** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: Fix Released => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871268
Title:
Installation fails due to useless
Public bug reported:
cant tell what are these errors releted too...
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.10
Package: xorg 1:7.7+19ubuntu15
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-36.40-generic 5.8.18
Uname: Linux 5.8.0-36-generic x86_64
.tmp.unity_support_test.0:
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu5
Public bug reported:
cant tell whats wrong
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.10
Package: xorg 1:7.7+19ubuntu15
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-36.40-generic 5.8.18
Uname: Linux 5.8.0-36-generic x86_64
.tmp.unity_support_test.0:
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu50.3
Architecture: amd
Thanks, this seems ready for promotion then
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iproute2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1910576
Title:
[MIR] libbpf (dependency of iproute2)
Status in iproute2 packag
** Changed in: network-manager
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1828134
Title:
Wifi not working after suspend/resu
Thanks for the update, and attempt to `apport-collect`. I too was
unsure what package to re-file against, and had forgotten it was against
the meta package when I pasted the apport-collect request.
Ubuntu 20.04.2 release date
(https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FocalFossa/ReleaseSchedule) refers to the ISO
[Expired for systemd (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bu
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871268
Title:
Installation fails due to useless
Thanks Christian, I think you're right, this probably doesn't need a
security review and being centralized in one place will probably be
easier to maintain.
Thanks
** Changed in: libbpf (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Changed in: libbpf (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Seth Arnold (seth-a
Haha yeah that fixed it. Thanks Seth!
I marked it private because way more info got uploaded than I was
expecting.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
Haha yeah that fixed it. Thanks Seth!
I marked it private because way more info got uploaded than I was
expecting.
** Attachment removed: "WifiSyslog.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1911836/+attachment/5453184/+files/WifiSyslog.txt
--
You received thi
Hello, I think the core of your problem is this:
Error 24 : Write error : cannot write compressed block
Caused by a full /boot:
/dev/sda2 483946424596 34365 93% /boot
Truncate a few older files in /boot (start a shell via sudo -s, then find files
with ls -l, then
** Tags added: focal
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1911614
Title:
Ubuntu 20.04 and 20.04.1 images use linux-generic-hwe-20.04 instead of
linux-gener
*** This bug is a security vulnerability ***
Private security bug reported:
Possibly related to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1911835
These just happened during the same update cycle.
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: linux-image-5.4.0-62-generic 5.4.0-62.70
Pro
Unfortunately apport-collect just says "no additional info collected"
(see pic added). I presume because 'ubuntu-meta' is not an installed
package? I struggled a bit trying to decide what the best way was to
report a bug like this because it's not actually a bug in the kernel
itself, it's just
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted apt (2.0.4) for focal have finished
running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
gcc-10/10.2.0-5ubuntu1~20.04 (amd64)
Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures,
proceeding afterwar
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted apt (2.0.4) for focal have finished
running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
gcc-10/10.2.0-5ubuntu1~20.04 (amd64)
Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures,
proceeding afterwar
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted apt (2.0.4) for focal have finished
running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
gcc-10/10.2.0-5ubuntu1~20.04 (amd64)
Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures,
proceeding afterwar
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted apt (2.0.4) for focal have finished
running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
gcc-10/10.2.0-5ubuntu1~20.04 (amd64)
Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures,
proceeding afterwar
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Reviewing your dmesg attachment in this bug report it
seems that there is a problem with your hardware. I recommend
performing a back up and then investigating the situation. Measures you
might take include check
** Patch added: "lp1908473_librelp_focal.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rsyslog/+bug/1908473/+attachment/5453106/+files/lp1908473_librelp_focal.debdiff
** Description changed:
[Impact]
In recent versions of rsyslog and librelp, the imrelp module leaks file
descrip
** Patch added: "lp1908473_librelp_groovy.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rsyslog/+bug/1908473/+attachment/5453105/+files/lp1908473_librelp_groovy.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
Matthew, thanks for the great work in this bug and patches.
Uploaded to Groovy and Focal w/ trivial changes; attached.
cheers,
Mauricio
...
debdiffs:
I've modified the patch files slightly, as we discussed;
- keep the commit messages;
- use its/patch headers for DEP3, adding Origin: / Bug-Ubun
Pretty good hint, interesting.
However, the ATEM is definitely able to take audio in on all four HDMI
ports, since it has level indicators and buttons to turn it on and off
(and AFV=Audio follows Video) and adjust the level on all four HDMI
ports.
And I do have a camera with a builtin Mic (GoPro
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: colord (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to colord in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net
I have same device ATEM Mini Pro ISO and Dell Vostro 3450.
I can confirm, that bug exists and is possible to grab sound from only first
port.
Actually all ports on ATEM HDMI grabber are NOT same. HDMI1 is using different
hardware than all others and is accepting sound from my computer.
If I'm us
** Tags removed: need-duplicate-check
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1911812
Title:
package libssl1.1:amd64 1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade:
Public bug reported:
error at first updating
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: libssl1.1:amd64 1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-38.43~20.04.1-generic 5.8.18
Uname: Linux 5.8.0-38-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.14
Architecture: amd64
Cas
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted apt (2.1.10ubuntu0.2) for groovy have
finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
reprotest/0.7.15 (amd64, arm64, s390x)
Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures,
procee
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted apt (2.1.10ubuntu0.2) for groovy have
finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
reprotest/0.7.15 (amd64, arm64, s390x)
Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures,
procee
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted apt (2.1.10ubuntu0.2) for groovy have
finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
reprotest/0.7.15 (amd64, arm64, s390x)
Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures,
procee
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Reviewing your dmesg attachment in this bug report it
seems that there is a problem with your hardware. I recommend
performing a back up and then investigating the situation. Measures you
might take include check
Public bug reported:
Same issue as the post here describes:
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/issues/3681
The video is scaled unevenly in the vertical axis, with a black bar
appearing in the bottom of the video window for a few frames. It happens
seemingly on all videos able to be hardwa
I'm going over the DEP8 failures
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to audit in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1848330
Title:
Installing auditd sometimes fails in post-inst
Status in audit package in Ubu
The test-cap-list test no longer fails when running the autopkgtest suite with
5.8 kernel:
https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/amd64/s/systemd/20210114_030125_af0b9@/log.gz
that verifies for focal. As mentioned in the d
Ok here's my understanding of this:
Most keyboards report a single usb device 'interface' for the keyboard
(some have separate interface(s) for builtin mice or other non-keyboard
stuff). However, your keyboard reports two separate 'interfaces' for
your single keyboard. Unfortunately, both of the i
Holy linux, it's still exists in 2020
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to android-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1293267
Title:
make_ext4fs results in "can't set android permissions - built wit
** Tags added: focal
** Package changed: ubuntu => bluez (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bluez in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1911456
Title:
Can't receive files over bluetooth unless se
You have been subscribed to a public bug:
On 18.04 I could send files from my phone to my laptop at any time.
On 20.04 I can't get files to be accepted by the laptop over bluetooth. After
much frustration and experimenting, I figured out that it will work, but only
if the bluetooth settings dial
** Description changed:
[IMPACT]
When, for whatever reason, logind or dbus is not available scheduled reboot
reboots the machine immediately.
From the sources it seems that this is intended :
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/master/src/systemctl/systemctl-logind.c#L318
Howeve
This bug is old but I'm going to un-duplicate it. I don't believe it is
fixed.
I've got a cron script on focal (cron 3.0pl1-136ubuntu1) which is
indirectly running `lxc` from a snap (/snap/bin/lxc).
I found the following in mail though:
/home/ubuntu/autopkgtest/tools/autopkgtest-build-lxd: 139:
Public bug reported:
Upon upgrading the following error has been observed. I am not sure what
caused this error. So i am attaching the whole list of things happened
just before the error observed.
lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS
Release:20.04
$ sudo apt upgrade
Readin
** Also affects: bluez (Ubuntu Groovy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: bluez (Ubuntu Hirsute)
Importance: High
Assignee: Dave Jones (waveform)
Status: New
** Tags removed: rls-gg-incoming rls-hh-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because y
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1793918 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1793918
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1793918
Add/reintroduce setting to enable suspend on lid-close with external
monitors attached
--
You received this bug notification because you are a mem
> /sys/power/image_size represents the required amount of space for the
image
no it doesn't:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-power
"The kernel's suspend-to-disk code will do its best to ensure the image size
will not exceed this number. However, if it turns out to be i
Do note.
If I change in /boot/firmware/config.txt the default
dtoverlay=vc4-fkms-v3d
To
dtoverlay=vc4-kms-v3d
Then the graphical issues disappear. Maybe something to consider?
On Tue, 12 Jan 2021, 02:25 Daniel van Vugt, <1911...@bugs.launchpad.net>
wrote:
> ** Tags added: raspi raspi-gfx
>
Same problem using the live image 20.10
** Attachment added: "20.10_corruption.png"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/1911369/+attachment/5453034/+files/20.10_corruption.png
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, whic
** Tags added: fr-1054
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bluez in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1905627
Title:
Bluetooth stops working on Raspberry Pi 4 with bluez 5.55-0ubuntu1.1
Status in bluez pa
I understand the need for the parameter upstream, however backporting
features to existing releases typically needs a bit more justification
than just the fact it's nice to have. Can you explain why you can't just
use the existing method (in focal) for creating a vxlan device?
Specifically, setting
Ubuntu 20.04 does not have this problem any more. I did a few tests
(even shutting down the server for which I had a share bookmarked). The
various different scenarios I tested all behaved as I would expect.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded pac
** Also affects: grub2 (Ubuntu Groovy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu Groovy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Groovy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: grub2 (Ubuntu Hirsut
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1835660
Title:
initramfs unpacking failed
Stat
How to stop receiving this emails?
---
V prípade akýchkoľvek otázok alebo nejasností ma neváhajte kontaktovať.
S pozdravom a úctou / Best regards and respectfully
Peter Onger
Mobil - 00421 904 526 034
Email - ogi2...@gmail.com
-
Zeitgeist - Th
Hello Norbert, or anyone else affected,
Accepted apt into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/2.0.4 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Te
Hello Torsten, or anyone else affected,
Accepted apt into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/2.0.4 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Te
Hello andresgenovez, or anyone else affected,
Accepted apt into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/2.0.4 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.
Hello Julian, or anyone else affected,
Accepted apt into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/2.0.4 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Tes
Hello Norbert, or anyone else affected,
Accepted apt into groovy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/2.1.10ubuntu0.2 in
a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.ub
Hello andresgenovez, or anyone else affected,
Accepted apt into groovy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/2.1.10ubuntu0.2 in
a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://w
Hello Julian, or anyone else affected,
Accepted apt into groovy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/2.1.10ubuntu0.2 in
a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.ubu
** Changed in: hwe-next
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894606
Title:
[SRU] Add profile-set for HP Thunderbolt Dock
14:32 < juliank> sil2100: everything is straight forward cherry-picked
from master, which is 2.1.18
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871268
Title:
Installation fails due to useless immedia
14:25 < sil2100> juliank: does the hirsute 2.1.18 include the fix for the short
pattern termination?
14:25 < sil2100> (talking about apt)
14:26 < juliank> sil2100: yeah, that was in 2.1.13 already :)
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notifi
FYI my problem seems to be solved after a bunch of updates to several
alsa packages a few weeks ago.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to alsa-driver in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901926
Title:
[HDA
** Description changed:
+ [Impact]
+
+ Source packages have been included in apt-cache pkgnames, and virtual
+ packages have not been included in apt-cache pkgnames --all-names. The
+ former leads to completions autocompleting to source package names where
+ they only should complete to binaries.
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
Short patterns like ~nfoo!~nbar or ~nfoo~nbar do not work correctly -
they are treated as ?name(foo!~nbar) / ?name(foo~nbar) rather than
?name(foo)?not(?name(bar)) / ?name(foo)?name(bar)
[Test Case]
Unit tests have been added that are run during build and check they
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted audit (1:2.8.2-1ubuntu1.1) for bionic
have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
openssh/1:7.6p1-4ubuntu0.3 (arm64, armhf, amd64, i386, ppc64el)
linux/4.15.0-132.136 (i386)
libvirt/4.0.0-1ubuntu8.1
[Summary]
MIR Team Ack to src:libbpf
This does not need a security review IMHO, but as outlined below I'd want
security to quickly ACK on that decision - assigning to Seth (security MIR
Team member) for that.
List of specific binary packages to be promoted to main: libbpf0
Required TODOs:
- None
Please test 20.10 live image, do you have the same corruption there?
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
** Changed in: mesa (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
** Changed in: mesa (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Timo Aaltonen (tjaalton)
--
You recei
70 matches
Mail list logo
