[Touch-packages] [Bug 2061834] [NEW] apt build-dep . fails to parse build dependencies

2024-04-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Public bug reported: seen in trantor 1.5.12+ds-1ubuntu3: Build-Depends: cmake, debhelper-compat (=13), dh-cmake, dh-cmake-compat (=1) replacing (=1) with (= 1) lets the parsing succeed. $ sudo apt build-dep . Note, using directory '.' to get the build dependencies Reading package lists... Done

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2058242] Re: Demote isc-dhcp to universe

2024-03-27 Thread Matthias Klose
that doesn't show up in component-mismatches yet. something in main still depending on it ** Changed in: isc-dhcp (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to isc-dhcp in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2057836] Re: gst-python1.0 fails to build: test failures

2024-03-25 Thread Matthias Klose
same test failures with pygobject 3.48.1-1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pygobject in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057836 Title: gst-python1.0 fails to build: test failures Status in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2057836] Re: gst-python1.0 fails to build: test failures

2024-03-25 Thread Matthias Klose
Debian added a b-d on pygobject >= 3.48.1, which we don't have -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pygobject in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057836 Title: gst-python1.0 fails to build: test failures

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2055195] [NEW] KUbuntu ships an outdated version that breaks Google

2024-02-27 Thread Matthias Mailänder
Public bug reported: Adding an account gets stuck. Calendars won't update. https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=420280 describes the details. Apparently installing a library convered from Fedora solves this. ** Affects: signon-ui (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1982336] Re: [24.04 FEAT] GDB: Support for new IBM Z Hardware (IBM z16)

2024-02-21 Thread Matthias Klose
** Changed in: gdb (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdb in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982336 Title: [24.04 FEAT] GDB: Support for new IBM Z

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054351] [NEW] nux ftbfs on armhf (tests segfaulting)

2024-02-19 Thread Matthias Klose
Public bug reported: [--] 8 tests from TestScrollView [ RUN ] TestScrollView.TestQueueDrawScrollDownNoScrollbars [ OK ] TestScrollView.TestQueueDrawScrollDownNoScrollbars (434 ms) [ RUN ] TestScrollView.TestQueueDrawScrollUpNoScrollbars [ OK ]

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054350] Re: nux ftbfs from source, failing test

2024-02-19 Thread Matthias Klose
** Changed in: nux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to nux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054350 Title: nux ftbfs from source, failing test Status in nux

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054350] [NEW] nux ftbfs from source, failing test

2024-02-19 Thread Matthias Klose
Public bug reported: seen in noble, all architectures: [--] 1 test from TestLoggingWriter [ RUN ] TestLoggingWriter.TestWriteMessage gtest-nuxcore-logger.cpp:171: Failure Value of: result Expected: is equal to 0x5d40f0 pointing to "ERROR 2010-09-10 06:34:45 test.module

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1815094] Re: [FTBFS] cast between incompatible function types from ‘bool (*)(nux::TextEntry*)’ to ‘GSourceFunc’ gcc >= 8.1 (Disco)

2024-02-19 Thread Matthias Klose
disco is EOL ** Changed in: nux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to nux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1815094 Title: [FTBFS] cast between incompatible

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1570894] Re: s390x build failure

2024-02-19 Thread Matthias Klose
builds ** Changed in: nux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to nux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1570894 Title: s390x build failure Status in nux

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2051997] Re: bdebstrap fails to build with python3-defaults 3.12

2024-02-07 Thread Matthias Klose
** Changed in: python3-defaults (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python3-defaults in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051997 Title: bdebstrap fails to build

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2051990] Re: python3-defaults 3.12 causes aubio to fail to build from source

2024-02-07 Thread Matthias Klose
** Changed in: python3-defaults (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python3-defaults in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051990 Title: python3-defaults 3.12 causes

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2051540] Re: ufw ftbfs with Python 3.12 as default

2024-02-07 Thread Matthias Klose
better, but still not complete: 1186s autopkgtest [04:54:38]: test root-unittest: [--- 1186s Interpreter: python3 1186s 1186s rm -rf ./build 1186s rm -rf ./staging 1186s rm -rf ./tests/testarea ./tests/unit/tmp 1186s rm -rf ./tmp 1186s rm -rf ./snap-build 1186s rm -rf ./parts

