Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
Since there isn't enough information in your report to differentiate
between a local configuration problem and a bug in Ubuntu, I'm marking
this bug as Incomplete.
If indeed this is a local configuration problem,
Public bug reported:
dnsmasq 2.80-1 is blocked from migrating to the release pocket because
of, amongst other things, a network-manager dep8 regression.
** Affects: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Importance: High
Status: Triaged
** Tags: rls-dd-incoming
--
You received this bug notifi
I've done some investigation and my best educated guess right now is
that there race somewhere, most like in the n-m dep8 tests but possibly
in n-m, which is being triggered by an unrelated timing change in the
newer dnsmasq and is causing some unwanted result that results in the
dep8 test teardown
The other obvious regression potential (to me anyway) is that previously
existing keys become missing. Could someone check for that please?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-keyring in Ubuntu.
https://bugs
To clarify a couple of things:
> Was this behaviour intended?!
No - modifications in /etc are not supposed to be overwritten by
packaging without user intervention.
Unfortunately though unless someone figures out steps to reproduce the
problem, I don't think any progress will be able to be made
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu bett
er.
Since it seems likely to me that this is a local configuration problem, rather t
han a bug in Ubuntu, I'm marking this bug as Incomplete.
If indeed this is a local configuration problem, you can find pointers to
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
Since it seems likely to me that this is a local configuration problem,
rather than a bug in Ubuntu, I'm marking this bug as Incomplete.
Specifically it looks like you have modified your ssh configuration but
did n
Am I right in understanding that there is no proposed action for Ubuntu
to take on this right now?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1790963
Title:
Unable to
** Description changed:
While not necessarily a critical issue for the Ubuntu keyrings, as
Debian uses newer keys periodically, it becomes impossible with the
default keyrings to verify the latest Debian archive files.
It seems reasonable to ensure the keyring contents in all releases a
Yes, but the fix will need to be backported and tested in Bionic
separately, if you want Bionic fixed. The final backported patch needs
to be a "debdiff" or contain the equivalent information, including the
changelog entry, etc. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Procedure for details
Let's leave this open since the bug appears valid and somebody else
might be able to volunteer the fix.
** Changed in: sudo (Ubuntu)
Status: Won't Fix => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to sudo in
The verification of the Stable Release Update for systemd has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for systemd has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for systemd has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for systemd has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
Thanks. I think that's sufficient justification.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1762385
Title:
dell_wmi: Unknown key codes
Status in OEM Priority Project:
Thanks. Out of band Dimitri explained to me that "unknown" isn't really
a mapping, which I think is key.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1738153
Title:
need
Please confirm the exact package version tested.
What about my question in comment 10? The Regression Potential currently
says "it just add one more mapping" but this doesn't appear to be true
because a mapping was also removed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of U
Thank you for checking that this doesn't introduce a regression on
unaffected hardware.
Note that we don't currently have a verification for the actual reason
this is being SRU'd, which is "rfkill keyboard shortcuts not working as
intended on some Dell machines".
--
You received this bug notific
An upload of libxkbcommon to bionic-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "Please use the security
pocket/process or else explain why this is using the SRU process over
the security process in the SRU information provided in the bug.".
--
You received this bug
An upload of libxkbcommon to bionic-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "Please use the security
pocket/process or else explain why this is using the SRU process over
the security process in the SRU information provided in the bug.".
--
You received this bug
The verification of the Stable Release Update for openssh has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
Hello Damiön, or anyone else affected,
Accepted systemd into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/229-4ubuntu21.5 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://
Hello Dmitriy, or anyone else affected,
Accepted systemd into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/229-4ubuntu21.5 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https:/
Hello Alex, or anyone else affected,
Accepted systemd into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/229-4ubuntu21.5 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wi
Hello errors.ubuntu.com, or anyone else affected,
Accepted systemd into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/229-4ubuntu21.5 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. S
Hello Nick, or anyone else affected,
Accepted systemd into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/229-4ubuntu21.5 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wi
Hello Mauricio, or anyone else affected,
Accepted systemd into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/229-4ubuntu21.5 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https:
Note: the Cosmic fix for this is in the unapproved queue, and could in
theory be rejected by the release team. The Xenial SRU should land in
updates only once Cosmic is resolved.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
> low regression potential, because it just add one more mapping.
The patch uploaded also removes the old mapping. Is there any
possibility that this will regress some users? How would one test for
this?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packa
Hello errors.ubuntu.com, or anyone else affected,
Accepted packagekit into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit/1.1.9-1ubuntu2.18.04.2
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this ne
Hello Julian, or anyone else affected,
Accepted packagekit into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit/1.1.9-1ubuntu2.18.04.2
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Hello Julian, or anyone else affected,
Accepted packagekit into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit/0.8.17-4ubuntu6~gcc5.4ubuntu1.4
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new
** Description changed:
+ [SRU Notes]
+
+ [rbasak] Requires apt 1.2.28 (Xenial) and 1.6.5 (Bionic), both of which
+ are currently in proposed. Do not release to updates without releasing
+ the newer apt first.
+
[Impact]
PackageKit needs an adjustment for frontend locking, so it does not rel
The updated description explains why frontend locking is necessary, but
how does this particular bug impact users? What's wrong for users as a
consequence of this bug? Eg. what user story is broken? I need to
understand this in order to judge whether an SRU is warranted, which I'm
supposed to consi
This is in the SRU queue but it looks like the security pocket might be
a better target? I asked Timo to liase with the security team to get a
decision on that.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libxkbcommon in U
I think we have a couple of open questions on this bug in Ubuntu then:
1) Is it fixed upstream?
2) Sam's question: what's the actual impact to Ubuntu users?
Since we can't make progress without these questions answered, and
depending on the answers we might not consider this to be a bug in
Ubunt
Hello bugproxy, or anyone else affected,
Accepted binutils into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/2.26.1-1ubuntu1~16.04.7 in
a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Can I suggest that profile.d/01-locale-check.sh is a misnomer and it
should be called something like profile.d/01-locale-fix.sh instead,
because it (potentially) actively changes things? OTOH /usr/bin/locale-
check is fine because it doesn't change anything in itself.
--
You received this bug not
Thank you for working on this. I agree with your approach. The debdiff
looks good.
I think that though it's clear that the bug is in the host command,
given that we haven't been able to figure out the fix (I spent some time
on it too), it's reasonable to add the timeout command as in your patch
as
** Tags added: server-next
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to avahi in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1752411
Title:
bind9-host, avahi-daemon-check-dns.sh hang forever causes network
connections to g
Hello Frederik, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-settings into bionic-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-
settings/18.04.6 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. S
I was forced to reboot due to a wifi hang so I no longer have the
process available. However I can try again to reproduce if you like -
gnome-initial-setup came up on next login. I'll wait though in case you
want me to instrument anything first.
--
You received this bug notification because you a
Looks like it's hung here:
https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-online-
accounts/tree/src/goabackend/goaubuntussoprovider.c?h=applied/ubuntu
/bionic-proposed#n882
Is there some kind of error path which is causing the async operation to
never complete?
Adding a gnome-online-accounts tas
Hi Michael,
What else uses this function, and does it do it in a security sensitive
way whose behaviour is now changed possibly for the worse? I understand
that the change is from upstream so they consider it OK, but that
doesn't placate my concern completely.
Second, I found https://git.kernel.o
Could someone please also check that lscpu still works without error on
amd64? Seems to me that we're fixing an edge case, which is fine, but we
should also verify the common case functionality. I'd hate to release
something that breaks the world on amd64 just because nobody checked it.
--
You re
(please also state the package version strings tested)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1732865
Title:
[LTCTest][OPAL][FW860.20] lscpu failed to list cpu
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~alfonsosanchezbeato/network-manager/+git/network-manager/+merge/349468
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~alfonsosanchezbeato/network-manager/+git/network-manager/+merge/349465
--
You received this bug notification
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
Reproduced on Xenial. I had to install "make" and "lzip".
** Changed in: mawk (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: mawk (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You received this bug noti
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Ngo Quang Thong (quangthong1981) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201786
Title:
ssh Agent admi
Please stop changing the subject line. How old it is doesn't have a
bearing on anything. Some software moves slowly.
** Summary changed:
- Please update mawk to latest upstream release - mawk in Ubuntu is 18 years
old!
+ Please update mawk to latest upstream release
--
You received this bug no
Hello Lazar, or anyone else affected,
Accepted pkgbinarymangler into bionic-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pkgbinarymangler/138.18.04.0 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Hello Nick, or anyone else affected,
Accepted slang2 into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/slang2/2.3.0-2ubuntu1.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wik
The verification of the Stable Release Update for python-apt has
completed successfully and the package has now been released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounte
Note that the workaround here is to edit the file in /etc/init.d/
manually and remove the circular dependency. If somebody familiar could
detail the exact edit here for the benefit of others, that would be
appreciated.
Local changes to /etc will be preserved on package upgrades.
Since there is a
> Robie: If the service offers a mechanism to set a specific NIC to
listen on, then the service should make good on that offer when it's
requested. Doesn't that make sense to you?
Correct. If you configure the service to listen on a specific NIC, you
should also configure the service to wait for t
Hello errors.ubuntu.com, or anyone else affected,
Accepted python-apt into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-
apt/1.1.0~beta1ubuntu0.16.04.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing th
Hello errors.ubuntu.com, or anyone else affected,
Accepted python-apt into trusty-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-
apt/0.9.3.5ubuntu3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new packa
Hello Ian, or anyone else affected,
Accepted bluez into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bluez/5.48-0ubuntu3.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.ub
> po-33374: Tweak the definition of PyGC_Head, so compilers do not believe
it is always 16-byte aligned on x86. This prevents crashes with more
aggressive optimizations present in GCC 8.
Will this cause any ABI issues? It isn't clear to me, so I'd like
confirmation of your opinion please Matth
On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 01:21:35AM -, John Gallagher wrote:
> > I'm not particularly familiar with this part of initramfs-tools, but
> it seems to me that essentials like the loading of the virtio_pci module
> would be short-circuited by your patch.
>
> Yes, you're right, thanks for pointing t
I was just pointed to
https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/wiki/Ubuntu-18.04-Root-on-ZFS and told
that ZFS filesystems aren't expected to be in /etc/fstab according to
those instructions. Is this correct? I haven't checked but it seems that
initramfs-tools wouldn't then fail under these conditions. Co
Thank you for taking the time to file this patch and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
Does this apply and work correctly on the current Ubuntu development
release (Cosmic) please? We land changes there first and only once
successful consider backporting to existing releases as appropriate.
> With t
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
Reassigning to the kernel since rsync should never be able to crash the
system and if it crashes it's usually the kernel or bad hardware that's
responsible.
** Package changed: rsync (Ubuntu) => linux (Ubuntu)
--
It looks like this bug has gathered quite a bit of attention since it
was first filed, so let me set some expectations here.
The trouble with patching Ubuntu is that then we're on the hook for
maintaining those patches indefinitely. This can cause a great deal of
pain if future upstream refactorin
If you can point to where upstream have fixed it please, then we would
have something to work on. Unfortunately I'm not sure we can make any
progress without that.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openldap in Ub
This bug was fixed in the package subunit - 1.3.0-1
Sponsored for Jelmer Vernooij (jelmer)
---
subunit (1.3.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* New upstream release.
* Unicodify my surname in debian/control.
* Bump standards version to 4.1.4 (no changes).
* debian/control: Update
> Both services fail when an attempt is made to specify a particular NIC
via their respective config files.
If this is the case, then I don't think this can be treated as a bug in
Ubuntu. Currently, if you change one end of the configuration that
requires one thing, you need to change the other en
Hello LocutusOfBorg, or anyone else affected,
Accepted rfkill into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rfkill/0.5-1ubuntu3.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
http
Some discussion here: https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2018/06/18/%23ubuntu-
release.html#t16:00
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rfkill in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1777476
Title:
non-installable in
Do we really need to add a dependency here? Why not silently do nothing
if udevadm isn't available? That'd fix your chroot case, right?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rfkill in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.n
I filed bug 1777445 for the non-interactive ssh case.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1771858
Title:
/snap/bin not in default PATH for units, snapd should s
A related issue is that "ssh " currently
fails because /snap/bin isn't in PATH. In that case, sshd sets PATH via
pam_env. I'm not sure if a systemd environment generator will help with
this use case or not.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded pac
Hello Martin, or anyone else affected,
Accepted nux into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nux/4.0.8+16.04.20180613.1-0ubuntu1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Martin, or anyone else affected,
Accepted nux into artful-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nux/4.0.8+17.10.20180613.3-0ubuntu1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
It seems to me that the most likely area of SRU regression would be an
accidental functional change in 50_check_unity_support in the case of a
user using a previous release. For SRU verification, in addition to the
test case, please could you also check that the previous release
correctly sets LIBG
Hello Martin, or anyone else affected,
Accepted nux into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nux/4.0.8+18.04.20180613.5-0ubuntu1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Resetting the tags since Łukasz has requested re-verification (see
previous comment).
