[Touch-packages] [Bug 1691991] Re: Xorg Segmentation fault on Hisilicon D05 board (arm64)

Yes, you can close this bug now. Thank you very much for your good works and to fix this problems. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1691991 Title: Xorg

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1685007] Re: package bluez:i386 5.37-0ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: aliprosessi komentotiedosto post-installation asennettu palautti virhetilakoodin 1

[Expired for bluez (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.] ** Changed in: bluez (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Expired -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bluez in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1654448] Re: XPS 13 9360 and 9350, Realtek ALC3246, Headphone audio hiss

Please try this: http://people.canonical.com/~khfeng/lp1654448-artful/ ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1699001] [NEW] package liblzma5:i386 5.1.1alpha+20120614-2ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: O pacote está num mau estado de inconsistência; deve reinstala-lo antes de tentar co

Public bug reported: error of instalation after try to install teamviewer 12 ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: liblzma5:i386 5.1.1alpha+20120614-2ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.8.0-54.57~16.04.1-generic 4.8.17 Uname: Linux 4.8.0-54-generic x86_64

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1698795] Re: App icons in top panel (next to menu) doesn't match theme

** Also affects: humanity-icon-theme (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags added: gnome-17.10 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to humanity-icon-theme in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1698638] Re: indicator-datetime list evolution calendar full-day event a day before actual date of event (Unity-7)

** Changed in: indicator-datetime (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Triaged ** Changed in: indicator-datetime (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to indicator-datetime

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1691908] Re: fstab binds appear as mounts (x-gvfs-hide is being ignored)

** Changed in: glib Status: Unknown => Confirmed ** Changed in: glib Importance: Unknown => Low -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1691908 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1698979] [NEW] ftbfs with python 3.6

Public bug reported: Tests fail with Python 3.6: == FAIL: autopilot.tests.unit.test_application_launcher.ApplicationLauncherInternalTests.test_get_application_launcher_wrapper_raises_runtimeerror

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1692127] Re: duplicate signature for Package problems can be too short

** Description changed: - Steve brought up bug 1691983 and how it's duplicate signature is missing - information. It contains: + [Impact] + apport is creating a shorter than necessary duplicate signature in apport-package bug reports which can lead to misconsolidation and confused developers.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1698972] [NEW] package bsdutils 1:2.29-1ubuntu2 [modified: usr/bin/logger usr/bin/renice usr/bin/script usr/bin/scriptreplay usr/bin/wall] failed to install/upgrade: package bsdu

Public bug reported: I am not sure that the issue is a bug. I was trying to install screen by the command prompt when i got the error message. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.04 Package: bsdutils 1:2.29-1ubuntu2 [modified: usr/bin/logger usr/bin/renice usr/bin/script

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1698171] Re: package openssl 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.6 failed to install/upgrade: le paquet openssl n'est pas prêt pour la configuration configuration impossible (état actuel « half-ins

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981 package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1698244] Re: package openssl 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.8 failed to install/upgrade: pakiet openssl nie jest gotowy do skonfigurowania nie można go skonfigurować (bieżący stan "half-instal

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981 package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1698100] Re: package openssl 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.6 failed to install/upgrade: el paquete openssl no está listo para configurarse no se puede configurar (estado actual `half-installe

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981 package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1688018] Re: DNS server from vpn connection is not being used after network-manager upgrade to 1.2.6

Cruz, thanks for this. However, (1) after all the trouble I had getting OpenVPN working, I don't fancy switching to something else (and my system does work at present, using the older version of Network Manager). Also, (2) I don't really understand what you say about /etc/hosts, though probably

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1698113] Re: package libssl1.0.0:i386 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.6 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configu

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981 package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1698104] Re: package libssl1.0.0:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.6 [modified: lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.1.0.0 lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libssl.so.1.0.0 usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/openssl-

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981 package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1697290] Re: package libssl-doc 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.8 failed to install/upgrade: pacote libssl-doc não está pronto para configuração não posso configurar (estado atual 'half-install

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981 package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1698292] Re: package libssl-doc 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.6 [modified: usr/share/doc/libssl-doc/changelog.Debian.gz usr/share/man/man3/evp.3ssl.gz] failed to install/upgrade: package libss

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981 package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1698097] Re: package libssl1.0.0:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.6 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting config

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981 package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1692981] Re: package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting config

Hello; would those of you affected by this bug please attach your /var/log/apt/term.log file? Thanks -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1698303] Re: package libssl-doc 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.6 [modified: usr/share/doc/libssl-doc/changelog.Debian.gz] failed to install/upgrade: package libssl-doc is not ready for configur

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981 package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1698150] Re: package openssl 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.8 failed to install/upgrade: Paket openssl ist nicht bereit zur Konfiguration kann nicht konfiguriert werden (momentaner Status »hal

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981 package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1698670] Re: package libssl1.0.0:i386 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.6 [modified: lib/i386-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.1.0.0 lib/i386-linux-gnu/libssl.so.1.0.0 usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/openssl-1.0.0/e

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981 package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1698098] Re: package libssl1.0.0:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu9.3 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting config

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981 package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1698324] Re: package libssl1.0.0:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.8 failed to install/upgrade: package libssl1.0.0:amd64 is not ready for configuration cannot configure (current status 'hal

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981 package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1583463] Re: package openssl 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4 [modified: usr/bin/openssl] failed to install/upgrade: package openssl is not ready for configuration cannot configure (current statu

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981 package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1692981] Re: package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting config

Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1696827] Re: package libssl1.0.0:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.6 [modified: lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.1.0.0 lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libssl.so.1.0.0 usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/openssl-

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981 package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1696799] Re: package libssl1.0.0:i386 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.8 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configu

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981 package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1657243] Re: package openssl 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981 package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1697335] Re: package libssl1.0.0:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.6 failed to install/upgrade: el paquete libssl1.0.0:amd64 no está listo para configurarse no se puede configurar (estado a

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981 package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1697016] Re: package libssl-doc 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.6 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981 package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1696930] Re: package libssl1.0.0:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.6 [modified: lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.1.0.0 lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libssl.so.1.0.0 usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/openssl-

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981 package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1697011] Re: package libssl-doc 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.6 failed to install/upgrade: package libssl-doc is not ready for configuration cannot configure (current status 'half-installed')

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981 package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1697838] Re: package libssl-doc 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.8 failed to install/upgrade: package libssl-doc is not ready for configuration cannot configure (current status 'half-installed')

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981 package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1697068] Re: package openssl 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.8 failed to install/upgrade: pakket verkeert in een heel slechte en inconsistente staat; u zou het opnieuw moeten installeren alvore

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981 package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1697072] Re: package libssl1.0.0:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu9.3 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso instalado el script post-installation devolvió el código de salida de error 1

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981 package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1697356] Re: package libssl-doc 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.6 [modified: usr/share/doc/libssl-doc/changelog.Debian.gz] failed to install/upgrade: el paquete libssl-doc no está listo para con

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981 package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1697597] Re: package libssl1.0.0:i386 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.6 failed to install/upgrade: le paquet libssl1.0.0:i386 n'est pas prêt pour la configuration configuration impossible (état

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981 package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1697911] Re: package libssl1.0.0:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.6 failed to install/upgrade: package libssl1.0.0:amd64 cannot be configured because libssl1.0.0:i386 is not ready (current

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981 package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1696940] Re: package libssl-doc 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.6 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981 package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1697313] Re: package libssl1.0.0:i386 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.6 failed to install/upgrade: package libssl1.0.0:i386 is not ready for configuration cannot configure (current status 'half-

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981 package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1696863] Re: package libssl1.0.0:i386 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.6 failed to install/upgrade: o pacote libssl1.0.0:i386 não está pronto para configuração não pode configurar (status actual

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981 package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1697280] Re: package libssl1.0.0:i386 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.6 failed to install/upgrade: le paquet est dans un état vraiment incohérent; vous devriez le réinstaller avant de tenter de

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981 package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1697801] Re: package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.8 failed to install/upgrade: package libssl-dev:amd64 is not ready for configuration cannot configure (current status 'half-

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981 package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1697099] Re: package openssl 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.6 failed to install/upgrade: package openssl is not ready for configuration cannot configure (current status 'half-installed')

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981 package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1697121] Re: package libssl1.0.0:i386 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.6 [modified: lib/i386-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.1.0.0 lib/i386-linux-gnu/libssl.so.1.0.0] failed to install/upgrade: package li

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1692981 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692981 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1692981 package libssl-dev:amd64 1.0.2g-1ubuntu11.2 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1582767] Re: apparmor permissions missing for winbind

** Changed in: ntp (Debian) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1582767 Title: apparmor permissions missing for winbind Status

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1666980] Re: cannot install click, missing python files

Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: click (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to click in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1698958] Re: package click 0.4.45.1+16.10.20160916-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-removal script returned error exit status 1

Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: click (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to click in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1698958] Re: package click 0.4.45.1+16.10.20160916-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-removal script returned error exit status 1

** Tags removed: need-duplicate-check -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to click in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1698958 Title: package click 0.4.45.1+16.10.20160916-0ubuntu1 failed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1698958] [NEW] package click 0.4.45.1+16.10.20160916-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-removal script returned error exit status 1

Public bug reported: I am unable to update Ubuntu through Software Updater, so I tried to update it manually. I am using the LXDE environment, in order to save RAM, as it is lighter than Gnome. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.04 Package: click 0.4.45.1+16.10.20160916-0ubuntu1

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1569925] Re: Shutdown hang on 16.04 with iscsi targets

Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1681410] Re: fstrim corrupts ocfs2 filesystems when clustered

Seeing the same thing with OCFS2 on Oracle VM Server 3.3.3. Clustered OCFS2, but on one device and only one node (Clustered when setup, but then the cluster portion wasn't utilized due to licensing) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1583801] Re: No sound via headphones (headset) when Ubuntu boots with them plugged in

Also affects ALC3234 on Dell Latitude 3340 See https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/1670059 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to alsa-driver in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1583801

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1692127] Re: duplicate signature for Package problems can be too short

** Branch linked: lp:~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu/artful/apport/ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692127 Title: duplicate signature for Package problems

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1698638] Re: indicator-datetime list evolution calendar full-day event a day before actual date of event (Unity-7)

> What Ubuntu release are you using? This is reproducible on 16.04, 17.04 & 17.10 For 16.04 there was a patch which fixes the issue for me (https://launchpadlibrarian.net/206123315/upcoming-after-end.patch) but since then indicator-datetime code changed significantly and the patch is not valid

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1698638] Re: indicator-datetime list evolution calendar full-day event a day before actual date of event (Unity-7)

What Ubuntu release are you using? What is the output of 'locale' specifically LC_TIME ? Does the event show correctly in gnome-calendar and in evolution? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to indicator-datetime

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1698638] Re: indicator-datetime list evolution calendar full-day event a day before actual date of event (Unity-7)

** Description changed: Indicator-datetime lists events to take place one day ahead e.g. all day event on Monday is listed to be happen on Sunday Also this scenario also happens for today's date. Foe example; 1. Create a full-day-event in any previous day (2nd june 2017) 2. Click

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1302004] Re: Indicator-datetime doesn't list in-progress events

The bug occurs for any event when DTSTART == DTEND -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to indicator-datetime in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1302004 Title: Indicator-datetime doesn't list in-progress

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1698638] Re: indicator-datetime list evolution calendar full-day event a day before actual date of event (Unity-7)

** Description changed: Indicator-datetime lists events to take place one day ahead e.g. all day event on Monday is listed to be happen on Sunday - Also this scenario also happens for today's date. Foe example; 1. Create a full-day-event in any previous day (2nd june 2017) 2.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1531184] Re: dnsmasq doesn't start on boot because its interface isn't up yet

Submitted patch upstream, will revisit in a couple weeks before taking on an extra deviation in Ubuntu (since currently we do not have any delta). ** Changed in: hundredpapercuts Assignee: David Britton (davidpbritton) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu) Assignee: David

[Touch-packages] [Bug 736349] Re: "Test speakers" is silent

For me, installing libcanberra-pulse worked. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-sounds in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/736349 Title: "Test speakers" is silent Status in OEM Priority Project:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1531184] Re: dnsmasq doesn't start on boot because its interface isn't up yet

** Also affects: dnsmasq (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=774970 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1576559] Re: Refused to switch profile to headset_head_unit: Not connected

I gave up and spent $80 on new headphones that seem to work. GhostTek SoDrop2s, if anyone wants to know. Working for me on 17.04 Zesty. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1376329] Re: readarray doesn't work with pipes

This is not a bug but the expected behavior. Due to the use of a pipe, "readarray blah" is executed in a sub-shell. But "echo ${blah[@]}" is executed in the parent shell. This has nothing to do with readarray, the command ": | blah=blah; echo $blah" would also fail to output blah. On the other

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1381567] Re: Bash returns unexpected character \001 on string operation

Affects xenial too. There is definitely something wrong. Several notes on this: 1. A direct call to "echo ${f[@]:0:1}" outputs "a". The problems thus lies in the variable assignment. 2. If first_char=${f[@]:0:1}, then echo "$first_char" outputs \001 but "declare -p first_char" outputs \001\001

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1576559] Re: Refused to switch profile to headset_head_unit: Not connected

More than a year and this bug is not yet fixed? Is it a huge problem to solve? Can I help with some log files or something like that? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1606078] Re: No sound with Ubuntu 16.04

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1533343 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1533343 Very same issue on an Asus E202SA. After watching a movie pulseaudio stoped working at the next reboot. Now I must use ALSA, but cannot use headphones o connect to HDI and listen only with the netbook's

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1394136] Re: if statement with pipe to grep randomly fails if pipefail is set

This is not a bug, although some might disagree with the current behavior of bash. With a command like 'yes | grep -q .', because the grep terminates early and the yes is writing past the end of the pipe buffer, the yes process is _always_ terminated with a SIGPIPE signal (which translates to a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1698880] [NEW] Horizontal line flickering

Public bug reported: When i'm scrolling or watching a video there is a horizontal line flickering in the middle of the screen. It doesnt matter if i use an external monitor or the monitor of my laptop. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: xorg 1:7.7+13ubuntu3

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1693226] Re: Break the conflicts with click the optparser

This bug was fixed in the package click - 0.4.46+17.04.20170607.3-0ubuntu1 --- click (0.4.46+17.04.20170607.3-0ubuntu1) zesty; urgency=medium * Rename the python package this installs from click to click_package. (LP: #1693226) * Use the correct overlayfs module name for the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1693226] Re: Break the conflicts with click the optparser

This bug was fixed in the package click - 0.4.46+16.10.20170607.3-0ubuntu1 --- click (0.4.46+16.10.20170607.3-0ubuntu1) yakkety; urgency=medium * Rename the python package this installs from click to click_package. (LP: #1693226) * Use the correct overlayfs module name for

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1693226] Re: Break the conflicts with click the optparser

This bug was fixed in the package click - 0.4.43+16.04.20170613-0ubuntu1 --- click (0.4.43+16.04.20170613-0ubuntu1) xenial; urgency=medium * Rename the python package this installs from click to click_package. (LP: #1693226) -- Kyle Fazzari Tue, 13 Jun

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1693226] Update Released

The verification of the Stable Release Update for click has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1696402] Re: chroot configuration strictly depends on overlayfs

This bug was fixed in the package click - 0.4.46+16.10.20170607.3-0ubuntu1 --- click (0.4.46+16.10.20170607.3-0ubuntu1) yakkety; urgency=medium * Rename the python package this installs from click to click_package. (LP: #1693226) * Use the correct overlayfs module name for

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1696402] Re: chroot configuration strictly depends on overlayfs

Thanks Lukasz. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to click in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696402 Title: chroot configuration strictly depends on overlayfs Status in click package in Ubuntu: Fix

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1698670] DuplicateSignature.txt

Due to a bug in apport's method for creating a duplicate signature, the DuplicateSignature in this report was incorrect. We are fixing that now, sorry for the noise! ** Attachment added: "DuplicateSignature.txt"

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1696402] Re: chroot configuration strictly depends on overlayfs

This bug was fixed in the package click - 0.4.46+17.04.20170607.3-0ubuntu1 --- click (0.4.46+17.04.20170607.3-0ubuntu1) zesty; urgency=medium * Rename the python package this installs from click to click_package. (LP: #1693226) * Use the correct overlayfs module name for the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1696402] Re: chroot configuration strictly depends on overlayfs

Autopkgtests in -proposed passed for both series, considering this as verified. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done-yakkety verification-done-zesty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1696402] Update Released

The verification of the Stable Release Update for click has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1698610] Re: package apport 2.20.4-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: El paquete está en un estado grave de inconsistencia - debe reinstalarlo antes de intentar su configuració

** Attachment removed: "DuplicateSignature.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1698610/+attachment/4898221/+files/DuplicateSignature.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1698610] DuplicateSignature.txt

Due to a bug in apport's method for creating a duplicate signature, the DuplicateSignature in this report was incorrect. We are fixing that now, sorry for the noise! ** Attachment added: "DuplicateSignature.txt"

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1698670] Re: package libssl1.0.0:i386 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.6 [modified: lib/i386-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.1.0.0 lib/i386-linux-gnu/libssl.so.1.0.0 usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/openssl-1.0.0/e

** Attachment removed: "DuplicateSignature.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1698670/+attachment/4898219/+files/DuplicateSignature.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1583269] Re: Bash dies with a SIGABRT sporadically when doing 'read -N INTEGER'.

Affects trusty too. A quick way to reproduce this is (works 9 times out of 10 here): $ bash -c 'read -N 1000' < /dev/urandom Trusty output: $ bash -c 'read -N 1000' < /dev/urandom malloc: ../.././builtins/../.././builtins/read.def:603: assertion botched realloc: start and end chunk

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1689825] Re: gnome-keyring not unlocked on boot

Although chromium-browser is affected by the issue, it doesn't appear to be the cause of the issue itself (other apps like gnome-terminal appear to be similarly affected), so I'm marking this bug invalid for chromium- browser. ** Changed in: chromium-browser (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed =>

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1583269] Re: Bash dies with a SIGABRT sporadically when doing 'read -N INTEGER'.

Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: bash (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bash in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1650792] Re: Ubuntu 16.04.1 System policy prevents modification of network settings for all users

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 964705 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/964705 Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1650792] Re: Ubuntu 16.04.1 System policy prevents modification of network settings for all users

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 964705 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/964705 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. I marked this bug as duplicate of bug #964705. Could you please take some time to open one more bug for the udev rule you

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1650792] Re: Ubuntu 16.04.1 System policy prevents modification of network settings for all users

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 964705 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/964705 Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: modemmanager (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1693226] Re: Break the conflicts with click the optparser

We tested this in xenial, yakkety and zesty proposed, together with snapcraft for bug #1692102. No issues found with the rename of the package, and now snapcraft can be updated without problems. I've just marked this as verified. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1688018] Re: DNS server from vpn connection is not being used after network-manager upgrade to 1.2.6

Just expanding a little bit more my last comment, on Ubuntu 17.04, using the 'sudo openconnect xxx' command is adding to the file /run/resolvconf/resolv.conf file the DNS IP addresses as global ones. Just also added them on the 'icon' version and it fixed it too. In Ubuntu 17.04 it's using by

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1694296] Re: package libnspr4:amd64 2:4.13.1-0ubuntu0.17.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting c

Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Since there isn't enough information in your report to differentiate between a local configuration problem and a bug in Ubuntu, I'm marking this bug as Incomplete. If indeed this is a local configuration

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1688018] Re: DNS server from vpn connection is not being used after network-manager upgrade to 1.2.6

On my Ubuntu 17.04 (also happened on 16.10, upgraded to 17.10 that same machine) the bug it's happening to me. My current workaround is to use an equivalent 'openconnect'. Command issued in my case: sudo openconnect --user my-vpn-user --csd-user my-local-unix-user --csd-wrapper

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1683923] Re: Empty extglob patterns hang bash

** Tags added: trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bash in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1683923 Title: Empty extglob patterns hang bash Status in bash package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1683923] Re: Empty extglob patterns hang bash

Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: bash (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bash in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1686573] Re: USB Modem not displayed in network manager

It seems that both ModemManager and NetworkManager are doing the right thing Apr 27 10:57:05 Paul-HP-Laptop ModemManager[846]: Modem /org/freedesktop/ModemManager1/Modem/1: state changed (enabling -> registered) Apr 27 10:57:06 Paul-HP-Laptop NetworkManager[898]: [1493254626.0016]

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1621396] Re: systemd-resolved crashed with SIGSEGV in dns_packet_is_reply_for()

** Tags added: verification-done-zesty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1621396 Title: systemd-resolved crashed with SIGSEGV in dns_packet_is_reply_for()

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1698751] Re: interface related rules appear active after deletion

Thank you for using ufw and reporting a bug. I cannot reproduce this: $ sudo ufw allow OpenSSH $ sudo ufw enable $ sudo ufw show added Added user rules (see 'ufw status' for running firewall): ufw allow OpenSSH $ sudo ufw allow in on eth0 to any port 8080 proto tcp Rule added Rule added (v6) $

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1672499] Re: systemd 232-18ubuntu1 ADT test failure with linux 4.10.0.13.15 on armhf

** Tags added: verification-done-zesty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1672499 Title: systemd 232-18ubuntu1 ADT test failure with linux 4.10.0.13.15 on

  1   2   >