[Touch-packages] [Bug 1872902] Re: Upgrade to Focal now removes chrony

2020-04-15 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
@xnox - yes I also only saw it happening in do-release-upgrade. I was even going for a VM instead of a container knowing that some of the time services will auto-disable themselves when running in a container. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1869796] Re: vague error during upgrade

2020-04-15 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
This will be fixed on the next merge, in the debhelper discussion we settled on --no-also which is a hidden dh_systemd option. OTOH the undocumented option even exists in Bionic, so for quite a while. Maybe we should just add it to focal which would stop printing that warning and maybe solve

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1872902] [NEW] Upgrade to Focal now removes chrony

2020-04-15 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Public bug reported: Due to changes in systemd for bug 1849156 this issue now happens. On an upgrade for people that had chrony installed on a do-release upgrade it now will: Calculating the changes MarkInstall systemd-timesyncd:amd64 < none -> 245.4-4ubuntu1 @un uN Ib > FU=1 Removing:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1849156] Re: systemd-timesyncd.service broken on upgrade to 19.10 if ntp was installed

2020-04-15 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
FYI - Hi Rbalint, this most likely has exposed/triggered bug 1872183 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1849156 Title: systemd-timesyncd.service broken on upgrade

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871538] Re: dbus timeout-ed during an upgrade, taking services down including gdm

2020-04-08 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Sure @seb128 - I'll let you know if it happens again (as I did a cleaning-reboot now). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to accountsservice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871538 Title: dbus

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871538] Re: Gnome Shell crashed on background upgrade of accountsservice

2020-04-08 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
> 1. Look in /var/crash for crash files and if found run: >ubuntu-bug YOURFILE.crash > Then tell us the ID of the newly-created bug. Again, they all seem to be prior or follow on issues, but they already have IDs in the error tracker. /var/crash/_usr_bin_gnome-clocks.1000.uploaded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871538] Re: Gnome Shell crashed on background upgrade of accountsservice

2020-04-08 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
> Also do you have any gnome-shell/gdm crash collected in /var/crash? No, just these: $ ll /var/crash/*.crash -rw-r- 1 paelzer whoopsie 3589735 Apr 6 08:34 /var/crash/_usr_bin_gnome-clocks.1000.crash -rw-r- 1 paelzer whoopsie 53170176 Apr 8 10:36

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871538] Re: Gnome Shell crashed on background upgrade of accountsservice

2020-04-08 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
> could you add the journalctl log from that session, that might include some hints Sure attached here, you see in the initial report and the later comments the time indexes to look out for. Also FYI for the rtkit issue that you will see in there => bug 1871543 ** Attachment added:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871543] Re: rtkit fails to start in focal "pthread_create failed: Resource temporarily unavailable"

2020-04-08 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
A full system restart resolved the issue for me, but thereby also removed my chances to debug further. I hope the bug gives others that might hit it as well a head start. For now I'm marking it incomplete ** Changed in: rtkit (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871538] Re: Gnome Shell crashed on background upgrade of accountsservice

2020-04-08 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Hi Daniel, none of the crashes that I had has the same signature as those that are reported on the dup. Furthermore as I outlined the crashes seem to be secondary issues after soemthing breaks and recycles gnome-shell. I'd ask for re-triage as that doesn't seem to be the same thing to me. **

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871538] Re: Gnome Shell crashed on background upgrade of accountsservice

2020-04-08 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Another crash just happened: Apr 08 10:28:06 Keschdeichel systemd[1]: Reloading. Apr 08 10:28:06 Keschdeichel systemd[1]: /lib/systemd/system/dbus.socket:5: ListenStream= references a path below legacy directory /var/run/, updating /var/run/dbus/system_bus_socket → /run> Apr 08 10:28:17

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871543] Re: rtkit fails to start in focal "pthread_create failed: Resource temporarily unavailable"

