[Expired for ntp (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu.
Thanks a lot Simon for your thoughts - this is exactly what I was
looking for.
"On a hypervisor, binding on link local IPs is undesirable IMHO"
Thats what I thought as well
But - if there is valid use of link locals in general - as I was unsure of and
you as well suggest there might be folks
On a hypervisor, binding on link local IPs is undesirable IMHO and
that's why I always added a similar ignore to the one you proposed. That
said, NTP works well over link local addresses so some folks are
probably using it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Ok I debugged more and it seems that the situation where i was unable to bind
is the special one.
I usually got this now:
Dec 13 15:24:31 bionic-test-kvm ntpd[6142]: Listen normally on 8 vnet0
[fe80::fc54:ff:fe46:80ed%10]:123
Dec 13 15:24:31 bionic-test-kvm ntpd[6142]: new interface(s)
Reading more into [1] and [2] I'm not 100% if ntp just has an issue or
if in general we should mask this interface type like:
interface ignore fe80::/64
[1]: https://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mills/ntp/html/miscopt.html#interface
[2]:
This looks promising
https://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mills/ntp/html/miscopt.html#interface
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1737998
Title:
trying to bind on all
6 matches
Mail list logo
