I realize I'm tilting at windmills here, but the need is being able to
build statically linked binaries. I don't see the harm in providing that
option for those who need it. What's next, patch out the -static flag
from gcc?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Upstream has repeatedly stated that they don't support building static
libraries, and --enable-static is explicitly switched off (configure:
error: --enable-static is not supported by systemd). If you have a
proper use case for that, you are welcome to discuss that
Right, we don't build static libraries (in quite a lot of packages), as
there's really no need for them and they just encourage code duplication
and hard to maintain systems.
** Summary changed:
- libudev1 does not include static library
+ libudev-dev does not include static library
** Changed
3 matches
Mail list logo
