debdiff
** Patch added: "debdiff_gdb_noble_from_14.1-0ubuntu2_to_14.1-0ubuntu3.diff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdb/+bug/1982336/+attachment/5746408/+files/debdiff_gdb_noble_from_14.1-0ubuntu2_to_14.1-0ubuntu3.diff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Test builds are done here:
https://launchpad.net/~fheimes/+archive/ubuntu/lp1982336
** Information type changed from Private to Public
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: gdb (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notifi
** Tags added: pe-sponsoring-request
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdb in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982336
Title:
[24.04 FEAT] GDB: Support for new IBM Z Hardware (IBM z16)
Status in Ubuntu
[Please ignore comment#35 - this was caused by a BZ-to-LP-bridge issue
...]
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1833322
Title:
Please consider no more havin
Thx doko, for having this incl. in gdb trunk/15 / 15.0.50.20240219-0ubuntu1:
https://launchpad.net/~doko/+archive/ubuntu/toolchain/+sourcepub/15802578/+listing-archive-extra
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdb
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdb in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982336
Title:
[24.04 FEAT] GDB: Support for new IBM
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdb in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982336
Title:
[24.04 FEAT] GDB: Support for new IB
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: Opinion => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1833322
Title:
Please consider no more having irq
Fix Committed with having:
pam | 1.5.3-4ubuntu1 | noble-proposed | source
** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded
Included in pam | 1.5.3-5ubuntu3.
** Changed in: pam (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscr
I see (deep in my mind I remember that such a discussion happened or at
least started somewhere).
Just notice that one interface is still _not_ optional, here in my case:
encc000
And the behavior changed recently, with the above config I didn not hit
the timeout in the past (even with earlier nob
I gave ~ppa5 a try on my s390x system.
If I set all interfaces to "optional: true" (incl. encc000), but except
encc000.2653, I don't face the timeout anymore. But if I UNset
"optional: true" for encc000 on top, I tap into the timeout again.
In the past it was okay to NOT have "optional: true" set
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060311
Title:
Setting "optional: true" to overcome he ti
** Changed in: lvm2 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Canonical Foundations Team (canonical-foundations) =>
(unassigned)
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Assignee: Skipper Bug Screeners (skipper-screen-team) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touc
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iptables in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1974056
Title:
iptables-1.8.7/iptables/tests/shell/testca
** Package changed: linux (Ubuntu) => pam (Ubuntu)
** Also affects: ubuntu-z-systems
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Assignee: (unassigned) => Skipper Bug Screeners (skipper-screen-team)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a mem
First of all I assume there was no previous attempt of doing a 'do-
release-upgrade' or even an attempt that was stopped/interrupted, or an
attempt to get the system updated in a different way, for example (in
the abs. not recommended way to) to change all 'impish' entries in
/etc/apt/sources.list
Well, it's a bit difficult to give remote recommendation for a system in this
state.
(Ideally I want to login to it by myself ...)
It would be good to know how many of the installed packages are still
packages from impish, and how many already from jammy.
One, may try to move forward to jammy (a
** Also affects: ubuntu-power-systems
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: ubuntu-power-systems
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu on IBM Power Systems Bug Triage
(ubuntu-power-triage)
** Changed in: ubuntu-power-systems
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in:
** Also affects: binutils (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1974115
Title:
[UBUNTU 22.04] BINUTILS
** Description changed:
SRU Justification:
==
[Impact]
* zlib: compressBound() returns an incorrect result on IBM z15 hardware.
* Passing the result of compressBound() to compress() results
in an error code.
* This is because compressBound() is not adjus
** Patch added:
"debdiff_bedtools_kinetic_from_2.30.0+dfsg-2_to_2.30.0+dfsg-2ubuntu1.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+source/bedtools/+bug/1961427/+attachment/5597488/+files/debdiff_bedtools_kinetic_from_2.30.0+dfsg-2_to_2.30.0+dfsg-2ubuntu1.patch
--
You received this bug noti
** Patch added:
"debdiff_bedtools_impish_from_2.30.0+dfsg-1_to_2.30.0+dfsg-1ubuntu0.1.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+source/bedtools/+bug/1961427/+attachment/5597490/+files/debdiff_bedtools_impish_from_2.30.0+dfsg-1_to_2.30.0+dfsg-1ubuntu0.1.patch
--
You received this bug no
** Patch added:
"debdiff_bedtools_jammy_from_2.30.0+dfsg-2_to_2.30.0+dfsg-2ubuntu0.1.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+source/bedtools/+bug/1961427/+attachment/5597489/+files/debdiff_bedtools_jammy_from_2.30.0+dfsg-2_to_2.30.0+dfsg-2ubuntu0.1.patch
--
You received this bug noti
I would like to proceed on this (to not loose to much time...)
To sum things up:
On top of the actual zlib fix,
there is another patch 'Remove compressBound assertions. (PR #1258)'
needed for htslib.
Unfortunately there is a standalone 'htslib' package,
as well as a htslib version included in (so
Thx for the retest!
With that I would go from Incomplete back to In Progress ...
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: Incomplete => In Progress
** Changed in: zlib (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
You are right, these are 'just' fixes w/o ABI changes and I am not aware
(couldn't find) of any cases of static linkages - I apologize.
So fortunately the complexity of this will be far less.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is
Just to clarify - only 21.10/impish got dropped.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961427
Title:
zlib: compressBound() returns an incorrect result on z15
Statu
** Information type changed from Private to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to nettle in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959469
Title:
[22.10 FEAT] Upgrade nettle to latest version >= 3.7.4 (cry
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu Kinetic)
Assignee: Ubuntu on IBM Power Systems Bug Triage (ubuntu-power-triage) =>
Canonical Foundations Team (canonical-foundations)
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu Jammy)
Assigne
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu Jammy)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Canonical Foundations Team
(canonical-foundations)
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu Kinetic)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You received this bu
** Description changed:
+ SRU Justification:
+ ==
+
+ [Impact]
+
+ * As of today the architectural (level) name 'arch14' is used
+as CPU name for the new IBM z16 system.
+
+ * The real name 'z16' couldn't be used until officially announced.
+
+ * That happened meanwhile,
** Description changed:
+ SRU Justification:
+ ==
+
+ [Impact]
+
+ * The latest glibc uses DT_RELR relocations,
+but it turned out that the linker support is still incomplete,
+as of binutils-2.38-3ubuntu1 on Ubuntu 22.04.
+
+ * It lacks the fix/commit 'PowerPC64 DT_RE
** Attachment removed: "reverse dependencies, gathered on focal.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zlib/+bug/1961427/+attachment/5597497/+files/reverse%20dependencies%2C%20gathered%20on%20focal.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seed
Since the symbol files are a bit tricky in this case (because the incl.
arch-specific entries), I'm uploading them here separately, too.
** Attachment added: "updated_symbols.tgz"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nettle/+bug/1959469/+attachment/5603726/+files/updated_symbols.tgz
--
Here is the debdiff for this version bump (from
3.7.3-1build2_to_3.8-0ubuntu1).
** Patch added: "debdiff_nettle_3.7.3-1build2_to_3.8-0ubuntu1.diff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nettle/+bug/1959469/+attachment/5603732/+files/debdiff_nettle_3.7.3-1build2_to_3.8-0ubuntu1.diff
** Cha
** Changed in: ubuntu-power-systems
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1978129
Title:
Incomplete support for DT_RELR relocat
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1974115
Title:
[UBUNTU 22.04] BINUTILS: Adding new platfo
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1015346
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1015346
** Also affects: nettle (Debian) via
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1015346
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification becau
Since the zlib package progressed meanwhile due to a security update, I
created new debdiffs for jammy and kinetic - see debdiffs_J_K.tar.gz.
** Attachment added: "zlib debdiffs for jammy and kinetic (latest)"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/htslib/+bug/1961427/+attachment/5604504/+f
zlib debdiffs for kinetic, jammy and focal (latest, with proper dep3)
** Patch removed: "zlib debdiffs for jammy and kinetic (latest)"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/htslib/+bug/1961427/+attachment/5604504/+files/debdiffs_J_K.tar.gz
** Attachment added: "zlib debdiffs for kinetic,
I've noticed that the updated zlib for kinetic just landed in -proposed:
"zlib | 1:1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu10 | kinetic-proposed"
hence I'm updating the corresponding entry to Fix Committed.
** Changed in: zlib (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notificatio
Public bug reported:
The 'linux-lowlatency' kernel build (incl. autopkgtest) was triggered in a
kinetic-proposed migration process (for zlib) and runs into a 'regression':
"autopkgtest for linux-lowlatency/5.19.0-1001.1: amd64: Pass, arm64: Regression
♻"
The regression is highly likely not due
zlib 1:1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu10 is stuck in kinetic-proposed for some time:
http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-
migration/kinetic/update_excuses.html#zlib
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ProposedMigration
Several of the initial regressions were due to timeouts and network
issues and are so
Looks like libbam-dev is the reason for the libbio-samtools-perl regression
on s390x. libbam-dev is used by libbio-samtools-perl and build based on it's
source package samtools-legacy, which includes another version of bgzf,
that misses the 'Remove compressBound assertions' (PR #1258) fix.
Problem
So yes, this is a new feature / kernel option for (arm only) introduced with
the migration to gcc 12:
[v3,1/2] AARCH64: Add gcc Shadow Call Stack support
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linu
x-hardening/patch/20220303074323.86282-1-ashim...@linux.alibaba.com/#24774364
--
You received this b
There is now a solution for LP#1983255.
Meanwhile I've noticed that gdcm is now flagged as a new regression for
zlib's proposed miration at 'update excuses' (was not the case before).
Found that this happened on Debian too:
https://www.mail-archive.com/debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org/msg1863513
The requested commits/patches were added and test packages '0.24.1-1ubuntu1'
were build in PPA:
https://launchpad.net/~fheimes/+archive/ubuntu/lp1982841/+packages
The builds also trigger intensive tests, that were all successful:
Testsuite summary for p11-kit 0.24.1
==
Regarding zlib focal-proposed migration:
For libbio-samtools-perl it's the same situation like on kinetic.
samtools-legacy requires the PR #1258, and libbio-samtools-perl a rebuild (to
link against the new libbio-dev). See update-excuse bug LP#1983255.
On top vcftools misses the 'Remove compress
Meanwhile libnettle8 3.8.1-2 landed in kinetic-proposed, hence updating status
to Fix Committed.
(thx to Magnus Holmgren)
** Changed in: nettle (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this
libnettle8 3.8.1-2 finally landed in kinetic,
hence updating the status to Fix Released and closing this ticket.
** Changed in: nettle (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug noti
Public bug reported:
On 22.04.1 I've noticed the following error in systlog:
Aug 16 06:19:15 s1lp10 console-setup.sh[783]: setfont: ERROR kdfontop.c:266
put_font_piofontx: ioctl(PIO_FONTX): 512,8x16: failed: Inappropriate ioctl for
device
Aug 16 06:19:15 s1lp10 console-setup.sh[786]: setfont: E
Had to re-upload the debdiff - now with fixed URLs in the Origin, section of
the DEP3 header.
(Notice the prefix 'new_' in the new version ...)
** Patch added:
"new_debdiff_p11-kit_kinetic_from_0.24.1-1_to_0.24.1-1ubuntu1.diff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/p11-kit/+bug/1982841/+
** Changed in: ubuntu-power-systems
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1978129
Title:
Incomplete support for DT_RE
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1974115
Title:
[UBUNTU 22.04] BINUTILS: Adding
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to p11-kit in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982841
Title:
[22.10 FEAT] [SEC2210] p11-kit: a
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to p11-kit in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982841
Title:
[22.10 FEAT] [SEC2210] p11-kit:
Thx Iliya! (updating tag accordingly)
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal
verification-needed-jammy
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-focal verification-done-jammy
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded p
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961427
Title:
zlib: compressBound() returns an inc
Hi Andreas, thanks for the verification, I'm going to adjust the tags
accordingly.
Don't worry about the potential regression, it's an automated mail based on the
results of the autopkgtests that run automatically while processing such an SRU
like this - and binutils trigger a lot of tests.
Such
** Tags added: reverse-proxy-bugzilla s390x
** Also affects: ubuntu-z-systems
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Assignee: (unassigned) => bugproxy (bugproxy)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded pack
Public bug reported:
Rebuilding zlib for s390x on oracular fails to build, probably due to
gcc 14 usage (since it became more strict).
Full build log can be found here:
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/741961061/buildlog_ubuntu-oracular-s390x.zlib_1%3A1.3.dfsg-3.1ubuntu4_BUILDING.txt.gz
erroneous
Hi Simon, not yet, but I'm pushing for this ...
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Importance: High => Critical
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zl
A new upload of the s390-tools package always also requires an upload of the
s390-tools-signed package with the same version as well.
I've attached the debdiff for it here...
** Also affects: s390-tools-signed (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Patch added:
"debdiff_s390-to
Patch got upstream accepted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=e8a7142a697c5d2673adea33ba23af82a89c9559
It looks to me that it should be picked together with:
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=a247088adaf122116919235f4a40189506139495
--
You received this bug notification
Thanks iii, just saw this a few minutes ago.
Does it makes sense to also add:
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=a247088adaf122116919235f4a40189506139495
(seems to be a bit related ...)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, whi
The fix solves the problem - I tried with a patched gcc-14:
https://launchpad.net/~fheimes/+archive/ubuntu/lp2073786/+sourcepub/16401085/+listing-archive-extra
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
ht
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075567
Title:
zlib fails to build on s390x on oracular
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2044104
Title:
[UBUNTU 20.04] chzdev -e is rebuilding ini
Thx for reviewing, uploading and the fix!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1998470
Title:
re-add s390x vectorized crc32 support to zlib in lunar
Status in Ubun
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1998470
Title:
re-add s390x vectorized crc32 suppor
Public bug reported:
It has been reported that 1.2.13 as well as the patch from LP#1990379 breaks
libxml2 (and libxml) on s390x:
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2155328). The attached patch
should fix the issue.
The upstream author proposed a fix and a new test for zlib-ng
(https:/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2002511
Title:
zlib 1.2.13 (and patched 1.2.11) breaks libxml(2) on s390x
Status in Ubuntu on IBM z Systems:
New
Status in zl
Attaching the slightly modified and renamed patch (original is at LP#1990379),
now as quilt patch, with some whitespace adjustments and a proper dep3 header.
** Patch added: "1390.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/2002511/+attachment/5640638/+files/1390.patch
--
You rec
Hi Ilya, yepp, breaking libxml2 is of course an issue.
Regarding the fix/patch, you attached here a patch named 'patch-1.2.11'.
We have currently the following package versions in the archive:
1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu1.5 | focal
1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu9.2 | jammy
1.2.11.dfsg-4.1ubuntu1 | kinetic
1.2.13.dfs
PPA test builds a ongoing for F, J, K and L at
https://launchpad.net/~fheimes/+archive/ubuntu/lp2002511
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2002511
Title:
zlib 1.2
** Description changed:
+ SRU Justification:
+ --
+
+ [ Impact ]
+
+ * zlib version 1.2.13, as well as patched zlib versions 1.2.11 with
+the patch from LP#1990379, break libxml2 and lxml on s390x.
+
+ * The problem appears during loading a gzipped XML file.
+
+ * Disabl
** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #2155328
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2155328
** Also affects: zlib via
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2155328
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub
** Summary changed:
- zlib 1.2.13 (and patched 1.2.11) breaks libxml(2) on s390x
+ zlib 1.2.13 (and patched 1.2.11) breaks libxml2 on s390x
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpa
** Patch added:
"debdiff_zlib_lunar_from_1.2.13.dfsg-1ubuntu3_to_1.2.13.dfsg-1ubuntu4.diff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/zlib/+bug/2002511/+attachment/5640780/+files/debdiff_zlib_lunar_from_1.2.13.dfsg-1ubuntu3_to_1.2.13.dfsg-1ubuntu4.diff
--
You received this bug notification because you are
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2002511
Title:
zlib 1.2.13 (and patched 1.2.11) breaks li
** Tags added: ppc64el reverse-proxy-bugzilla
** Changed in: ubuntu-power-systems
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: ubuntu-power-systems
Assignee: (unassigned) => bugproxy (bugproxy)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packa
** Summary changed:
- re-add s390x vectorized crc32 support to zlib in lunar
+ [23.04] re-add s390x vectorized crc32 support to zlib in lunar
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Tou
** Package changed: linux (Ubuntu) => s390-tools (Ubuntu)
** Also affects: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: ubuntu-z-systems
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
This was implemented around 2020, mainly to catch any ccw config changes in a
user friendly way:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892367
https://i527439087.restricted.launchpadlibrarian.net/527439087/20f6c87a-829f-11eb-9412-002481e91f22.txt?token=zC4n7TlCmffBDHm9Dl002PsfchDXC3Dk
Regarding:
"1) Ha
** Changed in: s390-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seed
Excuse me for chiming in so late, but we can test (and even recreate)
the situation by ourselves on our system (and we have systems with
attached crypto hw to it).
I just tried it on a jammy z/VM guest:
$ lszcrypt -V
CARD.DOM TYPE MODESTATUS REQUESTS PENDING HWTYPE QDEPTH FUNCTIONS
I had the update of the bug description on my todo list - it's done now.
** Description changed:
=== SRU information ===
+
[Meta]
This bug is part of a series of three bugs for a single SRU.
The "central" bug with the global information and debdiff is
http://pad.lv/2033422
[Impact]
Public bug reported:
The pam version(s) in Debian (checked buster) and Ubuntu (checked focal to
noble) are affected by
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2012871
Customers report a command going through PAM crashing for a given user.
A potential follow on issue can be that no ssh remote
** Also affects: ubuntu-z-systems
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pam in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045250
Title:
pam_lastlog doesn't handle localtim
** Also affects: ubuntu-z-systems
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Assignee: (unassigned) => bugproxy (bugproxy)
** Tags added: reverse-proxy-bugzilla
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages,
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pam in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045250
Title:
pam_lastlog doesn't handle localtime_r related e
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1833322
Title:
Consider removing irqbalance from default
verification on jammy was successful
** Description changed:
=== SRU information ===
[Meta]
This bug is part of a series of three bugs for a single SRU.
The "central" bug with the global information and debdiff is
http://pad.lv/2033422
[Impact]
Openssl using an engine dumps cor
Hi Grgo, did you also updated libssl3?
see test plan in Description:
"
- Upgrade not only the openssl package itself,
but also libssl3, before verification.
"
With that I could successfully verify.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, w
Since this bug is fixed with openssl 3.0.8 and newer,
I'm changing the status of the current devel. release to Fix Released too
(since we are there on 3.0.10).
And with that the affected project status can be set to Fix Released, too.
Thx!
** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progre
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925211
Title:
Hot-unplug of disks leaves broken blo
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1924794 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1924794
This is an issue that got already identified and reported (late in the cycle)
during 21.04 testing and is described at LP#1924794 in more detail.
It was unfortunately too late to get it fixed in time for 21
** Package changed: linux (Ubuntu) => openssl (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929921
Title:
Ubuntu 20.04.2 - OPENSSL_cleanse() fails with segmenta
With that we can close the entire bug, since hirsute / 5.11 is now Fix
Released (#34), groovy / 5.8 is not affected (#17) and the patches are
upstream with 5.13 (#33), hence will end up sooner or later in impish.
** Changed in: ubuntu-z-systems
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
** Chan
1 - 100 of 615 matches
Mail list logo