** Tags removed: verification-done-xenial
** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-xenial
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is s
I didn't see this as a bug in debhelper because, based on the Debian
bug, it seems to me that the use case of one package's tmpfiles.d/ file
overriding another was not considered, even if systemd can handle it
underneath. From that perspective, debhelper supporting lexical sort
based overriding is
Hello Mark-pcnetspec, or anyone else affected,
Accepted vte2.91 into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vte2.91/0.52.2-1ubuntu1~18.04.1 in
a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new packag
> I see the second PackageKit pull request has not yet been approved by
upstream - could we get someone reviewing it and merging before we
proceed?
I think the SRU remains blocked on this question?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, wh
Hello Nikkus, or anyone else affected,
Accepted menu into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/menu/2.1.47ubuntu2.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.u
Hello Nikkus, or anyone else affected,
Accepted menu into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/menu/2.1.47ubuntu1.16.04.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://
Hello Nikkus, or anyone else affected,
Accepted menu into artful-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/menu/2.1.47ubuntu1.17.10.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://
The verification of the Stable Release Update for openldap has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
Hello Julian, or anyone else affected,
Accepted util-linux into artful-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-
linux/2.30.1-0ubuntu4.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello Julian, or anyone else affected,
Accepted util-linux into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-
linux/2.31.1-0.4ubuntu3.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. S
Hello Julian, or anyone else affected,
Accepted util-linux into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-
linux/2.27.1-6ubuntu3.6 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
Hello bugproxy, or anyone else affected,
Accepted util-linux into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-
linux/2.27.1-6ubuntu3.6 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. S
** Tags removed: server-next server-next-drop
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1188475
Title:
ldap group doesn't work
Status in Cyrus-sasl2:
Fix Relea
Regression Potential?
For example, what if the if statement now unintentionally never succeeds
even if get_timestamp would work?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
There are some dep8 regressions reported in http://people.canonical.com
/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html. I've requested some retries. If
they're still failing, please could you take a look?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is
(or if it doesn't apply, please explain that here)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1766566
Title:
lib64z1: call dh_makeshlibs for the lib64z1 package
Status i
Thank you for the upload. Please fill out the Regression Potential
information. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Procedure
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.
** Tags added: server-next-drop
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1188475
Title:
ldap group doesn't work
Status in Cyrus-sasl2:
Fix Released
Status in
The fix was landed in the apparmor package and no change was needed to
the ntp or tor packages in the end. If I'm wrong, please reopen those
tasks.
** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => Invalid
** Changed i
Based on https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2018/04/13/%23ubuntu-
devel.html#t11:56, this sounds valid for either init-system-helpers or
debhelper.
13:47 rbasak, the description sounds valid. i believe i have hit
something similar before, thus yeah a fix to debhelper for this class of
issues would be mos
On second thought, perhaps invoke-rc.d should treat a systemd disabled
service the same way as one done through the policy-rc.d mechanism.
Whichever way, the correct behaviour should be decided package-wide by
the invoke-rc.d wrapper, so I'm reassigning to init-system-helpers.
** Changed in: freer
Thank you for filing this bug. I agree that it's worth asking the
desktop team to consider the default set of VPN plugins available by
default from time to time.
> In fact, most major desktop OSes have removed PPTP altogether because
it's insecure...
I'm commenting because I'd like to point out t
14:04 juliank: based on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+
bug/1750465/comments/10, are you suggesting I should hold on processing slangase
k's SRU upload?
14:04 Launchpad bug 1750465 in plymouth (Ubuntu Artful) "upgrade attemp
ting to process triggers out of order (package plymouth
501 - 600 of 1240 matches
Mail list logo
