[Touch-packages] [Bug 2059417] Re: Sync xz-utils 5.6.1-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2024-03-30 Thread Thorsten Glaser
It’s 5.4.5, so “no, but it does not contain the known backdoor”. Both Debian and Ubuntu are currently analysing what needs to be done. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xz-utils in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2032577] Re: xz crashed with SIGSEGV in lzma_lzma_optimum_normal

2024-02-05 Thread Thorsten Glaser
That sounds even more like a RAM issue (that it stopped occurring with the same kernel and software version). Perhaps when you switched away from Wayland, your graphics card is now used less heavily, and when the GPU was used more, the RAM got hotter or got minimally less power and therefore had

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1307883] Re: ca-certificates-java misses runtime dependency on initscripts

2024-01-21 Thread Thorsten Glaser
openjdk-8 fixed this by introducing explicit dependencies on the package carrying mountpoint: ifneq (,$(filter $(distrel),wheezy jessie precise trusty)) control_vars += '-Vmountpoint:Depends=initscripts' else control_vars += '-Vmountpoint:Depends=util-linux (>= 2.26.2-4)' endif ** Changed

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2028571] Re: klibc-utils contains identical binaries

2023-07-27 Thread Thorsten Glaser
jdupes normally considers hardlinks as one. And, indeed, on my Debian system, I see: -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 36656 May 27 2021 gunzip* -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 36656 May 27 2021 gzip* These aren’t hardlinks. And indeed they aren’t hardlinks in the Debian binary package either: $ paxtar -xOf

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2020814] Re: xmllint does not recognize emdash ( )

2023-05-26 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Hmm. I normally use libxml2 via xmlstarlet which has a somewhat nicer UX than xmllint. My guess is that you didn’t give a DTD, so it could only check that all present entities are syntactically valid, but not expand them. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2020814] Re: xmllint does not recognize emdash ( )

2023-05-26 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Yeah well, those portability problems were back in the 1990s when people used latin1 or whatever codepages. ** Changed in: libxml2 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2020814] Re: xmllint does not recognize emdash ( )

2023-05-25 Thread Thorsten Glaser
I doubt this is a bug: nowhere do you pass the validator a DTD, and entities are defined in the DTD. It’s best practice nowadays to not use entities but just write the UTF-8 characters directly. An em dash surrounded by hair spaces is: “ — ” (for your copy/paste convenience) -- You received

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2003826] [NEW] klibc/s390x on focal has broken setjmp/longjmp

2023-01-24 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Public bug reported: This is the same as https://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=943425 which is fixed in Debian bullseye and Ubuntu impish but still present in focal. ** Affects: klibc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1954716] Re: rpi nfsroot vers=4 not supported anymore?

2022-08-09 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Have you considered informing klibc upstream? (Granted, save for hpa that’s basically the Debian maintainers, but they don’t necessarily get Launchpad bugreports either.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to klibc

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1729558] Re: [regression] In Java apps like Netbeans, dark menu bars don't look good for disabled elements

2021-02-06 Thread Thorsten Glaser
As far as I see, openjdk-8 (8u275-b01-1) contains this patch, so it was backported upstream. ** Changed in: openjdk-8 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1850184] Re: losetup -f broken in 2.0.6-1ubuntu2

2019-10-31 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Yeah, I saw the mail; much better. I fixed one of these in dietlibc the other day… -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to klibc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1850184 Title: losetup -f broken in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1850184] Re: losetup -f broken in 2.0.6-1ubuntu2

2019-10-31 Thread Thorsten Glaser
How is this even a fix? Also, does this affect other applications built against klibc? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to klibc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1850184 Title: losetup -f broken in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1850184] Re: losetup -f broken in 2.0.6-1ubuntu2

2019-10-31 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Fun: this works with 2.0.7-1 built with gcc-9 in Debian. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to klibc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1850184 Title: losetup -f broken in 2.0.6-1ubuntu2 Status in klibc

[Touch-packages] Fwd: [Bug 1843743] Re: klibc ftbfs in eoan

2019-10-14 Thread Thorsten Glaser
-- Forwarded message -- From: Adam Conrad Message-ID: <157106879908.15546.2658970073129703906.mal...@soybean.canonical.com> 2.0.7-1 fails to build in the same way on Ubuntu 19.10. I'm assuming it's either glibc 2.30 (Debian is at 2.29) or linux 5.3 (Debian is at 5.2), with

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1843743] Re: klibc ftbfs in eoan

2019-10-07 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Probably fixed in 2.0.7 which fixed a parallel make issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to klibc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1843743 Title: klibc ftbfs in eoan Status in klibc package in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1799014] Re: bold font rendeing in Java is broken in Cosmic with OpenJDK 11

2018-11-02 Thread Thorsten Glaser
The testcase needs the “package test;” in the first line removed / commented-out, then it works. This works in 11.0.1+13-2 on Debian sid, as a new data point. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to freetype in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1701068] Re: motd.ubuntu.com currently shows media item (HBO's Silicon Valley using Ubuntu)

2017-07-05 Thread Thorsten Glaser
“The default configuration is that this "motd-news" feature is enabled and that it will check https://motd.ubuntu.com for updates.” is called “a useful feature” by the author of the LWN article, and in this bugreport. In the Debian world, we call this a phone-home privacy violation which is a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1589836] Re: package libxml2-utils 2.9.3+dfsg1-1 failed to install/upgrade: krijg geen toegang tot archief: Bestand of map bestaat niet

2016-06-07 Thread Thorsten Glaser
AUB niet de files verwijderen tijdens apt nog aan’t werken is. Probeer es: $ sudo apt-get update $ sudo apt-get -f install -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libxml2 in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1589679] Re: package libxml2 2.9.3+dfsg1-1 failed to install/upgrade: unable to securely remove '/usr/share/doc/libxml2/AUTHORS.dpkg-new': Read-only file system

2016-06-07 Thread Thorsten Glaser
I suggest to learn to read. Mount your filesystems read-write when you install packages. ** Changed in: libxml2 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libxml2 in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1493999] Re: xz-utils package is really, really old

2015-09-10 Thread Thorsten Glaser
This is being discussed in Debian already. Please don’t do this separately. Instead, work with the Debian maintainer to do this, then do a SyncRequest. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #731634 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=731634 ** Also affects: xz-utils (Debian) via

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1358762] Re: Included gzip 1.2.4 has several vulnerabilities

2014-11-25 Thread Thorsten Glaser
I have just looked at whether gzip can be replaced by BSD compress(1), which is a drop-in replacement under a more free licence, but even after adding fts and a lot of BSD functions it still needs funopen() which klibc doesn’t have ☹ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1358762] Re: Included gzip 1.2.4 has several vulnerabilities

2014-11-25 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Nevermind. I hacked MirBSD compress to omit the BSD compress method (so it only does gzip), and replaced a few more things, and got a working gzip/gunzip under BSD licence. If there is any interest in the klibc side to include that, be my guest. Sizes are nice, too (dynamically linked):

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1358762] Re: Included gzip 1.2.4 has several vulnerabilities

2014-11-25 Thread Thorsten Glaser
As I mentioned in IRC: I can probably easily shave another 2½K off .text by removing stub support for multiple compressors and using the gzopen() API already shipped by klibc. Note that klibc bundles zlib 1.2.3 whereas even MirBSD has 1.2.8 already. That would also need updating. But at least,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1370012] Re: upstart: (mis)uses shell reserved word ”stop”

2014-09-17 Thread Thorsten Glaser
@dino99 no it’s not related. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to upstart in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1370012 Title: upstart: (mis)uses shell reserved word ”stop” Status in “upstart” package in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1370012] [NEW] upstart: (mis)uses shell reserved word ”stop”

2014-09-16 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Public bug reported: upstart (1.5-0ubuntu7.2) /lib/init/upstart-job uses “stop” (in line 93) which is a reserved shell word. If using mksh (actually /bin/lksh) as /bin/sh, which defines this as default alias, upgrading udev, which wants to restart the udev service, fails. ** Affects: upstart