[Touch-packages] [Bug 1990684] Re: grub-efi-arm64-signed : Depends: grub-efi-arm64 (= 2.06-2ubuntu7) but 2.06-2ubuntu10 is to be installed

2022-09-28 Thread elatllat
Robie; thanks for the testing instructions link. verification-done-jammy; This bug is testable on AWS EC2 Graviton 1/2/3 (c6g,g5g,r6g,t4g) the cheapest of which is the t4g.nano ranging from 0.00280 0.00670 $USD/h depending on the region. So that's what I did. # echo -e

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1990684] Re: grub-efi-arm64-signed : Depends: grub-efi-arm64 (= 2.06-2ubuntu7) but 2.06-2ubuntu10 is to be installed

2022-09-23 Thread elatllat
Thanks Carlos, I now have a workaround; echo "APT::Get::Never-Include-Phased-Updates: 1;" > /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/99phased-updates -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1990684] Re: grub-efi-arm64-signed : Depends: grub-efi-arm64 (= 2.06-2ubuntu7) but 2.06-2ubuntu10 is to be installed

2022-09-23 Thread elatllat
grub-efi-arm64 is not listed here; https://people.canonical.com/%7Eubuntu-archive/phased-updates.html Maybe that page is limited to x86_64. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1990684] Re: grub-efi-arm64-signed : Depends: grub-efi-arm64 (= 2.06-2ubuntu7) but 2.06-2ubuntu10 is to be installed

2022-09-23 Thread elatllat
For the record echo -e "Update-Manager::Never-Include-Phased- Updates;\nAPT::Get::Never-Include-Phased-Updates: True;" > /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/99phased-updates did not change the buggy behaviour -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1990684] Re: grub-efi-arm64-signed : Depends: grub-efi-arm64 (= 2.06-2ubuntu7) but 2.06-2ubuntu10 is to be installed

2022-09-23 Thread elatllat
Thanks Steve, is there a workaround before then? Julian; apt policy grub-efi-arm64 grub-efi-arm64-signed grub-efi-arm64: Installed: 2.06-2ubuntu7 Candidate: 2.06-2ubuntu10 Version table: 2.06-2ubuntu10 500 (phased 13%) 500 http://ca-central-1.ec2.ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1423796] Re: Unable to mount lvmcache root device at boot time

2019-09-06 Thread elatllat
yah I have actually never seen a bug fixed on the Ubuntu bug tracker, just deal with it upstream or use a different distribution. IMO Ubuntu should delete bugs.launchpad.net and just merge pull requests on github/etc. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1556419] Re: nf_conntrack: automatic helper assignment is deprecated

2019-08-17 Thread elatllat
Shows up in dmesg on Ubuntu 18.04 with UFW. ** Also affects: ufw (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iptables in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1750051] Re: cron doesn't support MAILFROM

2019-06-14 Thread elatllat
CentOS 8 is not out yet so Ubuntu 18.04 is the best LTS for servers at the moment ... except for bugs like this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cron in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1750051 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1776943] Re: "login as other user" is a no-op

2018-06-14 Thread elatllat
Regarding the "No upgrade log present" I think the script is broken; > du /var/log/apt/history.log* 8 /var/log/apt/history.log 8 /var/log/apt/history.log.1.gz 36 /var/log/apt/history.log.2.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1776943] [NEW] "login as other user" is a no-op

2018-06-14 Thread elatllat
Public bug reported: login as user b, lock the screen then press "login as other user" and you will not be offered the option to login as user a, control+alt+f1 seems to be the hidden workaround. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04 Package: login 1:4.5-1ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 455024] Re: resize2fs: memory allocation failed while trying to resize

2017-06-01 Thread elatllat
e2fsck -y $D fails with "ext2fs_get_mem: Cannot allocate memory" on a computer with 100GB swap and 2GB RAM. #e2fsck 1.42.13 (17-May-2015) e2fsprogs is clearly not designed to scale, guess it's time to switch to btrfs -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1067386] Re: dm thin facility incomplete - thin-provisioning-tools not packaged

2016-07-05 Thread elatllat
On CentOS 7.2/Linux 3.10 lmv2 depends on device-mapper-persistent-data which is what they call thin-provisioning-tools repoquery --requires lvm2 yum info device-mapper-persistent-data.x86_64 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1067386] Re: dm thin facility incomplete - thin-provisioning-tools not packaged

2016-07-05 Thread elatllat
4 years later and this is still an issue on Ubuntu 16.04/Linux 4.4/LVM 2.02.133. ## setup; apt-get install -y lvm2 mkdir test cd test/ dd if=/dev/zero of=lvma.img bs=1M count=10 dd if=/dev/zero of=lvmb.img bs=1M count=10 dd if=/dev/zero of=lvmc.img bs=1M count=10 losetup /dev/loop0 lvma.img

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1389854] [NEW] Chromium is unstable

2014-11-05 Thread elatllat
Public bug reported: version 37 is known to be unstable (crashes with Aw Snap! all over the place) please upgrade to 38 or 40. ** Affects: apport (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1389854] Re: Chromium is unstable

2014-11-05 Thread elatllat
** Package changed: apport (Ubuntu) = chromium-browser (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1389854 Title: Chromium is unstable Status in