[Touch-packages] [Bug 1928080] Re: Noto Sans Hebrew is not set as the fallback font of Noto Sans
** Changed in: fontconfig (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to fontconfig in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928080 Title: Noto Sans Hebrew is not set as the fallback font of Noto Sans Status in fontconfig package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: [This is a minor issue] Hello, Noto Sans Hebrew is not set as the fallback font of Noto Sans in Kubuntu, and the current fallback font of Noto Sans is Liberation Sans, and not Noto Sans Hebrew. May you fix it, please? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fontconfig/+bug/1928080/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1939986] Re: Missing firmware files, in Ubuntu 20.04 LTS, for initramfs, when it loads i915
I just tagged the bug as affecting : initramfs-tools As I found this bug when doing: $ sudo update-initramfs -u W: Possible missing firmware /lib/firmware/i915/tgl_huc_7.5.0.bin for module i915 ** Also affects: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939986 Title: Missing firmware files, in Ubuntu 20.04 LTS, for initramfs, when it loads i915 Status in initramfs-tools package in Ubuntu: New Status in linux-firmware package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Dear all, I can see that the linux-firmware is missing firmware files, in Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS, for initramfs, when it loads i915. Package: linux-firmware 1.187.15 It contains the following files, for the module i915: i915/tgl_dmc_ver2_04.bin 2019-09-13 installed i915/tgl_dmc_ver2_06.bin 2020-03-04 installed i915/tgl_dmc_ver2_08.bin 2020-08-13 installed i915/tgl_guc_35.2.0.bin 2019-11-06 installed i915/tgl_huc_7.0.12.bin 2020-03-04 installed i915/tgl_huc_7.0.3.bin2019-11-06 installed Package: linux-firmware MUST at least contain the following files, for the module i915: i915/tgl_huc_7.5.0.bin2020-08-13 i915: Add HuC firwmare v7.5.0 for TGL as the module asks for it, during 'update-initramfs', to avoid: W: Possible missing firmware /lib/firmware/i915/tgl_huc_7.5.0.bin for module i915 But it COULD also contain : i915/tgl_dmc_ver2_12.bin 2021-07-28 i915: Add v2.12 DMC for TGL i915/tgl_guc_49.0.1.bin 2020-11-24 i915: Add GuC firmware v49.0.1 for all platforms i915/tgl_guc_62.0.0.bin 2021-06-29 firmware/i915/guc: Add GuC v62.0.0 for all platforms i915/tgl_huc_7.9.3.bin2021-06-29 firmware/i915/guc: Add HuC v7.9.3 for TGL & DG1 Source: $ modprobe --show-depends --ignore-install i915 ... insmod /lib/modules/5.10.0-1038-oem/kernel/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko $ modinfo -F firmware /lib/modules/5.10.0-1038-oem/kernel/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko ... i915/tgl_dmc_ver2_08.bin i915/tgl_guc_35.2.0.bin i915/tgl_huc_7.5.0.bin Actual result: $ sudo update-initramfs -u W: Possible missing firmware /lib/firmware/i915/tgl_huc_7.5.0.bin for module i915 Expected result: No Warning. and the firmware "i915/tgl_huc_7.5.0.bin" loaded for module i915 Info : INTEL Repository of firmware: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/firmware/linux-firmware.git/tree/i915 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: linux-firmware 1.187.15 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.10.0-1038.40-oem 5.10.46 Uname: Linux 5.10.0-1038-oem x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.18 Architecture: amd64 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: chris 1699 F pulseaudio /dev/snd/pcmC0D0p: chris 1699 F...m pulseaudio CasperMD5CheckResult: skip CurrentDesktop: XFCE Date: Sun Aug 15 14:46:47 2021 Dependencies: DistributionChannelDescriptor: # This is the distribution channel descriptor for the OEM CDs # For more information see http://wiki.ubuntu.com/DistributionChannelDescriptor canonical-oem-somerville-focal-amd64-20200502-85+fossa-bulbasaur+X54 InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-08-12 (2 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04 "Focal" - Build amd64 LIVE Binary 20200502-05:58 MachineType: Dell Inc. XPS 13 9310 PackageArchitecture: all ProcFB: 0 i915drmfb ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.10.0-1038-oem root=UUID=3dae0247-a884-48d8-83b7-fea7c803faa3 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 RelatedPackageVersions: linux-restricted-modules-5.10.0-1038-oem N/A linux-backports-modules-5.10.0-1038-oem N/A linux-firmware 1.187.15 SourcePackage: linux-firmware UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) WifiSyslog: dmi.bios.date: 07/16/2021 dmi.bios.release: 3.0 dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.bios.version: 3.0.4 dmi.board.name: 08607K dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.board.version: A00 dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvr3.0.4:bd07/16/2021:br3.0:svnDellInc.:pnXPS139310:pvr:rvnDellInc.:rn08607K:rvrA00:cvnDellInc.:ct10:cvr: dmi.product.family: XPS dmi.product.name: XPS 13 9310 dmi.product.sku: 0991 dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1939986/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help :
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1939973] Re: make 4.3-4.1 triggers build failures
copied the binary packages to https://launchpad.net/~doko/+archive/ubuntu/toolchain and removed them from impish-proposed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to make-dfsg in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939973 Title: make 4.3-4.1 triggers build failures Status in make-dfsg package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: trying to rebuild cross-toolchain-base from https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-toolchain-r/+archive/ubuntu/volatile/+packages triggers a build failure: [...] START stamp-dir/init-binutils tar -x -f /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.37.tar.xz set -e; cd binutils-2.37 ; cp -a /usr/src/binutils/debian/ . ; if [ -n "$(grep -v '^\#' /<>/debian/patches/binutils/series)" ]; then QUILT_PATCHES=/<>/debian/patches/binutils quilt --quiltrc /dev/null push -a; fi; rm -rf .pc cd binutils-2.37 ; env -i CROSS_ARCHS="amd64 i386 s390x ppc64el arm64 armhf armel powerpc" debian/rules stamps/control make: dpkg-architecture: No such file or directory make: lsb_release: No such file or directory make: lsb_release: No such file or directory make: pwd: No such file or directory make: dpkg-parsechangelog: No such file or directory make: dpkg-parsechangelog: No such file or directory make: dpkg-parsechangelog: No such file or directory make: dpkg-parsechangelog: No such file or directory debian/rules:163: *** unexpected source package name: . Stop. make: *** [debian/rules:215: stamp-dir/init-binutils] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage.pl: error: debian/rules build subprocess returned exit status 2 working around by omitting the -i option to env, or by setting PATH explicitly. Reverting to the version in the release pocket lets the c-t-b- build succeed. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/make-dfsg/+bug/1939973/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1901316] Re: [Z370 AORUS Gaming 7, Realtek ALC1220, Green Line Out, Rear] Playback problem. Center and subwoofer work, everything else has no sound.
