I also have a MAG X570S TOMAHAWK MAX WIFI motherboard and am having the
same problem.
For me, the card number seems to vary whenever I reboot, so I have to
use a command like this
pacmd load-module module-alsa-sink device=hw:`aplay -l | grep "USB
Audio" | head -n 1 | cut -d " " -f 2 | cut -d ":"
Hi All,
Please ignore my comment #5 as only ModemManager and libmbim commits are
needed for FM350 integration.
Thanks and Best Regards,
Murali
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to modemmanager in Ubuntu.
I think this was fixed in:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/2479
** Summary changed:
- Fractional scaling settings lost on logout
+ Fractional scaling settings lost on VM window resizing or logout
** Package changed: xorg (Ubuntu) => mutter (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: mutter
** Changed in: firefox
Importance: Medium => Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cairo in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/344814
Title:
Synthetic emboldening/italic/italic-bold fails for
That sounds like this bug, I think.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cairo in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/344814
Title:
Synthetic emboldening/italic/italic-bold fails for single-styled fonts
Hi!
I've encountered the following issue on Ubuntu 16.04 x32, printing the
following attachment:
https://bug1318845.bmoattachments.org/attachment.cgi?id=8816724 the
print preview looks ok, but when printing the file with a physical
printer or to a .pdf file the fonts from the bold column don't
Created attachment 9005195
print prev vs pdf.png
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cairo in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/344814
Title:
Synthetic emboldening/italic/italic-bold fails for
Murz: Thanks for the report -- but I think it's actually a different
issue from this bug, though.
This bug is about bold text being rendered as non-bold (and only when
printed), whereas it looks like your issue is about bold text being
*completely missing* (based on your first screenshot), which
I have the same problem with displaying Bold fonts in PDF in Firefox 38.0 on
Ubuntu 14.10, here is screenshots of PDF file (attached):
PDF view on tab: http://i.imgur.com/mptr8fd.png
Print preview: http://i.imgur.com/zr90wox.png
On Windows 8 all looks normally.
--
You received this bug
On Google Chrome (Chromium) on same Ubuntu Linux system this PDF file
displays normally.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cairo in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/344814
Title:
Synthetic
Created attachment 8636477
132782.pdf
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cairo in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/344814
Title:
Synthetic emboldening/italic/italic-bold fails for single-styled fonts
** Changed in: firefox
Importance: Low => Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1332959
Title:
When you press the "print screen" key Firefox shows the
Still fails randomly
@ jammy bash 5.1-6ubuntu1
Read -t 60 failure can often be triggered by changing the system clock
slightly. It often fails if waiting when ntp runs.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bash
I'm not familiar with your SRU process, debdiff, dput, the "General
Requirements" document, the "security policy document", or your upload
process, and I'm not into learning about all that and filling out your
special form and making your special upload when there is no guarantee
that Ubuntu will
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2022-10-10 19:01 EDT---
Thanks! With
https://ppa.launchpadcontent.net/fheimes/lp1990379+lp1982583/ubuntu
kinetic/main s390x zlib1g s390x 1:1.2.11.dfsg-4.1ubuntu2
the following command:
python3 -c 'import zlib; zlib.crc32(b"X"*50)'
begins to work
If you can fill out the SRU template, that'd be great! I see that you
worked with upstream to ID which commit corrected the problem, that will
be useful to whoever creates a debdiff! If you need a hand with the
debdiff, please let me know and I'll set some time aside. Thanks!
--
You received
I knew nothing about your SRU process until now; the man page for
`ubuntu-bug` makes no mention of it. Who fills out the SRU Bug Template
and makes the fix actually happen? Is there anything more I need to do
here?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch
In case anyone is curious conversation is on-going on the kernel-team mailing
list
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2022-October/133764.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
@juliank please test initrd-less boot; for example lxc launch --vm which
uses linux-kvm flavour booted without initrd.
There are differences of the mount options as applied by initramfs-
tools; systemd; and kernel itself.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
@juliank, is this an aws system? If not there's a good chance that you
are using an initramfs to mount the filesystems. That's definited in
either /etc/init.d/udev or directly out of the init that lives in the
initramfs.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Added screenshot from Libreoffice, showing it affects multiple
applications and font sizes
** Attachment added: "Screenshot from Libreoffice"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fonts-dejavu/+bug/1992369/+attachment/5622811/+files/Screenshot_2022-10-10_20-42-54.png
** Description
Public bug reported:
After updating from Focal to Jammy, I noticed that DejaVu Serif Italic
looks quite broken. At least the letters EFHIKLMNT and the digits 1 and
4 are affected
Please see the attached screenshot. This was obtained from `gnome-font-
viewer
@Ian, the back and forth on status was apparently due to a simple
mistake on which distro version was affected. The good news is that
thanks to comment #7, we now know that Kinetic is fixed which is one of
the required step to do a SRU
(https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates) to have the fix
I have same issue and could not fix with "apt-get install -f". Here my
output for "apt-get install -f"
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Correcting dependencies... Done
The following packages were automatically installed and are no
The problem was marked as Confirmed by Paride back on March 17.
Then today it gets marked Invalid.
Then later today it gets marked Confirmed again.
I don't understand your process.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed
Public bug reported:
.
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
Package: initramfs-tools 0.140ubuntu13
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-50.56-generic 5.15.60
Uname: Linux 5.15.0-50-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.1
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
Date:
I can confirm the problem affects rsync 3.2.3-8ubuntu3 as shipped in
22.04.
** Changed in: rsync (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsync in Ubuntu.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973830
Title:
Error upgrading from Ubuntu 20.04 to 22.04
Status
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Importance: Medium => High
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
--
You received
** Tags removed: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990684
Title:
grub-efi-arm64-signed : Depends: grub-efi-arm64 (= 2.06-2ubuntu7) but
I just upgraded from Ubuntu 20.04 to 22.04.1, and this bug now affects
me.
I first encountered it in Brave Browser, then tested Google Chrome, and
neither one will let me enter a filename--instead, it jumps to the
filter box, and clears the directory. Renaming files after they're
downloaded
Your incorrect statement "seems the issue does not actually exist" is
wrong. I told you exactly how to reproduce the problem on your latest
22.04.1 LTS release. I gave you the link to the upstream bug that Wayne
fixed over two years ago. This two-year-old bug does exist and it
exists in your
Your incorrect statement "seems the issue does not actually exist" is
wrong. I told you exactly how to reproduce the problem on your latest
22.04.1 LTS release. You were also given the link to the upstream bug
that Wayne fixed over two years ago. This two-year-old bug does exist
and it exists
I use one installation in both physical and VM environments, then I require it
to work.
I also often clone systems from VM to HW and viceversa.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gstreamer1.0 in Ubuntu.
I have tested the new version of the debdiff including the fix and the
fix of the fix.
Using it daily on my laptop and also tested it in the test setup described in
the description.
No issues seen so far.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded
Public bug reported:
I'm running Ubuntu 22.04.1 on VirtualBox latest release for quite some
time. Recently switched from 2560x1440 to 3840x2160 monitor resolution,
which forced me to enable 125% fractional scaling. Using default wayland
server, the scaling will be reset to 100% every time I do a
@eugenesan
Is there a plan to merge your update version into the official Ubuntu
package?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1978738
Title:
systemd-oomd and
** Tags added: foundation-triage-discuss
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982583
Title:
Fix for zlib CRC32 optimization for s390x
Status in Ubuntu on IBM z
Your /boot partition ran out of space, consider increasing its size or
cleaning it up
** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1992246 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992246
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1992246
package linux-firmware 20220329.git681281e4-0ubuntu3.5 failed to
install/upgrade: installed linux-firmware package post-installation script
Sponsored.
** Changed in: bash (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bash in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992206
Title:
bash: non existent locale
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
As this needs SRUing presumably, as it's broken in kinetic, this needs a
description of the impact. What does it mean that the state changed, how
does it impact the user?
Is this something security team wants to address, should foundations
address this?
** Also affects: sudo (Ubuntu Jammy)
On my kinetic system, /dev has nosuid, but no noexec.
** Tags added: foundations-triage-discuss
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1991975
Title:
dev file
** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: zram-config (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
Ok, created a new issue upstream:
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/pulseaudio/pulseaudio/-/issues/1400
** Bug watch added: gitlab.freedesktop.org/pulseaudio/pulseaudio/-/issues #1400
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/pulseaudio/pulseaudio/-/issues/1400
--
You received this bug notification
Likely same issue as bug 1974196, reassigning to apt for further
investigation.
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => Triaged
** Package changed: ubuntu-release-upgrader
Adding a focal task as bug 1973830 seems to be caused by the same issue.
** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
** Tags removed: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973470
Title:
Ubuntu-bug command can't find Firefox on Lubuntu Kinetic
Status in Apport:
You have been subscribed to a public bug:
ERROR Dist-upgrade failed: 'The package 'update-manager' is marked for
removal but it is in the removal deny list.'
Inside log file /var/log/dist-upgrade/main.log after trying:
sudo do-release-upgrade -d
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Qt frontend broken, seems to access self.cache[module_packages] where
module_packages is not a string or pair of strings, causing a TypeError.
Don't know if anyone actively maintains that.
** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in:
I cannot reproduce the issue in kinetic's 3.2.5, seems the issue does
not actually exist. If the issue exists in any stable release, I believe
it is minor enough to not warrant a stable release update.
** Changed in: rsync (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug
This does not appear to be an Ubuntu system, but a pop os one. Neither
does it appear to be an upgrade to 21.04 for that matter as the bug
says. It also involves various downgrades. Either way this is all very
unsupported.
** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
Thank you for taking the time to report this issue and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Examining the information you have given us, this does
not appear to be a bug report so we are closing it and converting it to
a question in the support tracker. We understand the difficulties you
are facing, but
Thank you for your bug report, could you also register the problem
upstream on
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/pulseaudio/pulseaudio/-/issues/ ? that's
probably a better place to suggest a such change
** Changed in: pulseaudio (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
** Summary changed:
-
Is there anything left to do here?
** Changed in: klibc (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: New => Incomplete
** Changed in: klibc (Ubuntu Cosmic)
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1991771
Title:
[FFe] Update to 3.0.6
Status in openssl
I looked at the queues for focal and jammy but did not find any zlib
uploads as indicated by "in progress" per SRU policy, so reset the
status to "triaged".
** Changed in: zlib (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: In Progress => Triaged
** Changed in: zlib (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: In Progress =>
Log entries from failure:
==
FAIL: test_no_failed (__main__.ServicesTest)
No failed units
--
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. It sounds like some part of the system has crashed. To
help us find the cause of the crash please follow these steps:
1. Look in /var/crash for crash files and if found run:
ubuntu-bug YOURFILE.crash
Then tell
Please explain what the problem is you would like to discuss.
** Package changed: xorg (Ubuntu) => ubuntu
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in
61 matches
Mail list logo