2020-04-08 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
I compared e.g. systemd-coredump vs rtkit. Similar user add calls: rtkit has: --disabled-password I recreated it without, and it made no difference. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rtkit in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871543] Re: rtkit fails to start in focal "pthread_create failed: Resource temporarily unavailable"

2020-04-08 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
I was playing with different similar users (system user with nologin) $ for u in $(grep nologin /etc/passwd | cut -d':' -f 1); do echo Trying $u; /tmp/rtkit-0.12/rtkit-daemon --stderr --user-name $u; done Working: daemon bin sys games man lp mail news uucp proxy www-data backup list irc gnats

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871543] Re: rtkit fails to start in focal "pthread_create failed: Resource temporarily unavailable"

2020-04-08 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Knowing that --no-drop-privileges is related I was breaking that into sub-sections. I set -O0 for better debugging. Then I dropped code of the drop-priv section. This section is it: 1755 if (setgroups(0, NULL) < 0 || 1756

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871543] Re: rtkit fails to start in focal "pthread_create failed: Resource temporarily unavailable"

2020-04-08 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
This would work as well as a workaround: --user-name root setgroups and setresgid are safe, it is the user set via setresuid that makes it fail eventually. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rtkit in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871543] Re: rtkit fails to start in focal "pthread_create failed: Resource temporarily unavailable"

2020-04-08 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
$ sudo userdel --remove rtkit $ id rtkit id: ‘rtkit’: no such user $ sudo apt install --reinstall rtkit $ id rtkit uid=109(rtkit) gid=114(rtkit) groups=114(rtkit) The issue does not go away by removing and recreating the user. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871543] Re: rtkit fails to start in focal "pthread_create failed: Resource temporarily unavailable"

2020-04-08 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
It is the raw clone call that fails: 101 if (__glibc_unlikely (ARCH_CLONE (_thread, STACK_VARIABLES_ARGS, 102 »···»···»···»···clone_flags, pd, >tid, tp, >tid) 103 »···»···»···== -1)) 104 return

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871543] Re: rtkit fails to start in focal "pthread_create failed: Resource temporarily unavailable"

2020-04-08 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Similar: https://superuser.com/questions/1440725/rtkit-fails-to-start-on-reboot => but I have no docker (nor runc/containerd) https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=230079 => re-install doesn't help for me (also I have no user issue) -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871543] Re: rtkit fails to start in focal "pthread_create failed: Resource temporarily unavailable"

2020-04-08 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Breakpoint 2, start_canary () at rtkit-daemon.c:2300 2300if (start_canary() < 0) (gdb) n 1670if ((canary_fd = eventfd(0, EFD_NONBLOCK|EFD_CLOEXEC)) < 0 || (gdb) 1677if ((r = -pthread_create(_thread_id, NULL, canary_thread, NULL)) < 0 || (gdb) Breakpoint 1,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871543] Re: rtkit fails to start in focal "pthread_create failed: Resource temporarily unavailable"

2020-04-08 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Start through dbus fails the same way. $ rtkitctl --start -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rtkit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871543 Title: rtkit fails to start in focal "pthread_create

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871543] Re: rtkit fails to start in focal "pthread_create failed: Resource temporarily unavailable"

2020-04-08 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Reproducible: $ sudo /usr/libexec/rtkit-daemon --stderr rtkit-daemon[1764664]: Successfully called chroot. rtkit-daemon[1764664]: Successfully dropped privileges. rtkit-daemon[1764664]: Successfully limited resources. rtkit-daemon[1764664]: pthread_create failed: Resource temporarily unavailable

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871543] Re: rtkit fails to start in focal "pthread_create failed: Resource temporarily unavailable"

2020-04-08 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
The issue is on my workstation which might have all kind of config history. On a fresh focal system it looks like "default off, start works" root@f:~# systemctl status rtkit-daemon ● rtkit-daemon.service - RealtimeKit Scheduling Policy Service Loaded: loaded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871543] [NEW] rtkit fails to start in focal "pthread_create failed: Resource temporarily unavailable"

