[Touch-packages] [Bug 1249343] Re: Packagekitd eating RAM, CPU

2023-04-16 Thread Matthias Klumpp
This should be resolved and since 1.2.6 the daemon will even shutdown again when not in use. ** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1953428] Re: /etc/PackageKit/Vendor.conf specifies invalid CodecUrl

2022-03-15 Thread Matthias Klumpp
What should be the replacement link? On Debian, we use https://wiki.debian.org/PackageKit/ItemNotFound#Missing_Codec -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to packagekit in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1963904] Re: /usr/libexec/packagekitd:11:__strcmp_avx2:AptCacheFile::resolvePkgID:AptIntf::resolvePackageIds:backend_get_details_thread:pk_backend_job_thread_setup

2022-03-07 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Patch added: "01_fix-single-candidate-pkgid-emission.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit/+bug/1963904/+attachment/5566548/+files/01_fix-single-candidate-pkgid-emission.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1963904] Re: /usr/libexec/packagekitd:11:__strcmp_avx2:AptCacheFile::resolvePkgID:AptIntf::resolvePackageIds:backend_get_details_thread:pk_backend_job_thread_setup

2022-03-07 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Looks like PK needs an updated `fix-single-candidate-pkgid-emission.patch` patch (attached). I queued it for Debian, but I am secretly waiting whether we will get another PK bugfix release in time (there's a few things left that I need to have a look at). In any case, I believe the attached

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1961837] Re: PackageKit 1.2.5 unable to perform upgrades

2022-02-24 Thread Matthias Klumpp
For completeness, a much better and simpler patch is this: https://salsa.debian.org/pkgutopia-team/packagekit/-/blob/0c43611b82879bd71e633af02878d9c80283f7da/debian/patches/01_fix-single-candidate-pkgid-emission.patch Maybe that will make its way into Ubuntu Jammy too, but it's not as urgent :-)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1961837] Re: PackageKit 1.2.5 unable to perform upgrades

2022-02-22 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Debian package is available: https://tracker.debian.org/news/1305719/accepted-packagekit-125-2-source-into-unstable/ I forgot to mark this issue as being explicitly closed in the changelog, but I guess Julian can do that when merging the changes into Ubuntu :-) ** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1961837] Re: PackageKit 1.2.5 unable to perform upgrades

2022-02-22 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Also affects: packagekit via https://github.com/PackageKit/PackageKit/issues/534 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to packagekit in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1961837] Re: PackageKit 1.2.5 unable to perform upgrades

2022-02-22 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Matthias Klumpp (ximion) ** Also affects: packagekit (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Critical Assignee: Matthias Klumpp (ximion) Status: New ** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => In Pr

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1961837] Re: PackageKit 1.2.5 unable to perform upgrades

2022-02-22 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Sounded like a daemon crash at first, but the deeper I dig the more nonsensical it gets at the moment... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to packagekit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961837 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1914278] Re: Kernel updates marked as "manually installed", prevents old kernels cleanup

2022-02-21 Thread Matthias Klumpp
> packagekit will attempt to upgrade itself while running. This causes a packagekit crash That should not happen - do you have a backtrace for that? Reporting it at the PackageKit bugtracker would also be nice so I have it on my radar. -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1914278] Re: Kernel updates marked as "manually installed", prevents old kernels cleanup

2022-02-21 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Makes sense to me :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to packagekit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1914278 Title: Kernel updates marked as "manually installed", prevents old kernels cleanup

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1914278] Re: Kernel updates marked as "manually installed", prevents old kernels cleanup

2022-02-21 Thread Matthias Klumpp
I tested this with a bunch of dummy packages and a local repository, and everything worked pretty well and states were applied as expected. Of course, doesn't mean that there may be a real-world bug that I haven't seen yet, but I think it's unlikely (I've also been running this on my machine on

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1914278] Re: Kernel updates marked as "manually installed", prevents old kernels cleanup

2022-02-21 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Resolving this required a fair bit of refactoring, so TBH I am not sure that it is safe to backport to Focal, unless version 1.2.5 is submitted as-a-whole. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1864307] Re: Many apps have no icon in Software on Focal

2020-05-26 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Nice :-) Now only the gnome-software patch is missing to fix this issue completely (at least for the package, according to Launchpad) ** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Triaged ** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Confirmed => Triaged --

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1864307] Re: Many apps have no icon in Software on Focal

2020-05-15 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864307 Title: Many apps have no icon in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1864307] Re: Many apps have no icon in Software on Focal

2020-05-11 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Neat :-) That should do the job for all combinations of snap-store and gnome-software, once the GS patch is in there as well. Thanks Ken for doing the integration work :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1861705] Re: The AppStream system cache was updated, but some components were ignored. Refer to the verbose log for more information.

2020-04-25 Thread Matthias Klumpp
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1872258 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872258 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1861631 "The AppStream system cache was updated, but some components were ignored. Refer to the verbose log for more information." ** This bug has been marked

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1862216] Re: Unclear AppStream message in `update` output

2020-04-25 Thread Matthias Klumpp
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1872258 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872258 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1861631 "The AppStream system cache was updated, but some components were ignored. Refer to the verbose log for more information." ** This bug has been marked

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1718453] Re: apt does not download dep11 files for foreign architectures and appstream cannot find applications for these archs.

2020-01-03 Thread Matthias Klumpp
At this point, I think it's safe to say that implementing full multiarch support for AppStream simply isn't going to happen, at least not anytime soon. It's simply easier for app authors to provide native implementations for amd64 instead of relying on i386 compatibility. If support was

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1673258] Re: Remove aptdaemon and drop or port its reverse-dependencies

2019-04-18 Thread Matthias Klumpp
It's worth mentioning that while PackageKit will likely not receive much feature development unless someone steps up to do that, it is in solid maintenance mode and likely will remain like that for quite some time. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1790613] Re: Regression: packagekit crashes updating itself to a new version

2018-10-11 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Yes, I completely missed that change, this needs to be changed. I need to prepare a new upload for Debian anyway, maybe I can change this behavior on the weekend at Debian. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1790613] Re: Regression: packagekit crashes updating itself to a new version

2018-10-11 Thread Matthias Klumpp
We don't actively kill PackageKit when updating it, we just tell the daemon to quit itself as soon as possible if it can do so. Also, a packagekitd times out automatically when inactive. So this crash really shouldn't happen... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1785498] Re: g_atomic_ref_count_dec: assertion 'g_atomic_int_get (arc) > 0' failed

2018-09-04 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1785498 Title: g_atomic_ref_count_dec:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1788894] Re: Hash Sum mismatch: DEP-11 Icons

2018-08-24 Thread Matthias Klumpp
This is not an issue in appstream, but likely the Ubuntu archive. But it could also be snapcraft doing something weird (that cache path is odd!). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 450410] Re: Uses deprecated dpkg --print-installation-architecture

2018-08-22 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Fixed for a while already. ** Changed in: makedev (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to makedev in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/450410 Title: Uses

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1675163] Re: Don't attempt to create devices in LXC containers

2018-08-22 Thread Matthias Klumpp
FWIW, I ran into that issue today as well, and it was really annoying. So I fixed in in Debian in a generic way, so this should work for every container solution out there. It requires systemd-detect-virt (systemd) to be installed prior to installing makedev though (which usually is the case).

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1785498] Re: g_atomic_ref_count_dec: assertion 'g_atomic_int_get (arc) > 0' failed

2018-08-19 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed ** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Matthias Klumpp (ximion) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to g

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1785498] Re: g_atomic_ref_count_dec: assertion 'g_atomic_int_get (arc) > 0' failed

2018-08-19 Thread Matthias Klumpp
This is fixed in Debian now, in package appstream/0.12.2-2. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #906538 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=906538 ** Also affects: appstream (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=906538 Importance: Unknown

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1785498] Re: g_atomic_ref_count_dec: assertion 'g_atomic_int_get (arc) > 0' failed

2018-08-19 Thread Matthias Klumpp
See the linked upstream issue for details - this will be fixed soon. ** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid ** Bug watch added: github.com/ximion/appstream/issues #198 https://github.com/ximion/appstream/issues/198 ** Also affects: appstream via

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1774491] Re: pkcon install fails -- proxy?

2018-05-31 Thread Matthias Klumpp
This very much looks like a bug int Aptdaemon's PK compatibility layer to me. At this point, it likely makes no sense to fix this issue, since that code has been dropped after the Xenial release. @tlc: This will likely be a won't fix bug, please upgrade to Bionic if you can. If you can't

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1716900] Re: apt-get: order of the dependencies ends in a diffrent result

2018-04-15 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Package changed: appstream (Ubuntu) => apt (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1716900 Title: apt-get: order of the dependencies ends in a diffrent

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1718453] Re: apt does not download dep11 files for foreign architectures and appstream cannot find applications for these archs.

2018-01-25 Thread Matthias Klumpp
@donkult: The downloads for all architectures are not allowed at time, because doing so would lead to AppStream-ID collisions, and AppStream itself has no notion of architectures (yet - I played around with that a bit, but there is no definitive good solution yet). For downloading Components-all,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1719384] [NEW] Sync packagekit 1.1.7-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2017-09-25 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Public bug reported: Please sync packagekit 1.1.7-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main) Changelog entries since current artful version 1.1.6-2: packagekit (1.1.7-1) unstable; urgency=medium [ Matthias Klumpp ] * New upstream version: 1.1.7 * Drop all patches: Applied upstream * Add

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1548480] Re: 95packagekit sleep hook weirdly installed in a subdirectory is ignored

2017-09-24 Thread Matthias Klumpp
FTR: https://github.com/hughsie/PackageKit/commit/a43b91cf23e0ae819bab4820249c53107231e6a2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to packagekit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1548480 Title: 95packagekit

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1548480] Re: 95packagekit sleep hook weirdly installed in a subdirectory is ignored

2017-09-24 Thread Matthias Klumpp
This has been resolved since PackageKit 0.8.14, we removed the pm-utils helper back then, since pm-utils is dead upstream. The issue here was fixed a while before even, but Ubuntu took a really long time to update to a recent version of PK. ** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu) Status:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1691501] Re: aptcc: WhatProvides doesn't return results for gst 1.0

2017-09-24 Thread Matthias Klumpp
(Fixed in PK 1.0.6-2) ** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to packagekit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1691501 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1716137] Re: Error message using easy-codec-install (gstreamer1.0-packagekit) is not useful & confusing

2017-09-24 Thread Matthias Klumpp
See https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit/+bug/1719077/comments/7 ** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed ** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Matthias Klumpp (ximion) -- You received this bug notification b

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1719077] Re: Unable to find codecs to play videos

2017-09-24 Thread Matthias Klumpp
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1716137 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1716137 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1716137 Error message using easy-codec-install (gstreamer1.0-packagekit) is not useful & confusing -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1719077] Re: Unable to find codecs to play videos

2017-09-24 Thread Matthias Klumpp
I fixed the bug mentioned in this report (the error message should be gone now and you should be able to search for mimetypes with PackageKit again). However, it could be possible that the error described here was masking another issue with missing codecs itself (I can't test that at time). In

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1719077] Re: Unable to find codecs to play videos

2017-09-23 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Indeed, I can reproduce this. This issue affects Debian as well, and I wonder why nobody noticed it so far. I have an idea on how to fix it. ** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Ma

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1716137] Re: Error message using easy-codec-install (gstreamer1.0-packagekit) is not useful & confusing

2017-09-09 Thread Matthias Klumpp
I think the message is even wrong... You shouldn't need the app-install-data package for this to work. I guess maybe this happens because the app-install-data package contains .desktop files indicating mimetypes, and PK/AppStream gets confused by that. There is definitely no hardcoding of this

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1699216] Re: Encrypted home support

2017-08-30 Thread Matthias Klumpp
In that case, just propose the patches upstream ;-) That will help everyone. I can maybe help with that and do a proper review later. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to accountsservice in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1699216] Re: Encrypted home support

2017-06-20 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Thank you for your work on this! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to accountsservice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1699216 Title: Encrypted home support Status in accountsservice package in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1699216] Re: Encrypted home support

2017-06-20 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Amazing, just last week I added this to my todo list, since I'd need it in gnome-initial-setup. I can test the patches, but ideally these should go upstream in the end. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1663695] Re: Kubuntu 16.04.1 discover empty after fresh install

2017-04-14 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Okay, 3:1 for the "the update works" camp, as it looks like ;-) ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to packagekit in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1663695] Re: Kubuntu 16.04.1 discover empty after fresh install

2017-04-11 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Tags removed: verification-failed ** Tags added: verification-needed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to packagekit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1663695 Title: Kubuntu 16.04.1 discover empty

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1663695] Re: Kubuntu 16.04.1 discover empty after fresh install

2017-04-09 Thread Matthias Klumpp
@cicerone55: Are you sure you updated the right package? Please check if libappstreamqt1 is at that particular version, because that's where the bug is located. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to packagekit in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1663695] Re: Kubuntu 16.04.1 discover empty after fresh install

2017-04-05 Thread Matthias Klumpp
I added an explanation (basically, a previous bugfix fixing GNOME Software broke this for the Qt bindings). ** Description changed: [Impact] - * A previous update made AppStream use modern-style component-ids, thereby breaking the Qt library if it is reading data from the cache and if

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1663695] Re: Kubuntu 16.04.1 discover empty after fresh install

2017-03-31 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Description changed: - Also reported at (https://github.com/hughsie/PackageKit/issues/177) + [Impact] - I tried discover just after installing Kubuntu 16.04.1 LTS, and some software was being displayed, but search was not working. I tried to install muon, and did some software update

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1663695] Re: Kubuntu 16.04.1 discover empty after fresh install

2017-03-29 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Added a version of this patch which also fixes the automatic tests. ** Patch added: "Fix for the bug and autopkgtests" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasma-discover/+bug/1663695/+attachment/4850082/+files/lp1663695fix+tests.debdiff ** Changed in: appstream (Ubuntu) Status:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1663695] Re: Kubuntu 16.04.1 discover empty after fresh install

2017-03-27 Thread Matthias Klumpp
I just wanted to reject that assumption because the version of AppStream in Xenial was too old, but it turns out you're right: A backport from a newer version broke this, and I didn't notice because my AppStreamQt is also newer (and using a better architecture where this bug can't happen

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1673258] Re: Remove aptdaemon and drop or port its reverse-dependencies

2017-03-17 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Would be quite cool to make the language-selector use "localization" AppStream components to detect missing locale... That would also make it work easily with PackageKit. => https://www.freedesktop.org/software/appstream/docs/sect-Metadata-Localization.html This would require some bigger

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1673302] Re: Merge packagekit 1.1.5-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2017-03-16 Thread Matthias Klumpp
(Closes: #845575) -- Matthias Klumpp <m...@debian.org> Wed, 08 Mar 2017 21:33:38 +0100 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit/+bug/1673302/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to :

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1661371] Re: [zesty] doesn't offer a window to install missing gstreamer codecs

2017-02-20 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Looks like it might be a good idea to get rid of sessioninstaller, since GNOME Software provides the PackageKit session interface properly already - but since Ubuntu doesn't use the PK backend of GS, I assume that the PK session API will also not work in Ubuntu's version of GNOME Software.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1595485] Re: packages to remove from yakkety

2016-10-24 Thread Matthias Klumpp
LDC just needs to be re-bootstrapped on all architectures. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libpng in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1595485 Title: packages to remove from yakkety Status in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1496292] Re: Needs to be ported to packagekit 1

2016-06-30 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Obviously I don't mean proposed-updates, but proposed for Yakkety. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to packagekit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1496292 Title: Needs to be ported to packagekit 1

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1496292] Re: Needs to be ported to packagekit 1

2016-06-30 Thread Matthias Klumpp
According to the proposed-updates Britney report, aptd and PK are still blocked (contact #ubuntu-release when update is needed). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to packagekit in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1553211] Re: Ubuntu should provide a default graphical method to install technical packages (plugins, kernels, terminal apps)

2016-06-25 Thread Matthias Klumpp
I think GNOME Software is the wrong choice for installing non-app system packages. So, in total there are three choices: 1) Use GNOME PackageKit for local package installs 2) Use GDebi 3) Hack GNOME Software to make local package installations work somehow. -- You received this bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1466587] Re: PackageKit doesn't respect phased updates

2016-06-16 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Patches welcome! :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to packagekit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1466587 Title: PackageKit doesn't respect phased updates Status in packagekit package in Ubuntu:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1496292] Re: Needs to be ported to packagekit 1

2016-05-24 Thread Matthias Klumpp
FWIW, just making Aptdaemon stop to pretend to be PackageKit and then adjust the dependent packages to not require the compat layer explicitly should also do the job. (we did that at Debian, and right now, only one package still explicitly depends on Aptd (but that one is using Aptd-specific

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1562733] Re: apt signature requierements prevent updates from some repositories

2016-05-10 Thread Matthias Klumpp
With your fix, we don't need to touch AppStream at all, since it would just work. Which would mean we could close the issue in "appstream" as invalid then... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1572778] Re: /usr/lib/packagekit/packagekitd:11:strlen:__add_to_environ:__setenv:AptIntf::init:backend_get_updates_thread

2016-04-21 Thread Matthias Klumpp
I really wonder why this issue appears now, especially since Ubuntu isn't using PK itself... Might be due to the backported patches, or even some non-backported stuff in combination with changes in APT (the aptcc backend evolved a lot in the last 3 years). -- You received this bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1561964] Re: packagekitd crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()

2016-04-20 Thread Matthias Klumpp
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1572778 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572778 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1560759 packagekitd crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()error just appeared at log in no apps open ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1572778

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1562285] Re: packagekitd crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()

2016-04-20 Thread Matthias Klumpp
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1572778 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572778 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1560759 packagekitd crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()error just appeared at log in no apps open ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1572778

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1562500] Re: packagekitd crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()

2016-04-20 Thread Matthias Klumpp
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1572778 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572778 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1560759 packagekitd crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()error just appeared at log in no apps open ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1572778

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1562293] Re: packagekitd crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()

2016-04-20 Thread Matthias Klumpp
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1572778 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572778 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1560759 packagekitd crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()error just appeared at log in no apps open ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1572778

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1562502] Re: packagekitd crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()

2016-04-20 Thread Matthias Klumpp
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1572778 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572778 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1560759 packagekitd crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()error just appeared at log in no apps open ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1572778

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1560864] Re: packagekitd crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()

2016-04-20 Thread Matthias Klumpp
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1572778 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572778 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1560759 packagekitd crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()error just appeared at log in no apps open ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1572778

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1560759] Re: packagekitd crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()error just appeared at log in no apps open

2016-04-20 Thread Matthias Klumpp
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1572778 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572778 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1572778 /usr/lib/packagekit/packagekitd:11:strlen:__add_to_environ:__setenv:AptIntf::init:backend_get_updates_thread -- You received this bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1565168] Re: Error appear checkin configuration

2016-04-20 Thread Matthias Klumpp
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1572778 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572778 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1560759 packagekitd crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()error just appeared at log in no apps open ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1572778

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1565291] Re: packagekitd crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()

2016-04-20 Thread Matthias Klumpp
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1572778 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572778 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1560759 packagekitd crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()error just appeared at log in no apps open ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1572778

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1569676] Re: packagekitd crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()

2016-04-20 Thread Matthias Klumpp
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1572778 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572778 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1560759 packagekitd crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()error just appeared at log in no apps open ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1572778

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1548480] Re: 95packagekit sleep hook weirdly installed in a subdirectory is ignored

2016-02-23 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Your analysis is correct :) I would of course prefer b) (maybe I need to lobby more for Ubuntu finally updating their 2y old PackageKit...), but any other option is fine. Since I don't have upload access to Ubuntu, and this problem doesn't exist in Debian, someone else would need to take care of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1548480] Re: 95packagekit sleep hook weirdly installed in a subdirectory is ignored

2016-02-22 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Ubuntu ships a prehistoric version of PackageKit - new releases of PK don't include that particular configuration file anymore, so the problem is - kind of - solved. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to packagekit

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1470655] Re: Update to PackageKit 1.0

2015-11-04 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Awesome! You can drop the virtual interface if you don't want to continue to use Aptdaemon for software which is using PackageKit interfaces (which I would of course welcome ^^). Cheers, Matthias -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1330037] Re: [FFe] upower 0.99.1 transition

2014-09-14 Thread Matthias Klumpp
** Changed in: gnome-packagekit (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Matthias Klumpp (ximion) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to tracker in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1330037 Title: [FFe] upower

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1361686] Re: PackageKit Daemon crash when I install using pkcon a IPK package

2014-08-26 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Interesting - do you mean a Listaller package with IPK package, or an Opkg package? ** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Matthias Klumpp (ximion) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1361686] Re: PackageKit Daemon crash when I install using pkcon a IPK package

2014-08-26 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Sounds like a Listaller message - you should not be able to install these with this PK version, but the service shiould also not crash. Can you paste the output of apt-cache policy listaller here? Where did you get the package from? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1361686] Re: PackageKit Daemon crash when I install using pkcon a IPK package

2014-08-26 Thread Matthias Klumpp
What happens if you run sudo lipa -i PKGNAME.ipk ? ** Package changed: packagekit (Ubuntu) = listaller -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to packagekit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1361686 Title: