[Touch-packages] [Bug 1815318] Re: mate 18.04.1 xserver won't open caja on local machine

2019-02-10 Thread Norbert
** Description changed:

+ Steps to reproduce:
+ 1. Have installed Ubuntu MATE 18.04 LTS (you know its hostname and IP - i.e. 
192.168.1.162)
+ 2. Install SSH server on Ubuntu MATE 18.04 LTS
+ 3. Open terminal on other remote system (client) and execute command to run 
Caja over X forwarding:
+ 
+ssh -X user@192.168.1.162 caja
+ 
+ Expected results:
+ * Caja is shown on remote (client) screen with window title *folder (on 
hostname)*
+ 
+ Actual results:
+ * Caja is not shown on remote (client) screen, but launches on server locally.
+ 
+ Note: this works normally if server runs Ubuntu MATE 16.04 LTS, but
+ fails with 18.04 LTS.
+ 
+ ---
+ Original description below:
+ 
  I can open a remote terminal using ssh -X 192.168.1.162. All other gui's
  that I've tested opened locally except the file manager Caja. When
  issuing caja in the remote terminal, I get nothing locally. Caja does
  open on the remote machine however, just not locally. The ssh -X 18.04.1
  client still works connecting to a mate 16.04 server. I've tested this
  on numerous mate 18.04 clients, two 16.04 servers and two 18.04 servers,
  all mate. Something is wonky with caja on an 18.04.1 server.
  
  Please let me know if I can provide any more information. The only file
  manager I've tested that works is an X file manager, xfimage. X2go works
  and connects to servers, SSH Connect to Server works, why isn't the
  remote X terminal working using caja?

** Also affects: openssh (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: deja-dup (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: blueman (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1815318

Title:
  mate 18.04.1 xserver won't open caja on local machine

Status in ubuntu-mate:
  New
Status in blueman package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in caja package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in deja-dup package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in openssh package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Steps to reproduce:
  1. Have installed Ubuntu MATE 18.04 LTS (you know its hostname and IP - i.e. 
192.168.1.162)
  2. Install SSH server on Ubuntu MATE 18.04 LTS
  3. Open terminal on other remote system (client) and execute command to run 
Caja over X forwarding:

 ssh -X user@192.168.1.162 caja

  Expected results:
  * Caja is shown on remote (client) screen with window title *folder (on 
hostname)*

  Actual results:
  * Caja is not shown on remote (client) screen, but launches on server locally.

  Note: this works normally if server runs Ubuntu MATE 16.04 LTS, but
  fails with 18.04 LTS.

  ---
  Original description below:

  I can open a remote terminal using ssh -X 192.168.1.162. All other
  gui's that I've tested opened locally except the file manager Caja.
  When issuing caja in the remote terminal, I get nothing locally. Caja
  does open on the remote machine however, just not locally. The ssh -X
  18.04.1 client still works connecting to a mate 16.04 server. I've
  tested this on numerous mate 18.04 clients, two 16.04 servers and two
  18.04 servers, all mate. Something is wonky with caja on an 18.04.1
  server.

  Please let me know if I can provide any more information. The only
  file manager I've tested that works is an X file manager, xfimage.
  X2go works and connects to servers, SSH Connect to Server works, why
  isn't the remote X terminal working using caja?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-mate/+bug/1815318/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1815415] Re: please update libseccomp for newer kernel syscalls

2019-02-10 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
** Description changed:

  [Impact]
  
   * The libseccomp library provides an easy to use, platform independent,
     interface to the Linux Kernel's syscall filtering mechanism. But it can
     only "control" those syscalls it knows about. Therefore staying up to
     date with newer kernels is a requirement to be fully funcitonal.
  
   * At the time 18.04 was released with the 4.15 kernel the new definitions
     were not yet released for libseccomp - lets fix this mismatch by
-    backporting the new syscall definitions [2].
+    backporting the new syscall definitions [2][3].
  
  [Test Case]
  
   * TODO
  
  [Regression Potential]
  
   * This isn't adding new active code like functions, but only extending
     the definitions of per-arch syscall numbers to be aware of the newer
     syscalls that were added in the kernel. Therefore no old use-cases
     should regress (they are not touched). The only change in behavior for
     an SRU POV would be that things that got denied so far (e.g. if you
     tried to set such a new syscall through libseccomp) was denied before
     and would now work. I think that is exactly the intention of the SRU
     and not a regression.
  
  [Other Info]
  
   * Requested while security reviewing an libseccomp SRU to have one update
     for both [1].
+  * we also missed the former update for kernel 4.9 [3] as the official 
+releases of the lib are rather slow.
  
  ---
  
  This came up while working on bug 1755250 which asked for statx.
  But on the review of that it was pointed out [1] that it would be great to 
support further new kernel syscall defines - this isn't even looking at HWE 
kernels for Bionic, but "just" adding those which are there for the 4.15 kernel 
Bionic was released with.
  With the HWE kernels in mind there would be even more one might want to add, 
but there is no newer such update in the upstream repo yet.
  
  [1]: 
https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/ubuntu/+source/libseccomp/+git/libseccomp/+merge/362906/comments/944418
  [2]: 
https://github.com/seccomp/libseccomp/commit/c842c2f6c203ad9da37ca60219172aa0be68d26a
+ [3]: 
https://github.com/seccomp/libseccomp/commit/d9102f12fd39bd77151a1f630fcfc8c80f86c55c

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libseccomp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1815415

Title:
  please update libseccomp for newer kernel syscalls

Status in libseccomp package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libseccomp source package in Bionic:
  Triaged
Status in libseccomp source package in Cosmic:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]

   * The libseccomp library provides an easy to use, platform independent,
     interface to the Linux Kernel's syscall filtering mechanism. But it can
     only "control" those syscalls it knows about. Therefore staying up to
     date with newer kernels is a requirement to be fully funcitonal.

   * At the time 18.04 was released with the 4.15 kernel the new definitions
     were not yet released for libseccomp - lets fix this mismatch by
     backporting the new syscall definitions [2][3].

  [Test Case]

   * TODO

  [Regression Potential]

   * This isn't adding new active code like functions, but only extending
     the definitions of per-arch syscall numbers to be aware of the newer
     syscalls that were added in the kernel. Therefore no old use-cases
     should regress (they are not touched). The only change in behavior for
     an SRU POV would be that things that got denied so far (e.g. if you
     tried to set such a new syscall through libseccomp) was denied before
     and would now work. I think that is exactly the intention of the SRU
     and not a regression.

  [Other Info]

   * Requested while security reviewing an libseccomp SRU to have one update
     for both [1].
   * we also missed the former update for kernel 4.9 [3] as the official 
 releases of the lib are rather slow.

