I was running a few test builds with different combinations of gcc,
elfutils and protobuf and trying to make the build fail... but it
continues working despite the older elfutils compiled with the newer
gcc.
Last check was with protobuf-3.12.4-1ubuntu3 (from jammy, 4 days ago) in
an impish 0.185-1
It would be interesting to know if the issue is due to the differences in the
toolchain used to build elfutils 0.183-6 and 0.183-8. The build logs show they
were 10.2.1-23ubuntu2
and 11.2.0-1ubuntu2, respectively. If we built 2 copies of 0.183-8 in the same
environment, but just varied the diff
** Tags removed: rls-ii-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to protobuf in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939413
Title:
/usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libprotobuf.a’ generated with LTO version
9.2
The rebuild of protobuf no longer has lto information according to
objdump, but the reported version certainly does. The "bad" version was
built during hirsute devel, so I took a current hirsute system and
systematically downgraded build-deps to the versions in the log of the
"bad" build. Turns out
While the rebuild allowed for mozc to build on arm64, as Matthias
pointed out there is a root cause that remains to be dealt with, so re-
opening.
** Changed in: protobuf (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touc
This bug was fixed in the package protobuf - 3.12.4-1ubuntu3
---
protobuf (3.12.4-1ubuntu3) impish; urgency=medium
* No-change rebuild to build with gcc-11 (LP: #1939413)
-- Gunnar Hjalmarsson Thu, 12 Aug 2021 12:38:56
+0200
** Changed in: protobuf (Ubuntu)
Status: New =
3.12.4-1ubuntu1 using binutils 2.36 OK 3.12.4-1ubuntu2 BAD
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to protobuf in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939413
Title:
/usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libprotobuf.a’ gener
correctly stripped on other architectures, also not stripped in hirsute,
so not a regression in impish.
** Tags removed: ftbfs
** Tags added: rls-ii-incoming
** Changed in: protobuf (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Matthias Klose (doko) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you
the real problem here is that the package is not stripped at all on
arm64.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to protobuf in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939413
Title:
/usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libpro
** Changed in: protobuf (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => New
** Changed in: protobuf (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Gunnar Hjalmarsson (gunnarhj) => Matthias Klose (doko)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to proto
rebuilding just hides the issue. need to find out why the lto sections
are in the archive.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to protobuf in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939413
Title:
/usr/lib/aarch64-
Thanks for reporting this, Heinrich! It looks like protobuf needs to be
built with gcc-11.
** Changed in: protobuf (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Changed in: protobuf (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Gunnar Hjalmarsson (gunnarhj)
** Changed in: mozc (Ubuntu)
Status
This is an example build log:
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/552672484/buildlog_ubuntu-impish-
arm64.mozc_2.26.4220.100+dfsg-4ubuntu3_BUILDING.txt.gz
from the impish test rebuild:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-
announce/2021-August/001294.html
--
You received this bug notifica
** Also affects: mozc (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags added: ftbfs impish
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to protobuf in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939413
Title:
/usr
14 matches
Mail list logo
