[Touch-packages] [Bug 1545308] Re: Backport upstream fix for memleak

This bug was fixed in the package glib2.0 - 2.46.2-1ubuntu2 --- glib2.0 (2.46.2-1ubuntu2) wily; urgency=medium * d/p/0001-GDBusProxy-Fix-a-memory-leak-during-initialization.patch: Cherry-pick upstream patch to fix a memleak in GDBusProxy (LP: #1545308) -- Iain Lane

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1545308] Re: Backport upstream fix for memleak

** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu Wily) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1545308 Title: Backport upstream fix for memleak

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1545308] Re: Backport upstream fix for memleak

** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1545308 Title: Backport upstream fix for memleak

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1545308] Re: Backport upstream fix for memleak

Hey Brian, I was going to let this run longer, but I think we're safe. I've observed RSS of both xfce4-power-manager and NetworkManager grow by over 1.5MB from usage at start up and have now dropped back to more than 1MB below usage at start up. These observations were made with swap disabled,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1545308] Re: Backport upstream fix for memleak

I finally got around to enabling the package from proposed. I'll report back in a few days with results. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1545308 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1545308] Re: Backport upstream fix for memleak

Hello Trent, or anyone else affected, Accepted glib2.0 into wily-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/2.46.2-1ubuntu2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1545308] Re: Backport upstream fix for memleak

Sorry, I spaced this. Description updated. :) ** Description changed: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758641 Please consider taking this memleak fix from upstream. I've built the package with it locally and confirmed that it fixes the leak in xfce4 -power-manager, which

Re: [Touch-packages] [Bug 1545308] Re: Backport upstream fix for memleak

On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 04:25:02PM -, Trent Nelson wrote: > Thanks fellas! > > Iain, > > Was the SRU comment directed at me or Sebastien? I would be happy to > update what I can later this evening, but some of the information > requested there seems like it would better come from someone

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1545308] Re: Backport upstream fix for memleak

Thanks fellas! Iain, Was the SRU comment directed at me or Sebastien? I would be happy to update what I can later this evening, but some of the information requested there seems like it would better come from someone more familiar with the glib code base (potential regressions, etc). -- You

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1545308] Re: Backport upstream fix for memleak

I uploaded it, sorry for the delay! It would be good if you could update the bug with the information from , otherwise the SRU team might delay accepting the upload (hopefully not). ** Also affects: glib2.0 (Ubuntu Wily) Importance:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1545308] Re: Backport upstream fix for memleak

Iain said he could have a look, assigning to him, thanks! ** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Iain Lane (laney) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1545308] Re: Backport upstream fix for memleak

The commit is in the stable serie https://git.gnome.org/browse/glib/commit/?h=glib-2-46=e98e1eff83c742c73a148dd7b75c00d77e0cee40 ** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which