  ---

  This came up while working on bug 1755250 which asked for statx.
  But on the review of that it was pointed out [1] that it would be great to 
support further new kernel syscall defines - this isn't even looking at HWE 
kernels for Bionic, but "just" adding those which are there for the 4.15 kernel 
Bionic was released with.
  With the HWE kernels in mind there would be even more one might want to add, 
but there is no newer such update in the upstream repo yet.

  [1]: 
https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/ubuntu/+source/libseccomp/+git/libseccomp/+merge/362906/comments/944418
  [2]: 
https://github.com/seccomp/libseccomp/commit/c842c2f6c203ad9da37ca60219172aa0be68d26a
  [3]: 
https://github.com/seccomp/libseccomp/commit/d9102f12fd39bd77151a1f630fcfc8c80f86c55c

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libseccomp/+bug/1815415/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1815415] Re: please update libseccomp for newer kernel syscalls

2019-02-10 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
@Seth / @Tyler - Hi, you asked for the change, but I'd want to ask for
something as well :-) Do you have any testcases from your security work
that we could reuse here to check the SRU for SRU verification?

** Description changed:

+ [Impact]
+ 
+  * The libseccomp library provides an easy to use, platform independent, 
+interface to the Linux Kernel's syscall filtering mechanism. But it can 
+only "control" those syscalls it knows about. Therefore staying up to 
+date with newer kernels is a requirement to be fully funcitonal.
+ 
+  * At the time 18.04 was released with the 4.15 kernel the new definitions 
+were not yet released for libseccomp - lets fix this mismatch by 
+backporting the new syscall definitions.
+ 
+ [Test Case]
+ 
+  * TODO
+ 
+ [Regression Potential]
+ 
+  * This isn't adding new active code like functions, but only extending 
+the definitions of per-arch syscall numbers to be aware of the newer 
+syscalls that were added in the kernel. Therefore no old use-cases 
+should regress (they are not touched). The only change in behavior for 
+an SRU POV would be that things that got denied so far (e.g. if you 
+tried to set such a new syscall through libseccomp) was denied before 
+and would now work. I think that is exactly the intention of the SRU 
+and not a regression.
+ 
+ [Other Info]
+  
+  * Requested while security reviewing an libseccomp SRU to have one update 
+for both [1].
+ 
+ ---
+ 
  This came up while working on bug 1755250 which asked for statx.
  But on the review of that it was pointed out [1] that it would be great to 
support further new kernel syscall defines - this isn't even looking at HWE 
kernels for Bionic, but "just" adding those which are there for the 4.15 kernel 
Bionic was released with.
  With the HWE kernels in mind there would be even more one might want to add, 
but there is no newer such update in the upstream repo yet.
  
  [1]:
  
https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/ubuntu/+source/libseccomp/+git/libseccomp/+merge/362906/comments/944418

** Description changed:

  [Impact]
  
-  * The libseccomp library provides an easy to use, platform independent, 
-interface to the Linux Kernel's syscall filtering mechanism. But it can 
-only "control" those syscalls it knows about. Therefore staying up to 
-date with newer kernels is a requirement to be fully funcitonal.
+  * The libseccomp library provides an easy to use, platform independent,
+    interface to the Linux Kernel's syscall filtering mechanism. But it can
+    only "control" those syscalls it knows about. Therefore staying up to
+    date with newer kernels is a requirement to be fully funcitonal.
  
-  * At the time 18.04 was released with the 4.15 kernel the new definitions 
-were not yet released for libseccomp - lets fix this mismatch by 
-backporting the new syscall definitions.
+  * At the time 18.04 was released with the 4.15 kernel the new definitions
+    were not yet released for libseccomp - lets fix this mismatch by
+    backporting the new syscall definitions [2].
  
  [Test Case]
  
-  * TODO
+  * TODO
  
  [Regression Potential]
  
-  * This isn't adding new active code like functions, but only extending 
-the definitions of per-arch syscall numbers to be aware of the newer 
-syscalls that were added in the kernel. Therefore no old use-cases 
-should regress (they are not touched). The only change in behavior for 
-an SRU POV would be that things that got denied so far (e.g. if you 
-tried to set such a new syscall through libseccomp) was denied before 
-and would now work. I think that is exactly the intention of the SRU 
-and not a regression.
+  * This isn't adding new active code like functions, but only extending
+    the definitions of per-arch syscall numbers to be aware of the newer
+    syscalls that were added in the kernel. Therefore no old use-cases
+    should regress (they are not touched). The only change in behavior for
+    an SRU POV would be that things that got denied so far (e.g. if you
+    tried to set such a new syscall through libseccomp) was denied before
+    and would now work. I think that is exactly the intention of the SRU
+    and not a regression.
  
  [Other Info]
-  
-  * Requested while security reviewing an libseccomp SRU to have one update 
-for both [1].
+ 
+  * Requested while security reviewing an libseccomp SRU to have one update
+    for both [1].
  
  ---
  
  This came up while working on bug 1755250 which asked for statx.
  But on the review of that it was pointed out [1] that it would be great to 
support further new kernel syscall defines - this isn't even looking at HWE 
kernels for Bionic, but "just" adding those which are there for the 4.15 kernel 
Bionic was released with.
  With the HWE kernels in mind there would be even more one might want to add, 
but there is no newer such update in the upstream repo yet.
  
- [1]:
- 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1815415] [NEW] please update libseccomp for newer kernel syscalls

2019-02-10 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 
Public bug reported:

This came up while working on bug 1755250 which asked for statx.
But on the review of that it was pointed out [1] that it would be great to 
support further new kernel syscall defines - this isn't even looking at HWE 
kernels for Bionic, but "just" adding those which are there for the 4.15 kernel 
Bionic was released with.
With the HWE kernels in mind there would be even more one might want to add, 
but there is no newer such update in the upstream repo yet.

[1]:
https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/ubuntu/+source/libseccomp/+git/libseccomp/+merge/362906/comments/944418

** Affects: libseccomp (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Fix Released

** Affects: libseccomp (Ubuntu Bionic)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Triaged

** Affects: libseccomp (Ubuntu Cosmic)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Fix Released

** Package changed: docker.io (Ubuntu) => libseccomp (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libseccomp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1815415

Title:
  please update libseccomp for newer kernel syscalls

Status in libseccomp package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libseccomp source package in Bionic:
  Triaged
Status in libseccomp source package in Cosmic:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  This came up while working on bug 1755250 which asked for statx.
  But on the review of that it was pointed out [1] that it would be great to 
support further new kernel syscall defines - this isn't even looking at HWE 
kernels for Bionic, but "just" adding those which are there for the 4.15 kernel 
Bionic was released with.
  With the HWE kernels in mind there would be even more one might want to add, 
but there is no newer such update in the upstream repo yet.