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2051997] Re: bdebstrap fails to build with python3-defaults 3.12

2024-02-06 Thread Matthias Klose
NMUed ** Changed in: bdebstrap (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python3-defaults in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051997 Title: bdebstrap fails to build

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2051990] Re: python3-defaults 3.12 causes aubio to fail to build from source

2024-02-06 Thread Matthias Klose
NMUed in Debian ** Changed in: aubio (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python3-defaults in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051990 Title: python3-defaults

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2051997] Re: bdebstrap fails to build with python3-defaults 3.12

2024-02-06 Thread Matthias Klose
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1061735 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061735 ** Also affects: bdebstrap (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061735 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2051540] Re: ufw ftbfs with Python 3.12 as default

2024-01-31 Thread Matthias Klose
** Changed in: ufw (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ufw in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051540 Title: ufw ftbfs with Python 3.12 as default

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2051541] [NEW] unattended-upgrades ftbfs with Python 3.12 as default

2024-01-29 Thread Matthias Klose
Public bug reported: [...] Running ./test_pep484.py with python3 s -- Ran 0 tests in 0.000s NO TESTS RAN (skipped=1) make[2]: *** [Makefile:9: check] Error 5 make[2]: Leaving directory '/<>/test' make[1]: *** [debian/rules:16:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2051540] [NEW] ufw ftbfs with Python 3.12 as default

2024-01-29 Thread Matthias Klose
Public bug reported: == ERROR: test_ufwcommand_parse (tests.unit.test_parser.ParserTestCase.test_ufwcommand_parse) Test UFWCommand.parse() -- Traceback (most

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2051512] [NEW] apport ftbfs with Python 3.12 as the default

2024-01-29 Thread Matthias Klose
Public bug reported: debian/rules override_dh_auto_test make[1]: Entering directory '/<>' tests/run-linters --errors-only Skipping mypy tests, mypy is not installed Running pylint... * Module apport-retrace bin/apport-retrace:577:44: E0601: Using variable 'crashid' before

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2015243] Re: py3versions doesn't follow symlinks (like realpath)

2024-01-15 Thread Matthias Klose
The python3 symlink is not meant to be handled by alternatives. ** Changed in: python3-defaults (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python3-defaults in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2049369] [NEW] autopkg tests ignored for migration of python3-defaults adding 3.12

2024-01-15 Thread Matthias Klose
Public bug reported: autopkg tests ignored for migration of python3-defaults adding 3.12: These are the autopkg tests for packages, which we'll ignore for the initial migration of python3-defaults adding 3.12. ** Affects: python3-defaults (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1775994] Re: package libbinutils:amd64 2.30-20ubuntu2~18.04 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting con

2023-12-06 Thread Matthias Klose
not a binutils issue, please reinstall, as the error message says ** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1918462] Re: package libbinutils:amd64 2.34-6ubuntu1.1 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configur

2023-12-06 Thread Matthias Klose
this is not a binutils issue, please reinstall as the error message suggests ** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1977958] Re: binutils: addr2line: getting error "DWARF error: section .debug_str is larger than its filesize" when building Android 8.1 on Ubuntu 20.04

2023-12-06 Thread Matthias Klose
closing as won't fix for 20.04 LTS ** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1977958 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1824249] Re: package binutils-multiarch (not installed) [modified: usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-addr2line usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-ar usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-gprof usr/bin/x86_64-li

2023-12-06 Thread Matthias Klose
please remove the package, and re-install it ** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1824249 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2025564] Re: package binutils-common 2.40-2ubuntu4.1 failed to install/upgrade: dpkg-deb --fsys-tarfile subprocess returned error exit status 2

2023-12-06 Thread Matthias Klose
this is not a binutils issue. try to re-donwload your updates ** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2029525] Re: binutils-i686-linux-gnu not provided for riscv64

2023-12-06 Thread Matthias Klose
we currently don't build cross compilers on riscv64, because it slows down the toolchain updates. That might change, if we have native hardware for our buildds. ** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2039149] Re: readelf riscv unknown

2023-12-06 Thread Matthias Klose
please provide a test case ** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2039149 Title: readelf riscv

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2044506] [NEW] issues on armhf with -fstack-clash-protection

2023-11-24 Thread Matthias Klose
Public bug reported: TBD ** Affects: gnutls28 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: libarchive (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: libselinux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: libxml2 (Ubuntu)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2038998] Re: [amdgpu] Screen artifacts/UI oddities on Wayland

2023-11-10 Thread Matthias Uschok
Happened to me also. Saw the attached error in dmesg. ** Attachment added: "dmesg.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/2038998/+attachment/5717812/+files/dmesg.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2040051] Re: systemd-networkd-wait-online terminates with "Could not create manager: Invalid argument"

2023-11-03 Thread Matthias Nagel
root@h12345678:~ # cat /proc/cmdline quiet root@h12345678:~ # uname -a Linux h12345678.my-hoster.tld 4.15.0 #1 SMP Wed Jul 12 12:00:44 MSK 2023 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Please note that my hoster uses OpenVZ with a shared kernel across guest OSes. -- You received this bug notification

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2040051] Re: systemd-networkd-wait-online terminates with "Could not create manager: Invalid argument"

2023-10-25 Thread Matthias Nagel
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2040051 Title: systemd-networkd-wait-online terminates

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2040055] Re: systemd-resolved fails: Failed to start query: Invalid argument

2023-10-25 Thread Matthias Nagel
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2040055 Title: systemd-resolved fails: Failed to start

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2040051] Re: systemd-networkd-wait-online terminates with "Could not create manager: Invalid argument"

2023-10-24 Thread Matthias Nagel
FYI: I found the package `usrmerge` installed it and the directories `/[bin|sbin|lib]` directories were successfully merged with their and `/usr/[bin|sbin|lib]` counterparts. The complaint in `systemctl satus` is gone. However, it was not the solution to my problem. Hence, my shot in the dark in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2040051] Re: systemd-networkd-wait-online terminates with "Could not create manager: Invalid argument"

2023-10-23 Thread Matthias Nagel
Maybe it is nothing, but please not that the file path has changed with 23.10. It is not `/usr/lib/...` anymore, but only `/lib/...`. The error messages comes from https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/2c87b71b00523ef2aecdd2b68e61008b7d2e5ecc/src/network/wait- online/wait-online.c#L217 (and it

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2040055] Re: systemd-resolved fails: Failed to start query: Invalid argument

2023-10-23 Thread Matthias Nagel
Unfortunately, increasing the log level to debug doesn't make any difference. I already tried the approach with the drop-in configuration file, but systemd-resolved doesn't log any additional information. It is basically the same "non-reaction" as in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2040051] Re: systemd-networkd-wait-online terminates with "Could not create manager: Invalid argument"

2023-10-23 Thread Matthias Nagel
Unfortunately, it doesn't make any difference. There is no additional output root@h2917298:~ # SYSTEMD_LOG_LEVEL=debug /lib/systemd/systemd-networkd-wait-online Could not create manager: Invalid argument I have already tried that before filing the bug report. Sorry, I didn't mention that in the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2040051] Re: systemd-networkd-wait-online terminates with "Could not create manager: Invalid argument"

2023-10-22 Thread Matthias Nagel
Maybe related to #2040055. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2040051 Title: systemd-networkd-wait-online terminates with "Could not create manager: Invalid

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2040055] Re: systemd-resolved fails: Failed to start query: Invalid argument

2023-10-22 Thread Matthias Nagel
Maybe related to #2040051. ** Summary changed: - systemd-resolved stops resolving host names + systemd-resolved fails: Failed to start query: Invalid argument -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2040055] [NEW] systemd-resolved stops resolving host names

2023-10-21 Thread Matthias Nagel
Public bug reported: # lsb_release -rd No LSB modules are available. Description:Ubuntu 23.10 Release:23.10 # aptitude show 'systemd-resolved' Package: systemd-resolved Version: 253.5-1ubuntu6 State: installed The system is unable to resolve any DNS names. Whenever a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2040051] [NEW] systemd-networkd-wait-online terminates with "Could not create manager: Invalid argument"

2023-10-21 Thread Matthias Nagel
Public bug reported: # lsb_release -rd No LSB modules are available. Description:Ubuntu 23.10 Release:23.10 # aptitude show systemd Package: systemd Version: 253.5-1ubuntu6 State: installed systemd-networkd-wait-online terminates with "Could not create

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2037205] Re: setuptools: FTBFS in mantic

2023-10-04 Thread Matthias Klose
** Changed in: setuptools (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dh-python in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037205 Title: setuptools: FTBFS in mantic Status

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1943818] Re: mesa built with -O3 on ppc64el has broken EGL

2023-09-04 Thread Matthias Klose
is that still the case with recent compiler versions? ** Changed in: gcc-11 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943818

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2022845] Re: SRU: update binutils to the 2.38 branch and ignore lto-wrapper warnings

2023-07-24 Thread Matthias Klose
after retries, all the autopkg tests pass, binutils test results don't show regressions. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2025458] Re: SRU: rebuild libunwind with GCC 11.4

2023-07-06 Thread Matthias Klose
the package successfully built. All the autopkg tests from the previous comment have been retried and succeeded. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2025458] Re: SRU: rebuild libunwind with GCC 11.4

2023-06-30 Thread Matthias Klose
** No longer affects: libunwind (Ubuntu Lunar) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libunwind in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2025458 Title: SRU: rebuild libunwind with GCC 11.4 Status in libunwind

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1997161] Re: libunwind-dev has wrong LTO data

2023-06-30 Thread Matthias Klose
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1039962 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1039962 ** Also affects: libunwind (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1039962 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2025458] [NEW] SRU: rebuild libunwind with GCC 11.4

2023-06-30 Thread Matthias Klose
Public bug reported: Reported in LP: #1997161 after updating GCC 11 in 22.04 LTS to 11.3, and now to 11.4, linking with the static libraries provided by libunwind-dev fails with: lto1: fatal error: bytecode stream in file '/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1997161] Re: libunwind-dev has wrong LTO data

2023-06-30 Thread Matthias Klose
The real issue is, that the .a files in the libunwind-dev package are not stripped, and therefore the LTO information is kept in these files. This is done by intent in the packaging. Trying to figure why ... In the meantime the least invasive thing to do is to just rebuild with GCC 11.4. ** Also

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2022845] [NEW] SRU: update binutils to the 2.38 branch and ignore lto-wrapper warnings

2023-06-04 Thread Matthias Klose
Public bug reported: The tests sometimes fail with spurious lto-wrapper warnings and let the build fail. Ignore these warnings, they don't matter for the test outcome. Also apply four fixes from the binutils 2.38 branch: * SRU: LP: #1982105. Update from the binutils 2.38 branch: - Fix PR

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1249343] Re: Packagekitd eating RAM, CPU

2023-04-16 Thread Matthias Klumpp
This should be resolved and since 1.2.6 the daemon will even shutdown again when not in use. ** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2003099] [NEW] Flickering when minimizing

2023-01-17 Thread Matthias Veternik
Public bug reported: When minimizing windowed applications, the animation sometimes jumps wildly around, mostly to the top left corner of the screen. I found a temporary workaround with a config file in /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/20-intel.conf, which supposedly has some other unwanted effects on other

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1957909] Re: NetworkManager connectivity check fails

2022-11-06 Thread Matthias Harter
Still a problem in latest Ubuntu. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1957909 Title: NetworkManager connectivity check fails Status in network-manager

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1982105] Re: update binutils to the 2.38 branch in 22.04 LTS

2022-10-25 Thread Matthias Klose
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982105 Title: update binutils to the 2.38 branch in 22.04

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1982105] Re: update binutils to the 2.38 branch in 22.04 LTS

2022-10-24 Thread Matthias Klose
** Summary changed: - update binutils to the 2.38 branch in 20.04 LTS + update binutils to the 2.38 branch in 22.04 LTS ** Description changed: - SRU: update binutils to the 2.38 branch in 20.04 LTS. + SRU: update binutils to the 2.38 branch in 22.04 LTS. The new build will be validated by

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1971474] Re: SRU: Update gdb to the final 12.1 release in 22.04 LTS

2022-10-24 Thread Matthias Klose
tested together with the binutils and GCC SRUs. No regressions. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1982105] Re: update binutils to the 2.38 branch in 20.04 LTS

2022-10-24 Thread Matthias Klose
all autopkg tests passed now ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy ** Tags added: verification-done verification-needed-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1969856] Re: bash --version does not correspond to package name

2022-08-31 Thread Matthias Klose
bash upstream encodes the patchlevel into the version number, while patches and security fixes in Ubuntu are applied on top of the upstream version. That's expected behavior. ** Changed in: bash (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1971474] Re: SRU: Update gdb to the final 12.1 release in 22.04 LTS

