Marking this as "Fix released" for glib and LibreOffice in Ubuntu as
there are Ubuntu releases where this is fixed.
A SRU for Ubuntu 12.04 would need a series target. But that is
theoretical as the amount of rebuilds needed for that are way too high
risk and it will get closed WontFix anyway.
**
Bug is confirmed with the newest LibreOffice 5.0
(1:5.0.0~rc5-0ubuntu1~precise1).
Could anybody suggest a full list of packages to be rebuilt for fixing
this bug on Precise?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: gvfs (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu.
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu.
Hi Andreas, I guess you can (at your own risk) create a ppa, upload the
fix and upload the rdeps there.
you will fix your problem, without affecting the whole distro.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0
Just quickly: Of course its insane to rebuild all rdeps. However, this
is what would be the only way to fix this properly.
A. Heinlein in comment 70 only rebuild the packages between glib and
LibreOffice, which fixes the immediate problem, but might cause
unforseeable and hard to debug/triage
Thank you, guys!
I understand that doing massive rebuild may cause unexpected regressions.
Please let me know if you find other reasonable method.
As temporary solution I downgraded LibreOffice to 3.5.7.2 from precise-updates.
But what is interesting - I can't open files from Samba share (r/w
I fully agree that rebuilding only a few packages is no suitable general
solution. But so is the recommendation to upgrade to 14.04.
There is a reason that corporate environments do not upgrade so often,
and even 2 years is a very short time in this context. I have only
recently upgraded a few
Hi Adam, yes, I missed the rdeps thing.
Deleting from my ppa and unsubscribing sponsors.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1214352
Title:
[SRU]
** Attachment added: debdiff
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/+bug/1214352/+attachment/4338685/+files/debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu.
thanks Norbert, I missed that :)
https://launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+archive/ubuntu
/locutusofborg-ppa
package with the fix above uploaded here, can you please test it?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed
Dear LocutusOfBorg!
Thank you for your patched packages! This Glib fix is very important, it should
be SRUed.
I tested your packages with libreoffice packages from PPA
(4.4.1~rc2-0ubuntu1~precise1, 4.3.6~rc2-0ubuntu1~precise1).
But what is interesting - the bug is not fixed.
I can't understand
We are not going to be rebuilding all of glib's rdeps for this in an
SRU. That's insanity. I'm going to look at this later to see if
there's anything we can do that looks like a sensible and targeted fix,
but it does look like this is just a poor SRU candidate, due to the
regression potential
@ Norbert
I'm unsuscribing the Ubuntu Bug Control team from this bug. If you
think there's a good reason for the team to be subscribed, please email
me.
Thanks.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in
Hi Norbert, did you try to download glib 2.24.1-0ubuntu2 and try to
apply the patch?
I tried, but the file is completely different, so you need to ask
somebody to rebase the patch if you really want the bug fixed in lucid.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Dear LocutusOfBorg (costamagnagianfranco)!
I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.5 (Precise Pangolin) LTS, not on 10.04 (Lucid Lynx)
LTS.
I tried to apply patch locally on my 12.04.5, but got into dependency
problems.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded
** Summary changed:
- GUINT32/64_SWAP_LE_BE macros do not enclose val argument in parentheses
+ [SRU] GUINT32/64_SWAP_LE_BE macros do not enclose val argument in parentheses
** Description changed:
+ [Impact]
+ * This bug affects Glib-dependent packages, one of them is modern version of
17 matches
Mail list logo
