Re: [Touch-packages] [Bug 1374577] Re: 'unconfined' should be precached and not listed under 'Location access' (or 'Other app access')

2014-09-29 Thread David Barth
Indeed, the Location plugin in System settings does /hide/ unconfined entries, because: 1. there is no way to get back to the actual application desktop file to display its name and icon: we just know that an undefined unconfined application was granted access 2. in theory unconfined applications

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1374577] Re: 'unconfined' should be precached and not listed under 'Location access' (or 'Other app access')

2014-09-26 Thread Jamie Strandboge
** Package changed: trust-store (Ubuntu) = location-service (Ubuntu) ** Description changed: If I go to Location access under Security Privacy, I have an entry in the list that is blank. I'm not sure what this is but I'm assuming it is for 'unconfined' ('unconfined' should be precached to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1374577] Re: 'unconfined' should be precached and not listed under 'Location access' (or 'Other app access')

2014-09-26 Thread David Barth
It could be historical indeed. To verify, you could remove the Trust.db file and re-authorize each of your applications using Location to see if one of them still re-creates the unconfined entry. However, being unconfined it should have been filtered out anyway. so I'll mark the bug confirmed for

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1374577] Re: 'unconfined' should be precached and not listed under 'Location access' (or 'Other app access')

2014-09-26 Thread Jamie Strandboge
Ok, I was wrong, after reseting the db, I can see that while the location service does incorrectly prompt, system settings does not show it. This is somewhat worse than I thought because if you choose the wrong thing with the location trust store, you cannot undo it (without resetting the db).