[Touch-packages] [Bug 1417568] Re: diff reports bogus differences on identical files

2015-04-05 Thread Teo
I forgot to change the incomplete status when I responded to the request for information. ** Changed in: diffutils (Ubuntu) Status: Expired = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to diffutils in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1417568] Re: diff reports bogus differences on identical files

2015-04-04 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for diffutils (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.] ** Changed in: diffutils (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Expired -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to diffutils in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1417568] Re: diff reports bogus differences on identical files

2015-02-03 Thread teo1978
non sensitive is the problem :( But now that I think about it, I have a suspect of the possible cause. It could be that one file had linux-style newlines, and the other window-style newlines (one being \r and the other \r\n, never remember which is which). So, the two filews would technically

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1417568] Re: diff reports bogus differences on identical files

2015-02-03 Thread Andreas Olsson
Would it be possible for you to provide two (non-sensitive) example files showing this behavior? ** Changed in: diffutils (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to diffutils in