2020-04-08 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Public bug reported: I was debugging something else and found rtkit broken on my system. Apr 08 06:09:22 Keschdeichel rtkit-daemon[1726502]: Successfully called chroot. Apr 08 06:09:22 Keschdeichel rtkit-daemon[1726502]: Successfully dropped privileges. Apr 08 06:09:22 Keschdeichel

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871538] [NEW] Gnome Shell crashed on background upgrade of accountsservice

2020-04-08 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Public bug reported: This morning I found my computer on the login screen. But not the one of the screen log, no a new one - so something must have crashed. Logging in again confirmed that all apps were gone and the gnome shell was brought down what seems like triggered by a background update o

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1849156] Re: systemd-timesyncd.service broken on upgrade to 19.10 if ntp was installed

2020-04-06 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Great @rbalint - the chrony test fixes have landed ~1h ago. Combined with your upload this should be ok then - thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1849156

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1870980] Re: dnsmasq conf file runtime group conflicts with initd

2020-04-06 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
After install the daemon runs fine in 18.04: root@b:~# systemctl status dnsmasq ● dnsmasq.service - dnsmasq - A lightweight DHCP and caching DNS server Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/dnsmasq.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled) Active: active (running) since Mon 2020-04-06

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1849156] Re: systemd-timesyncd.service broken on upgrade to 19.10 if ntp was installed

2020-04-05 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Debian MP is merged at the end of last Week. It is in 245.4-2 in debian/unstable since Saturday. It is not yet in 245.2-1ubuntu3 which is the current focal-proposed. I was working on bug 1870144 and considering to modify timesyncd there, but seeing this change coming I'll (on the chrony side)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1870427] Re: package smartmontools 7.1-1build1 failed to install/upgrade: conffile difference visualizer subprocess returned error exit status 127

2020-04-03 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Hmm, the pager is called from dpkg to show the diff in your case. This didn't change and dpkg doesn't do anything magic. I can only assume that you might have the "pager" itself setup in an odd way. Due to a bug or intentional - I don't know. Could you report back the output of: $

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1869629] Re: please add /etc/mdns.allow to /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/mdns

2020-04-03 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Lol - sorry for the noise after seeing another case like that I had to realize that focal-unapproved just is multiple pages now :-) It is on the second page still waiting for the release team to accept after beta is out. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1869629] Re: please add /etc/mdns.allow to /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/mdns

2020-04-03 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
@Jamie/John - did you let this upload cancel from focal-unapproved? It was, but is no more in -unapproved - but it also does not show up in -proposed. I'm confused and was wondering if this was lost in work of the release-team or if you cancelled (and plan to re-upload) it intentionally? --

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1869796] Re: vague error during upgrade

2020-04-01 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
If you follow the Debian discussion it seems this tends to go the "please fix in systemd" way. Therefore I'm adding a systemd task ** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1869629] Re: please add /etc/mdns.allow to /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/mdns

2020-04-01 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
It seems Rich has already requested the same change upstream after we identified it is not chrony but a general issue. That is great that allowed to backport an official commit. Thanks jjohansen for making the debdiff of that. I polished the dep3 headers and changelog a bit to fit in lines and

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1869629] Re: please add /etc/mdns.allow to /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/mdns

2020-03-31 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
** Tags added: rls-ff-incoming -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1869629 Title: please add /etc/mdns.allow to /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/mdns Status in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1869629] Re: please add /etc/mdns.allow to /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/mdns

2020-03-30 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Hi Rich, thanks for your continued help - yes I agree that we need to fix this in the apparmor abstraction and not each individual other affected package. FYI: I pinged jjohansen yesterday and he said he will make an upload ready and will ask jdstrand to sponsor it. I subscribed them both here

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1869629] Re: AppArmor denied access to /etc/mdns.allow to cronyd

2020-03-30 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Hi, /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.chronyd has #include And thereby should have: /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/nameservice: #include Which in turn defines: /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/mdns: # mdnsd /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/mdns: /etc/nss_mdns.conf r, /etc/apparmor.d/abstractions/mdns:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1867908] Re: Fix RTM NEW/DELLINK IFLA_IFNAME copy for maximum ifname length

2020-03-25 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
** Tags added: champagne -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to wpa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1867908 Title: Fix RTM NEW/DELLINK IFLA_IFNAME copy for maximum ifname length Status in wpa package

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1855140] Re: How to handle tmpfiles.d in non-systemd environments

2020-03-23 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
This waits on systemd for a general approach/solution. Related discussions that happened already: - https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2020/01/msg00032.html - https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2020-February/040911.html ** Tags removed: server-triage-discuss -- You received this

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1863590] Re: Chrony test hangs with libpcap2 1:2.31-1

2020-03-10 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Both migrated, issue resolved. libcap2 | 1:2.32-1| focal | source, amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, s390x bubblewrap | 0.4.0-1ubuntu3 | focal | source, amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, s390x ** Changed in: libcap2 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released **

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1866264] Re: incorrect dependancy requirement for sasl2-bin

2020-03-06 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Hmm, that worked for me just nice. root@b:~# apt install sasl2-bin Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following additional packages will be installed: db-util db5.3-util The following NEW packages will be installed: db-util

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1866264] Re: incorrect dependancy requirement for sasl2-bin

2020-03-06 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
FYI: here an info how current Bionic should look like: Package: sasl2-bin Architecture: amd64 Version: 2.1.27~101-g0780600+dfsg-3ubuntu2.1 Priority: optional Section: utils Source: cyrus-sasl2 Origin: Ubuntu Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers Original-Maintainer: Debian Cyrus SASL Team Bugs:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1863930] Re: SSH 1.99 clients fail to connect to openssh-server 1:7.6p1-4ubuntu0.3

2020-03-03 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Merge Proposal review is complete, but waiting on some feedback that helps to classify the severity and urgency correctly. Depending on that the options will be: - actually unimportant: don't SRU it at all - some reasonable cases exists, but are very rare: SRU it but hold the release in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1863930] Re: SSH 1.99 clients fail to connect to openssh-server 1:7.6p1-4ubuntu0.3

2020-03-03 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Autopkgtests are complete on the PPA at https://bileto.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/3962 https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/3962/+packages Tests all passed or are known force-badtest cases already. Waiting for Kyle's response to properly handle the severity of this ... -- You

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1863930] Re: SSH 1.99 clients fail to connect to openssh-server 1:7.6p1-4ubuntu0.3

2020-03-02 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
I've redone the patches following the usual patch guidelines and opened an MP with these at: => https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+git/openssh/+merge/380138 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1863930] Re: SSH 1.99 clients fail to connect to openssh-server 1:7.6p1-4ubuntu0.3

2020-03-02 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
protoversion of "1.99" as equivalent to "2.0"; however, some backward-compatible clients send a protoversion of "1.99" and expect the server to treat it as "2.0". This regression was introduced in openssh-portable 7.6p1 from commit 97f4d3083; fixes

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1863930] Re: SSH 1.99 clients fail to connect to openssh-server 1:7.6p1-4ubuntu0.3

2020-02-27 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Yep, thanks cjwatson -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1863930 Title: SSH 1.99 clients fail to connect to openssh-server 1:7.6p1-4ubuntu0.3 Status in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1863930] Re: SSH 1.99 clients fail to connect to openssh-server 1:7.6p1-4ubuntu0.3

2020-02-27 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
@Kyle - in prep for an SRU - do you have steps to reproduce this e.g. with which Ubuntu based client/options one can easily send 1.99 on a connection attempt? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1863930] Re: SSH 1.99 clients fail to connect to openssh-server 1:7.6p1-4ubuntu0.3

2020-02-27 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Assigned to cjwatson for now, but feel free to tell us you want us to drive the SRU for this and we can change it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1863930

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1863930] Re: SSH 1.99 clients fail to connect to openssh-server 1:7.6p1-4ubuntu0.3

2020-02-27 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Thanks Kyle for the great report and prepping a fix already. offending: 97f4d3083 is in >=1%7.6p1-1 fix: 9e9c4a7e5 is in >=1%7.7p1-1 fix: c9c1bba06 is in >=1%7.7p1-1 Matching that with versions in Ubuntu means only Bionic should be affected. openssh | 1:5.9p1-5ubuntu1| precise |

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1863733] Re: Bubblewrap upstream-as-root test fails on libcap2 1:2.31-1 and later

2020-02-26 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
The MP was approved and I uploaded but it seems Lukasz did the same upload already. => https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bubblewrap/0.4.0-1ubuntu3 I now marked the MP as rejected. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1862157] Re: dnsmasq does in all cases prepend "tftp_root" to tftp-bootfiles

2020-02-26 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Changing the behavior in Ubuntu only would only break plenty of scripts automation and expectations. I (personally) agree to Simon who also is "the upstream" on this that it is a security feature and people can still (if preferred) just not set it. I have read the answer twice but don't really

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1863733] Re: Bubblewrap upstream-as-root test fails on libcap2 1:2.31-1 and later

2020-02-26 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Test build in https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/3943/+packages works against the older libcap2 =>

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1863733] Re: Bubblewrap upstream-as-root test fails on libcap2 1:2.31-1 and later

2020-02-26 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
FYI - I'm taking a look if the proposed change on the issue would help us to unblock the new libcap2. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libcap2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1863733 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1864423] Re: Failed test 'default log is not used' with new procps 3.3.16-1

2020-02-25 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Tests are all good now, things should migrate once britney gets to them ... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to procps in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864423 Title: Failed test 'default log is not

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1863590] Re: Chrony test hangs with libpcap2 1:2.31-1

2020-02-25 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #951577 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=951577 ** Also affects: bubblewrap (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=951577 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1863733] Re: Bubblewrap upstream-as-root test fails on libcap2 1:2.31-1 and later

2020-02-25 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #951577 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=951577 ** Also affects: bubblewrap (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=951577 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1864423] Re: Failed test 'default log is not used' with new procps 3.3.16-1

2020-02-25 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
FYI: - postgresql-common itself had a flaky test on armhf (re-started) and should migrate soon (everything else is good) - I triggered the procps tests with the new postgresql-common @Steve - thanks for picking up the cleanup of the fs.protected_regular setting on procps itself -- You received

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1864423] Re: Failed test 'default log is not used' with new procps 3.3.16-1

2020-02-24 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Submitted to Debian via: https://salsa.debian.org/postgresql/postgresql-common/merge_requests/8 And if there are no other blockers Myon will do an upload soon, so we can sync and retest procps against that then. ** Changed in: postgresql-common (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1864423] Re: Failed test 'default log is not used' with new procps 3.3.16-1

2020-02-24 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
I see no difference between the simple test above and the status when the real test is running: Bad: -rw-r- 1 postgres adm 559 Feb 24 10:55 /var/log/postgresql/postgresql-12-main.log 12 main 5432 online postgres /var/lib/postgresql/12/main /var/log/postgresql/postgresql-12-main.log Good:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1864423] Re: Failed test 'default log is not used' with new procps 3.3.16-1

2020-02-24 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
I found that it depends on file permissions/ownership. The construct: open L, ">$default_log"; close L; # empty default log file only works if you are the file owner. The test is running as root and the open/close will fail to open the postgres:adm opened file. A simple test might look like:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1864423] Re: Failed test 'default log is not used' with new procps 3.3.16-1

2020-02-24 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
A trivial check like: $ echo foo > testfile; perl -e 'my $test = "/home/ubuntu/testfile"; open L, ">$test"; close L;' cat testfile Is not broken, it must be more special to the test env of postgresql- common ?! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1864423] Re: Failed test 'default log is not used' with new procps 3.3.16-1

2020-02-24 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Replacing the perl construct open L, ">$default_log"; close L; # empty default log file with the also more readable: truncate "$default_log", 0; Fixes the issue in postgresql-common. That might be a fix for this particular test, but (unfortunately) the construct above is a common use-case in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1864423] Re: Failed test 'default log is not used' with new procps 3.3.16-1

2020-02-24 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
The failing tests are part of 020_create_sql_remove.t: The checks are like: ok -z $default_log, "default log is not used"; And $default_log points to /var/log/postgresql/postgresql-12-main.log in both cases. Entering interactive mode on fail: $ sudo ./testsuite -f 20 -V -s Eventually the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1864424] Re: new vim version in 20.04 sets mouse=a by default

2020-02-24 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Subscribing Steve who did the merge according to the Changelog -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to vim in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864424 Title: new vim version in 20.04 sets mouse=a by default

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1864424] [NEW] new vim version in 20.04 sets mouse=a by default

2020-02-24 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Public bug reported: Upgrading vim in Focal from 2:8.1.0875-5ubuntu4 to 2:8.1.2269-1ubuntu1 changed the default behavior. Old: :set mouse mouse= New: :set mouse mouse=a That new behavior prevents most peoples common In fact that is one thing that always annoys me when working with a Debian

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1864423] [NEW] Failed test 'default log is not used' with new procps 3.3.16-1

2020-02-23 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Public bug reported: Since the new procps upload procps | 2:3.3.16-1ubuntu1 | focal-proposed | source, amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, s390x the tests of postgresql-common fail. The issues are: autopkgtest [15:43:10]: test run-testsuite: - - - - - - - - - - results - - - - - - - - - -

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1863590] Re: Chrony test hangs with libpcap2 1:2.31-1

2020-02-23 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
FYI - libcap2 2.32 is blocking on bubblewrap (bug 1863733) that needs the tests updated (https://github.com/containers/bubblewrap/issues/353) to pass proposed migration. FYI No current chrony tests in excuses that are blocking anyone (and if so testing vs libcap2 from proposed makes it work) - we

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1863590] Re: Chrony test hangs with libpcap2 1:2.31-1

2020-02-17 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
FYI: 2.32 was uploaded to Debian, should resolve via autosync -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libcap2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1863590 Title: Chrony test hangs with libpcap2 1:2.31-1

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1863590] Re: Chrony test hangs with libpcap2 1:2.31-1

2020-02-17 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Since it is a sync I filed a Debian bug for it, but due to our FF it depends how they respond. => https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=951492 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #951492 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=951492 ** Also affects: libcap2 (Debian)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1863590] Re: Chrony test hangs with libpcap2 1:2.31-1

2020-02-17 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
** Changed in: chrony (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: libcap2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libcap2 in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1863590] Re: Chrony test hangs with libpcap2 1:2.31-1

2020-02-17 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
libcap2 breaks it, libcap2 has a fix. I'd prefer that we get libcap2 2.32 to fix it. References: - https://sites.google.com/site/fullycapable/release-notes-for-libcap - https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206539 ** Also affects: libcap2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1703821] Re: Dovecot and Apparmor complains at operation file_inherit

2020-02-17 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
This is a post 2.13 fix upstream. As mentioned by Christian it is in the backport branches, the respective merge for 2.13 is: $ git tag --contains 28c4d3a339dea8120eb59fea314bc0026b50 v2.13.3 Thereby this is fixed in E 2.12: $ git tag --contains 1ce8cd213c1f8948658818ac8a9a964755aac6d0

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1863447] Re: openssh outdated by 8.2

2020-02-16 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Hi Hadmut, we had the same discussion over the weekend if 8.2 would be good to have in 20.04. I subscribed cjwatson who usually does openssh updates to comment on his intentions in this regard. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1861472] Re: upgrade from fresh bionic to focal needlessly prompts user

2020-02-16 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~bryce/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+git/openssh/+merge/378685 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861472

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1862437] Re: Ubuntu 16.10 & later, & derivatives do not query the assigned DNS server

2020-02-14 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
We can see in your logs (thanks for all your effort BTW) that the failing cases are exactly those which have: ... Server: 127.0.0.53 Address: 127.0.0.53#53 ... That represents the switch to systemd-resolved. It might be worth to check (and if you want report) your output of: $ systemd-resolve

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1862928] Re: python-crypto (i386) needs rebuild in Focal (python 3.7 -> python 3.8 dependency refresh)

2020-02-12 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
FYI The ones working seem to be those building as: Architecture: all While the ones you report as failing are: Architecture: any -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python-crypto in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1862762] Re: Merge 8.2001.0-1 from Debian

2020-02-11 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
** Changed in: rsyslog (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/ubuntu/+source/rsyslog/+git/rsyslog/+merge/378910 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1862762] [NEW] Merge 8.2001.0-1 from Debian

2020-02-11 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Public bug reported: Debian is at 8.2001.0-1 which among many fixes by the new upstream changes also resolved python3 issues. This is a year of extra fixes that would be nice going into a new LTS. Important: I think I might be able to prepare the merge but I'm unavailable next week so I'd need

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1827253] Re: [apparmor] missing 'mr' on binary for usage on containers

2020-02-10 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
We have a new MP that fixes things for real in Focal. The former SRUs already have been set to verification-failed and can be cancelled from -proposed if it helps to clear up things. ** Changed in: rsyslog (Ubuntu Disco) Status: Fix Committed => Triaged ** Changed in: rsyslog (Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1827253] Re: [apparmor] missing 'mr' on binary for usage on containers

2020-02-10 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
** Changed in: rsyslog (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => In Progress ** Also affects: rsyslog (Ubuntu Eoan) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: rsyslog (Ubuntu Eoan) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: rsyslog (Ubuntu Eoan) Importance: Undecided => Low

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1862157] Re: dnsmasq does in all cases prepend "tftp_root" to tftp-bootfiles

2020-02-07 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. I appreciate the quality of this bug report and I'm sure it'll be helpful to others to find this discussion if they are experiencing the same issue. This sounds like an upstream bug to me. I have checked the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1862157] Re: dnsmasq does in all cases prepend "tftp_root" to tftp-bootfiles

2020-02-07 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Hi Thomas, as you already described yourself if you set in /etc/dnsmasq.conf tftp-root=/ then all paths you provide in per subnet config would work if each of them were added as absolute path. This works as-is without any change to the package. `tftp-root` is defined as: --tftp-root=[,] Look

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1861975] Re: libiptc.pc non-functional

2020-02-06 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
** Changed in: strongswan (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iptables in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861975 Title: libiptc.pc non-functional Status in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1861975] Re: libiptc.pc non-functional

2020-02-05 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Actually the merge of 1.8.4 and the FTBFS are so different - closing the iptables tasks to live in a different place if needed. ** No longer affects: iptables (Debian) ** Changed in: iptables (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Also affects: strongswan (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1861975] Re: libiptc.pc non-functional

2020-02-05 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Actually this isn't as bad as I first thought, but it can be. Let me illustrate how/why. iptables changed its -dev packaging. Then strongswan adapted by changing iptables-dev to libip4tc-dev + libip6tc-dev. If strongswan would have stayed as-is it woul still work. But due to adapting to the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1861975] [NEW] libiptc.pc non-functional

2020-02-05 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Public bug reported: Hi, I found this by trying to merge a newer strongswan which was an FTFBS. I wondered what happened and found: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947176 This is exactly my issue and we might face FTBFS in strongswan, systemd and probably others as well. The

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1858285] Re: SSH not honoring use of ~/.ssh/authorized_keys

2020-01-07 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
>From man ssh: -i identity_file Selects a file from which the identity (private key) for public key authentication is read. The default is ~/.ssh/id_dsa, ~/.ssh/id_ecdsa, ~/.ssh/id_ed25519 and ~/.ssh/id_rsa. Identity files may also be specified on a per-host basis in the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1849785] Re: FTBFS on i386/ppc64/s390x (Eoan+Focal)

2019-12-17 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
An SRU for just a FTBFS seems wrong. Even keeping it forever in block-proposed seems wrong. The fixes are known and ready for whoever does a real upload. The most likely upload is a full backport of the new version which already includes the fixes. For whoever does an upload to Eoan what you

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1855993] Re: Navit FTBFS - cmake fix needed to work with newer pango

2019-12-11 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
. ** Changed in: pango1.0 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix ** Changed in: navit (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: navit (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Christian Ehrhardt  (paelzer) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1855993] Re: FTBFS in focal blocking gpsd transition for libgps25

2019-12-11 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
** Also affects: cmake (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: cmake (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Rik Mills (rikmills) ** Changed in: cmake (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Description changed: + A change in Pango [1] broke builds using GTK2 as

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1855993] Re: FTBFS in focal blocking gpsd transition for libgps25

2019-12-11 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
navit last time built fine in Eoan on 2019-09-10 Comparing the environments between late Eoan and Focal... The Eoan version of pango-coverage.h doesn't have the include that is failing me. ** Bug watch added: gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmake/issues #19531

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1855993] Re: FTBFS in focal blocking gpsd transition for libgps25

2019-12-11 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
#ubuntu-desktop was helpful: [11:29] cpaelzer, hey, it's https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmake/issues/19531 [11:29] RikMills, ^ [11:29] cpaelzer, we talked about it on friday on #ubuntu-release, we should backport that patch to cmake -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1842643] Re: Update to 1.44

2019-12-11 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
This is in Focal, lets close the bug pango1.0 | 1.44.7-1 | focal | source ** Changed in: pango1.0 (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pango1.0

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1855993] Re: FTBFS in focal blocking gpsd transition for libgps25

2019-12-11 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
navit actually just naively includes and the error pups up much below that. It has #define GDK_ENABLE_BROKEN might that be related? Build dep is: libgtk2.0-dev Which brings in: libpango1.0-dev | 1.44.7-1 | focal | amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, s390x And that has

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1855993] Re: FTBFS in focal blocking gpsd transition for libgps25

2019-12-11 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Added a pango1.0 task for awareness -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pango1.0 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1855993 Title: FTBFS in focal blocking gpsd transition for libgps25 Status in navit

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1855140] Re: How to handle tmpfiles.d in non-systemd environments

2019-12-10 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
I reworded the bug Description to be the general discussion that it is. Waiting for: - Debian GR [1] to complete as its decision has direct impact on how to handle this in packages - Ubuntu systemd maintainers to chime in as this might have been discussed in other bugs before [1]:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1855140] Re: haproxy package misses creation of default stats socket path in Docker container

2019-12-09 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Adding a systemd task as I really think this is more a general than a haproxy specific discussion/bug/feature. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1855140 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1855140] Re: haproxy package misses creation of default stats socket path in Docker container

2019-12-09 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Maybe related discussion https://lists.debian.org/debian- devel/2019/12/msg00060.html ** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1853852] Re: hard to reproduce issues in systemd autopkgtest against new libseccomp 2.4.2

2019-12-09 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Issue is in systemd, fix known (now). I'll prep an MP to discuss, but given how much extra churn systemd updates usually cause this most likely won't be uploaded "on its own" ** Changed in: libseccomp (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: New =>

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1853852] Re: hard to reproduce issues in systemd autopkgtest against new libseccomp 2.4.2

2019-11-27 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
FYI: Discussions with both upstreams continue, I'm right now trying a new spin with a different approach that does not use the _exact calls and will get back to the upstreams once (if) that works. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1832297] Re: usrmerge changes path of iptables - please update libvirt on a merge of 1.8.1-x

2019-11-27 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
First of all I beg your pardon, I'm sure there was a similar discussion recently but I only find this bug which is older. I think it was something paride found, so maybe it was on IRC? Well I tried to proactively let you know via this bug months before anyway :-) Well wherever that other recent

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >