** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Matthias Klumpp (ximion)
** Also affects: packagekit (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Critical
Assignee: Matthias Klumpp (ximion)
Status: New
** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: New => In Pr
Sounded like a daemon crash at first, but the deeper I dig the more
nonsensical it gets at the moment...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to packagekit in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961837
Title:
P
> packagekit will attempt to upgrade itself while running. This causes a
packagekit crash
That should not happen - do you have a backtrace for that? Reporting it
at the PackageKit bugtracker would also be nice so I have it on my
radar.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
Makes sense to me :-)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to packagekit in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1914278
Title:
Kernel updates marked as "manually installed", prevents old kernels
cleanup
Statu
I tested this with a bunch of dummy packages and a local repository, and
everything worked pretty well and states were applied as expected. Of course,
doesn't mean that there may be a real-world bug that I haven't seen yet, but I
think it's unlikely (I've also been running this on my machine on
Resolving this required a fair bit of refactoring, so TBH I am not sure
that it is safe to backport to Focal, unless version 1.2.5 is submitted
as-a-whole.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https:/
Hello??
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1957909
Title:
NetworkManager connectivity check fails
Status in network-manager package in Ubuntu:
New
there is no python-is-python2 in jammy anymore
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to six in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958720
Title:
python3-yaml and python3-six are not co-installable with python-is
we will not change the ISA for the upcoming 22.04 LTS release, but do
the change not before the GCC 12 defaults change planned for 22.10.
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch
adding exact references from IRC logs ... please provide these in the
first place.
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/582482377/buildlog_ubuntu-jammy-
riscv64.ktexteditor_5.90.0-0ubuntu2_BUILDING.txt.gz"
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages,
** Bug watch added: Sourceware.org Bugzilla #28826
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28826
** Also affects: binutils via
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28826
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1004269
https
Public bug reported:
I randomly receive "No internet connection available" notification, even
if my internet connection is stable. (Not the exact term)
In /usr/lib/NetworkManager/conf.d/20-connectivity-ubuntu.conf the endpoint
http://connectivity-check.ubuntu.com./
is used. I manually pinged the
Removing packages from impish-proposed:
python3-defaults 3.9.4-1ubuntu1 in impish
2to3 3.9.4-1ubuntu1 in impish amd64
2to3 3.9.4-1ubuntu1 in impish arm64
2to3 3.9.4-1ubuntu1 in impish armhf
2to3 3.9.4-1ubuntu1 in impish i386
** Tags added: ppc64el
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943818
Title:
mesa built with -O3 on ppc64el has broken EGL
Status in Mesa:
Unknown
Status in gcc-11
3.12.4-1ubuntu1 using binutils 2.36 OK 3.12.4-1ubuntu2 BAD
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to protobuf in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939413
Title:
/usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libprotobuf.a’ gener
correctly stripped on other architectures, also not stripped in hirsute,
so not a regression in impish.
** Tags removed: ftbfs
** Tags added: rls-ii-incoming
** Changed in: protobuf (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Matthias Klose (doko) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification beca
the real problem here is that the package is not stripped at all on
arm64.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to protobuf in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939413
Title:
/usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libpro
copied the binary packages to
https://launchpad.net/~doko/+archive/ubuntu/toolchain
and removed them from impish-proposed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to make-dfsg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/19
Public bug reported:
trying to rebuild cross-toolchain-base from
https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-toolchain-r/+archive/ubuntu/volatile/+packages
triggers a build failure:
[...]
START stamp-dir/init-binutils
tar -x -f /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.37.tar.xz
set -e; cd binutils-2.37 ; cp -a /usr/src/
** Changed in: protobuf (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => New
** Changed in: protobuf (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Gunnar Hjalmarsson (gunnarhj) => Matthias Klose (doko)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscri
rebuilding just hides the issue. need to find out why the lto sections
are in the archive.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to protobuf in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939413
Title:
/usr/lib/aarch64-
looking at a 20210706 build, the fix seems to work. Unsure what I did
wrong yesterday. So the fix would be needed on the trunk and the
branch.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdb in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
yes, double checked,
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdb/11.0.90.20210705-0ubuntu2/+build/21752179
Ubuntu's compiler enables a few hardening flags by default,
-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security
but that's unchanged from the gdb 10.2 build.
--
You r
fixed in 11.0.90.20210705-0ubuntu2
** Changed in: gdb (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdb in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1934505
Title:
gdb 11 d
no, that patch doesn't help. the gdb 10.2 build was fine, working
correctly.
gdb: configured with: --build=s390x-linux-gnu
--host=s390x-linux-gnu
--prefix=/usr
--libexecdir=${prefix}/lib/gdb
--disable-werror
--disable-maintainer-mode
--disable
for a s390x setup, maybe see
https://developer.ibm.com/components/ibm-linuxone/gettingstarted/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdb in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1934505
Title:
gdb 11 doesn't wor
** Bug watch added: Sourceware.org Bugzilla #28056
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28056
** Also affects: gdb via
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28056
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** Changed in: gdb (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
No, the gcc packages don't depend on any tbb package. Probably tbb
needs an update to a new upstream version in the distro.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to tbb in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193377
No gcc package depends on libtbb2
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to tbb in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1933775
Title:
libgcc-s1 and libstdc++6 depend on broken libtbb2 package
Status in gcc:
Con
No, see the upstream issue. A new tbb upstream version is needed.
** Package changed: gcc-11 (Ubuntu) => tbb (Ubuntu)
** Tags removed: deprecated execution gcc intel libstdc++ pragma tbb warning
** Tags added: rls-ii-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub
On 5/31/21 8:03 PM, Balint Reczey wrote:
> @doko would it be enough keep ld-* unstripped on armhf and armel only?
sure, that would fix the immediate issue. but is there a reason why you don't
want to have this across all architectures, or is this meant just for the
backports?
--
You received th
we usually don't require MIRs for new binary packages. Please just make
sure that the security team knows about the added binary in bionic, and
then we can promote it.
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
No, you would need to provide symlinks for all variants, for the real
file and all the symlinks.
The unstripped ld.so is 220k, the stripped one 192k. So these 28k look
pretty marginal to add, and I wouldn't see this a regression in size.
Attaching the diff that already is in the glibc in impish.
or 3) make sure that the detached debug information for ld.so is
available and can be found.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdb in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927192
Title:
gdb ftbfs on armhf,
see also
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2021-May/126011.html
so not stripping ld.so
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdb in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927192
Title:
gdb ftbfs on ar
It's ok to strip glibc/ld.so on armhf, but then gdb needs to be able to
find the debug symbols.
For impish,
- call dh_strip in glibc with current debhelper, not compat 8,
so that the build-id's are resolved by build file system
layout, not the original file names. That's already done in
this is "fixed" in the glibc 2.33 branch, if I understand the glibc
maintainers correctly, they consider this as a workaround (see PR27744).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdb in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad
** Bug watch added: Sourceware.org Bugzilla #27826
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27826
** Also affects: gdb via
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27826
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
Public bug reported:
see https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdb/10.2-0ubuntu3
$ zcat buildlog_ubuntu-impish-armhf.gdb_10.2-0ubuntu3_BUILDING.txt.gz | fgrep
'(timeout)'|wc -l
10451
** Affects: gdb (Ubuntu)
Importance: High
Status: Confirmed
** Tags: ftbfs rls-ii-incoming
** Ta
** Tags added: ftbfs
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdb in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1926934
Title:
gdb batch calls time out on armhf
Status in gdb:
Confirmed
Status in gdb package in Ubunt
what value do these bug reports have? did you file these upstream? it's
also not clear which version you are testing
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscri
** Bug watch added: Sourceware.org Bugzilla #27810
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27810
** Also affects: gdb via
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27810
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
Public bug reported:
seen when trying to build the gcc-10, or gcc-snapshot packages. A lot
of tests in the guality test suite time out after 300 seconds (the
default dejagnu timeout). These tests, like pr36728-1.c run ok on other
architectures (and fail), but timeout on armhf.
Seen in impish wit
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1925348 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925348
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1925348
stack-overflow on GNU libiberty/rust-demangle.c:664 demangle_path
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch se
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1925348 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925348
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1925348
stack-overflow on GNU libiberty/rust-demangle.c:664 demangle_path
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch se
please don't submit issues like this without a reproducer.
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
** Changed in: gmp (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gmp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864062
Title:
autopkgtest regressions with gmp 6.2.0
Status in gmp p
utopic is EOL, closing the issue
** Changed in: gcc-defaults (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to qtbase-opensource-src in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131863
the binutils issues is fixed upstream. closing the binutils task.
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to qtbase-opensource-src in
Ubuntu.
htt
this is correct behavior. The headers are searched in
/usr/include/python3.8
** Package changed: gcc-defaults (Ubuntu) => python3-defaults (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: python3-defaults (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
To
** Changed in: debhelper (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
** Changed in: fakeroot (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
To
that's the proposed patch to dh_strip to keep permissions and owners
independent of strip/objcopy keeping these.
** Patch added: "dh_strip.diff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fakeroot/+bug/1915250/+attachment/5464124/+files/dh_strip.diff
--
You received this bug notification beca
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #982457
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=982457
** Also affects: debhelper (Debian) via
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=982457
Importance: Unknown
currently building binutils against the release pocket to mitigate the
immediate issue
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1915250
Title:
buildd file owner/gro
also why is the dh sequencer calling dh_fixperms before doing
modifications on files (e.g. dh_strip)?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1915250
Title:
buildd
fakeroot needs an update for glibc-2.33, see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889862
not just the build fix from
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/SMQ3RYXEYTVZH6PLQMKNB3NM4XLPMNZO/
discussions of tools not preserving file ownership/per
** Package changed: glibc (Ubuntu) => fakeroot (Ubuntu)
** Also affects: glibc (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: binutils (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: debhelper (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
btw, I created a PR upstream. still waiting for merging though
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libnotify/-/merge_requests/17
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libnotify in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2
Public bug reported:
[MIR] libmd (dependency of libbsd)
** Affects: libbsd (Ubuntu)
Importance: High
Status: New
** Affects: libmd (Ubuntu)
Importance: High
Status: Incomplete
** Tags: hirsute rls-hh-incoming
** Changed in: libmd (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided =
removed the update-excuse tag. that's unrelated to the current 2.33
migration.
** Tags removed: update-excuse
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to audit in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1907472
Title:
Public bug reported:
[MIR] libbpf (dependency of iproute2)
** Affects: iproute2 (Ubuntu)
Importance: High
Assignee: Kernel Packages (kernel-packages)
Status: New
** Affects: libbpf (Ubuntu)
Importance: High
Assignee: Kernel Packages (kernel-packages)
Status:
Public bug reported:
tiff 4.1.0+git201212-1 enabled deflate support, adding libdeflate0 as a
dependency to libtiff5, making the package uninstallable.
Therefor I uploaded 4.1.0+git201212-1ubuntu1 disabling the deflate
support to make libtiff5 installable again.
Either this package stays this way
** Bug watch added: Sourceware.org Bugzilla #27050
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27050
** Also affects: binutils via
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27050
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
** Also affects: gdb (Ubuntu Bionic)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdb in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908063
Title:
gdb-multiarch 8.1.1-0ubuntu1 reg
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1907789
Title:
2.35.50 breaks ld -no-pie
Status in bi
fixed in hirsute
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905768
Title:
ld: DWARF error: could
Public bug reported:
see
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vim/2:8.2.1913-1ubuntu1
blocking the perl transition
** Affects: vim (Ubuntu)
Importance: High
Status: Confirmed
** Tags: ftbfs rls-hh-incoming
** Changed in: vim (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed i
all packages built, gdb test suite looks ok.
LP: #1901026 was tested separately.
The BOT only reports bogus, so ignore it.
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-bionic
--
You received this bug notification because yo
from what I see, all these are unrelated to the bug fix, but problems
with the test infrastructure.
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-bionic
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
T
** Also affects: gdb (Ubuntu Bionic)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdb in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901026
Title:
[GDB] No socket file connection
Public bug reported:
gdb 8.1.1 is a minor bug fix release for 8.1. Some of the issues fixed
in 8.1.1 are already fixed in the branch update in 8.1-0ubuntu3:
* gdb 8.1.1 release.
This is a minor corrective release over GDB 8.1, fixing following issues:
- PR gdb/23028 (inconsistent disasse
** Changed in: gdb (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdb in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1890270
Title:
SRU: update gdb 9.2 for 20.04 LTS
Status in gdb p
Public bug reported:
This is a proposal to backport the Python 2.7.18 release to bionic, like
it was done for 2.7.17 in LP: #1855133.
** Affects: python-stdlib-extensions (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Affects: python2.7 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
S
builds ok, test results look ok.
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-focal
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python2.7 in Ubuntu.
ht
package works as expected. test suite check done with the binary upload.
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-focal
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which i
** Description changed:
Ubuntu 20.04 LTS shipped with the python 2.7.18 release candidate.
Please let's update to the final release.
Upstream changes are:
- Documentation changes
- Identify as 2.7.18 instead of 2.7.18rc1
Acceptance criteria: The package builds, and the test
** Description changed:
SRU: update gdb 9.2 for 20.04 LTS
according to https://sourceware.org/gdb/ this is a bug fix release:
"""
This is a minor corrective release over GDB 9.1, fixing the following issues:
PR tui/25586 (Resizing the source/disassembly or command window produce
** Description changed:
SRU: update gdb 9.2 for 20.04 LTS
+
+ according to https://sourceware.org/gdb/ this is a bug fix release:
+
+ """
+ This is a minor corrective release over GDB 9.1, fixing the following issues:
+
+ PR tui/25586 (Resizing the source/disassembly or command window produce
that worked on the second retry
** Changed in: gdk-pixbuf (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdk-pixbuf in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891474
Title:
gd
seen in a focal test rebuild:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-rebuild-20200810-focal/+build/19801445
** Changed in: xz-utils (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: Fix Committed => Confirmed
** Tags added: rls-ff-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
Public bug reported:
seen in a focal test rebuild:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-rebuild-20200810-focal/+build/19801040
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-rebuild-20200810-focal/+build/19801038
---
Executed: 2257 Tests
Skipped:31 Tests
FAIL
Public bug reported:
seen in a focal test rebuild:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-rebuild-20200810-focal/+build/19799602
Missing build dependencies: python-sphinx
** Affects: pycurl (Ubuntu)
Importance: High
Status: Confirmed
** Tags: ftbfs rls-ff-incoming
** Changed
Public bug reported:
seen in a focal test rebuild:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-rebuild-20200810-focal/+build/19794513
Ok: 22
Expected Fail: 0
Fail: 1
Unexpected Pass: 0
Skipped: 0
Timeout: 0
The output
Public bug reported:
Ubuntu 20.04 LTS shipped with the python 2.7.18 release candidate.
Please let's update to the final release.
Upstream changes are:
- Documentation changes
- Identify as 2.7.18 instead of 2.7.18rc1
Acceptance criteria: The package builds, and the testsuite doesn't show
regr
Public bug reported:
SRU: update gdb 9.2 for 20.04 LTS
** Affects: gdb (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdb in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1
yes, this looks sensible as a SRU
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883880
Title:
fix non-8-bit x86 displacements breaking AVX512 builds on Bionic
Status i
I found the older version at http://ppa.launchpad.net/oem-solutions-
group/nvidia-driver-staging/ubuntu. It turned out that it's most likely
that the hardware is broken, so it was just a coincidence that the
hardware failed after the driver update. Sorry for the noise.
Best regards,
Mat
happend multiple times. Unfortunately the old driver version is not
available anymore and I can't check if this is really caused by the
driver update.
Best regards,
Matthias
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: xorg 1:7.7+19ubuntu7.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-108.109-ge
Removing packages from groovy:
url-dispatcher 0.1+17.04.20170328-0ubuntu6 in groovy
liburl-dispatcher1 0.1+17.04.20170328-0ubuntu6 in groovy amd64
liburl-dispatcher1 0.1+17.04.20170328-0ubuntu6 in groovy arm64
liburl-dispatcher1 0.1+17.04.2017
Removing packages from groovy:
ubuntu-app-launch 0.12+17.04.20170404.2-0ubuntu6 in groovy
gir1.2-ubuntu-app-launch-3 0.12+17.04.20170404.2-0ubuntu6 in
groovy amd64
gir1.2-ubuntu-app-launch-3 0.12+17.04.20170404.2-0ubuntu6 in
groovy arm64
gir
Nice :-) Now only the gnome-software patch is missing to fix this issue
completely (at least for the package, according to Launchpad)
** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
--
Yo
Removing packages from groovy:
zmqpp 4.1.2-0ubuntu2 in groovy
libzmqpp-dev 4.1.2-0ubuntu2 in groovy amd64
libzmqpp-dev 4.1.2-0ubuntu2 in groovy arm64
libzmqpp-dev 4.1.2-0ubuntu2 in groovy armhf
libzmqpp-dev 4.1.2-0ubuntu2 in gr
Public bug reported:
zmqpp: ftbfs in groovy, no rdeps, remove the package
** Affects: zmqpp (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zmqpp in Ubuntu.
h
** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864307
Title:
Many apps have no icon in S
** Tags added: rls-ff-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bash in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1878517
Title:
please apply bash 5.0 patch 17
Status in bash package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug desc
Neat :-) That should do the job for all combinations of snap-store and
gnome-software, once the GS patch is in there as well.
Thanks Ken for doing the integration work :-)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubunt
Hi Sebastien,
yeah, exactly that was the functionality I looked for - the +click
hotkey. Unfortunately it is not very intuitive if you don't know about
it. So I guess that I am not the only user which would be more familiar
with the click outside...
Similar thing about the path editing feature: y
Public bug reported:
Open a random file save form (gedit, LibreOffice doesn't matter).
Sometimes the first entry in the file list gets highlighted
automatically which may be a folder (especially when it is not the first
time you save a file). So the user may click on another entry to change
the s
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1872258 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872258
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1861631
"The AppStream system cache was updated, but some components were ignored.
Refer to the verbose log for more information."
** This bug has been marked
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1872258 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872258
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1861631
"The AppStream system cache was updated, but some components were ignored.
Refer to the verbose log for more information."
** This bug has been marked
101 - 200 of 1565 matches
Mail list logo
