[Touch-packages] [Bug 2061995] Re: ULTS 22, 24: FontConfig broken by including ".conf" file

2024-05-01 Thread Peter Grandi
After several hundred package updates over time this problem is no longer occurring, I suspect that it was something buggy in the XML library used by FotnConfig. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to fontconfig in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2061995] Re: ULTS 22, 24: FontConfig broken by including ".conf" file

2024-04-20 Thread Peter Grandi
** Summary changed: - ULLTS 22,24: FontConfig broken by including ".conf" file + ULTS 22,24: FontConfig broken by including ".conf" file -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to fontconfig in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2061995] Re: ULLTS 22, 24: FontConfig broken by including ".conf" file

2024-04-17 Thread Peter Grandi
** Also affects: fontconfig (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to fontconfig in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061995 Title: ULLTS 22,24: FontConfig

[Touch-packages] [Bug 988144] Re: Getting error message: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(605) [sender=3.0.9]

2017-05-27 Thread Peter Grandi
> the remote 'rsync' process takes too long to send back the > list of block checksums to the local 'rsync' in some situations As to that a quick web search indicates previous reports: https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/68775/rsync-timed-out 3 «It looks like the server times out on the SSH

[Touch-packages] [Bug 988144] Re: Getting error message: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(605) [sender=3.0.9]

2017-05-27 Thread Peter Grandi
This happens for me too with files of a few GB sometimes on ULTS 14 with RSYNC 3.1.0. > It also works, when I try rsync with -W option at client side. Same, and for me it works also when specifying '--block-size 4096'. What this makes me suspect is that the remote 'rsync' process takes too long

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267059] Re: "Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies" does not work

2015-12-22 Thread Peter Grandi
Note that this long story started from kernel upgrades, and so far nobody has made an important point... When you install a new kernel package, you may want to remove all previous versions indeed, *except* the one that is currently running. Because if you remove the package for the currently