Public bug reported: There is a problem when running a bond on top of vlans. Running ifup with verbose enabled shows run-parts being executed in (what seems like) alphabetical order, but to enslave a vlan interface, run-part /etc/network/if-pre-up.d/vlan should be executed before run-part /etc/network/if-pre-up.d/ifenslave.
Our workaround has been to add "pre-up export IFACE=<name> IF_VLAN_RAW_DEVICE=<raw device name>; /etc/network/if-pre-up.d/vlan" to all vlan slaves, but it would be better to fix this in the ifup scripts themselves by reordering the run-parts. Tested with version 1.9-3ubuntu10.4 ** Affects: ifupdown (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description changed: There is a problem when running a bond on top of vlans. Running ifup with verbose enabled shows run-parts being executed in (what seems like) alphabetical order, but to enslave a vlan interface, run-part /etc/network/if-pre-up.d/vlan should be executed before run-part /etc/network/if-pre-up.d/ifenslave. Our workaround has been to add "pre-up export IFACE=<name> IF_VLAN_RAW_DEVICE=<raw device name>; /etc/network/if-pre-up.d/vlan" to all vlan slaves, but it would be better to fix this in the ifup scripts themselves by reordering the run-parts. + + Tested with version 1.9-3ubuntu10.4 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ifupdown in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1768235 Title: Ifenslave failing when bonding vlans Status in ifupdown package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: There is a problem when running a bond on top of vlans. Running ifup with verbose enabled shows run-parts being executed in (what seems like) alphabetical order, but to enslave a vlan interface, run-part /etc/network/if-pre-up.d/vlan should be executed before run-part /etc/network/if-pre-up.d/ifenslave. Our workaround has been to add "pre-up export IFACE=<name> IF_VLAN_RAW_DEVICE=<raw device name>; /etc/network/if-pre-up.d/vlan" to all vlan slaves, but it would be better to fix this in the ifup scripts themselves by reordering the run-parts. Tested with version 1.9-3ubuntu10.4 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1768235/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp