However, a chance would be to piggy-back a fix like this with a more
severe zlib update that might come up in future.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990379
Tit
** Changed in: zlib (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Skipper Bug Screeners (skipper-screen-team) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990379
Title:
[UBUNTU
Thanks for reporting this, Ilya.
Can you please elaborate about the potential impact of this issue - that
'inflate() does not update strm.adler if DFLTCC is used'?
Especially because this is marked with severity medium, but the Ubuntu stable
release update process (SRUs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/S
Public bug reported:
After I remove old kernels, I see there are artifacts left over in
/lib/modules. Below, I should have only two folders - one for the latest
5.4 kernel, and one for the latest 5.15 kernel.
$ ls /lib/modules
5.15.0-41-generic 5.15.0-46-generic 5.4.0-126-generic
5.15.0-43-gene
> Previously we only had the option of using a system wide sysctl
> kernel.unprivileged_userns_clone to disable unprivileged user
> namespaces. Debian defaults this to off, and you have to opt in.
Just to avoid misunderstandings (I failed to parse the above sentence
unambiguously): in Debian, unpr
** Package changed: linux (Ubuntu) => zlib (Ubuntu)
** Also affects: ubuntu-z-systems
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Assignee: (unassigned) => Skipper Bug Screeners (skipper-screen-team)
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Importance: Undecided =>
You have been subscribed to a public bug:
== Comment: #0 - Ilya Leoshkevich - 2022-09-21 05:02:24 ==
inflate() does not update strm.adler if DFLTCC is used.
Found with a JDK test.
zlib-ng PR: https://github.com/zlib-ng/zlib-ng/pull/1349
Updated zlib PR: https://github.com/madler/zlib/pull/410
Hi Julian,
I didn't see the 'boot failures on older system' from comment#90.
Would you please point it out more specifically?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.n
In short unprivileged user namespaces a vector for exploit chains, as
they expose interfaces that otherwise would not be available.
4 out 5 exploits chains in pwn2own 2022 used unprivileged user
namespaces. They were also used in 2021, 2020, ... Yes the actual
vulnerabilities were in other interf
** Attachment added: "lp1990586.edsp"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python3.10/+bug/1990586/+attachment/5618167/+files/lp1990586.edsp
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.
I attached the edsp file. Hope it helps.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990586
Title:
22.04: python3* mismatched phasing breaks dist-upgrades
Status in apt p
python3{.10,-defaults,-stdlib-extensions} have all had their phasing set
to 100% now to avoid this issue.
** Changed in: python3-defaults (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
** Changed in: python3-stdlib-extensions (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
** Changed in: pytho
Public bug reported:
updating from server 20.04 to 22.04
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: systemd 249.11-0ubuntu3.6
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-48.54~20.04.1-generic 5.15.53
Uname: Linux 5.15.0-48-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.24
Architecture: am
NB, also broke Steam (from .deb).
Is there a link anywhere to some of this discussion, happy for security
to be improved, but I'd like to understand what is being disabled, and
what the specific issue is.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packa
I've been thinking about both some more and I believe we can fix this
more easily than I thought earlier, but I'd still like the data to be
able to reproduce this.
Because obviously no such issues occured during testing.
In the meantime could SRU team please pull the python3.10 update, or
phase i
Same issue as [Bug 1990525] [NEW] E: Internal Error, AutoRemover broke
stuff. See the comment there.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubun
It broke for me between 5.19.0-15 and 5.19.0-17, and breaks every
flatpak app I have installed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990064
Title:
unconfined p
** Description changed:
Impact
--
Users who manually run sudo apt dist-upgrade without paying attention can
remove essential parts of their system
Test Case
-
This test case won't work as well if phasing is set to 0% or 100%
- Set /etc/machine-id to 2c030cfce3b4487f9
** Tags added: rls-jj-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990586
Title:
22.04: python3* mismatched phasing breaks dist-upgrades
Status in apt package in
Public bug reported:
Impact
--
Users who manually run sudo apt dist-upgrade without paying attention can
remove essential parts of their system
Test Case
-
This test case won't work as well if phasing is set to 0% or 100%
Set /etc/machine-id to 2c030cfce3b4487f9810f12a3ac6e87c
sudo
** Changed in: dh-python (Debian)
Status: Unknown => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dh-python in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990562
Title:
attempting to diff static library files rai
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: audit (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to audit in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
As you say there are many new things in there. At this point its
probably better to just land the two things we care about
1. posix ipc mediation
2. user namespace mediation
on top of the existing 3.0.7. That would give us a clear set of
important features, with a we defined set of patches instea
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1020528
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1020528
** Also affects: dh-python (Debian) via
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1020528
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification be
** Changed in: dh-python (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Confirmed
** Changed in: dh-python (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Nick Rosbrook (enr0n) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dh-python in Ubu
** Patch added: "dh-python_5.20220819ubuntu1.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dh-python/+bug/1990562/+attachment/5618100/+files/dh-python_5.20220819ubuntu1.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscr
Public bug reported:
In verbose mode, if files differ in share_files(), dhpython will try to
show a diff of the files. When these files are static libraries, this
raises a UnicodeDecodeError. For example, from a recent numpy build on
arm64[1]:
W: dh_python3 fs:146: Paths differ:
debian/python3-n
Hello , do you think this bug will be corrected soon ? or i change
parent directory name of mountpoints ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990293
Title:
Can
Sorry, "E: External solver failed with: I am too dumb, i can just dump!"
is the expected output, this means it created the file.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/19
This bug was fixed in the package systemd - 251.4-1ubuntu6
---
systemd (251.4-1ubuntu6) kinetic; urgency=medium
* test: deny-list TEST-36-NUMAPOLICY on ppc64el (LP: #1989969)
File:
debian/patches/lp1989969-test-deny-list-TEST-36-NUMAPOLICY-on-ppc64el.patch
https://git.laun
This bug was fixed in the package systemd - 251.4-1ubuntu6
---
systemd (251.4-1ubuntu6) kinetic; urgency=medium
* test: deny-list TEST-36-NUMAPOLICY on ppc64el (LP: #1989969)
File:
debian/patches/lp1989969-test-deny-list-TEST-36-NUMAPOLICY-on-ppc64el.patch
https://git.laun
This bug was fixed in the package systemd - 251.4-1ubuntu6
---
systemd (251.4-1ubuntu6) kinetic; urgency=medium
* test: deny-list TEST-36-NUMAPOLICY on ppc64el (LP: #1989969)
File:
debian/patches/lp1989969-test-deny-list-TEST-36-NUMAPOLICY-on-ppc64el.patch
https://git.laun
@jeremyszu (os369510) Did you see #90, it seems your patch would cause
boot failures on older system unable to handle this memory range.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.l
I think the right fix here is to strip the output of dpkg-buildflags
from the config script output. We've definitely had problems before
where leaking dpkg-buildflags into other build tools made it effectively
impossible for dependent packages to work around toolchain issues.
** Changed in: krb5
** Tags removed: foundations-triage-discuss
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to krb5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1980494
Title:
krb5-multidev is not multi-arch installable due to differences in
I want to say I agree with avih and had the same idea but I had no
chance to update the bug yet. Currently sorting out actual upgrade
failures that might be regressions from the new phasing though.
It remains to be seen if we can do this safely. We need to add a new
flag "PhasedKeep" or something
** Tags removed: foundations-triage-discuss
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1988819
Title:
When apt keeps back packages due to p
# APT_EDSP_DUMP_FILENAME=/tmp/lp1990525.edsp apt dist-upgrade --solver
dump
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading state information... Done
Execute external solver... Error!
The solver encountered an error of type: ERR_JUST_DUMPING
The following information might h
** Description changed:
juliank indicates we should gather /var/lib/dpkg/status when we are
reporting apport-package bugs and that it should also be collected for
ubuntu-release-upgrader bugs and something else. So maybe it should
actually go in the ubuntu general hook.
+
+ This came abou
Public bug reported:
juliank indicates we should gather /var/lib/dpkg/status when we are
reporting apport-package bugs and that it should also be collected for
ubuntu-release-upgrader bugs and something else. So maybe it should
actually go in the ubuntu general hook.
This came about because of bu
Sorry wrong package
** Package changed: software-properties (Ubuntu) => python-apt (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python-apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990546
Title:
apt.auth uses
Public bug reported:
apt.auth needs to be deprecated or ported to work with the new regime.
** Affects: python-apt (Ubuntu)
Importance: High
Status: Triaged
** Tags: foundations-todo
** Tags added: foundations-todo
** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undec
** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in
Ubu
Addition:
This check is not made in the partition mounted as root. I can see the
following in journalctl -b:
Condition check resulted in File System Check on Root Device being
skipped
It is made in all other mounted partitions.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
I have this bug after updrading from focal to jammy. Now in every boot I
can see for several seconds the message "Press Ctrl+C to cancel all
filesystem checks in process".
With "journalctl -b", I follow all the booting procedure and I can see
several
Starting File System Check on /dev/disk/by-uui
Public bug reported:
After trying several setups, I think this is a bug. If not - I can't
find how to fix things.
Setup: Ubuntu 22.04, with ubuntu-minimal installed (which depends on
isc-dhcp-client). A network with a bridge interface. This can be
anything, even an old /etc/network/interfaces fil
Thank you for your bug report. Please run
APT_EDSP_DUMP_FILENAME=/tmp/lp1990525.edsp apt dist-upgrade --solver
dump and attach /tmp/lp1990525.edsp to the bug (if that works).
If that does not work, please pass
-o Debug::pkgDepCache::Marker=1
-o Debug::pkgDepCache::AutoInstall=1
-o Debug::pkgProbl
Public bug reported:
Issue appeared and wanted to send info automatically. No clue what else
you need from me.
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: linux-image-5.15.0-48-generic 5.15.0-48.54~20.04.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-46.49~20.04.1-generic 5.15.39
Uname: Linu
** Patch removed: "ubuntu wsl seed diff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-meta/+bug/1990526/+attachment/5618055/+files/ubuntu-seeds.diff
** Patch added: "ubuntu wsl seed diff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-meta/+bug/1990526/+attachment/5618064/+files/0001
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: iptables (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iptables in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad
** Patch added: "ubuntu wsl seed diff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-meta/+bug/1990526/+attachment/5618055/+files/ubuntu-seeds.diff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990526
Title:
[FFe] UDI snap no longer strictly needed for WSL OOBE
Status in ubuntu-meta package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug
Public bug reported:
Ubuntu Desktop Installer (UDI, for short) package implementing the WSL
OOBE has been ported to Windows and the WSL application is able to
launch the OOBE running as a native Win32 application, instead of
relying on WSLg to display the OOBE.
That implies in the possibility of
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2022-09-22 08:10 EDT---
zlib1g s390x 1:1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu1.4 passes all of my tests.
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2022-09-22 08:18 EDT---
@Ilya: thanks a lot for your instant verification on focal!
With that, I am updating the tags / key
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1975865
Title:
Hash and size mismatch with http://ddebs.ubu
doan van thang, please report a new bug for your issue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971538
Title:
My machine has Wi-Fi Hotspot broken after upg
Public bug reported:
I'm trying to run a dist-upgrade, which should be simple enough, but it
keeps failing at:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading state information... Done
Calculating upgrade... Done
Hmm, seems like the AutoRemover destroyed something which rea
Hi,
on 21.09.2022 updating ubuntu broke it with this bug.
Running on i386, dell latitude e7450 with ssd and ubuntu22.04.1, kernel
5.15.0-48 generic, x86.
After booting, I get the mtd device must be supplied etc etc error, and
I am left with a terminal only version.
I have an important hint: as s
** Tags removed: verification-done verification-done-focal
** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-focal
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961427
T
The version of glib2.0 in the proposed pocket of Jammy that was
purported to fix this bug report has been removed because one or more
bugs that were to be fixed by the upload have failed verification and
been in this state for more than 10 days.
--
You received this bug notification because you a
The version of glib2.0 in the proposed pocket of Jammy that was
purported to fix this bug report has been removed because one or more
bugs that were to be fixed by the upload have failed verification and
been in this state for more than 10 days.
** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status:
Well, I had comment #11 in mind where the 1:1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu1.3 was
successfully verified on focal.
Meanwhile that version got overruled by a security update:
zlib (1:1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu1.3) focal-security; urgency=medium
and became 'already used', hence a new version was needed for this bug an
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-focal
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961427
T
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1989969
Title:
autopkgtest TEST-36-NUMAPOLICY failur
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990187
Title:
systemd-resolved recommends libnss-re
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990278
Title:
systemd-resolved not included in
The verification of the Stable Release Update for systemd has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
This bug was fixed in the package systemd - 245.4-4ubuntu3.18
---
systemd (245.4-4ubuntu3.18) focal; urgency=medium
[ Nick Rosbrook ]
* core: make sure we don't get confused when setting TERM for a tty fd
(LP: #1959475)
File:
debian/patches/lp1959475-core-make-sure-we-don
Hey Frank! You switched the focal verification tags, but I do not see
any verification of the focal packages. Comment #65 only mentions
versions for jammy. Have the focal packages been tested in any way?
Switching back tags for focal.
** Tags removed: verification-done verification-done-focal
**
The verification of the Stable Release Update for systemd has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
This bug was fixed in the package systemd - 245.4-4ubuntu3.18
---
systemd (245.4-4ubuntu3.18) focal; urgency=medium
[ Nick Rosbrook ]
* core: make sure we don't get confused when setting TERM for a tty fd
(LP: #1959475)
File:
debian/patches/lp1959475-core-make-sure-we-don
This bug was fixed in the package systemd - 245.4-4ubuntu3.18
---
systemd (245.4-4ubuntu3.18) focal; urgency=medium
[ Nick Rosbrook ]
* core: make sure we don't get confused when setting TERM for a tty fd
(LP: #1959475)
File:
debian/patches/lp1959475-core-make-sure-we-don
This bug was fixed in the package systemd - 245.4-4ubuntu3.18
---
systemd (245.4-4ubuntu3.18) focal; urgency=medium
[ Nick Rosbrook ]
* core: make sure we don't get confused when setting TERM for a tty fd
(LP: #1959475)
File:
debian/patches/lp1959475-core-make-sure-we-don
This bug was fixed in the package systemd - 245.4-4ubuntu3.18
---
systemd (245.4-4ubuntu3.18) focal; urgency=medium
[ Nick Rosbrook ]
* core: make sure we don't get confused when setting TERM for a tty fd
(LP: #1959475)
File:
debian/patches/lp1959475-core-make-sure-we-don
The verification of the Stable Release Update for gzip has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a reg
This bug was fixed in the package gzip - 1.10-4ubuntu4.1
---
gzip (1.10-4ubuntu4.1) jammy; urgency=medium
* Cherry-pick upstream patch to use more portable alignment to resolve
failure to execute on
WSL1. https://github.com/microsoft/WSL/issues/8219 LP: #1966849
-- Dimitri
This bug was fixed in the package python3.10 - 3.10.6-1~22.04
---
python3.10 (3.10.6-1~22.04) jammy-proposed; urgency=medium
* SRU: LP: #1982108: Backport 3.10.6 to 20.04 LTS.
python3.10 (3.10.6-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* Python 3.10.6 release.
[ Leonidas Da Silva Barbosa
This bug was fixed in the package python3-defaults - 3.10.6-1~22.04
---
python3-defaults (3.10.6-1~22.04) jammy-proposed; urgency=medium
* SRU: LP: #1982108. Update to Python 3.10.6 in Ubuntu 22.04 LTS.
python3-defaults (3.10.6-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* Bump version to 3.10.
The verification of the Stable Release Update for python3-defaults has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you en
The verification of the Stable Release Update for systemd has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
This bug was fixed in the package systemd - 249.11-0ubuntu3.6
---
systemd (249.11-0ubuntu3.6) jammy; urgency=medium
* Deny-list TEST-58-REPART on ppc64el (LP: #1988994)
File: debian/patches/lp1988994-Deny-list-TEST-58-REPART-on-ppc64el.patch
https://git.launchpad.net/~ubunt
This bug was fixed in the package systemd - 249.11-0ubuntu3.6
---
systemd (249.11-0ubuntu3.6) jammy; urgency=medium
* Deny-list TEST-58-REPART on ppc64el (LP: #1988994)
File: debian/patches/lp1988994-Deny-list-TEST-58-REPART-on-ppc64el.patch
https://git.launchpad.net/~ubunt
The verification of the Stable Release Update for systemd has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
This bug was fixed in the package systemd - 249.11-0ubuntu3.6
---
systemd (249.11-0ubuntu3.6) jammy; urgency=medium
* Deny-list TEST-58-REPART on ppc64el (LP: #1988994)
File: debian/patches/lp1988994-Deny-list-TEST-58-REPART-on-ppc64el.patch
https://git.launchpad.net/~ubunt
This bug was fixed in the package systemd - 249.11-0ubuntu3.6
---
systemd (249.11-0ubuntu3.6) jammy; urgency=medium
* Deny-list TEST-58-REPART on ppc64el (LP: #1988994)
File: debian/patches/lp1988994-Deny-list-TEST-58-REPART-on-ppc64el.patch
https://git.launchpad.net/~ubunt
The verification of the Stable Release Update for systemd has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
This bug was fixed in the package systemd - 249.11-0ubuntu3.6
---
systemd (249.11-0ubuntu3.6) jammy; urgency=medium
* Deny-list TEST-58-REPART on ppc64el (LP: #1988994)
File: debian/patches/lp1988994-Deny-list-TEST-58-REPART-on-ppc64el.patch
https://git.launchpad.net/~ubunt
The verification of the Stable Release Update for systemd has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
This bug was fixed in the package systemd - 249.11-0ubuntu3.6
---
systemd (249.11-0ubuntu3.6) jammy; urgency=medium
* Deny-list TEST-58-REPART on ppc64el (LP: #1988994)
File: debian/patches/lp1988994-Deny-list-TEST-58-REPART-on-ppc64el.patch
https://git.launchpad.net/~ubunt
The verification of the Stable Release Update for systemd has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
This bug was fixed in the package systemd - 249.11-0ubuntu3.6
---
systemd (249.11-0ubuntu3.6) jammy; urgency=medium
* Deny-list TEST-58-REPART on ppc64el (LP: #1988994)
File: debian/patches/lp1988994-Deny-list-TEST-58-REPART-on-ppc64el.patch
https://git.launchpad.net/~ubunt
The verification of the Stable Release Update for systemd has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for systemd has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for systemd has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
This bug was fixed in the package systemd - 249.11-0ubuntu3.6
---
systemd (249.11-0ubuntu3.6) jammy; urgency=medium
* Deny-list TEST-58-REPART on ppc64el (LP: #1988994)
File: debian/patches/lp1988994-Deny-list-TEST-58-REPART-on-ppc64el.patch
https://git.launchpad.net/~ubunt
The verification of the Stable Release Update for systemd has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
This bug was fixed in the package systemd - 249.11-0ubuntu3.6
---
systemd (249.11-0ubuntu3.6) jammy; urgency=medium
* Deny-list TEST-58-REPART on ppc64el (LP: #1988994)
File: debian/patches/lp1988994-Deny-list-TEST-58-REPART-on-ppc64el.patch
https://git.launchpad.net/~ubunt
Let's stick to the following, please: over 2,300 packages in Ubuntu Main
and over 23,000 packages in Ubuntu Universe, meaning over 25,000
packages in total.
It should work for every LTS from Xenial forward.
Remember that:
Standard Ubuntu LTS gives you 5 years of coverage for Main, esm-infra
give
I got a workaround by disabling the firewall. But the moment you turn it
on (even if clients connected beforehand), the internet loses connection
again. Quite annoying (also dangerous) for hotspot
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, whic
99 matches
Mail list logo