  [1]:
  
https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/ubuntu/+source/libseccomp/+git/libseccomp/+merge/362906/comments/944418

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libseccomp/+bug/1815415/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1815415] [NEW] please update libseccomp for newer kernel syscalls

2019-02-10 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
You have been subscribed to a public bug:

This came up while working on bug 1755250 which asked for statx.
But on the review of that it was pointed out that it would be great to support 
further new kernel syscall defines - this isn't even looking at HWE kernels for 
Bionic, but "just" adding those which are there for the 4.15 kernel Bionic was 
released with.
With the HWE kernels in mind there would be even more one might want to add, 
but there is no newer such update in the upstream repo yet.

** Affects: libseccomp (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
please update libseccomp for newer kernel syscalls
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1815415
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch 
seeded packages, which is subscribed to libseccomp in Ubuntu.

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1190350] Re: size listings of partitions do not match

2019-02-10 Thread ill
This is still happening on ubuntu 18.10

** Changed in: coreutils (Ubuntu)
   Status: Expired => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to coreutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1190350

Title:
  size listings of partitions do not match

Status in coreutils package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  When running baobab on my laptop, it says that the root partition is
  about 5GB on an install of kubuntu. When running df, it says that the
  root partition takes up 20GB, even though there is nothing that could
  be taking up that much space.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/coreutils/+bug/1190350/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1768754] Re: Applications are muted (silent) but system sounds work

2019-02-10 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for pulseaudio (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for
60 days.]

** Changed in: pulseaudio (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1768754

Title:
  Applications are muted (silent) but system sounds work

Status in pulseaudio package in Ubuntu:
  Expired

Bug description:
  How to reproduce this bug:

  * Connect a laptop to a dock, which is connected to a screen with an HDMI / 
DisplayPort cable.
  * Then configure the sound to exit through the cable connecting the screen.
  * Turn off the computer
  * Take it out of the dock
  * Turn on the computer

  Then, the sound automatically switches to the audio output of the
  laptop. System sounds work well, such as the bell of output volume
  slider or the test speaker buttons “front left” or “front right”.
  Unfortunately, no more applications can produce a sound.

  Graphically, applications react normally, we can see their connections
  with pulse audio in the applications tab of the sound settings. But no
  sound comes out of the speakers.

  Workaround :
  * Connect an alternative audio output, such as a Bluetooth headset
  * Select it in the “Choose a device for sound output:” option
  * Switch back to the internal audio speakers
  * Et voilà !

  If it help, my laptop is a “HP Zbook G2” sometime connected to a “HP
  2012 230W Docking Station”

  Thank you for your attention.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
  Package: gnome-control-center 1:3.28.1-0ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-20.21-generic 4.15.17
  Uname: Linux 4.15.0-20-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: GNOME
  Date: Thu May  3 09:21:01 2018
  EcryptfsInUse: Yes
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: gnome-control-center
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to bionic on 2018-04-24 (8 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1768754/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1774901] Re: Ubuntu 16.04 atualized, then wifi no more

2019-02-10 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for network-manager (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity
for 60 days.]

** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1774901

Title:
  Ubuntu 16.04 atualized, then wifi no more

Status in network-manager package in Ubuntu:
  Expired

Bug description:
  I use Ubuntu 18.04 LTS release 18.04, since its delivery, in dual boot
  with Windows 8.1, and its all ok. In may 28 I made a normal
  atualization so reboot, then wifi device not connected no more. I
  don´t have wired connection, only wifi, so I don´t know what to
  do.(I´m posting this by Windows, and wifi is connected.)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/1774901/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1799259] Re: Online Accounts imap does not support plain

2019-02-10 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for gnome-online-accounts (Ubuntu) because there has been no
activity for 60 days.]

** Changed in: gnome-online-accounts (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Expired

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gnome-online-accounts in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1799259

Title:
  Online Accounts imap does not support plain

Status in gnome-online-accounts package in Ubuntu:
  Expired

Bug description:
  When I try to log in with IMAP It does not go and alerts that it does
  not support plain.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
  Package: gnome-control-center 1:3.28.2-0ubuntu0.18.04.2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-38.41-generic 4.15.18
  Uname: Linux 4.15.0-38-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.4
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Mon Oct 22 09:21:51 2018
  ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gnome-control-center
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-10-18 (4 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 
(20180725)
  ProcEnviron:
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   SHELL=/bin/bash
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
  SourcePackage: gnome-control-center
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-online-accounts/+bug/1799259/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1811248] Re: systemd--networkd mounts denied for lxc guest

2019-02-10 Thread km
adding cross reference

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=916639#85

> I think that disabling AppArmor by default for new LXC containers for
Buster would be an OK-ish fallback option, if nothing else can
realistically be made to work in time for the freeze; that would be
sad, but it would not be a regression vs. Stretch.

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #916639
   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=916639

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1811248

Title:
  systemd--networkd mounts denied for lxc guest

Status in apparmor package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Host unbuntu cosmic | lxc 3.0.3 | aa 2.12 | systemd 239-7
  Guest Arch Linux | systemd 240.0

  After having upgraded in the guest systemd from 239.370 to 240.0 the
  host's AA is exhibiting

  > audit: type=1400 audit(1547125168.853:722): apparmor="DENIED"
  operation="mount" info="failed flags match" error=-13 profile="lxc-
  container-default-cgns" name="/" pid=8426 comm="(networkd)" flags="rw,
  rslave"

  and the guest

  > systemd-networkd.service: Failed to set up mount namespacing: Permission 
denied
  > systemd-networkd.service: Failed at step NAMESPACE spawning 
/usr/lib/systemd/systemd-networkd: Permission denied

  According to lxc bug tracker https://github.com/lxc/lxc/issues/2778

  > While we'd like to allow such mounts we cannot do so until the
  apparmor_parser is fixed to handle them correctly.

  other cross references

  https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/11371
  https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/61313

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/1811248/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1757915] Re: Please port your package away from Qt 4

2019-02-10 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: zbar (Debian)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zbar in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1757915

Title:
  Please port your package away from Qt 4

Status in zbar package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in zbar package in Debian:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  Currently Qt 4 has been dead upstream and we are starting to have
  problems maintaining it, like for example in the OpenSSL 1.1 support
  case.

  Following in the footsteps of Debian[1], all packages directly or
  indirectly depending on qt4-x11 (like this one) must either get ported
  to Qt 5 and uploaded to the development release or get removed (by
  means of demotion to -proposed or removal of the package) before the
  19.04 release. If it is possible to port your package by the 18.10
  release, please do so.

  If you have any questions about porting or this transition, please ask
  in #ubuntu-qt (preferred) or directly ping me

  [1] https://wiki.debian.org/Qt4Removal

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zbar/+bug/1757915/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1815384] [NEW] [Latitude 7490, Realtek ALC3246, Black Headphone Out, Front] Playback problem

2019-02-10 Thread Catalin Gabriel Stan
Public bug reported:

lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS
Release:18.04


I am not sure how to describe the problem.

If i turn off my laptop with my headphones in, when it boots up (without 
removing the headphones at any times), then no sound is playing on any exits. 
Not on the laptop's speaker, neither on the headphones.
  
I am a developer, and I think the issue it's that the hardware is trying to 
play the sound on the headphones (because you restrict playing on both the 
speakers and the headphones at once, without extra custom configurations), 
because playing on headphones is what the hardware remembers, but ubuntu 
forgets that between reboots and it's telling the hardware to play on speakers, 
which the hardware won't do. 

To fix the problem, i have to unplug my headphones and plug them back
in. And sometimes that is annoying because some sounds may be too loud
and i am in a meeting :) .

Maybe in ubuntu, the audio port is being initialized with speakers at
boot time, and it is not verifying the aux outputs for listeners, to
initialize with that.

Maybe this should be a new feature.

The feature would be to scan the audio ports at boot time, to see if any
auxiliary ports are found. Not sure if multiple can be found. Initialize
with whatever state would be if those auxiliary ports where plugged in
one at a time, and not found like this. The initial state should not
always be the default audio port.

Thank you for understanding, and please let me know if you what i mean.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: alsa-base 1.0.25+dfsg-0ubuntu5
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-45.48-generic 4.15.18
Uname: Linux 4.15.0-45-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.5
Architecture: amd64
AudioDevicesInUse:
 USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
 /dev/snd/controlC0:  catalinstan   2906 F pulseaudio
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Sun Feb 10 23:02:24 2019
InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-06-25 (230 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 (20180426)
PackageArchitecture: all
SourcePackage: alsa-driver
Symptom: audio
Symptom_AlsaPlaybackTest: ALSA playback test through plughw:PCH successful
Symptom_Card: Built-in Audio - HDA Intel PCH
Symptom_Jack: Black Headphone Out, Front
Symptom_PulsePlaybackTest: PulseAudio playback test successful
Symptom_Type: None of the above
Title: [Latitude 7490, Realtek ALC3246, Black Headphone Out, Front] Playback 
problem
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 11/26/2018
dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.bios.version: 1.7.2
dmi.board.name: 0KP0FT
dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.board.version: A00
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvr1.7.2:bd11/26/2018:svnDellInc.:pnLatitude7490:pvr:rvnDellInc.:rn0KP0FT:rvrA00:cvnDellInc.:ct10:cvr:
dmi.product.family: Latitude
dmi.product.name: Latitude 7490
dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc.

** Affects: alsa-driver (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug bionic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to alsa-driver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1815384

Title:
  [Latitude 7490, Realtek ALC3246, Black Headphone Out, Front] Playback
  problem

Status in alsa-driver package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  lsb_release -rd
  Description:  Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS
  Release:  18.04

  
  I am not sure how to describe the problem.

  If i turn off my laptop with my headphones in, when it boots up (without 
removing the headphones at any times), then no sound is playing on any exits. 
Not on the laptop's speaker, neither on the headphones.

  I am a developer, and I think the issue it's that the hardware is trying to 
play the sound on the headphones (because you restrict playing on both the 
speakers and the headphones at once, without extra custom configurations), 
because playing on headphones is what the hardware remembers, but ubuntu 
forgets that between reboots and it's telling the hardware to play on speakers, 
which the hardware won't do. 

  To fix the problem, i have to unplug my headphones and plug them back
  in. And sometimes that is annoying because some sounds may be too loud
  and i am in a meeting :) .

  Maybe in ubuntu, the audio port is being initialized with speakers at
  boot time, and it is not verifying the aux outputs for listeners, to
  initialize with that.

  Maybe this should be a new feature.

  The feature would be to scan the audio ports at boot time, to see if
  any auxiliary ports are found. Not sure if multiple can be found.
  Initialize with whatever state would be if those auxiliary ports where
  plugged in one at a time, and not found like this. The initial state
  should not always be the default audio port.

  Thank you for understanding, and please let me know if you what i
  mean.

  ProblemType: Bug
  

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1804603] Re: systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service fails on btrfs

2019-02-10 Thread Kris B.
Srill happening on 18.04LTS with ext4fs

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1804603

Title:
  systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service fails on btrfs

Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in systemd source package in Bionic:
  Fix Released
Status in systemd source package in Cosmic:
  Fix Released
Status in systemd source package in Disco:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]

   * Last security update introduced a regression on btrfs based systems, 
causing systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service to fail to start, resulting in degraded 
machines.
   * Cherrypick upstream fixes to resolve this.

  [Test Case]

   * Install VM using btrfs for /
   * Boot, check that systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service is started successfully 
with:
  $ systemctl status systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service

  [Regression Potential]

   * btrfs fd doesn't support the set of flags that systemd used, with
  this patch, a compat set of flags is set instead, thus resolving the
  introduced regression. The worst case scenario is that creating
  subvolumes/directories is still broken (as in, the current status
  quo).

  [Other Info]
   
   * Example bad output

  
  After update to systemd 237-3ubuntu10.9 systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service fails 
with:

  Nov 21 13:44:12 node-blc49 systemd[1]: Starting Create Volatile Files and 
Directories...
  Nov 21 13:44:12 node-blc49 systemd-tmpfiles[1226]: Failed to create directory 
or subvolume "/var": Bad file descriptor
  Nov 21 13:44:12 node-blc49 systemd-tmpfiles[1226]: Failed to create directory 
or subvolume "/home": Bad file descriptor
  Nov 21 13:44:12 node-blc49 systemd-tmpfiles[1226]: Failed to create directory 
or subvolume "/srv": Bad file descriptor
  Nov 21 13:44:12 node-blc49 systemd[1]: systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service: Main 
process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE
  Nov 21 13:44:12 node-blc49 systemd[1]: systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service: Failed 
with result 'exit-code'.
  Nov 21 13:44:12 node-blc49 systemd[1]: Failed to start Create Volatile Files 
and Directories.

  This happens on btrfs root filesystems in real hardware and on our
  virtualized servers as well. 237-3ubuntu10.6 didnt show this errors
  and going back to 237-3ubuntu10 removes them as well.

  # lsb_release -rd
  Description:Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS
  Release:18.04

  # apt-cache policy systemd
  systemd:
    Installiert:   237-3ubuntu10.9
    Installationskandidat: 237-3ubuntu10.9
    Versionstabelle:
   *** 237-3ubuntu10.9 500
  500 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-updates/main amd64 
Packages
  500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-security/main amd64 
Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
   237-3ubuntu10 500
  500 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/main amd64 Packages

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1804603/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Touch-packages] [Bug 1774443] Re: wireless hardblocked and wireless enable button not functional

2019-02-10 Thread Nicholas Wright
Yes, the issue still persists in 4.19.20 and 5.0-rc5

On Fri, Feb 8, 2019, 9:55 AM Kai-Heng Feng 
wrote:

> Does this still happen on latest mainline kernel?
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1774443
>
> Title:
>   wireless hardblocked and wireless enable button not functional
>
> Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
>   Confirmed
> Status in network-manager package in Ubuntu:
>   New
>
> Bug description:
>   Laptop is an HP Pavilion dm4-3170se. Dual booting Windows 7 and
>   ubuntu. In Windows, system boots with wireless disabled and then
>   pressing the wireless enable button twice enables WiFi.
>
>   In ubuntu, system boots with wireless disabled and wireless enable
>   button has no functionality either directly or in combination with the
>   fn-key.
>
>   Module hp_wmi may be the culprit? But disabling this has no effect on
>   hardblock.
>
>   reference forum post for more detailed info:
>
> https://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2392934=13772159#post13772159
>
>   ProblemType: Bug
>   DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
>   Package: network-manager 1.2.6-0ubuntu0.16.04.2
>   ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.13.0-43.48~16.04.1-generic 4.13.16
>   Uname: Linux 4.13.0-43-generic x86_64
>   ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.17
>   Architecture: amd64
>   CurrentDesktop: Unity
>   Date: Thu May 31 10:32:38 2018
>   IfupdownConfig:
># interfaces(5) file used by ifup(8) and ifdown(8)
>auto lo
>iface lo inet loopback
>   InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-05-19 (11 days ago)
>   InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.4 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64
> (20180228)
>   IpRoute:
>default via 172.16.96.1 dev eno1  proto static  metric 100
>169.254.0.0/16 dev eno1  scope link  metric 1000
>172.16.96.0/19 dev eno1  proto kernel  scope link  src 172.16.119.109
> metric 100
>192.17.90.180 via 172.16.96.1 dev eno1  proto dhcp  metric 100
>   NetworkManager.state:
>[main]
>NetworkingEnabled=true
>WirelessEnabled=true
>WWANEnabled=true
>   ProcEnviron:
>LANGUAGE=en_US
>PATH=(custom, no user)
>XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
>LANG=en_US.UTF-8
>SHELL=/bin/bash
>   RfKill:
>0: phy0: Wireless LAN
> Soft blocked: no
> Hard blocked: yes
>   SourcePackage: network-manager
>   UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
>   nmcli-con:
>NAMEUUID  TYPE
>   TIMESTAMP   TIMESTAMP-REAL   AUTOCONNECT
> AUTOCONNECT-PRIORITY  READONLY  DBUS-PATH
>  ACTIVE  DEVICE  STATE  ACTIVE-PATH
>
>Wired connection 1  0357c159-f43c-38f9-8b6f-91bb641d1712
> 802-3-ethernet  1527780471  Thu 31 May 2018 10:27:51 AM CDT  yes
> 4294966297no/org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Settings/0
> yes eno1activated
> /org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/ActiveConnection/1
>   nmcli-dev:
>DEVICE  TYPE  STATEDBUS-PATH
>   CONNECTION  CON-UUID  CON-PATH
>
>eno1ethernet  connected
> /org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Devices/2  Wired connection 1
> 0357c159-f43c-38f9-8b6f-91bb641d1712
> /org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/ActiveConnection/1
>wlp8s0  wifi  unavailable
> /org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Devices/1  --  --
>   --
>
>lo  loopback  unmanaged
> /org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Devices/0  --  --
>   --
>   nmcli-nm:
>RUNNING  VERSION  STATE  STARTUP  CONNECTIVITY  NETWORKING
> WIFI-HW  WIFI  WWAN-HW  WWAN
>running  1.2.6connected  started  full  enabled
>  enabled  disabled  enabled  enabled
>   ---
>   ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.18
>   Architecture: amd64
>   AudioDevicesInUse:
>USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
>/dev/snd/controlC0:  naww   1928 F pulseaudio
>   CurrentDesktop: Unity
>   DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
>   HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=96f5e2e6-1a22-453e-84c5-21cb7094a381
>   IfupdownConfig:
># interfaces(5) file used by ifup(8) and ifdown(8)
>auto lo
>iface lo inet loopback
>   InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-05-19 (32 days ago)
>   InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.4 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64
> (20180228)
>   IpRoute:
>default via 192.168.42.129 dev enp0s20u3  proto static  metric 100
>169.254.0.0/16 dev enp0s20u3  scope link  metric 1000
>192.168.42.0/24 dev enp0s20u3  proto kernel  scope link  src
> 192.168.42.168  metric 100
>   MachineType: Hewlett-Packard HP Pavilion dm4 Notebook PC
>   NetworkManager.state:
>[main]
>NetworkingEnabled=true
>WirelessEnabled=true
>WWANEnabled=true
>   Package: network-manager 1.2.6-0ubuntu0.16.04.2
>   PackageArchitecture: amd64
>   ProcFB: 0 inteldrmfb
>   ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.13.0-43-generic
> root=UUID=753230c7-6c88-415a-93f2-c133b9a161b1 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
>   

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1815367] [NEW] Hardcoded default "From: root (Cron Daemon)" is invalid

2019-02-10 Thread Hyacinth
Public bug reported:

Since the default hardcoded "From:" header is invalid, it prevents
emails from Cron to be delivered by SMTP. I should be changed to
something that is valid.

cron:
  Installed: 3.0pl1-128ubuntu2

Description:Ubuntu 16.04.5 LTS
Release:16.04

** Affects: cron (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cron in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1815367

Title:
  Hardcoded default "From: root (Cron Daemon)" is invalid

Status in cron package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Since the default hardcoded "From:" header is invalid, it prevents
  emails from Cron to be delivered by SMTP. I should be changed to
  something that is valid.

  cron:
Installed: 3.0pl1-128ubuntu2

  Description:  Ubuntu 16.04.5 LTS
  Release:  16.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cron/+bug/1815367/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1815354] Re: BCM 43142 driver not installed - no WiFi

2019-02-10 Thread Ubuntu QA Website
This bug has been reported on the Ubuntu ISO testing tracker.

A list of all reports related to this bug can be found here:
http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/reports/bugs/1815354

** Tags added: iso-testing

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1815354

Title:
  BCM 43142 driver not installed - no WiFi

Status in network-manager package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Disco daily Lubuntu 09.02.2019 and Disco daily Kubuntu 10.02.2019

  BCM 43142 drivers not installed resulting in no WiFi during and after
  installation.

  I was able to attach ethernet cable and use the command line "ubuntu-
  drivers" command to install the drivers and all worked well after
  that.

  Of course if running a machine with no ethernet then this is a huge
  problem for the user.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/1815354/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1814481] Re: bluetooth keyboard not working

2019-02-10 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

** Changed in: xorg (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1814481

Title:
  bluetooth keyboard not working

Status in xorg package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  I recently got a nice mechanical bluetooth keyboard to use on my
  thinkpad. It works fine with Android, Windows 10 and Xubuntu 19.04
  live, but on my installed xubuntu 18.04, 18.04 live and 18.10 live it
  only works after calling `sudo evtest /dev/input/eventN`.

  Xorg.0.log shows it is detected fine, and I can't see anything there
  after temporarily getting it to work using the evtest trick.

  18.515] (II) config/udev: Adding input device Keychron K1 
(/dev/input/event23)
  [18.515] (**) Keychron K1: Applying InputClass "libinput keyboard 
catchall"
  [18.515] (II) Using input driver 'libinput' for 'Keychron K1'
  [18.515] (**) Keychron K1: always reports core events
  [18.515] (**) Option "Device" "/dev/input/event23"
  [18.515] (**) Option "_source" "server/udev"
  [18.516] (II) event23 - Keychron K1: is tagged by udev as: Keyboard
  [18.516] (II) event23 - Keychron K1: device is a keyboard
  [18.516] (II) event23 - Keychron K1: device removed
  [18.524] (II) libinput: Keychron K1: needs a virtual subdevice
  [18.524] (**) Option "config_info" 
"udev:/sys/devices/pci:00/:00:14.0/usb1/1-7/1-7:1.0/bluetooth/hci0/hci0:256/0005:05AC:0255.0007/input/input24/event23"
  [18.524] (II) XINPUT: Adding extended input device "Keychron K1" (type: 
MOUSE, id 20)
  [18.524] (**) Option "AccelerationScheme" "none"
  [18.524] (**) Keychron K1: (accel) selected scheme none/0
  [18.524] (**) Keychron K1: (accel) acceleration factor: 2.000
  [18.524] (**) Keychron K1: (accel) acceleration threshold: 4
  [18.524] (II) event23 - Keychron K1: is tagged by udev as: Keyboard
  [18.524] (II) event23 - Keychron K1: device is a keyboard
  [18.524] (**) Keychron K1: Applying InputClass "libinput keyboard 
catchall"
  [18.524] (II) Using input driver 'libinput' for 'Keychron K1'
  [18.524] (**) Keychron K1: always reports core events
  [18.524] (**) Option "Device" "/dev/input/event23"
  [18.524] (**) Option "_source" "_driver/libinput"
  [18.524] (II) libinput: Keychron K1: is a virtual subdevice
  [18.524] (**) Option "config_info" 
"udev:/sys/devices/pci:00/:00:14.0/usb1/1-7/1-7:1.0/bluetooth/hci0/hci0:256/0005:05AC:0255.0007/input/input24/event23"
  [18.524] (II) XINPUT: Adding extended input device "Keychron K1" (type: 
KEYBOARD, id 21)
  [18.524] (**) Option "xkb_model" "pc105"
  [18.524] (**) Option "xkb_layout" "us"
  [18.524] (**) Option "xkb_variant" "altgr-intl"
  [18.524] (WW) Option "xkb_options" requires a string value

  I've also tried using the latest 4.20.6 from mainline-ppa and the
  latest bluetooth/bluz ppa without success.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
  Package: xorg 1:7.7+19ubuntu7.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-45.48-lowlatency 4.15.18
  Uname: Linux 4.15.0-45-lowlatency x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.5
  Architecture: amd64
  CompizPlugins: No value set for 
`/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options/active_plugins'
  CompositorRunning: None
  CurrentDesktop: XFCE
  Date: Sun Feb  3 23:51:29 2019
  DistUpgraded: 2019-02-03 21:49:33,752 DEBUG /openCache(), new cache size 92675
  DistroCodename: bionic
  DistroVariant: ubuntu
  DkmsStatus: virtualbox, 5.2.18, 4.15.0-45-lowlatency, x86_64: installed
  ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes
  GraphicsCard:
   Intel Corporation HD Graphics 620 [8086:5916] (rev 02) (prog-if 00 [VGA 
controller])
 Subsystem: Lenovo HD Graphics 620 [17aa:224b]
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-07-24 (559 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Xubuntu 16.04.2 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 
(20170215)
  MachineType: LENOVO 20HFCTO1WW
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.15.0-45-lowlatency 
root=UUID=8f8366ae-4d29-44cf-9b85-f83f1771eab1 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=1
  SourcePackage: xorg
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to bionic on 2019-02-03 (0 days ago)
  dmi.bios.date: 09/14/2018
  dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.bios.version: N1WET51W (1.30 )
  dmi.board.asset.tag: Not Available
  dmi.board.name: 20HFCTO1WW
  dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.board.version: SDK0J40709 WIN
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Information
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.chassis.version: None
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvrN1WET51W(1.30):bd09/14/2018:svnLENOVO:pn20HFCTO1WW:pvrThinkPadT470s:rvnLENOVO:rn20HFCTO1WW:rvrSDK0J40709WIN:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrNone:
  dmi.product.family: ThinkPad T470s
  dmi.product.name: 20HFCTO1WW
  dmi.product.version: ThinkPad T470s
  dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO
  version.compiz: 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1815354] [NEW] BCM 43142 driver not installed - no WiFi

2019-02-10 Thread Leó Kolbeinsson
Public bug reported:

Disco daily Lubuntu 09.02.2019 and Disco daily Kubuntu 10.02.2019

BCM 43142 drivers not installed resulting in no WiFi during and after
installation.

I was able to attach ethernet cable and use the command line "ubuntu-
drivers" command to install the drivers and all worked well after that.

Of course if running a machine with no ethernet then this is a huge
problem for the user.

** Affects: network-manager (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1815354

Title:
  BCM 43142 driver not installed - no WiFi

Status in network-manager package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Disco daily Lubuntu 09.02.2019 and Disco daily Kubuntu 10.02.2019

  BCM 43142 drivers not installed resulting in no WiFi during and after
  installation.

  I was able to attach ethernet cable and use the command line "ubuntu-
  drivers" command to install the drivers and all worked well after
  that.

  Of course if running a machine with no ethernet then this is a huge
  problem for the user.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/1815354/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1689825] Re: gnome-keyring not unlocked on xenial when dbus-user-session is installed

2019-02-10 Thread Rolf Leggewie
Could this be an incompatibility between i386 and amd64 packages?  I
have trouble adding my keys via ssh-add and after reading some comments
here and elsewhere gave removing dbus-user-session a try.  My computer
is amd64 with i386 foreign arch.  dbus-user-session was replaced with
dbus-user-session:i386 and a few other :386 packages.  After the
installation, the situation was much worse, with ssh-add completely
hanging now.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dbus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1689825

Title:
  gnome-keyring not unlocked on xenial when dbus-user-session is
  installed

Status in chromium-browser package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in dbus package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in flatpak package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  1) Release: 16.04.2
  2) gnome-keyring: 3.18.3-0ubuntu2
  3) Login. gnome-keyring unlocks "login" features including for google chrome
  4) gnome-keyring is not unlocked, chrome takes 2 minutes to open and with no 
secure password features(sync) functioning.

  For the past couple days, chrome on Ubuntu 16.04 takes a REALLY long
  time (maybe 2 minutes) to start. Once chrome is started, I am not able
  to sync and any secure password features are broken. I found out this
  is due to gnome-keyring not being unlocked at login. There's also no
  way to unlock the "login" portion of the keyring from the running
  daemon by default. I have to kill the gnome-keyring process and start
  without "--login" as a parameter. Then the "login" section shows up
  which I'm able to unlock. From there chrome starts up instantly but
  asks the following:

  Enter password to unlock your login keyring
  The login keyring did not get unlocked when you logged into your computer

  After that, all of it's sync and secure features are functional.

  Starting google-chrome-stable from a command line at boot without
  running the above workaround shows the following error messages:

  Gkr-Message: secret service operation failed: Did not receive a reply. 
Possible causes include: the remote application did not send a reply, the 
message bus security policy blocked the reply, the reply timeout expired, or 
the network connection was broken.
  Gkr-Message: secret service operation failed: Did not receive a reply. 
Possible causes include: the remote application did not send a reply, the 
message bus security policy blocked the reply, the reply timeout expired, or 
the network connection was broken.
  [4364:4393:0510/100407.740292:ERROR:token_service_table.cc(130)] Failed to 
decrypt token for service AccountId-108842767310111573264
  [4364:4445:0510/100407.740292:ERROR:gcm_store_impl.cc(929)] Failed to restore 
security token.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
  Package: gnome-keyring 3.18.3-0ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.8.0-52.55~16.04.1-generic 4.8.17
  Uname: Linux 4.8.0-52-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.5
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: GNOME-Flashback:Unity
  Date: Wed May 10 09:43:37 2017
  SourcePackage: gnome-keyring
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1689825/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1413283] Re: "Set as default" is absent from "Open with.." context menu

2019-02-10 Thread anatoly techtonik
Answering to my unspoken question about why 35k views and 68 heats gets
low priority. Because top and medium priority are all crashes, and it
seems that while crashes are popping up no user features willbe
developed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk+3.0/+bugs?orderby=-heat=0

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gtk+3.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1413283

Title:
  "Set as default" is absent from "Open with.." context menu

Status in One Hundred Papercuts:
  New
Status in gtk+3.0 package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Question http://askubuntu.com/questions/90214/how-to-set-default-
  program gets 35k+ views. I suspect much of it is because there is no
  intuitive way to set a file association. See the comment under
  accepted answer:

  Right-click -> open with -> other application DOES NOT show "Set as 
default"...
  Right-click -> Properties -> Open With DOES show "Set as default"

  I was looking for "Set as default" in "Open with.." menu myself .

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/1413283/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1800727] Re: [Regression] [Dell XPS 15 9575] Airplane mode key cannot deactivate airplane mode after update to xkb-data 2.23.1-1ubuntu1.18.10.1 from -proposed

2019-02-10 Thread Mario Vukelic
** Description changed:

+ Airplane mode works (enable and disable) after the eventual fixes in bug
+ #1740894 and the regression does not occur.
+ 
+ [Original report]
+ 
  Bug #1740894 proposed update to xkb-data 2.23.1-1ubuntu1.18.10.1 in
  order to pass KEY_RFKILL to userspace.
  
  Despite the issue described in bug #1740894, on Dell XPS 15 9575 the
  airplane mode key actually  worked flawlessly out-of-the-box after
  installing Cosmic at beginning of September, using xkb-data 2.23.
  
  Updating to the proposed xkb-data 2.23.1-1ubuntu1.18.10.1 however leads to 
the following issue:
  1. Press airplane mode key Fn+Pos1
  -> Works. Pop-up says "Airplane mode enabled", airplane icon appears in 
panel, Wifi and BT are off.
  2. Press Fn+Pos1 again
  -> Broken. Pop-up briefly says "Airplane mode disabled", then immediately 
changes to "... enabled", airplane icon remains in panel, Wifi and BT remain 
OFF.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.10
  Package: xkb-data 2.23.1-1ubuntu1.18.10.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.18.0-11.12-generic 4.18.12
  Uname: Linux 4.18.0-11-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.10-0ubuntu13
  Architecture: amd64
  BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log'
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Tue Oct 30 22:13:45 2018
  Dependencies:
-  
+ 
  DistUpgraded: Fresh install
  DistroCodename: cosmic
  DistroVariant: ubuntu
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-09-13 (47 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.10 "Cosmic Cuttlefish" - Alpha amd64 (20180912)
  Lsusb:
-  Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub
-  Bus 001 Device 003: ID 0489:e0a2 Foxconn / Hon Hai 
-  Bus 001 Device 004: ID 27c6:5395  
-  Bus 001 Device 002: ID 0bda:58f4 Realtek Semiconductor Corp. 
-  Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
+  Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub
+  Bus 001 Device 003: ID 0489:e0a2 Foxconn / Hon Hai
+  Bus 001 Device 004: ID 27c6:5395
+  Bus 001 Device 002: ID 0bda:58f4 Realtek Semiconductor Corp.
+  Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
  MachineType: Dell Inc. XPS 15 9575
  PackageArchitecture: all
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.18.0-11-generic 
root=UUID=26ff4c95-5f68-4121-b7d0-989fa705fcc8 ro quiet splash
  SourcePackage: xkeyboard-config
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 08/08/2018
  dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.bios.version: 1.1.9
  dmi.board.name: 0C32VW
  dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.board.version: A00
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvr1.1.9:bd08/08/2018:svnDellInc.:pnXPS159575:pvr:rvnDellInc.:rn0C32VW:rvrA00:cvnDellInc.:ct10:cvr:
  dmi.product.family: XPS
  dmi.product.name: XPS 15 9575
  dmi.product.sku: 080D
  dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc.
  version.compiz: compiz N/A
  version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.95-1
  version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 18.2.2-0ubuntu1
  version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 18.2.2-0ubuntu1
  version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.20.1-3ubuntu2.1
  version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A
  version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:18.1.0-1
  version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 
2:2.99.917+git20171229-1ubuntu1
  version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.15-3

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xkeyboard-config in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1800727

Title:
  [Regression] [Dell XPS 15 9575]  Airplane mode key cannot deactivate
  airplane mode after update to xkb-data 2.23.1-1ubuntu1.18.10.1 from
  -proposed

Status in xkeyboard-config package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  Airplane mode works (enable and disable) after the eventual fixes in
  bug #1740894 and the regression does not occur.

  [Original report]

  Bug #1740894 proposed update to xkb-data 2.23.1-1ubuntu1.18.10.1 in
  order to pass KEY_RFKILL to userspace.

  Despite the issue described in bug #1740894, on Dell XPS 15 9575 the
  airplane mode key actually  worked flawlessly out-of-the-box after
  installing Cosmic at beginning of September, using xkb-data 2.23.

  Updating to the proposed xkb-data 2.23.1-1ubuntu1.18.10.1 however leads to 
the following issue:
  1. Press airplane mode key Fn+Pos1
  -> Works. Pop-up says "Airplane mode enabled", airplane icon appears in 
panel, Wifi and BT are off.
  2. Press Fn+Pos1 again
  -> Broken. Pop-up briefly says "Airplane mode disabled", then immediately 
changes to "... enabled", airplane icon remains in panel, Wifi and BT remain 
OFF.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.10
  Package: xkb-data 2.23.1-1ubuntu1.18.10.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.18.0-11.12-generic 4.18.12
  Uname: Linux 4.18.0-11-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.10-0ubuntu13
  Architecture: 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1686470] Re: Apt updates that are uniformly spread across all timezones, with predictable application windows

2019-02-10 Thread Jarno Suni
Then should the version in xenial-proposed be deleted?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1686470

Title:
  Apt updates that are uniformly spread across all timezones, with
  predictable application windows

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in unattended-upgrades package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in apt source package in Xenial:
  Fix Released
Status in unattended-upgrades source package in Xenial:
  Fix Released
Status in apt source package in Yakkety:
  Won't Fix
Status in unattended-upgrades source package in Yakkety:
  Won't Fix
Status in apt source package in Zesty:
  Fix Released
Status in unattended-upgrades source package in Zesty:
  Fix Released
Status in apt source package in Artful:
  Fix Released
Status in unattended-upgrades source package in Artful:
  Fix Released
Status in apt package in Debian:
  Fix Released
Status in unattended-upgrades package in Debian:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [ Impact ]

   * unattended-upgrades are enabled by default in Ubuntu 16.04 and
  later

   * Currently the following three things happen as a monolithic event:
     - metadata updates: apt update
     - download of updates: apt upgrade --download-only
     - application of updates: apt upgrade

   * For the long running instances, all of the above happens at random
     times throughout the day.

   * If systems were poweredoff / suspended, this happens on boot /
  resume

   * End-users would like to have predictable timing, and control over when
     the updates happen.

  Considering all of the above, the following new behavior is proposed
  which should address all concerns in question. It combines all the
  desired properties from both end-user and mirror perspectives.

  [ Proposed Default Behavior ]

   * Decouple unattended-upgrades application, from apt update

   * apt update:
     - shall be a systemd timer based unit, triggered every 12h with a
   random delay of 12h, therefore executed randomly twice a day.
     - if unattened-upgrades (default on), or download-upgreadaeble-packages
   are enabled, it should result in updates being downloaded aka
   `apt upgrade --download-only`

   * unattended-upgrades:
     - shall be a separate systemd timer based unit triggered at 6am local
   time with a random delay of 1h, therefore executed between 6am and
   7am local time.

   * On boot / resume:
     - if we have missed one, or more, apt update timers,
   apt update / download upgrades / unattended-upgrade will happen in
   sequence. This may result in mirror spikes, but we do want to secure
   cold/stale-booted systems as soon as possible.

  [Test Case]

   * Run system for more than 24h, and check that apt updates were
     automatically executed twice.

   * Check that unattended upgrades were triggered to be applied at
     6am..7am window, if any.

   * Poweroff the machine over the period when apt-get update was
     scheduled, poweron and observe that apt-get update / download /
     unattended upgrade are all performed on boot.

   * Downgrade systemd to the release version of the package (from
     -security). Remove apt periodic stamp files rm /var/lib/apt/periodic/*.
 Then run 'sudo systemctl start apt-daily.service'.
     Confirm that the systemd package is downloaded, but not upgraded.

  [Regression Potential]

   * The newly proposed behavior is a mix of Pre-xenial behavior of "do
     everything at 6am..6:30am window" and the xenial+ behavior of "do
     everything at random times throughout the day". If there are specific
     deployments that rely on the previous types of behaviour they will be
     able to adjust manually the systemd timers with the overrides to be
     executed exactly as they wish; or match the .0 release behaviour that
     they prefer.

   * If timers behavior is coded wrongly the proposed behaviour might not be
     executed as intended, thus requiring further SRUs to bring us in-line
     with the great expectations.

  [Other Info]

    * Related bug reports and history:
  - bug #1615482
  - bug #1554848

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1686470/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1740894] Re: KEY_RFKILL is not passed to userspace

2019-02-10 Thread Mario Vukelic
And I can confirm that it is fixed on Disco as well

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libxkbcommon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1740894

Title:
  KEY_RFKILL is not passed to userspace

Status in libxkbcommon package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in xkeyboard-config package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in xorgproto package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in xkeyboard-config source package in Bionic:
  Fix Committed
Status in xkeyboard-config source package in Cosmic:
  Fix Committed
Status in xkeyboard-config source package in Disco:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  * Impact
  the airplane mode key doesn't work in GNOME

  * Test case
  Use a laptop with a key to activate airplane mode, it should toggle the 
corresponding mode on/off when used

  * Regression potential
  The change adds a new key definition but doesn't touch any existing one, 
nothing specific to test out of the new key working

  -

  There are a couple things going on, that could be fixed by a Debian or
  Ubuntu maintainer:

  - libxkbdcommon needs to be updated from 0.7.1 to 0.7.2. This
  introduces the RFKill key: https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives
  /wayland-devel/2017-August/034721.html

  - x11-proto needs a new release. This commit added RFKill, but it is
  not in a release:
  
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/proto/xproto/commit/?id=98a32d328e7195e12c38baa877917335bceffbaf

  - Likely other X11 packages need to be rebuilt.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libxkbcommon/+bug/1740894/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp