[Touch-packages] [Bug 1621210] Re: [MIR] fonts-android

** Bug watch removed: Debian Bug tracker #804684 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=804684 ** Summary changed: - [MIR] fonts-android + libgs9-common recommends fonts-droid-fallback which isn't in main -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touc

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1621210] Re: [MIR] fonts-android

So we don't need this? Will mark invalid. ** Changed in: fonts-android (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to fonts-android in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/16

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1621210] Re: [MIR] fonts-android

Uploaded. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to fonts-android in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1621210 Title: [MIR] fonts-android Status in fonts-android package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Status i

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1621210] Re: [MIR] fonts-android

http://packages.ubuntu.com/yakkety/libgs9-common I attached a patch for changing it, and after a test build I could do: $ dpkg -I libgs9-common_9.19~dfsg+1-0ubuntu3_all.deb | grep Recommends Recommends: fonts-noto-cjk ** Also affects: ghostscript (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1621210] Re: [MIR] fonts-android

I do not find any Ghostscript with a depends/recommends/suggests on fonts-noto-cjk. Can someone tell me which Ghostscript version? Or can someone post a patch to switch Ghostscript to fonts-noto-cjk? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, w

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1621210] Re: [MIR] fonts-android

This was simply an oversight when I tried minimize the delta between Debian and Ubuntu, letting the new Ghostscript package be based on Debian's with the only difference that the libopenjpeg shipped with Ghostscript is used and not the system's one. I can simply reapply the change to get it recomm

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1621210] Re: [MIR] fonts-android

Yeah, I thought noto was the replacement. Unless there's a good reason android is needed, I'd prefer we standardize. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to fonts-android in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/162

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1621210] Re: [MIR] fonts-android

I suppose this is due to . In Ubuntu (and flavors) previous fonts-droid depends/recommends were replaced with fonts-noto-cjk in Xenial; please see . Wondering if it would be better in Ubuntu to change that libgs9-common recommend