Hello I've upgrade to Ubuntu 21.04, the the issue still exists. Kernel version: Linux 5.11.0-25-generic #27-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jul 9 23:06:29 UTC 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to alsa-driver in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901316 Title: [Z370 AORUS Gaming 7, Realtek ALC1220, Green Line Out, Rear] Playback problem. Center and subwoofer work, everything else has no sound. Status in alsa-driver package in Ubuntu: Won't Fix Bug description: When using the Ubuntu sound settings and doing a test, only the center and subwoofer channels produce sound. When playing any media that relies on left/right channels, I don't hear anything. Used alsamixer to unmute / increase volume to all desired channels with no change Used PulseAudio volume control to load multiple different audio profiles with the same results. Ubuntu Release: Description: Ubuntu 20.10 Release: 20.10 alsa-base: Installed: 1.0.25+dfsg-0ubuntu5 Candidate: 1.0.25+dfsg-0ubuntu5 Version table: *** 1.0.25+dfsg-0ubuntu5 500 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu groovy/main amd64 Packages 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu groovy/main i386 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status pulseaudio: Installed: 1:13.99.2-1ubuntu1 Candidate: 1:13.99.2-1ubuntu1 Version table: *** 1:13.99.2-1ubuntu1 500 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu groovy/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status I also experienced the issue in the latest default kernel for Ubuntu, so I downloaded one of the later stable ones: Linux terry-pc 5.9.1-050901-generic #202010170731 SMP Sat Oct 17 07:42:59 UTC 2020 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux When doing a speaker test, I get the following results: speaker-test -c6 speaker-test 1.2.3 Playback device is default Stream parameters are 48000Hz, S16_LE, 6 channels Using 16 octaves of pink noise Rate set to 48000Hz (requested 48000Hz) Buffer size range from 32 to 349525 Period size range from 10 to 116509 Using max buffer size 349524 Periods = 4 was set period_size = 87381 was set buffer_size = 349524 0 - Front Left -- NO SOUND 4 - Center -- WORKS CORRECTLY 1 - Front Right -- NO SOUND 3 - Rear Right -- NO SOUND 2 - Rear Left -- NO SOUND 5 - LFE -- WORKS CORRECTLY I plugged headphones into the front jack, and the system detected and switched the sound output device to the headphones. However, I still did not hear any sound when doing a test. Lastly, this sound device works as expected under Windows 10, so I don't believe that it is a hardware issue. Thank you for your time. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.10 Package: alsa-base 1.0.25+dfsg-0ubuntu5 Uname: Linux 5.9.1-050901-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu50 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: skip CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Sat Oct 24 09:12:25 2020 PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm-256color PATH=(custom, no user) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: alsa-driver Symptom: audio Symptom_AlsaPlaybackTest: ALSA playback test through plughw:PCH successful Symptom_Card: Built-in Audio - HDA Intel PCH Symptom_Jack: Green Line Out, Rear Symptom_PulsePlaybackTest: PulseAudio playback test successful Symptom_Type: Only some of outputs are working Title: [Z370 AORUS Gaming 7, Realtek ALC1220, Green Line Out, Rear] Playback problem UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 11/28/2019 dmi.bios.release: 5.12 dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc. dmi.bios.version: F15a dmi.board.asset.tag: Default string dmi.board.name: Z370 AORUS Gaming 7 dmi.board.vendor: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. dmi.board.version: x.x dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Default string dmi.chassis.type: 3 dmi.chassis.vendor: Default string dmi.chassis.version: Default string dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvrF15a:bd11/28/2019:br5.12:svnGigabyteTechnologyCo.,Ltd.:pnZ370AORUSGaming7:pvrDefaultstring:rvnGigabyteTechnologyCo.,Ltd.:rnZ370AORUSGaming7:rvrx.x:cvnDefaultstring:ct3:cvrDefaultstring: dmi.product.family: Default string dmi.product.name: Z370 AORUS Gaming 7 dmi.product.sku: Default string dmi.product.version: Default string dmi.sys.vendor: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. modified.conffile..etc.modprobe.d.alsa-base.conf: [deleted] To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/1901316/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1939989] Re: Module i915 is not updated, in Ubuntu 20.04 LTS
I just tagged the bug as affecting : initramfs-tools As I found this bug when doing: $ sudo update-initramfs -u W: Possible missing firmware /lib/firmware/i915/tgl_huc_7.5.0.bin for module i915 ** Also affects: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939989 Title: Module i915 is not updated, in Ubuntu 20.04 LTS Status in initramfs-tools package in Ubuntu: New Status in linux-oem-5.10 package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Dear all, Module i915.ko is asking for the firmware file: i915/tgl_huc_7.5.0.bin Date: 2020-08-13 Description: i915: Add HuC firwmare v7.5.0 for TGL But the module i915 should also ask for : i915/tgl_huc_7.9.3.bin Date: 2021-06-29 Description: firmware/i915/guc: Add HuC v7.9.3 for TGL & DG1 i915/tgl_dmc_ver2_12.bin Date: 2021-07-28 Description: i915: Add v2.12 DMC for TGL i915/tgl_guc_62.0.0.bin Date: 2021-06-29 Description: firmware/i915/guc: Add GuC v62.0.0 for all platforms or at least (this 8 month old firmware): i915/tgl_guc_49.0.1.bin Date: 2020-11-24 Description: i915: Add GuC firmware v49.0.1 for all platforms This requirement will fix some bugs and improve stability on our hardware using Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS. FYI: I cannot appreciate myself, if this is a security vulnerability or not. Cheers Command lines, of the actual result: $ modprobe --show-depends --ignore-install i915 ... insmod /lib/modules/5.10.0-1038-oem/kernel/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko $ modinfo -F firmware /lib/modules/5.10.0-1038-oem/kernel/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko ... i915/tgl_dmc_ver2_08.bin i915/tgl_guc_35.2.0.bin i915/tgl_huc_7.5.0.bin Package: linux-modules-5.10.0-1038-oem: Installed: 5.10.0-1038.40 Candidate: 5.10.0-1038.40 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: linux-modules-5.10.0-1038-oem 5.10.0-1038.40 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.10.0-1038.40-oem 5.10.46 Uname: Linux 5.10.0-1038-oem x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.18 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: skip CurrentDesktop: XFCE Date: Sun Aug 15 15:09:44 2021 Dependencies: DistributionChannelDescriptor: # This is the distribution channel descriptor for the OEM CDs # For more information see http://wiki.ubuntu.com/DistributionChannelDescriptor canonical-oem-somerville-focal-amd64-20200502-85+fossa-bulbasaur+X54 InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-08-12 (2 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04 "Focal" - Build amd64 LIVE Binary 20200502-05:58 SourcePackage: linux-oem-5.10 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1939989/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1939986] Re: Missing firmware files, in Ubuntu 20.04 LTS, for initramfs, when it loads i915
Updating lib/firmware with the ones over https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/firmware/linux- firmware.git/tree/i915 makes all the warning go away. As per Bug 1847786: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-firmware/+bug/1847786 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939986 Title: Missing firmware files, in Ubuntu 20.04 LTS, for initramfs, when it loads i915 Status in initramfs-tools package in Ubuntu: New Status in linux-firmware package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Dear all, I can see that the linux-firmware is missing firmware files, in Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS, for initramfs, when it loads i915. Package: linux-firmware 1.187.15 It contains the following files, for the module i915: i915/tgl_dmc_ver2_04.bin 2019-09-13 installed i915/tgl_dmc_ver2_06.bin 2020-03-04 installed i915/tgl_dmc_ver2_08.bin 2020-08-13 installed i915/tgl_guc_35.2.0.bin 2019-11-06 installed i915/tgl_huc_7.0.12.bin 2020-03-04 installed i915/tgl_huc_7.0.3.bin2019-11-06 installed Package: linux-firmware MUST at least contain the following files, for the module i915: i915/tgl_huc_7.5.0.bin2020-08-13 i915: Add HuC firwmare v7.5.0 for TGL as the module asks for it, during 'update-initramfs', to avoid: W: Possible missing firmware /lib/firmware/i915/tgl_huc_7.5.0.bin for module i915 But it COULD also contain : i915/tgl_dmc_ver2_12.bin 2021-07-28 i915: Add v2.12 DMC for TGL i915/tgl_guc_49.0.1.bin 2020-11-24 i915: Add GuC firmware v49.0.1 for all platforms i915/tgl_guc_62.0.0.bin 2021-06-29 firmware/i915/guc: Add GuC v62.0.0 for all platforms i915/tgl_huc_7.9.3.bin2021-06-29 firmware/i915/guc: Add HuC v7.9.3 for TGL & DG1 Source: $ modprobe --show-depends --ignore-install i915 ... insmod /lib/modules/5.10.0-1038-oem/kernel/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko $ modinfo -F firmware /lib/modules/5.10.0-1038-oem/kernel/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko ... i915/tgl_dmc_ver2_08.bin i915/tgl_guc_35.2.0.bin i915/tgl_huc_7.5.0.bin Actual result: $ sudo update-initramfs -u W: Possible missing firmware /lib/firmware/i915/tgl_huc_7.5.0.bin for module i915 Expected result: No Warning. and the firmware "i915/tgl_huc_7.5.0.bin" loaded for module i915 Info : INTEL Repository of firmware: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/firmware/linux-firmware.git/tree/i915 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: linux-firmware 1.187.15 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.10.0-1038.40-oem 5.10.46 Uname: Linux 5.10.0-1038-oem x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.18 Architecture: amd64 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: chris 1699 F pulseaudio /dev/snd/pcmC0D0p: chris 1699 F...m pulseaudio CasperMD5CheckResult: skip CurrentDesktop: XFCE Date: Sun Aug 15 14:46:47 2021 Dependencies: DistributionChannelDescriptor: # This is the distribution channel descriptor for the OEM CDs # For more information see http://wiki.ubuntu.com/DistributionChannelDescriptor canonical-oem-somerville-focal-amd64-20200502-85+fossa-bulbasaur+X54 InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-08-12 (2 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04 "Focal" - Build amd64 LIVE Binary 20200502-05:58 MachineType: Dell Inc. XPS 13 9310 PackageArchitecture: all ProcFB: 0 i915drmfb ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.10.0-1038-oem root=UUID=3dae0247-a884-48d8-83b7-fea7c803faa3 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 RelatedPackageVersions: linux-restricted-modules-5.10.0-1038-oem N/A linux-backports-modules-5.10.0-1038-oem N/A linux-firmware 1.187.15 SourcePackage: linux-firmware UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) WifiSyslog: dmi.bios.date: 07/16/2021 dmi.bios.release: 3.0 dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.bios.version: 3.0.4 dmi.board.name: 08607K dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.board.version: A00 dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvr3.0.4:bd07/16/2021:br3.0:svnDellInc.:pnXPS139310:pvr:rvnDellInc.:rn08607K:rvrA00:cvnDellInc.:ct10:cvr: dmi.product.family: XPS dmi.product.name: XPS 13 9310 dmi.product.sku: 0991 dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1939986/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1939238] Re: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY.
It doesn't matter whether you store your personal data on the partition where the OS is located, or elsewhere. Either way, you may need to know how to run e2fsck on the file system if you want to try to maximally recover data. If you don't know what you are doing, sure, go ahead and run fsck -y. But there is the chance you may lose data that you might have been able to recover if you had more skills. Note that in the case that you referenced, the kernel had already detected some kind of file system inconsistency. That is the source of the "/dev/sda1 contains a file system with errors, checked force". This should not happen, unless there is some kind of hardware bug, or kernel bug which has led to the file system getting corrupted. This could be caused by flaky/low-quality/failing memory, or flaky/low- quality/failing HDD or SSD. An expert would have to look at the kernel logs for hints to see what might have gone wrong. If the user has regularly been doing backups, then sure, maybe you don't care they can just run "fsck -y".But I don't want to give that advice, only to hear that some graduate student had ten years worth of thesis research, and it wasn't backed up, and they were using the lowest possible cost HDD or SSD that was not reliably storing their data. Sometimes, the best thing to do for low-comptency users, is for them to ask for help, maybe at a local Linux User's Group, so that an expert can try help them out.There is no magic incantation, no kind of "Hocus Pocus" magic set of instructions that will always do the right thing. And to give "low competency users" instructions which might not be the best thing is ultimately, IMHO, going to doing them a grave disservice. P.S. One could argue that a graduate student who has ten years of research on cheap sh*t storage and who hasn't been doing their backups doesn't deserve to graduate with a Ph.D. But that's not a very charitable attitude -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to e2fsprogs in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939238 Title: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY. Status in e2fsprogs package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Hello This problem did not occur on my computer. https://nsa40.casimages.com/img/2021/08/07/210807015400327092.png It occurs in users who are not competent. This week, the French forum collapsed over this incident. I think changing the advice phrase might improve understanding of the action to be taken. Can these lines " ( i.e.. without -a or -p options) fsck existed with status code 4 The root file system on /dev/ requires a manual fsck" become "execute this command 'fsck -y /dev/xx' to do a manual fsck on the root file system." ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.04 Package: gnome-terminal 3.38.1-1ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-25.27-generic 5.11.22 Uname: Linux 5.11.0-25-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu65.1 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Sun Aug 8 15:16:28 2021 ExecutablePath: /usr/libexec/gnome-terminal-server InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-08-02 (370 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200423) ProcEnviron: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8 PATH=(custom, user) SHELL=/bin/bash XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= SourcePackage: gnome-terminal UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to hirsute on 2021-07-11 (27 days ago) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/e2fsprogs/+bug/1939238/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1870829] Re: AptX and AptX HD unavailable as Bluetooth audio quality options
>From a duplicate of this bug, as tldr: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1939933 > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=991597 > > > Does that mean that enabling it, would only add some dependencies but > > > not actually do anything? > > > > Yes, a (soft) dependency should probably be added against > > gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad, but as I said, the needed version (>= 1.19) is > > not yet in debian > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gst-plugins-bad/-/commit/b916522382aaa33f216636a292e97cd769ac4093 > > 1.19.1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1870829 Title: AptX and AptX HD unavailable as Bluetooth audio quality options Status in pulseaudio package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in pulseaudio package in Debian: Unknown Bug description: Current situation: When one connects a Bluetooth audio device, at best one can choose between "Headset Head Unit (HSP/HFP)" and "High Fidelity Playback (A2DP Sink)". That is sad when the audio device supports AptX or AptX HD. Expected situation: One can select AptX or AptX HD as the Bluetooth audio output profile. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1870829/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1940008] [NEW] systemd lsb-base integration script leaking shell variable changes which can break consumers
Public bug reported: I am using systemd version 248.3-1ubuntu3 from the impish repository. It was compiled and built in the following manner: # add impish deb-src repository to apt sources apt build-dep systemd/impish apt source -b systemd/impish Once built, it was installed over the top of systemd 245.4-4ubuntu3. I am running ubuntu 20.04.2. The source tarball of systemd includes a file (./debian/systemd/lib/lsb/init-functions.d/40-systemd) which is intended to be installed into the drop-in script directory provided by the lsb- base package (/lib/lsb/init-functions.d). The problem that I am having is that this file (which is sourced by any script which sources /lib/lsb/init-functions) is setting variables, and in doing so, accidentally overwriting variables which are configured by the calling script. https://gist.github.com/TheWug/e120145f08e994d89e235e077a82ea75#file-40-systemd-L19 I noticed this when investigating why ipmiutil_wdt.service (provided by package ipmiutil) was failing to start. The problem is that the ipmiutil_wdt script, which makes use of init-functions, was statically setting some variables for later use, including one called $prog. $prog is then inadvertently overwritten by 40-systemd when ipmiutil_wdt sources /lib/lsb/init-functions. I think this is systemd's bug because systemd's lsb-base drop-in is not being a "good neighbor" to the scripts with which it shares a controlling shell. Even if ipmiutil were to rewrite its ipmiutil-wdt script, any other such script provided by another package which tries to use a variable called $prog (or $executable, or $argument, or $service, or $state, or any of a handful of others) will find its feet being stepped on by systemd's drop-in. I propose that the drop-in be modified to encapsulate all of this behavior where variables are assigned to within a function or subshell or something, so they can't accidentally contaminate the outside world. Other related package versions: lsb-base: 11.1.0ubuntu2 ipmiutil: 3.1.5-1 ** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940008 Title: systemd lsb-base integration script leaking shell variable changes which can break consumers Status in systemd package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I am using systemd version 248.3-1ubuntu3 from the impish repository. It was compiled and built in the following manner: # add impish deb-src repository to apt sources apt build-dep systemd/impish apt source -b systemd/impish Once built, it was installed over the top of systemd 245.4-4ubuntu3. I am running ubuntu 20.04.2. The source tarball of systemd includes a file (./debian/systemd/lib/lsb/init-functions.d/40-systemd) which is intended to be installed into the drop-in script directory provided by the lsb-base package (/lib/lsb/init-functions.d). The problem that I am having is that this file (which is sourced by any script which sources /lib/lsb/init-functions) is setting variables, and in doing so, accidentally overwriting variables which are configured by the calling script. https://gist.github.com/TheWug/e120145f08e994d89e235e077a82ea75#file-40-systemd-L19 I noticed this when investigating why ipmiutil_wdt.service (provided by package ipmiutil) was failing to start. The problem is that the ipmiutil_wdt script, which makes use of init-functions, was statically setting some variables for later use, including one called $prog. $prog is then inadvertently overwritten by 40-systemd when ipmiutil_wdt sources /lib/lsb/init-functions. I think this is systemd's bug because systemd's lsb-base drop-in is not being a "good neighbor" to the scripts with which it shares a controlling shell. Even if ipmiutil were to rewrite its ipmiutil-wdt script, any other such script provided by another package which tries to use a variable called $prog (or $executable, or $argument, or $service, or $state, or any of a handful of others) will find its feet being stepped on by systemd's drop-in. I propose that the drop-in be modified to encapsulate all of this behavior where variables are assigned to within a function or subshell or something, so they can't accidentally contaminate the outside world. Other related package versions: lsb-base: 11.1.0ubuntu2 ipmiutil: 3.1.5-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1940008/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1940014] [NEW] Several potential bugs of null pointer dereference in libx11-1.6.4
Public bug reported: Ubuntu version: 18.04 libx11-xcb-dev version:1.6.4 Hello,I found some potential bugs in package libx11,and the .docx file in the attachment I uploaded shows the occurrence process of the bug in a graphical way.Would you help me check whether the bugs mentioned below are true? I'm not 100% sure that the bugs I submitted is correct. I hope you don't mind seeing the wrong bug I submitted.Thank you very much for your patience. In file libx11-1.6.4/src/Xrm.c,defination of function XrmGetStringDatebase,line 1559. there is a statement call function NewDataBase(),load its return value to db,and this function may return a null pointer.in line 1560,there is a statement derefer db without check it.the process of this potential bug is shown in figure 1. There are several bugs caused by same reason such as in file Xrm.c,defination of function XrmPutStringResource,line 1532.In file Xrm.c ,defination of function XrmCombineFileDatabase,line 1702.In file Xrm.c,defiantion of function XrmGetFileDatabase,line 1678.In file Xrm.c,defination of function XrmPutLineResource,line 1547.In file Xrms.c,defination of function XrmGetStringDatabase,line 1559. In file libx11-1.6.4/src/Xrm.c,defination of function append_value_list,line 489. there is a statement call function Xmalloc to allocate memory,load its return value to value_list,but Xmalloc may fail to allocate memory,so value_list may be a null pointer.in line 490,there is a statement derefer value_list without check it.the process of this potential bug is shown in figure 2. In file libx11-1.6.4/modules/im/ximcp/imLcIm.c,defination of function _XimWriteCachedDefaultTree,line 464. there is a statement call function Xmalloc to allocate memory,load its return value to m,but Xmalloc may fail to allocate memory,so m may be a null pointer.statements after derefer m without check it.the process of this potential bug is shown in figure 3. In file libx11-1.6.4/src/PolyReg.c,defination of function InsertEdgeInET,line 98. there is a statement call function Xmalloc to allocate memory,load its return value to tmpSLLBlock,but Xmalloc may fail to allocate memory,so tmpSLLBlock may be a null pointer.in line 100,there is a statement derefer tmpSLLBlock without check it.the process of this potential bug is shown in figure 5.btw,there are several null pointer dereference caused by same reason,one of which is marked by green text in graph 4. In file libx11-1.6.4/modules/im/ximcp/imCallbk.c,defination of function _XimStrConversionCallback,line 338. there is a statement call function Xmalloc to allocate memory,load its return value to buf,but Xmalloc may fail to allocate memory,so buf may be a null pointer.in line 340,buf act as the first parameter of funcion _XimSetHeader(this function is in file libx11-1.6.2/modules/im/ximcp/imDefIm.c,line 78),in this function there are several statement derefer buf without check.the process of this potential bug is shown in figure 5.btw,some of lines after line 340 also will derefer buf without check. In file libx11-1.6.4/modules/im/ximcp/imCallbk.c,defination of function _read_text_from_packet,line 528. there is a statement call function Xmalloc to allocate memory,load its return value to text->feedback,but Xmalloc may fail to allocate memory,so text->feedback may be a null pointer.In line 531,there is a statement derefer text->feedback without check it.the process of this potential bug is shown in figure 6. In file libx11-1.6.4/src/xcms/cmsColNm.c,defination of function _XcmsParseColorString,line 212. there is a statement call function Xmalloc to allocate memory,load its return value to string_lowered ,but Xmalloc may fail to allocate memory,so string_lowered may be a null pointer.In line 219,there is a statement derefer string_lowered without check it.the process of this potential bug is shown in figure 7. In file libx11-1.6.4/src/xcms/cmsColNm.c,defination of function _XcmsLookupColorName,line 421. there is a statement call function Xmalloc to allocate memory,load its return value to name_lowered ,but Xmalloc may fail to allocate memory,so name_lowered may be a null pointer.In line 432,there is a statement derefer name_lowered without check it.the process of this potential bug is shown in figure 8. In file libx11-1.6.4/src/xcms/IdOfPr.c,defination of function XcmsFormatOfPrefix,line 70. there is a statement call function Xmalloc to allocate memory,load its return value to string_lowered ,but Xmalloc may fail to allocate memory,so string_lowered may be a null pointer.In line 82,there is a statement derefer string_lowered without check it.the process of this potential bug is shown in figure 9. In file libx11-1.6.4/src/InitExt.c,defination of function XESetWireToError,line 332. there is a statement call function Xmalloc to allocate memory,load its return value to dpy->error_vec ,but Xmalloc may fail to allocate memory,so dpy->error_vec may be a null pointer.In line
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1940018] [NEW] Several potential bugs of memory leak in libx11-1.6.4
Public bug reported: Ubuntu version: 18.04 libx11 version:1.6.4 Hello,I found some potential bugs in package libx11-xcb-dev,and the microsoft word file in the attachment I uploaded shows the occurrence process of the bug in a graphical way.Would you help me check whether the bugs mentioned below are true? I'm not 100% sure that the bugs I submitted is correct. I hope you don't mind seeing the wrong bug I submitted.Thank you very much for your patience. In file libx11-1.6.4/modules/im/ximcp/imLcPrs.c,defination of parsestringfile,line 734. The statement "tbp=malloc(size);"allocate memory to tbp and in line 738,if select false branch at this statement,tbp will not be freed correctly.the process of this potential bug is shown in figure 1. In file libx11-1.6.4/src/xlibi18n/lcDB.c,defination of f_numeric,line 882. The statement "wordp=malloc(len+1);"allocate memory to wordp and in line 883,if select false branch at this statement,function f_numeric will go on to execute.In line 910 or line 915,if select false branch at this statement,wordp will not be freed correctly.the process of this potential bug is shown in figure 2. In file libx11-1.6.4/src/xlibi18n/lcDB.c,defination of f_default,line 933. The statement "wordp=malloc(len+1);"allocate memory to wordp and in line 934,if select false branch at this statement,function f_default will go on to execute.and if select true branch in line 938,flow goto err,In line 989,if select false branch here,wordp will not be freed correctly.the process of this potential bug is shown in figure 3. ** Affects: libx11 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added: "libx11_memory_leak.docx" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940018/+attachment/5518042/+files/libx11_memory_leak.docx -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libx11 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940018 Title: Several potential bugs of memory leak in libx11-1.6.4 Status in libx11 package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Ubuntu version: 18.04 libx11 version:1.6.4 Hello,I found some potential bugs in package libx11-xcb-dev,and the microsoft word file in the attachment I uploaded shows the occurrence process of the bug in a graphical way.Would you help me check whether the bugs mentioned below are true? I'm not 100% sure that the bugs I submitted is correct. I hope you don't mind seeing the wrong bug I submitted.Thank you very much for your patience. In file libx11-1.6.4/modules/im/ximcp/imLcPrs.c,defination of parsestringfile,line 734. The statement "tbp=malloc(size);"allocate memory to tbp and in line 738,if select false branch at this statement,tbp will not be freed correctly.the process of this potential bug is shown in figure 1. In file libx11-1.6.4/src/xlibi18n/lcDB.c,defination of f_numeric,line 882. The statement "wordp=malloc(len+1);"allocate memory to wordp and in line 883,if select false branch at this statement,function f_numeric will go on to execute.In line 910 or line 915,if select false branch at this statement,wordp will not be freed correctly.the process of this potential bug is shown in figure 2. In file libx11-1.6.4/src/xlibi18n/lcDB.c,defination of f_default,line 933. The statement "wordp=malloc(len+1);"allocate memory to wordp and in line 934,if select false branch at this statement,function f_default will go on to execute.and if select true branch in line 938,flow goto err,In line 989,if select false branch here,wordp will not be freed correctly.the process of this potential bug is shown in figure 3. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libx11/+bug/1940018/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1939966] Re: Random system stops
Thanks for the bug report. Next time the problem happens, please: 1. Wait 10 seconds. 2. Reboot. 3. Run: journalctl -b-1 > prevboot.txt 4. Attach the resulting text file here. 5. Also check for crashes using these instructions: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Responses#Missing_a_crash_report_or_having_a_.crash_attachment ** Package changed: xorg (Ubuntu) => ubuntu ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939966 Title: Random system stops Status in Ubuntu: Incomplete Bug description: Every once in a while (it's been three times this week), the entire system will just stop. There's still electricity running. The keyboard is lit up, and the monitor is black (electricity-running black, and not shutdown-black). There's no picture and no sound. Just immediately before it does, I know it's about to happen because whatever audio is playing at the time will begin repeating, and then the computer goes down. I don't actually know if it's an Xorg problem. It just sounded like the closest possibility, based on the way the computer actually behaves. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: xorg 1:7.7+19ubuntu14 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-25.27~20.04.1-generic 5.11.22 Uname: Linux 5.11.0-25-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia .proc.driver.nvidia.capabilities.gpu0: Error: path was not a regular file. .proc.driver.nvidia.capabilities.mig: Error: path was not a regular file. .proc.driver.nvidia.gpus..01.00.0: Error: path was not a regular file. .proc.driver.nvidia.registry: Binary: "" .proc.driver.nvidia.suspend: suspend hibernate resume .proc.driver.nvidia.suspend_depth: default modeset uvm .proc.driver.nvidia.version: NVRM version: NVIDIA UNIX x86_64 Kernel Module 470.57.02 Tue Jul 13 16:14:05 UTC 2021 GCC version: gcc version 9.3.0 (Ubuntu 9.3.0-17ubuntu1~20.04) ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.18 Architecture: amd64 BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log' CasperMD5CheckResult: skip CompizPlugins: No value set for `/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options/active_plugins' CompositorRunning: None CurrentDesktop: XFCE Date: Sat Aug 14 19:34:11 2021 DistUpgraded: Fresh install DistroCodename: focal DistroVariant: ubuntu DkmsStatus: nvidia, 470.57.02, 5.11.0-25-generic, x86_64: installed nvidia, 470.57.02, 5.8.0-63-generic, x86_64: installed virtualbox, 6.1.22, 5.11.0-25-generic, x86_64: installed virtualbox, 6.1.22, 5.8.0-63-generic, x86_64: installed ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes GraphicsCard: NVIDIA Corporation TU106 [GeForce RTX 2060] [10de:1f15] (rev a1) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:1e21] Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Renoir [1002:1636] (rev f0) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Renoir [1043:1e21] InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-03-20 (147 days ago) InstallationMedia: Xubuntu 20.04.2 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20210204) MachineType: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. TUF Gaming FA506IV_TUF506IV ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.11.0-25-generic root=UUID=0fc8340c-98de-4434-9806-ec613e241e8c ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 SourcePackage: xorg Symptom: display UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 07/02/2020 dmi.bios.release: 5.16 dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc. dmi.bios.version: FA506IV.309 dmi.board.asset.tag: ATN12345678901234567 dmi.board.name: FA506IV dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. dmi.board.version: 1.0 dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Tag dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. dmi.chassis.version: 1.0 dmi.ec.firmware.release: 3.9 dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvrFA506IV.309:bd07/02/2020:br5.16:efr3.9:svnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:pnTUFGamingFA506IV_TUF506IV:pvr1.0:rvnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:rnFA506IV:rvr1.0:cvnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:ct10:cvr1.0: dmi.product.family: TUF Gaming FA506IV dmi.product.name: TUF Gaming FA506IV_TUF506IV dmi.product.version: 1.0 dmi.sys.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. version.compiz: compiz N/A version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.102-1ubuntu1~20.04.1 version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 20.2.6-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx N/A version.nvidia-graphics-drivers: nvidia-graphics-drivers-* N/A version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.20.9-2ubuntu1.2~20.04.2 version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:19.1.0-1 version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.99.917+git20200226-1 version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.16-1 To
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1939941] Re: Drop down menu issues
** Package changed: xorg (Ubuntu) => thunderbird (Ubuntu) ** Also affects: firefox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939941 Title: Drop down menu issues Status in firefox package in Ubuntu: New Status in thunderbird package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I found that about a month or so ago that I was having problems with dropdown menus in Thunderbird where they would not respond when I clicked on them. I managed to get around this by using the arrow keys but I would also have issues with the thunderbird icon in the icon tray not responding if I suspended the computer with Thunderbird still open. Now I find that the drop down application menu in Firefox also doesn't work and when I click on it the menu flashes up very quickly but then disappears. Also sometimes drop down menus that I have opened continue to persist in the display even after I have shut down the program, so I don't think it is a problem just in Mozilla products. I have reported the bug to Mozilla however just in case. Thanks. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.04 Package: xorg 1:7.7+22ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-25.27-generic 5.11.22 Uname: Linux 5.11.0-25-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu65.1 Architecture: amd64 BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log' CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown CompositorRunning: None CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Sat Aug 14 13:19:47 2021 DistUpgraded: 2021-05-17 16:32:46,967 DEBUG Running PostInstallScript: '/usr/lib/ubuntu-advantage/upgrade_lts_contract.py' DistroCodename: hirsute DistroVariant: ubuntu ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes, if not too technical GraphicsCard: Intel Corporation 4th Gen Core Processor Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:0416] (rev 06) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) Subsystem: Dell 4th Gen Core Processor Integrated Graphics Controller [1028:05bd] Subsystem: Dell Sun XT [Radeon HD 8670A/8670M/8690M / R5 M330 / M430 / Radeon 520 Mobile] [1028:05bd] InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-03-06 (160 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.10 "Groovy Gorilla" - Release amd64 (20201022) MachineType: Dell Inc. Latitude E6440 ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_GB:en PATH=(custom, no user) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/BOOT/ubuntu_i3o8fa@/vmlinuz-5.11.0-25-generic root=ZFS=rpool/ROOT/ubuntu_i3o8fa ro quiet splash vt.handoff=1 SourcePackage: xorg Symptom: display UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to hirsute on 2021-05-17 (88 days ago) dmi.bios.date: 06/13/2019 dmi.bios.release: 65.24 dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.bios.version: A24 dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.chassis.type: 9 dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvrA24:bd06/13/2019:br65.24:svnDellInc.:pnLatitudeE6440:pvr00:rvnDellInc.:rn:rvr:cvnDellInc.:ct9:cvr: dmi.product.name: Latitude E6440 dmi.product.sku: 05BD dmi.product.version: 00 dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc. version.compiz: compiz N/A version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.105-3~21.04.1 version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 21.0.3-0ubuntu0.2 version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx N/A version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.20.11-1ubuntu1.1 version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:19.1.0-2 version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.99.917+git20200714-1ubuntu1 version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.17-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1939941/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1870829] Re: AptX and AptX HD unavailable as Bluetooth audio quality options
** Changed in: pulseaudio (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Confirmed ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #991597 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=991597 ** Also affects: pulseaudio (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=991597 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1870829 Title: AptX and AptX HD unavailable as Bluetooth audio quality options Status in pulseaudio package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in pulseaudio package in Debian: Unknown Bug description: Current situation: When one connects a Bluetooth audio device, at best one can choose between "Headset Head Unit (HSP/HFP)" and "High Fidelity Playback (A2DP Sink)". That is sad when the audio device supports AptX or AptX HD. Expected situation: One can select AptX or AptX HD as the Bluetooth audio output profile. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1870829/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1931722] Re: software-properties-gtk generates python errors
[Expired for software-properties (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.] ** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Expired -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1931722 Title: software-properties-gtk generates python errors Status in software-properties package in Ubuntu: Expired Bug description: Launching software-properties-gtk gives all these Python errors after having upgraded to 21.04: Gtk-Message: 17:32:53.643: Failed to load module "appmenu-gtk-module" Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/software-properties-gtk", line 100, in app = SoftwarePropertiesGtk(datadir=options.data_dir, options=options, file=file) File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/softwareproperties/gtk/SoftwarePropertiesGtk.py", line 196, in __init__ bus = dbus.SystemBus() File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/dbus/_dbus.py", line 195, in __new__ return Bus.__new__(cls, Bus.TYPE_SYSTEM, mainloop=mainloop, File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/dbus/_dbus.py", line 102, in __new__ bus = BusConnection.__new__(subclass, bus_type, mainloop=mainloop) File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/dbus/bus.py", line 124, in __new__ bus = cls._new_for_bus(address_or_type, mainloop=mainloop) dbus.exceptions.DBusException: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.LimitsExceeded: The maximum number of active connections for UID 1000 has been reached Version: 0.99.10 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.04 Package: software-properties-common 0.99.10 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-18.19-generic 5.11.17 Uname: Linux 5.11.0-18-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu65.1 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown CurrentDesktop: MATE Date: Fri Jun 11 17:36:34 2021 InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-09-06 (277 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-MATE 20.04.1 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200731) PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=fr_FR PATH=(custom, no user) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: software-properties UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to hirsute on 2021-06-08 (2 days ago) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/1931722/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1940008] Re: systemd lsb-base integration script leaking shell variable changes which can break consumers
I'm not a bash script architect, but I bodged together this workaround and the ipmiutil_wdt service starts correctly with it applied to my system: https://gist.github.com/TheWug/1a7f509e040f10c05039acc06fe29d9e -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940008 Title: systemd lsb-base integration script leaking shell variable changes which can break consumers Status in systemd package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I am using systemd version 248.3-1ubuntu3 from the impish repository. It was compiled and built in the following manner: # add impish deb-src repository to apt sources apt build-dep systemd/impish apt source -b systemd/impish Once built, it was installed over the top of systemd 245.4-4ubuntu3. I am running ubuntu 20.04.2. The source tarball of systemd includes a file (./debian/systemd/lib/lsb/init-functions.d/40-systemd) which is intended to be installed into the drop-in script directory provided by the lsb-base package (/lib/lsb/init-functions.d). The problem that I am having is that this file (which is sourced by any script which sources /lib/lsb/init-functions) is setting variables, and in doing so, accidentally overwriting variables which are configured by the calling script. https://gist.github.com/TheWug/e120145f08e994d89e235e077a82ea75#file-40-systemd-L19 I noticed this when investigating why ipmiutil_wdt.service (provided by package ipmiutil) was failing to start. The problem is that the ipmiutil_wdt script, which makes use of init-functions, was statically setting some variables for later use, including one called $prog. $prog is then inadvertently overwritten by 40-systemd when ipmiutil_wdt sources /lib/lsb/init-functions. I think this is systemd's bug because systemd's lsb-base drop-in is not being a "good neighbor" to the scripts with which it shares a controlling shell. Even if ipmiutil were to rewrite its ipmiutil-wdt script, any other such script provided by another package which tries to use a variable called $prog (or $executable, or $argument, or $service, or $state, or any of a handful of others) will find its feet being stepped on by systemd's drop-in. I propose that the drop-in be modified to encapsulate all of this behavior where variables are assigned to within a function or subshell or something, so they can't accidentally contaminate the outside world. Other related package versions: lsb-base: 11.1.0ubuntu2 ipmiutil: 3.1.5-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1940008/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1940008] Re: systemd lsb-base integration script leaking shell variable changes which can break consumers
It also looks like, farther down, systemctl_redirect() leaks $service. Not sure if it's intentional or not, given that it works to protect its other variables, so maybe it could use some attention too. https://gist.github.com/TheWug/e120145f08e994d89e235e077a82ea75#file-40-systemd-L70 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940008 Title: systemd lsb-base integration script leaking shell variable changes which can break consumers Status in systemd package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I am using systemd version 248.3-1ubuntu3 from the impish repository. It was compiled and built in the following manner: # add impish deb-src repository to apt sources apt build-dep systemd/impish apt source -b systemd/impish Once built, it was installed over the top of systemd 245.4-4ubuntu3. I am running ubuntu 20.04.2. The source tarball of systemd includes a file (./debian/systemd/lib/lsb/init-functions.d/40-systemd) which is intended to be installed into the drop-in script directory provided by the lsb-base package (/lib/lsb/init-functions.d). The problem that I am having is that this file (which is sourced by any script which sources /lib/lsb/init-functions) is setting variables, and in doing so, accidentally overwriting variables which are configured by the calling script. https://gist.github.com/TheWug/e120145f08e994d89e235e077a82ea75#file-40-systemd-L19 I noticed this when investigating why ipmiutil_wdt.service (provided by package ipmiutil) was failing to start. The problem is that the ipmiutil_wdt script, which makes use of init-functions, was statically setting some variables for later use, including one called $prog. $prog is then inadvertently overwritten by 40-systemd when ipmiutil_wdt sources /lib/lsb/init-functions. I think this is systemd's bug because systemd's lsb-base drop-in is not being a "good neighbor" to the scripts with which it shares a controlling shell. Even if ipmiutil were to rewrite its ipmiutil-wdt script, any other such script provided by another package which tries to use a variable called $prog (or $executable, or $argument, or $service, or $state, or any of a handful of others) will find its feet being stepped on by systemd's drop-in. I propose that the drop-in be modified to encapsulate all of this behavior where variables are assigned to within a function or subshell or something, so they can't accidentally contaminate the outside world. Other related package versions: lsb-base: 11.1.0ubuntu2 ipmiutil: 3.1.5-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1940008/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1939933] Re: pulseaudio is not built with AptX support
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1870829 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1870829 Oh, sorry I never tested any of the new codecs. Bug 1870829 has been reopened. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1870829 AptX and AptX HD unavailable as Bluetooth audio quality options -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939933 Title: pulseaudio is not built with AptX support Status in pulseaudio package in Ubuntu: New Status in pulseaudio package in Debian: Unknown Bug description: The changelog mentions AptX, but it's not actually enabled in the build if I'm not mistaken. Aptx support seems to require gstreamer in the build dependency at least. [changelog] pulseaudio (1:15.0+dfsg1-1ubuntu1) impish; urgency=medium * New upstream version resynchronized on Debian - Support for bluetooth LDAC and AptX codecs and HFP profiles for improved audio quality [upstream release notes] https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/PulseAudio/Notes/15.0/#supportforldacandaptxbluetoothcodecsplussbcxqsbcwithhigher-qualityparameters [meson.build] bluez5_gst_dep = dependency('gstreamer-1.0', version : '>= 1.14', required : get_option('bluez5-gstreamer')) bluez5_gstapp_dep = dependency('gstreamer-app-1.0', required : get_option('bluez5-gstreamer')) have_bluez5_gstreamer = false if bluez5_gst_dep.found() and bluez5_gstapp_dep.found() have_bluez5_gstreamer = true cdata.set('HAVE_GSTLDAC', 1) cdata.set('HAVE_GSTAPTX', 1) endif [build log] https://launchpadlibrarian.net/551304449/buildlog_ubuntu-impish-amd64.pulseaudio_1%3A15.0+dfsg1-1ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz ... Dependency gstreamer-1.0 skipped: feature gstreamer disabled Dependency gstreamer-app-1.0 skipped: feature gstreamer disabled Dependency gstreamer-rtp-1.0 skipped: feature gstreamer disabled Run-time dependency gstreamer-1.0 found: NO (tried pkgconfig and cmake) Run-time dependency gstreamer-app-1.0 found: NO (tried pkgconfig and cmake) ... Enable D-Bus: true Enable BlueZ 5: true Enable native headsets:true Enable ofono headsets:true Enable GStreamer based codecs: false To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1939933/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1883798] Re: package libjpeg-turbo8 2.0.3-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/usr/share/doc/libjpeg-turbo8/changelog.Debian.gz', which is different f
Thank you so much ...you make my day. Thanks Diki for the solution Solution By " Diki Taufik Gurohman (taufikdiki11) wrote on 2020-12-15 " rm -rf /usr/share/doc/libjpeg-turbo8/changelog.Debian.gz then apt --fix-broken install -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libjpeg-turbo in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883798 Title: package libjpeg-turbo8 2.0.3-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/usr/share/doc/libjpeg- turbo8/changelog.Debian.gz', which is different from other instances of package libjpeg-turbo8:amd64 Status in libjpeg-turbo package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: not install file !!! packettracer ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: libjpeg-turbo8 2.0.3-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-37.41-generic 5.4.41 Uname: Linux 5.4.0-37-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.2 AptOrdering: libjpeg-turbo8:amd64: Install NULL: ConfigurePending Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: skip Date: Wed Jun 17 03:37:01 2020 DpkgTerminalLog: Preparing to unpack .../libjpeg-turbo8_2.0.3-0ubuntu1.20.04.1_amd64.deb ... Unpacking libjpeg-turbo8:amd64 (2.0.3-0ubuntu1.20.04.1) over (2.0.3-0ubuntu1) ... [1mdpkg:[0m error processing archive /var/cache/apt/archives/libjpeg-turbo8_2.0.3-0ubuntu1.20.04.1_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite shared '/usr/share/doc/libjpeg-turbo8/changelog.Debian.gz', which is different from other instances of package libjpeg-turbo8:amd64 ErrorMessage: trying to overwrite shared '/usr/share/doc/libjpeg-turbo8/changelog.Debian.gz', which is different from other instances of package libjpeg-turbo8:amd64 InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-06-16 (0 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200423) Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.8, Python 3.8.2, python3-minimal, 3.8.2-0ubuntu2 PythonDetails: N/A RelatedPackageVersions: dpkg 1.19.7ubuntu3 apt 2.0.2ubuntu0.1 SourcePackage: libjpeg-turbo Title: package libjpeg-turbo8 2.0.3-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/usr/share/doc/libjpeg-turbo8/changelog.Debian.gz', which is different from other instances of package libjpeg-turbo8:amd64 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libjpeg-turbo/+bug/1883798/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1939973] [NEW] make 4.3-4.1 triggers build failures
Public bug reported: trying to rebuild cross-toolchain-base from https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-toolchain-r/+archive/ubuntu/volatile/+packages triggers a build failure: [...] START stamp-dir/init-binutils tar -x -f /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.37.tar.xz set -e; cd binutils-2.37 ; cp -a /usr/src/binutils/debian/ . ; if [ -n "$(grep -v '^\#' /<>/debian/patches/binutils/series)" ]; then QUILT_PATCHES=/<>/debian/patches/binutils quilt --quiltrc /dev/null push -a; fi; rm -rf .pc cd binutils-2.37 ; env -i CROSS_ARCHS="amd64 i386 s390x ppc64el arm64 armhf armel powerpc" debian/rules stamps/control make: dpkg-architecture: No such file or directory make: lsb_release: No such file or directory make: lsb_release: No such file or directory make: pwd: No such file or directory make: dpkg-parsechangelog: No such file or directory make: dpkg-parsechangelog: No such file or directory make: dpkg-parsechangelog: No such file or directory make: dpkg-parsechangelog: No such file or directory debian/rules:163: *** unexpected source package name: . Stop. make: *** [debian/rules:215: stamp-dir/init-binutils] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage.pl: error: debian/rules build subprocess returned exit status 2 working around by omitting the -i option to env, or by setting PATH explicitly. Reverting to the version in the release pocket lets the c-t-b- build succeed. ** Affects: make-dfsg (Ubuntu) Importance: High Status: Confirmed ** Tags: block-proposed rls-ii-incoming ** Changed in: make-dfsg (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: make-dfsg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Tags added: block-proposed rls-ii-incoming -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to make-dfsg in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939973 Title: make 4.3-4.1 triggers build failures Status in make-dfsg package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: trying to rebuild cross-toolchain-base from https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-toolchain-r/+archive/ubuntu/volatile/+packages triggers a build failure: [...] START stamp-dir/init-binutils tar -x -f /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.37.tar.xz set -e; cd binutils-2.37 ; cp -a /usr/src/binutils/debian/ . ; if [ -n "$(grep -v '^\#' /<>/debian/patches/binutils/series)" ]; then QUILT_PATCHES=/<>/debian/patches/binutils quilt --quiltrc /dev/null push -a; fi; rm -rf .pc cd binutils-2.37 ; env -i CROSS_ARCHS="amd64 i386 s390x ppc64el arm64 armhf armel powerpc" debian/rules stamps/control make: dpkg-architecture: No such file or directory make: lsb_release: No such file or directory make: lsb_release: No such file or directory make: pwd: No such file or directory make: dpkg-parsechangelog: No such file or directory make: dpkg-parsechangelog: No such file or directory make: dpkg-parsechangelog: No such file or directory make: dpkg-parsechangelog: No such file or directory debian/rules:163: *** unexpected source package name: . Stop. make: *** [debian/rules:215: stamp-dir/init-binutils] Error 2 dpkg-buildpackage.pl: error: debian/rules build subprocess returned exit status 2 working around by omitting the -i option to env, or by setting PATH explicitly. Reverting to the version in the release pocket lets the c-t-b- build succeed. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/make-dfsg/+bug/1939973/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1939238] Re: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY.
Hello "It asks me to do an fsk manually if I read between the lines, and I don't understand what that means or what to do." => https://forum.ubuntu-fr.org/viewtopic.php?pid=22480277#p22480277 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to e2fsprogs in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939238 Title: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY. Status in e2fsprogs package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Hello This problem did not occur on my computer. https://nsa40.casimages.com/img/2021/08/07/210807015400327092.png It occurs in users who are not competent. This week, the French forum collapsed over this incident. I think changing the advice phrase might improve understanding of the action to be taken. Can these lines " ( i.e.. without -a or -p options) fsck existed with status code 4 The root file system on /dev/ requires a manual fsck" become "execute this command 'fsck -y /dev/xx' to do a manual fsck on the root file system." ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.04 Package: gnome-terminal 3.38.1-1ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-25.27-generic 5.11.22 Uname: Linux 5.11.0-25-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu65.1 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Sun Aug 8 15:16:28 2021 ExecutablePath: /usr/libexec/gnome-terminal-server InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-08-02 (370 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200423) ProcEnviron: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8 PATH=(custom, user) SHELL=/bin/bash XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= SourcePackage: gnome-terminal UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to hirsute on 2021-07-11 (27 days ago) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/e2fsprogs/+bug/1939238/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp