[Touch-packages] [Bug 1539627] Re: Buffer underflow in nano 2.4.2-1ubuntu0.1 causes SIGSEGV

2017-06-26 Thread Amr Ibrahim
** Changed in: nano (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to nano in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1539627 Title: Buffer underflow in nano

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1539627] Re: Buffer underflow in nano 2.4.2-1ubuntu0.1 causes SIGSEGV

2016-07-08 Thread Benno Schulenberg
** Changed in: nano (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to nano in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1539627 Title: Buffer underflow in nano

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1539627] Re: Buffer underflow in nano 2.4.2-1ubuntu0.1 causes SIGSEGV

2016-04-16 Thread Benno Schulenberg
Thanks for confirming. Strangely, I was now able to reproduce the crash with your recipe on nano-2.4.2. I think it has been fixed since then by commit 8a06dfa on August 2 last year, which was a fix for a Debian bug [1], which went into 2.4.3 and later. [1]

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1539627] Re: Buffer underflow in nano 2.4.2-1ubuntu0.1 causes SIGSEGV

2016-04-15 Thread Bartłomiej Żogała
Hello, no longer reproducible for me on any of my machines -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to nano in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1539627 Title: Buffer underflow in nano 2.4.2-1ubuntu0.1 causes

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1539627] Re: Buffer underflow in nano 2.4.2-1ubuntu0.1 causes SIGSEGV

2016-04-13 Thread Benno Schulenberg
Ping? Bartłomiej? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to nano in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1539627 Title: Buffer underflow in nano 2.4.2-1ubuntu0.1 causes SIGSEGV Status in nano package in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1539627] Re: Buffer underflow in nano 2.4.2-1ubuntu0.1 causes SIGSEGV

2016-02-25 Thread Benno Schulenberg
I don't use Ubuntu's package; I only run nano built from source. This is what 'ldd /usr/local/bin/nano' says here: linux-gate.so.1 => (0x00d0b000) libncursesw.so.5 => /lib/libncursesw.so.5 (0x005dc000) libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 (0x0011)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1539627] Re: Buffer underflow in nano 2.4.2-1ubuntu0.1 causes SIGSEGV

2016-02-25 Thread Bartłomiej Żogała
Hello, missed your first reply, also sorry for typo - locale is pl_PL.UTF-8 not pl_PL.UTF . Are you sure you are runnigng exactly the same version from deb package as mine - linked to libncursesw.so.5 (with 'w')? If I recompiled from apt-source I've got result as yours - no undhandled bugs

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1539627] Re: Buffer underflow in nano 2.4.2-1ubuntu0.1 causes SIGSEGV

2016-02-25 Thread Benno Schulenberg
Waiting for the info requested in comment #2. ** Changed in: nano (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to nano in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1539627 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1539627] Re: Buffer underflow in nano 2.4.2-1ubuntu0.1 causes SIGSEGV

2016-01-29 Thread Benno Schulenberg
When I follow your recipe (touch .the_test.swp; nano the_test), I don't get a segfault but just an error message on the status bar: [ Error reading lock file ./.the_test.swp: Not enough data read ] Please try the command 'nano --ignore --locking the_test' instead (to test only the locking