed in: sensible-utils (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to sensible-utils in Ubuntu.
** Changed in: sensible-utils (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to sensible-utils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891196
Title:
FTBFS because of
Public bug reported:
THe porefs value needs to be changed from 'noline,wrap' to 'noline'.
This will be solved with 'sensible-utils 0.0.13', currently in Debian
experimental.
** Affects: sensible-utils (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Affects: sensible-utils (Debian)
Thanks to Heitor's work, the pull request to support preferred_lft has
been merged upstream: https://github.com/CanonicalLtd/netplan/pull/89
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
Verification done on focal:
=== Snap only:
$ LANGUAGE=en_US apport-cli snap-store
*** Collecting problem information
The collected information can be sent to the developers to improve the
application. This might take a few minutes.
...dpkg-query: no packages found matching snap-store
*** Send
@brian-murray subiquity is somehow special cased via `data/package-
hooks/subiquity.py` and it was that way even before we added the snap
handling.
@seth-arnold Yes. Apport can only report bugs automatically if there is
a launchpad project provided via the snap's contact field. Snap
developers
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu Focal)
Assignee: Lukas Märdian (slyon) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861082
Title:
[SRU] ubuntu-
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861082
Title:
[SRU] ubuntu-bug doesn't know how
** Description changed:
[Impact]
Users of Ubuntu 20.04 are not able to easily report bugs against applications
provided as a snap.
[Test Case]
Install subiquity snap:
# sudo snap install subiquity --classic
subiquity 20.06.1 aus Canonical✓ installiert
# snap list | grep
** Description changed:
- Hello, I had problems with subiquity in the focal live server install
- image. I tried to use 'ubuntu-bug subiquity' to report the bug, but
- ubuntu-bug apparently cannot file bug reports against snaps.
+ [Impact]
+ Users of Ubuntu 20.04 are not able to easily report
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu Focal)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Lukas Märdian (slyon)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861082
Title:
ubuntu-bug does
We are actively working on it for the current 20.10 cycle.
But it needs some changes in systemd-networkd, which are currently
blocked due to a discussion upstream:
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/15060
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded
** Branch linked: lp:~slyon/apport/apport-snap-handling
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861082
Title:
ubuntu-bug doesn't know how to file bugs against
My Merge Proposal can be found here:
https://code.launchpad.net/~slyon/apport/apport/+merge/385120
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861082
Title:
** Branch linked: lp:~slyon/apport/apport
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861082
Title:
ubuntu-bug doesn't know how to file bugs against snaps
Status in
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Lukas Märdian (slyon)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861082
Title:
ubuntu-bug doesn't k
501 - 550 of 550 matches
Mail list logo
