[Touch-packages] [Bug 1392176] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2016-07-18 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From ru...@us.ibm.com 2016-07-18 15:08 EDT--- . -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1392176 Title: mounts cgroups unconditionally which

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1392176] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2016-06-28 Thread bugproxy
sudo cat /proc//mountinfo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1392176 Title: mounts cgroups unconditionally which causes undesired effects with cpu hotplug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1392176] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2016-06-18 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From shg...@cn.ibm.com 2016-06-18 09:49 EDT--- (In reply to comment #77) > "LXC cases, like docker and KVM" - did you mean non-lxc cases? > > xenial by default should now be using libpam-cgfs, should not be using > cgmanager, and should not be creating cpusets. Thanks for the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1392176] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2016-06-17 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From shg...@cn.ibm.com 2016-06-17 06:01 EDT--- (In reply to comment #63) > > @Sqxm - thanks for that input. > > For what it's worth you should be able to use ppa:serge-hallyn/systemd in > xenial to get cpusets not created by default. Unfortunately I need to make > some more

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1392176] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-07-12 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From bharata@in.ibm.com 2015-07-12 06:07 EDT--- *** Bug 127595 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1392176] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-06-25 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From preeti.mur...@in.ibm.com 2015-06-16 04:50 EDT--- Hi, An update on this: We are looking at solving this issue in either of the following two ways: 1. Have a config option where user specifies the controllers to mount. 2. Have the patch that mounts cgroups for containers

Re: [Touch-packages] [Bug 1392176] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-04-20 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting bugproxy (bugpr...@us.ibm.com): --- Comment From preeti.mur...@in.ibm.com 2015-04-20 03:20 EDT--- Hi, We want cgroups to be mounted *without* the cpuset controller. From your conversation I could make out the following: 1. LXC does not have a hard requirement on cpusets.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1392176] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2015-04-19 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From preeti.mur...@in.ibm.com 2015-04-20 03:20 EDT--- Hi, We want cgroups to be mounted *without* the cpuset controller. From your conversation I could make out the following: 1. LXC does not have a hard requirement on cpusets. But the challenge in not mounting cpusets