2022-08-22 Thread Matthias Klose
** Description changed: Update gdb to the final 12.1 release in 22.04 LTS. jammy ships with the gdb 12.1 release candidate, taken from the gdb-12 branch. Changes up to the final release are: - - updated gnulib library - - Fix for PR mi/29002 (Windows only) - - gdb: fix 'remote show

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1982108] Re: SRU: update python3.10 to the 3.10.5 release in 22.04 LTS

2022-08-22 Thread Matthias Klose
** Also affects: python3-defaults (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python3-defaults in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982108 Title: SRU: update

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1982105] Re: update binutils to the 2.38 branch in 20.04 LTS

2022-08-22 Thread Matthias Klose
** Description changed: SRU: update binutils to the 2.38 branch in 20.04 LTS. The new build will be validated by the main component on all architectures. + + test rebuilds at + https://people.canonical.com/~ginggs/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20220728-jammy-jammy.html +

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1982105] Re: update binutils to the 2.38 branch in 20.04 LTS

2022-07-19 Thread Matthias Klose
** Also affects: binutils (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982105 Title: update binutils to the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1974115] Re: [UBUNTU 22.04] BINUTILS: Adding new platform name IBM z16

2022-07-19 Thread Matthias Klose
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu Kinetic) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: Canonical Foundations Team (canonical-foundations) => Matthias Klose (doko)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1982105] [NEW] update binutils to the 2.38 branch in 20.04 LTS

2022-07-19 Thread Matthias Klose
Public bug reported: SRU: update binutils to the 2.38 branch in 20.04 LTS. The new build will be validated by the main component on all architectures. ** Affects: binutils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1978129] Re: Incomplete support for DT_RELR relocations on Ubuntu 22.04

2022-07-19 Thread Matthias Klose
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu Kinetic) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: Canonical Foundations Team (canonical-foundations) => Matthias Klose (doko)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1976258] [NEW] icu ftbfs in the jammy release pocket

2022-05-30 Thread Matthias Klose
Public bug reported: as seen in a test rebuild, this package fails to build in the jammy release pocket (note the log behind the link might go away): https://launchpadlibrarian.net/604216394/buildlog_ubuntu-jammy- amd64.icu_70.1-2_BUILDING.txt.gz [...] make[4]: Leaving directory

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1976259] [NEW] librsvg ftbfs in the jammy release pocket

2022-05-30 Thread Matthias Klose
Public bug reported: as seen in a test rebuild, this package fails to build in the jammy release pocket (note the log behind the link might go away): https://launchpadlibrarian.net/604216345/buildlog_ubuntu- jammy-i386.librsvg_2.52.5+dfsg-3_BUILDING.txt.gz test

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1976255] [NEW] accountsservice ftbfs in the jammy release pocket

2022-05-30 Thread Matthias Klose
Public bug reported: as seen in a test rebuild, this package fails to build in the jammy release pocket (note the log behind the link might go away): https://launchpadlibrarian.net/604216054/buildlog_ubuntu-jammy- amd64.accountsservice_22.07.5-2ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz Ok: 2

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1971474] [NEW] SRU: Update gdb to the final 12.1 release in 22.04 LTS

2022-05-03 Thread Matthias Klose
Public bug reported: Update gdb to the final 12.1 release in 22.04 LTS. jammy ships with the gdb 12.1 release candidate, taken from the gdb-12 branch. Changes up to the final release are: - updated gnulib library - Fix for PR mi/29002 (Windows only) - gdb: fix 'remote show FOO-packet' aliases

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1953200] Re: [jammy] FTBFS, gcc ICE?

2022-03-25 Thread Matthias Klose
mir builds with the recent gcc-11 in jammy, closing ** Changed in: mir (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: gcc-11 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mir

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1452115] Re: Python interpreter binary is not compiled as PIE

2022-03-24 Thread Matthias Klose
** Changed in: python3.10 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python2.7 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1452115 Title: Python interpreter binary is not

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1965112] Re: cupsd crashed with SIGSEGV in __strcmp_evex()

2022-03-16 Thread Matthias Klose
$ cupsctl _debug_logging=1 _remote_admin=0 _remote_any=0 _share_printers=0 _user_cancel_any=0 BrowseLocalProtocols=dnssd DefaultAuthType=Basic ErrorPolicy=retry-job IdleExitTimeout=60 JobPrivateAccess=default JobPrivateValues=default MaxLogSize=0 PageLogFormat= SubscriptionPrivateAccess=default

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1965112] Re: cupsd crashed with SIGSEGV in __strcmp_evex()

2022-03-16 Thread Matthias Klose
doko@xe1:~$ driverless ipp://HP%20LaserJet%20500%20colorMFP%20M570dw%20(6C84AD)._ipp._tcp.local/ doko@xe1:~$ driverless --std-ipp-uris ipp://NPI6C84AD.local:631/ipp/printer doko@xe1:~$ lpstat -v lpstat: No destinations added. $ ps aux | grep cups-browsed root 94786 0.0 0.0 172744 11908 ?

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1953428] Re: /etc/PackageKit/Vendor.conf specifies invalid CodecUrl

2022-03-15 Thread Matthias Klumpp
What should be the replacement link? On Debian, we use https://wiki.debian.org/PackageKit/ItemNotFound#Missing_Codec -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to packagekit in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1963904] Re: /usr/libexec/packagekitd:11:__strcmp_avx2:AptCacheFile::resolvePkgID:AptIntf::resolvePackageIds:backend_get_details_thread:pk_backend_job_thread_setup

2022-03-07 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Patch added: "01_fix-single-candidate-pkgid-emission.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit/+bug/1963904/+attachment/5566548/+files/01_fix-single-candidate-pkgid-emission.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1963904] Re: /usr/libexec/packagekitd:11:__strcmp_avx2:AptCacheFile::resolvePkgID:AptIntf::resolvePackageIds:backend_get_details_thread:pk_backend_job_thread_setup

2022-03-07 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Looks like PK needs an updated `fix-single-candidate-pkgid-emission.patch` patch (attached). I queued it for Debian, but I am secretly waiting whether we will get another PK bugfix release in time (there's a few things left that I need to have a look at). In any case, I believe the attached

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1960608] Re: python-pip >= 21.3.1+dfsg-3 fails pip3-root.sh autopkgtest with python3.10

2022-02-26 Thread Matthias Klose
python3.10 now in -proposed ** Changed in: python3.10 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dh-python in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960608 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1961837] Re: PackageKit 1.2.5 unable to perform upgrades

2022-02-24 Thread Matthias Klumpp
For completeness, a much better and simpler patch is this: https://salsa.debian.org/pkgutopia-team/packagekit/-/blob/0c43611b82879bd71e633af02878d9c80283f7da/debian/patches/01_fix-single-candidate-pkgid-emission.patch Maybe that will make its way into Ubuntu Jammy too, but it's not as urgent :-)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1961837] Re: PackageKit 1.2.5 unable to perform upgrades

2022-02-22 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Debian package is available: https://tracker.debian.org/news/1305719/accepted-packagekit-125-2-source-into-unstable/ I forgot to mark this issue as being explicitly closed in the changelog, but I guess Julian can do that when merging the changes into Ubuntu :-) ** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1961837] Re: PackageKit 1.2.5 unable to perform upgrades

2022-02-22 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Also affects: packagekit via https://github.com/PackageKit/PackageKit/issues/534 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to packagekit in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1961837] Re: PackageKit 1.2.5 unable to perform upgrades

2022-02-22 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Matthias Klumpp (ximion) ** Also affects: packagekit (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Critical Assignee: Matthias Klumpp (ximion) Status: New ** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => In Pr

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1961837] Re: PackageKit 1.2.5 unable to perform upgrades

2022-02-22 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Sounded like a daemon crash at first, but the deeper I dig the more nonsensical it gets at the moment... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to packagekit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961837 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1914278] Re: Kernel updates marked as "manually installed", prevents old kernels cleanup

2022-02-21 Thread Matthias Klumpp
> packagekit will attempt to upgrade itself while running. This causes a packagekit crash That should not happen - do you have a backtrace for that? Reporting it at the PackageKit bugtracker would also be nice so I have it on my radar. -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1914278] Re: Kernel updates marked as "manually installed", prevents old kernels cleanup

2022-02-21 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Makes sense to me :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to packagekit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1914278 Title: Kernel updates marked as "manually installed", prevents old kernels cleanup

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1914278] Re: Kernel updates marked as "manually installed", prevents old kernels cleanup

2022-02-21 Thread Matthias Klumpp
I tested this with a bunch of dummy packages and a local repository, and everything worked pretty well and states were applied as expected. Of course, doesn't mean that there may be a real-world bug that I haven't seen yet, but I think it's unlikely (I've also been running this on my machine on

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1914278] Re: Kernel updates marked as "manually installed", prevents old kernels cleanup

2022-02-21 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Resolving this required a fair bit of refactoring, so TBH I am not sure that it is safe to backport to Focal, unless version 1.2.5 is submitted as-a-whole. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1957909] Re: NetworkManager connectivity check fails

2022-02-10 Thread Matthias Harter
Hello?? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1957909 Title: NetworkManager connectivity check fails Status in network-manager package in Ubuntu: New

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1958720] Re: python3-yaml and python3-six are not co-installable with python-is-python2 in jammy

2022-02-10 Thread Matthias Klose
there is no python-is-python2 in jammy anymore -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to six in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958720 Title: python3-yaml and python3-six are not co-installable with

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1959325] Re: New binutils causes build failures for many RISC-V packages

2022-01-30 Thread Matthias Klose
we will not change the ISA for the upcoming 22.04 LTS release, but do the change not before the GCC 12 defaults change planned for 22.10. ** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1959325] Re: New binutils causes build failures for many RISC-V packages

2022-01-28 Thread Matthias Klose
adding exact references from IRC logs ... please provide these in the first place. https://launchpadlibrarian.net/582482377/buildlog_ubuntu-jammy- riscv64.ktexteditor_5.90.0-0ubuntu2_BUILDING.txt.gz" -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1958389] Re: Jammy builds of xen segfault, but only on launchpad x86 builders

2022-01-27 Thread Matthias Klose
** Bug watch added: Sourceware.org Bugzilla #28826 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28826 ** Also affects: binutils via https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28826 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1004269

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1957909] [NEW] NetworkManager connectivity check fails

2022-01-14 Thread Matthias Harter
Public bug reported: I randomly receive "No internet connection available" notification, even if my internet connection is stable. (Not the exact term) In /usr/lib/NetworkManager/conf.d/20-connectivity-ubuntu.conf the endpoint http://connectivity-check.ubuntu.com./ is used. I manually pinged

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1946965] Re: python3-defaults: py3versions -i does not list python3.10 when it is installed

2021-11-05 Thread Matthias Klose
Removing packages from impish-proposed: python3-defaults 3.9.4-1ubuntu1 in impish 2to3 3.9.4-1ubuntu1 in impish amd64 2to3 3.9.4-1ubuntu1 in impish arm64 2to3 3.9.4-1ubuntu1 in impish armhf 2to3 3.9.4-1ubuntu1 in impish i386

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1943818] Re: mesa built with -O3 on ppc64el has broken EGL

2021-09-16 Thread Matthias Klose
** Tags added: ppc64el -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943818 Title: mesa built with -O3 on ppc64el has broken EGL Status in Mesa: Unknown Status in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1939413] Re: /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libprotobuf.a’ generated with LTO version 9.2 instead of the expected 11.0

2021-08-26 Thread Matthias Klose
3.12.4-1ubuntu1 using binutils 2.36 OK 3.12.4-1ubuntu2 BAD -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to protobuf in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939413 Title: /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libprotobuf.a’

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1939413] Re: /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libprotobuf.a’ generated with LTO version 9.2 instead of the expected 11.0

2021-08-26 Thread Matthias Klose
correctly stripped on other architectures, also not stripped in hirsute, so not a regression in impish. ** Tags removed: ftbfs ** Tags added: rls-ii-incoming ** Changed in: protobuf (Ubuntu) Assignee: Matthias Klose (doko) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification beca

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1939413] Re: /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libprotobuf.a’ generated with LTO version 9.2 instead of the expected 11.0

2021-08-26 Thread Matthias Klose
the real problem here is that the package is not stripped at all on arm64. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to protobuf in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939413 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1939973] Re: make 4.3-4.1 triggers build failures

2021-08-15 Thread Matthias Klose
copied the binary packages to https://launchpad.net/~doko/+archive/ubuntu/toolchain and removed them from impish-proposed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to make-dfsg in Ubuntu.

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >