[Touch-packages] [Bug 1724013] Re: mount does not correctly process x-* options

2017-11-30 Thread Phillip Susi
mount.cifs is not part of util-linux, and it also is not supposed to ignore unknown options. This is only a feature of util-linux mount since it is generic, and not expected to understand every possible option supported by every possible filesystem. -- You received this bug notification because

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1724013] Re: mount does not correctly process x-* options

2017-11-09 Thread DaytonaJohn
However, mount.cifs ignores the options passed to it by the util-linux mount when it is not invoked by root. In that case, mount.cifs obtains the options from the fstab file and does not do any processing to ignore comments. So the status of this bug should not be invalid, unless mount.cifs is not

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1724013] Re: mount does not correctly process x-* options

2017-11-09 Thread Phillip Susi
I don't think that is a bug in mount.cifs then. The util-linux mount treats x-* options as comments or application specific options. mount.cifs is the specific application, and it expects to be able to recognize all mount options. ** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1724013] Re: mount does not correctly process x-* options

2017-10-24 Thread DaytonaJohn
After further investigation, it turns out that mount is actually handling the options correctly and passing the options (with x-* options removed) to mount.cifs. The problem is that mount.cifs ignores those passed options if the user running the mount command is not root, and just grabs the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1724013] Re: mount does not correctly process x-* options

2017-10-17 Thread DaytonaJohn
output from "mount -v /mnt/mybook": mount.cifs kernel mount options: ip=192.168.1.3,unc=\\192.168.1.3\Public,noauto,x- test.opt,noperm,soft,cache=none,sec=none,uid=1000,gid=1000,user=,pass= mount error(22): Invalid argument Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g. man mount.cifs) --