[Touch-packages] [Bug 1512111] Re: "Ubuntu Light" font has heavier weight than "Ubuntu"

2018-01-22 Thread Paul Sladen
The valid CSS would be: font-weight: lighter; In the case of explicitly wanting "Ubuntu Light", once everything is fixed, the CSS access will hopefully be just: font-family: "Ubuntu"; font-weight: 300; -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1512111] Re: "Ubuntu Light" font has heavier weight than "Ubuntu"

2018-01-22 Thread Paul Sladen
Hello Daniel, plan is to switch the fonts for source-built versions. These source-built fonts should in the first instance be work-alikes (equivalents) to the binary fonts currently shipped via Google Fonts. The versions hosted on Google Fonts have undergone various refinements of the metadata

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1599775] Re: "low-graphics mode" in VirtualBox guest, but X server running

2016-07-13 Thread Paul Sladen
This changeset was applied upstream: https://www.virtualbox.org/changeset/62201/vbox/trunk/src/VBox/Additions/common/crOpenGL/egl.c -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1599775] Re: "low-graphics mode" in VirtualBox guest, but X server running

2016-07-12 Thread Paul Sladen
Further discussion at: https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2016/07/12/%23ubuntu-devel.html#t15:20 with a pointer to: https://www.virtualbox.org/browser/vbox/trunk/src/VBox/Additions/common/crOpenGL/egl.c#L136 And side-discussion of possible better ways of how to detect client GL vs. server GL, which

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1599775] Re: "low-graphics mode" in VirtualBox guest, but X server running

2016-07-08 Thread Paul Sladen
@ellisistfroh: I cannot see anything in the lightdm (1.18.2-0ubuntu1) changelog to suggest that it might have addressed this issue. @michael-thayer: thank you for spending the extra time to confirm that lightdm (1.18.2-0ubuntu1) is still affected. -- You received this bug notification because

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1599775] Re: "low-graphics mode" in VirtualBox guest, but X server running

2016-07-07 Thread Paul Sladen
** Description changed: I sometimes get the "low-graphics mode" message when starting an Ubuntu 16.04 virtual machine inside of VirtualBox (current development code trunk, somewhere past version 5.1 beta 3 and a debug build). When I switch to VT-7 I find the X server running without any

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1573275] Re: ifupdown should not hard-depend upon 'mountkernfs' and 'urandom'

2016-04-22 Thread Paul Sladen
Alternative solution implemented via Open Build Service 'Ubuntu:16.04' configuration update. ** Changed in: ifupdown (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ifupdown in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1573275] Re: ifupdown should not hard-depend upon 'mountkernfs' and 'urandom'

2016-04-22 Thread Paul Sladen
So, guessing, was this the diff that was applied: --- Ubuntu-16.04.txt.orig 2016-04-22 14:24:12.163974719 +0200 +++ Ubuntu-16.04.txt2016-04-22 14:23:51.095974821 +0200 @@ -88,2 +88,3 @@ +Ignore: upstart:ifupdown Ignore:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1573275] Re: ifupdown should not hard-depend upon 'mountkernfs' and 'urandom'

2016-04-22 Thread Paul Sladen
Neal: do you have eg. an OBS commit log/changeset we can link this to? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ifupdown in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1573275 Title: ifupdown should not hard-depend upon

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1572588] Re: Toolkit should use new orange #e95420

2016-04-22 Thread Paul Sladen
** Summary changed: - does not use the new orange + Toolkit should use new orange #e95420 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-html5-theme in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572588 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1512111] Re: "Ubuntu Light" font has heavier weight than "Ubuntu"

2016-01-06 Thread Paul Sladen
(For want of a better place to put it), useful ttx diffs + changelog forwarded to me at the end of yesterday which gives more context on what the above referenced .zip file delivery is. [Kudos to DM Engineering to doing this in an automated fashion, and those along the chain for passing it

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1512111] Re: "Ubuntu Light" font has heavier weight than "Ubuntu"

2016-01-04 Thread Paul Sladen
The test case suggests a change to 'Ubuntu Mono', but the 'Ubuntu_0.831.zip' I have here doesn't have any Ubuntu Mono (nor source, nor changelog, nor scripting, nor test cases, nor any contextual information). I can see: 2016-01-04 11:31 Zip file (repacked today?) 2015-12-04 10:55 .ttfs

[Touch-packages] [Bug 861334] Re: [nc] Ship Ubuntu Mono .psf as default console font in Ubuntu 11.10

2015-12-17 Thread Paul Sladen
If other people want to test: sudo apt-get install fonts-ubuntu-font-family-console dpkg -L fonts-ubuntu-font-family-console | grep -m1 .psf | xargs sudo setfont -C /dev/tty2 and then it's possible to flick between: Ctrl-Alt-F1 (tty1 showing Ubuntu Mono Regular rendered to 8x16)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1525150] Re: Ubuntu font missing part of 8 and 3 in hexchat

2015-12-11 Thread Paul Sladen
Possibly from the numeral glyphs being fetched from Ubuntu Arabic Regular, and the Latin coming from Ubuntu Regular, and the metrics somehow being confused. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 683294] Re: do not hardcode x86 hw breakpoint instruction

2015-09-09 Thread Paul Sladen
Woo! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to nux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683294 Title: do not hardcode x86 hw breakpoint instruction Status in Nux: Fix Released Status in nux package in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1379960] Re: Menu interaction in fully maximised window causes the next click on the title bar to restore the window (after 2^31ms of uptime)

2015-05-22 Thread Paul Sladen
Simon: excellent work. I have a particular fondness for reading the write-ups on this time of bug. It reminds me a little of the infamous Doesn't print on Tuesdays (bug #248619). Once again, kudos to gradually narrowing down how to replicate it, then finding it and finally offering the patch.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 863358] Re: [pkg] Can't easily use Ubuntu without using Ubuntu Mono

2015-05-06 Thread Paul Sladen
As Ubuntu (proportional) and Ubuntu Mono have different family names it would probably make sense to split the binary packages produced into two .debs built at the same time—this would allow installing one or the other. Doing this as a one-off would be painful, but it would be relatively quick

[Touch-packages] [Bug 851084] Re: [pkg] does not show up in list returned by xfontsel, don't know 14-part font name

2015-05-06 Thread Paul Sladen
This likely needs a day or two of debugging depending. For fixing: once it's possible to rebuild the font, this is then likely to be relatively easy to patch; either in the source, or binary. And then an hour or so to confirm the fix works. -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1430104] Re: Uses obsolete package naming

2015-03-10 Thread Paul Sladen
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 851457 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/851457 (Hasn't been updated, because there hasn't been a upstream realise to fix it in). ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 851457 [pkg] package should be renamed according to new Debian Fonts Policy

[Touch-packages] [Bug 934038] Re: [nc] FFe: Upload $newer upstream version

2015-03-04 Thread Paul Sladen
All in good time hopefully! :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-font-family-sources in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/934038 Title: [nc] FFe: Upload $newer upstream version Status in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1403293] Re: Unity Dash can't understand logout, reboot, or shutdown

2014-12-19 Thread Paul Sladen
Install attached to: ~/.local/share/applications/logout.desktop and a Logout icon will appear in Unity when typing logout. ** Attachment added: logout.desktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1403293/+attachment/4284166/+files/logout.desktop -- You received this bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1403293] Re: Unity Dash can't understand logout, reboot, or shutdown

2014-12-19 Thread Paul Sladen
Install attached to: ~/.local/share/applications/shutdown.desktop and a Shutdown icon will appear in Unity when typing shutdown. ** Attachment added: shutdown.desktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1403293/+attachment/4284167/+files/shutdown.desktop -- You received

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1403293] Re: Unity Dash can't understand logout, reboot, or shutdown

2014-12-19 Thread Paul Sladen
Lonnie: being familiar with the Design team (having worked in it…), my suspicion is that this class of feature improvement often gets bogged down for (very) long periods of time. Therefore a method that can be deployed (or at least prototyped) immediately using existing external mechanisms is far

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1403293] Re: Unity Dash can't understand logout, reboot, or shutdown

2014-12-19 Thread Paul Sladen
** Attachment removed: xserver.devices.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1403293/+attachment/4282487/+files/xserver.devices.txt ** Attachment removed: xdpyinfo.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1403293/+attachment/4282486/+files/xdpyinfo.txt

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1403293] Re: Unity Dash can't understand logout, reboot, or shutdown

2014-12-17 Thread Paul Sladen
It should be possible to solve this by providing a '.desktop' file containing entries for 'shutdown', 'logout', and 'reboot/restart'; and then it's not a Unity dash issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity

[Touch-packages] [Bug 864323] Re: Category fonts in application lens is empty thus obsolete

2014-12-10 Thread Paul Sladen
Is the category empty for a reason, or is the filtering just broken? (If so that could be fixed instead of removal). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/864323

[Touch-packages] [Bug 974480] Re: Notification area whitelist is obsolete

2014-09-01 Thread Paul Sladen
Anton: I'm interested in understanding the situation a little better: 1. Internal applications originally targeting eg. GNOME 2, and you're now needing to run these under Unity. 2. Bought-in (external non-IBM) applications originally targeting eg. GNOME 2, and you're now needing to run