** Changed in: ofono-qt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ofono-qt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1613469
Title:
[MIR] ofono-qt
Status in ofono-qt package
We will no longer need this in main once the telephony-service silo land
that removes depends on telepathy-ofono. That work is in silo
https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1902 and we're fighting
with build and test issues, hope to have it resolved in the next day or
so.
** Changed in:
** Changed in: ofono-qt (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: ofono-qt (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Gustavo Pichorim Boiko (boiko)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ofono-qt in
Using ofono-phonesim and scripting the manual interactions (like
starting a call, restarting ofono) all seems like perfect a candidate
for autopkgtest (rather than a unit test, where you may not want to mess
up your dev system).
The custom patches to ofono-qt are all the more reason to migrate to
- libqofono did not exist by the time telepathy-ofono was created, and
ofono-qt was the only alternative. libqofono started as a fork of ofono-
qt IIRC.
- The tests work with ofono-phonesim (actually phonesim is required).
- Some tests require manual interaction:
ofono-phonesim wouldn't work for tests?
Do we have a roadmap to switching to libqofono?
As a general rule, we don't like to officially support already-abandoned
code with an existing replacement if we can help it. It would be nice
to know that we do have a plan.
--
You received this bug
Tests are not executed because they rely on ofonod running with some
modem enabled, which is not doable on test environments.
Yes, it was abandoned upstream because ofono-qt was mostly replaced by
libqofono.
This is the main reason why it has no bugs open.
There was some discussion to move
Questions:
- Tests aren't being run, do we know why?
- This is apparently abandoned upstream. And we don't share the package
with Debian. It doesn't seem to need much maintenance, but do we have
resources paying attention to this? There are no open bugs in LP, which
encourages but shocks me.
8 matches
Mail list logo
