[Touch-packages] [Bug 2060073] Re: folks build test failures with glib 2.80

2024-04-03 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
FWIW there is some discussion upstream in these two issues: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/folks/-/issues/140 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/issues/3316 ** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/issues #3316 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/issues/3316 -- You received

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2045586] Re: livecd-rootfs uses losetup -P for theoretically reliable/synchronous partition setup but it's not reliable

2024-02-18 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
** Description changed: - In mantic, we migrated livecd-rootfs to use losetup -P instead of - kpartx, with the expectation that this would give us a reliable, race- - free way of loop-mounting partitions from a disk image during image - build. + [impact] + In mantic, we migrated livecd-rootfs to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2045586] Re: livecd-rootfs uses losetup -P for theoretically reliable/synchronous partition setup but it's not reliable

2024-02-18 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Here is a backport of the partial fix to jammy https://code.launchpad.net/~mwhudson/livecd-rootfs/+git/livecd- rootfs/+merge/460729 I'm not sure I am best placed to update this bug description to match the SRU template though -- I'm not sure which builds are being affected in practice and so

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2045586] Re: livecd-rootfs uses losetup -P for theoretically reliable/synchronous partition setup but it's not reliable

2024-01-30 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Oh wait, we've been through something very like this before https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-initramfs-tools/+bug/1834875. I suspect a judicious application of flock may be the most correct solution available. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2045586] Re: livecd-rootfs uses losetup -P for theoretically reliable/synchronous partition setup but it's not reliable

2024-01-24 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Here's my workaround then https://code.launchpad.net/~mwhudson/livecd- rootfs/+git/livecd-rootfs/+merge/459380 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045586

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2045586] Re: livecd-rootfs uses losetup -P for theoretically reliable/synchronous partition setup but it's not reliable

2024-01-23 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Amazing debugging Dann. Until we can get a kernel fix, what's the way forward here? Run losetup without -P, run udevadm settle, run partprobe on the device (then maybe run udevadm settle again??) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages,

Re: [Touch-packages] [Bug 2045586] Re: livecd-rootfs uses losetup -P for theoretically reliable/synchronous partition setup but it's not reliable in noble

2023-12-11 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
> Is only asking kernel to scan the device; to then generate "kernel udev" > events; for then udev to wakeup and process/emit "udev udev" events; and > create the required device nodes. > It's not udev that creates nodes like /dev/loop1p1 though is it? That's devtmpfs surely. -- You received

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2037417] Re: mantic images after 20230917 are failing to deploy with failure to mount root and kernel filesystems

2023-10-04 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Ah no it's a bit simpler than that https://github.com/util-linux/util- linux/issues/2528. --disable-libmount-mountfd-support looking better tbh. ** Bug watch added: github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues #2528 https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/2528 -- You received this bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2037417] Re: mantic images after 20230917 are failing to deploy with failure to mount root and kernel filesystems

2023-10-04 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
So the cause of this, I am fairly sure, is the new "libmount-mountfd" support in util-linux which seems to have the consequence that "mount -o remount $mountpoint" fails for an overlay that references paths no longer available in the current mount namespace. You can see the discussion of a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2037417] Re: mantic images after 20230917 are failing to deploy with failure to mount root and kernel filesystems

2023-10-04 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
** Also affects: util-linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037417 Title: mantic images after

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2037417] Re: mantic images after 20230917 are failing to deploy with failure to mount root and kernel filesystems

2023-10-04 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
** Tags added: foundaitions-todo ** Tags removed: foundaitions-todo ** Tags added: foundations-todo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037417 Title: mantic

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2037202] Re: Mantic/23.10: PXE boot tries to initialize DHCP before network link is up

2023-10-02 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
https://code.launchpad.net/~mwhudson/ubuntu/+source/initramfs- tools/+git/initramfs-tools/+merge/452586 might be a fix? Not tested at all. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2037202] Re: Mantic/23.10: PXE boot tries to initialize DHCP before network link is up

2023-10-02 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Is the point here that dhcpcd -1 exits immediately if it finds no devices, even if it has a -t argument? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037202

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1974483] Re: autoinstall ssh:install-server:false is misleading in 22.04

2023-09-24 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
This is fixed in the 23.10 dailies. I'm not sure it's really practical to fix this for the next 22.04 point release, unfortunately. ** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released ** Changed in: subiquity Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1999104] Re: arm64: broken c++ exception handler support leads to std::terminate() being called and program abort

2022-12-14 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
I tweaked the version numbers slightly (ubuntu1 -> ubuntu0.1) and uploaded. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libunwind in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1999104 Title: arm64: broken c++ exception

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1993084] Re: libkrb5-dev: dpkg-deb: error: paste subprocess was killed by signal (Broken pipe)

2022-10-17 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
I think we're going to need more output that than to help you debug this. ** Changed in: krb5 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to krb5 in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1993008] Re: ftbfs: E: fontconfig: alien-tag fc-cache-used-in-maintainer-script

2022-10-17 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
lintian errors do not count as a build failure. You could file this as a bug in Debian if you like -- we'll pick up the fix from there in due course. ** Changed in: fontconfig (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992979] Re: kinetic ppc64le reporting Failed to send WATCHDOG=1 notification message: Transport endpoint is not connected

2022-10-17 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
** Tags added: foundations-triage-discuss -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992979 Title: kinetic ppc64le reporting Failed to send WATCHDOG=1 notification

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992947] Re: gdb fails in Ubuntu-22.04

2022-10-17 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
There is a new version of gdb in jammy-proposed that might help. Can you try that? (some pointers on how to do this at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdb in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992727] Re: package linux-image-5.15.0-50-generic 5.15.0-50.56~20.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with return code 1

2022-10-17 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
I think your /boot ran out of space during the upgrade. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992727 Title: package linux-image-5.15.0-50-generic

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1689381] Re: FTBFS cp: cannot stat 'doc/fontconfig-user.html'

2022-10-17 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
fontconfig 2.13.1-4.4ubuntu1 built successfully for me in a kinetic sbuild so I think this can be closed. ** Changed in: fontconfig (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1959832] Re: new version available upstream: 11.2

2022-10-17 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Kinetic has 12.1? ** Changed in: gdb (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdb in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959832 Title: new version available

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1951491] Re: Can't run snaps: .slice/session-1.scope is not a snap cgroup

2022-10-16 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
I think the issue here is that snaps (with cgroupsv2) require a systemd user session and some desktop environments do not set this up? It's not clear to me what needs to change here -- should snapd be more tolerant of this situation or should the other desktop environments change to set the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1269840] Re: ubuntu-bug ubuntu-bug doesn't work

2022-10-16 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992688] Re: firefox deb not installed

2022-10-16 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
This just needs to be backported to Jammy now? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992688 Title: firefox deb not installed Status in firefox package in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1990729] Re: gdb crashes when run from VSCode

2022-09-27 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Oh yikes I'm sorry for giving you incomplete advice. These are the instructions to follow: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed -- no building from source required! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1990729] Re: gdb crashes when run from VSCode

2022-09-26 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Could you try the gdb from proposed? I think it should help. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdb in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990729 Title: gdb crashes when run from VSCode Status in gdb

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1989973] Re: focal: Vim 2:8.1.2269-1ubuntu5.8 failed to build for arm32, makes it uninstallable without explicit version

2022-09-18 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
** Tags added: foundations-todo ** Changed in: vim (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Critical -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to vim in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1989973 Title: focal: Vim

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1989973] Re: focal: Vim 2:8.1.2269-1ubuntu5.8 failed to build for arm32, makes it uninstallable without explicit version

2022-09-18 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Argh that shouldn't have happened. I've retried both the builds (it looks like they failed because of infrastructure issues), hopefully that will fix it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to vim in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1989292] Re: package openssh-server 1:8.9p1-3 failed to install/upgrade: »installiertes openssh-server-Skript des Paketes post-installation«-Unterprozess gab den Fehlerwert 1 zur

2022-09-18 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
It's unclear to me how the comment about the kernel panic and the openssh upgrade failing are related to me, I'm afraid. ** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1971409] Re: value_copy: Assertion `arg->contents != nullptr' failed.

2022-09-18 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdb/+bug/1971474 tracks the update of gdb to the 12.1 final release. You could try installing gdb from jammy-proposed and see if that helps? ** Tags added: foundations-todo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1971474] Re: SRU: Update gdb to the final 12.1 release in 22.04 LTS

2022-09-18 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
** Changed in: gdb (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdb in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971474 Title: SRU: Update gdb to the final 12.1 release in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1761341] Re: lsb_release crashed with ValueError in (): could not convert string to float: '6.06 LTS'

2022-09-18 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Ioanna are you going to take care of preparing patches for fixing the stable releases? I marked the overall/kinetic task as fix released as you say the bug is no longer present there. ** Changed in: lsb (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1989969] Re: autopkgtest TEST-36-NUMAPOLICY failure on ppc64el

2022-09-18 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Tags added: foundations-todo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1989969 Title: autopkgtest

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1981622] Re: mtd device must be supplied (device name is empty)

2022-09-18 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
I don't see an upload for focal either in the unapproved queue or in proposed. Am I confused? resetting the status for focal to in progress in any case. ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Fix Committed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1872124] Re: Please integrate ubuntu-drivers --gpgpu into Ubuntu Server

2022-08-25 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
The version of subiquity in 22.04.1 supports this now. ** Changed in: subiquity Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1981385] Re: initrd lacks modules to mount boot image from http boot

2022-08-10 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Ah yes that was it, thanks so much! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1981385 Title: initrd lacks modules to mount boot image from http boot Status

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1981385] [NEW] initrd lacks modules to mount boot image from http boot

2022-07-11 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Public bug reported: If you use UEFI http boot to boot an image (rather than an EFI executable) and get all the way to a normal userspace, you can access the boot image as /dev/pmem0. But this is not accessible in the initrd; presumably some modules are missing. Dimitri added some modules that

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892825] Re: update-locale not perform correctly sanity checks

2022-05-12 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Verified that the new version does not generated bogus lines on bionic: root@lp-1892825-bionic:~# cp /etc/default/locale /tmp/locale root@lp-1892825-bionic:~# update-locale --locale-file /tmp/locale LANG = C.UTF-8 root@lp-1892825-bionic:~# diff -u /etc/default/locale /tmp/locale ---

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1927192] Re: gdb ftbfs on armhf, testsuite timeouts

2022-04-27 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Verified: root@146e5ef6a792:/# dpkg -l libc6 Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend |/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name Version Architecture Description

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892825] Re: update-locale not perform correctly sanity checks

2022-04-25 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Verified: root@focal-vm:~# dpkg -l locales | grep ^ii ii locales2.31-0ubuntu9.7 all GNU C Library: National Language (locale) data [support] root@focal-vm:~# cp /etc/default/locale /tmp/locale root@focal-vm:~# update-locale --locale-file /tmp/locale LANGUAGE = en_US.UTF-8

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1958148] Re: mkinitramfs is too slow

2022-03-14 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958148 Title: mkinitramfs is too slow

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892825] Re: update-locale not perform correctly sanity checks

2022-03-09 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
** Description changed: [impact] A simple typo using the update-locale script can render a system inoperable without booting into single user mode or similar: $ sudo update-locale LANGUAGE = en_US.UTF-8 $ sudo -s sudo: pam_open_session: Bad item passed to pam_*_item() sudo: policy

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1942113] Re: systemd unit test regression in autopkgtest (oomd-utils)

2022-03-08 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1942113 Title: systemd unit test regression in autopkgtest

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1962332] Re: xenial systemd fails to start if cgroup2 is mounted

2022-02-28 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
"so this is fixed already in f and later" - think you mean "b and later" here? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962332 Title: xenial systemd fails to start

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892825] Re: update-locale not perform correctly sanity checks

2022-01-25 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Verified: root@focal:~# dpkg-query -W libc6 libc6:amd64 2.31-0ubuntu9.2 root@focal:~# cp /etc/default/locale /tmp/locale root@focal:~# update-locale --locale-file /tmp/locale LANGUAGE = en_US.UTF-8 root@focal:~# diff -u /etc/default/locale /tmp/locale --- /etc/default/locale 2019-10-21

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892825] Re: update-locale not perform correctly sanity checks

2022-01-25 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Oh heh Gunnar had done that already :) Doubly verified then. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pam in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892825 Title: update-locale not perform correctly sanity checks

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892825] Re: update-locale not perform correctly sanity checks

2021-11-14 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
** Description changed: + [impact] + A simple typo using the update-locale script can render a system inoperable without booting into single user mode or similar: + + $ sudo update-locale LANGUAGE = en_US.UTF-8 + $ sudo -s + sudo: pam_open_session: Bad item passed to pam_*_item() + sudo: policy

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892825] Re: update-locale not perform correctly sanity checks

2021-10-19 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Fwiw I reported this as a pam bug too https://github.com/linux- pam/linux-pam/issues/395 ** Bug watch added: github.com/linux-pam/linux-pam/issues #395 https://github.com/linux-pam/linux-pam/issues/395 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892825] Re: update-locale not perform correctly sanity checks

2021-10-18 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
** Also affects: glibc (Ubuntu Impish) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: pam (Ubuntu Impish) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: glibc (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: pam (Ubuntu Focal)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892825] Re: update-locale not perform correctly sanity checks

2021-10-18 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Adding a pam task, pam_env does some sanity checking of the input (e.g. %=1 in /etc/default/locale gets ignored) so I don't see why an empty variable name should cause a total failure. But will fix the update- locale script too. ** Also affects: pam (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1940860] Re: Mellanox NIC interface names change between 5.4 and 5.8

2021-09-26 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
I should say here that I don't really know what changes to subiquity are desirable here. I don't really like the idea of subiquity always using set-name, that just feels wrong, but I can see the problem here too. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1916485] Re: test -x fails inside shell scripts in containers

2021-09-21 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Are using the docker packages from the Ubuntu archive? It doesn't quite look like it but I'm not completely sure how to tell. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1940996]

2021-09-08 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Did the patch ever get sent to libc-alpha? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to grep in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940996 Title: test failure - test-regex Status in grep: In Progress Status in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1943077] Re: snapd fails to autopkgtest on mksquashfs, which is looking for libgcc_s

2021-09-08 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/10757 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943077 Title: snapd fails to autopkgtest on mksquashfs, which is looking for

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1943077] Re: snapd fails to autopkgtest on mksquashfs, which is looking for libgcc_s

2021-09-08 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
So what is going on here is that libc is trying to load libgcc_s.so.1 and as it is not in the snap it ends up loading it from the host. Apparently in all releases from xenial through to hirsute this has worked but for whatever reason it does not work on impish. I think the appropriate fix is for

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1943077] Re: snapd fails to autopkgtest on mksquashfs, which is looking for libgcc_s

2021-09-08 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
(I confirmed by bind mount shenanigans that putting the libgcc_s.so.1 from the core snapd into the snapd snap makes this work) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1942975] [NEW] gcr 3.40.0-2 ftbfs

2021-09-07 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Public bug reported: Reported upstream as https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gcr/-/issues/84. Looks like it might be a flaky test? ** Affects: gcr (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: ftbfs update-excuse -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1940505] Re: monero FTBFS on riscv64

2021-09-05 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
** Tags added: update-excuse -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940505 Title: monero FTBFS on riscv64 Status in binutils: Fix Released Status in binutils

Re: [Touch-packages] [Bug 1942113] Re: systemd unit test regression in autopkgtest (oomd-utils)

2021-08-31 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Sigh yes it does look like you found amd fixed the same bug. Oh well at least I learnt some things yesterday. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1942113 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1942113] Re: systemd unit test regression in autopkgtest (oomd-utils)

2021-08-31 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
So it turns out that if you have security.nesting=true set on the container, then the systemd in proposed manages to set up a unified hierarchy and the test fails. This is the difference between the production test runs and mine. I filed a bug upstream

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1942113] Re: systemd unit test regression in autopkgtest (oomd-utils)

2021-08-30 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Hmm something is off here: I'm pretty sure containers inherit their cgroups mode from the host, so the default hierarchy changing in the systemd in the archive shouldn't affect anything. I can reproduce the failure of this report by adding systemd.unified_cgroup_hierarchy=1 to the kernel command

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1942113] Re: systemd unit test regression in autopkgtest (oomd-utils)

2021-08-30 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
So yes, that is what matters. When a system is booted with systemd 248.3-1ubuntu3, it sets up the cgroups in "hybrid" mode. systemd 248.3-1ubuntu5 defaults to "unified" mode but simply upgrading the package does not redo this setup -- the system remains in hybrid mode. The test cases that are

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1942113] Re: systemd unit test regression in autopkgtest (oomd-utils)

2021-08-30 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
The difference I can see between the passing and failing run is that in the failing run, systemd and glibc are upgraded before the "rebooting testbed after setup commands that affected boot" and in the passing run they are upgraded after that step. That doesn't make a lot of sense but maybe the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1940635] Re: systemd-networkd failing to acquire a DHCP6 lease from dnsmasq on armhf

2021-08-29 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940635 Title: systemd-networkd failing to acquire a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1940635] Re: systemd-networkd failing to acquire a DHCP6 lease from dnsmasq on armhf

2021-08-29 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
I filed a bug in systemd (although I'm not really sure it's systemd's bug) https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/20564 and uploaded a simple workaround (in systemd) that passed systemd armhf autopkgtests in my PPA. Fingers crossed! We should come back and review this fix after glibc has

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1940635] Re: systemd-networkd failing to acquire a DHCP6 lease from dnsmasq on armhf

2021-08-28 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
So what is going on is this: In icmp6_receive systemd passes a buffer for control messages to recvmsg that is only big enough for the messages it expects to receive. glibc now attempts to append an extra control message to the buffer (translating SO_TIMESTAMP / COMPAT_SO_TIMESTAMP_OLD to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1940635] Re: systemd-networkd failing to acquire a DHCP6 lease from dnsmasq on armhf

2021-08-28 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
We must be hitting this line, right? https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=blob;f=sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/convert_scm_timestamps.c;h=00c934c4135f0d4256068adcf23a3de024fadd43;hb=HEAD#l87 IOW, ddstreet was right in comment #10. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1940635] Re: systemd-networkd failing to acquire a DHCP6 lease from dnsmasq on armhf

2021-08-23 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Is this only seen with glibc 2.34? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940635 Title: systemd-networkd failing to acquire a DHCP6 lease from dnsmasq on armhf

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1940818] [NEW] FFe diffutils 3.8

2021-08-23 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Public bug reported: diffutils ftbfs with glibc 2.34 because of gnulib issues around SIGSTKSZ no longer being constant. diffutils 3.8 was released with an updated gnulib and builds fine with glibc 2.34 (https://launchpad.net/~mwhudson/+archive/ubuntu/devirt/+packages?field.name_filter=diffutils)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1932010] Re: [21.10 FEAT] zlib CRC32 optimization for s390x

2021-08-11 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
I made the changes iii suggested and uploaded. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1932010 Title: [21.10 FEAT] zlib CRC32 optimization for s390x Status in Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1932010] Re: [21.10 FEAT] zlib CRC32 optimization for s390x

2021-08-10 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
At a very quick glance, Simon's patch looks a bit closer to the pull request than the one in comment #4, so if you could test that soon that would be good. Simon, aside from debian/patches/lp1932010-ibm-z-add-vectorized- crc32-implementation.patch which I'm not sure I'm competent to review beyond

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1934995] Re: Broken on ppc64el (toolchain bug?)

2021-07-26 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Simon, no fix has been uploaded yet? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to umockdev in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1934995 Title: Broken on ppc64el (toolchain bug?) Status in glibc package in Ubuntu:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1934995] Re: Broken on ppc64el (toolchain bug?)

2021-07-26 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Martin, right I thought I'd said that in my comment too about the prototype in the header but apparently I only thought it really loudly, or something :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to umockdev in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1934995] Re: Broken on ppc64el (toolchain bug?)

2021-07-25 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
So I don't have the faintest idea what caused this to start failing but the issue here is in mir: int (*real_open)(char const *path, int flags, mode_t mode); *(void **)(_open) = dlsym(RTLD_NEXT, "open"); return (*real_open)(path, flags, mode); The declaration for real_open here does

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1929110] Re: Please merge sudo 1.9.5p2-3 (main) from Debian unstable (main) Edit

2021-05-24 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
This looks mostly ok but the merge doesn't seem to account for the apport hooks being in debian now -- the changelog still lists it as a difference, the package-hooks dir is in the .dirs files twice, and I think they might be installed twice. -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1923485] Re: unable to reconize Asgard NVME with short serial

2021-04-14 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
That said, we could fix this issue in curtin by searching for a device with specified serial by just looking through the udev db directly rather than by globbing in /dev/disk/by-id. In fact I thought we already did that! But apparently not. -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1923485] Re: unable to reconize Asgard NVME with short serial

2021-04-14 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
The upstream bug request has a PR that seems to fix the issue already. I guess if it gets accepted upstream we can think about backporting the fix to stable releases in the fullness of time. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1915307] Re: Please merge sudo 1.9.5p2-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2021-02-14 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Thanks, this looks good to me but out of an abundance of caution (this is sudo, after all), I'm going to get Marc from the security team to take a look -- it seems the upstream fixes for the CVE are a bit different from the ones currently in Ubuntu and I'd like him to verify that we think upstream

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1915307] Re: Please merge sudo 1.9.5p2-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2021-02-11 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Hi, this looks mostly very good! I have some tiny nitpicks: 1) It's good to mention the patches that are being dropped in the changelog entry. 2) There are some whitespace changes in the bottom of the changelog that you could drop if you felt like it. -- You received this bug notification

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1891486] Re: vim ftbfs in focal (armhf, ppc64el)

2021-01-10 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
These seem to have both passed on retry... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to vim in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891486 Title: vim ftbfs in focal (armhf, ppc64el) Status in vim package in Ubuntu:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1659719] Re: ssh can't call a binary from a snap without the full path

2020-10-01 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
And verified on xenial: (client-server-5)mwhudson@anduril:~/src/subiquity$ ssh ubuntu@10.187.142.193 "sh -c 'dpkg-query -W libpam-modules; type go '" libpam-modules:amd641.1.8-3.2ubuntu2.1 go: not found (client-server-5)mwhudson@anduril:~/src/subiquity$ lxc exec lp1659719-xenial -- apt

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1666203] Re: pam_tty_audit failed in pam_open_session

2020-10-01 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Verified the new upload on xenial: root@xenial-pam-play:~# dpkg -l libpam-modules Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend |/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1666203] Re: pam_tty_audit failed in pam_open_session

2020-09-30 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: Won't Fix => In Progress ** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu Xenial) Assignee: Don van der Haghen (donvdh) => Michael Hudson-Doyle (mwhudson) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1893170] Re: [Ubuntu 20.10] zlib: DFLTCC compression level switching issues

2020-09-07 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Great thanks for testing. I've uploaded to groovy -- th ext step is to SRU to focal I guess -- can you provide an impact statement / test case / regression potential as described at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#SRU_Bug_Template ? -- You received this bug notification because you

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1893170] Re: [Ubuntu 20.10] zlib: DFLTCC compression level switching issues

2020-09-06 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Hi I've updated the patch to the latest version and uploaded the package to my PPA as version 1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu2~ppa2 which should appear here soon: https://launchpad.net/~mwhudson/+archive/ubuntu/devirt/+packages?field.name_filter=zlib. Can you test this on your hardware and let me know how it

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1893170] Re: [Ubuntu 20.10] zlib: DFLTCC compression level switching issues

2020-08-27 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
** Changed in: zlib (Ubuntu Groovy) Assignee: Skipper Bug Screeners (skipper-screen-team) => Michael Hudson-Doyle (mwhudson) ** Changed in: zlib (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Michael Hudson-Doyle (mwhudson) -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1889059] Re: [Ubuntu 20.04] zlib on s390x may produce incomplete raw (but not gzip/zlib) streams

2020-08-20 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Great thanks for confirming. Are you able to test the packages mentioned above? We don't have z15 hardware to test on (also bug 1884514 while you're here :-p) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1659719] Re: ssh can't call a binary from a snap without the full path

2020-08-20 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
And bionic: mwhudson@anduril:~$ ssh ubuntu@10.187.142.63 "sh -c 'dpkg-query -W libpam-modules; type go '" libpam-modules:amd641.1.8-3.6ubuntu2.18.04.1 go: not found mwhudson@anduril:~$ lxc exec test-pam-bionic -- apt install -y libpam-modules/bionic-proposed Reading package lists... Done

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1659719] Re: ssh can't call a binary from a snap without the full path

2020-08-20 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
The focal autopkgtest failures are in cyrus-imapd: Mail::JMAPTalk version 0.15 required--this is only version 0.13 at ./Cassandane/Cyrus/JMAPCore.pm line 47. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at ./Cassandane/Cyrus/JMAPCore.pm line 47. This seems very unlikely to be due to pam, and it happens

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1659719] Re: ssh can't call a binary from a snap without the full path

2020-08-20 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Verified on focal: mwhudson@anduril:~$ ssh ubuntu@10.187.142.128 "sh -c 'dpkg-query -W libpam-modules; type go '" libpam-modules:amd641.3.1-5ubuntu4 go: not found mwhudson@anduril:~$ lxc exec test-pam-focal -- apt install -y libpam-modules/focal-proposed Reading package lists... Done

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1889059] Re: [Ubuntu 20.04] zlib on s390x may produce incomplete raw (but not gzip/zlib) streams

2020-08-19 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Hi, is it correct to say that fixing this bug and bug 1882494 just requires updating the patch we have to the current state of the https://github.com/madler/zlib/pull/410 pull request? If so, the package that is currently building at

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1659719] Re: ssh can't call a binary from a snap without the full path

2020-07-21 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
** Description changed: - ssh can't call a binary from a snap, it will only work using the full - path. + [impact] + ssh can't call a binary from a snap, it will only work using the full path. + + [test case] + Create a container. Install the go snap (and make sure golang-go is not installed).

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1659719] Re: ssh can't call a binary from a snap without the full path

2020-07-09 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
** No longer affects: snapd (Ubuntu) ** No longer affects: snapd (Ubuntu Groovy) ** Also affects: pam (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: openssh (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu Xenial)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1874381] Re: LVM device unavailable after 18.04 to 20.04 upgrade Timed out waiting for device /dev/mapper/s5lp8--v g-home

2020-07-09 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
So one solution to this would be to run "vgck --updatemetadata" on each vg in postinst... would there be downside to that? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lvm2 in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1659719] Re: ssh can't call a binary from a snap without the full path

2020-07-08 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
I've filed https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=964580 about the pam ordering issue. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #964580 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=964580 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1659719] Re: ssh can't call a binary from a snap without the full path

2020-07-08 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Here's a better patch that I've tested this time. I dropped the code around adding /usr/local/games to PATH as that was in trusty. ** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu Groovy) Status: Confirmed => In Progress ** Patch added: "pam_1.3.1-5ubuntu4_1.3.1-5ubuntu5.patch"

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1659719] Re: ssh can't call a binary from a snap without the full path

2020-07-02 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
It's easy enough to unconditionally add /snap/bin to path, see attached, but I can't really see a clean way to only have it present in the $PATH when snapd is installed (without code changes to pam_env, anyway). ** Patch added: "pam_1.3.1-5ubuntu4_1.3.1-5ubuntu5.patch"

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1764172] Re: Unable to change hostname from the one specified during Bionic server installation

2020-05-07 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
This got fixed quite a while ago I think, apologies for the lack of updates. ** Changed in: subiquity Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to hostname in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1862846] Re: Crash and failure installing focal

2020-05-07 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
** Changed in: subiquity Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862846 Title: Crash and failure installing focal Status in

  1   2   >