[Touch-packages] [Bug 1610714] Re: Evince crashes with _cairo_gstate_set_dash

Uploaded. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to poppler in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1610714 Title: Evince crashes with _cairo_gstate_set_dash Status in Poppler: Unknown Status in poppler package

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1598384] Re: [Wishlist] apt command: add more subcommands to autocomplete, help and manpage

All commands have bash completion since recent releases (1.3~exp2, 1.2.13). The former is in yakkety, the latter will hit xenial at some point (or actually 1.2.14 or 1.2.15 will). We just have another bug preventing 1.3~exp3 from being in yakkety, so we cannot start the 1.2.14 transition in xenial

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1657567] Re: "Content-Range: */" on non-416 responses considered invalid

It will come to (yakkety and) xenial eventually. But it's not urgent enough to warrant a prioritised upload on its own IMO. There's some other stuff I want to figure out first - like merging new translations, and some other bug fixes from the 1.4 series. -- You received this bug notification

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1662327] Re: apt-daily.service was slowing down one system startup

The service is started by a (persistent) timer. The timer runs at 0600 and 1800 (+/-13). Apparently that timer elapsed before your boot. That said, the reason it starts before a login manager is that it does not depend on a login manager - why would it, it does not need that. And systemd starts

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1661199] Re: Apt-cacher-ng fails on https repo

It would be nice to have some more details, but I think it's a bit unrealistic to display a web page in apt's error handling system. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1661199] Re: Apt-cacher-ng fails on https repo

Think about that: Your proxy returns 403 and you have 20 repositories, and now get 20 messages, each 100 lines long because your proxy decided to go fancy. And of course: If reported as an actual error message, these things also become python exceptions. Or did you really just mean the message

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1659002] Re: package python-apt 1.1.0~beta1build1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

** Package changed: python-apt (Ubuntu) => python2.7 (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: python2.7 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python2.7 in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1651923] Re: apt https method decodes redirect locations and sends them to the destination undecoded.

Yes, please file a new bug. And that really seems more like an unattended-upgrades bug, I can't believe it's a regression in 1.2.19 - the change in 1.2.19 is just that: + Uri.Path = QuoteString(Uri.Path, "+~ "); - just quoting the path component of the Uri before downloading it (in the https

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1658027] Re: pkgcache.bin. files fill up drive

This does not happen only with apt-get update. A new temporary file is created by (almost) every APT command if at least one of the main cache files is outdated. It is then renamed to the final file. If APT exits before the rename, the temporary filename might stay around until you run clean.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1657567] Re: "Content-Range: */" on non-416 responses considered invalid

Fix committed: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/apt/apt.git/commit/?id=4759a70 commit 4759a702081297bde66982efed8b2b7fd39ca27c Author: Julian Andres Klode <j...@debian.org> Date: Wed Jan 18 20:39:27 2017 +0100 basehttp: Only read Content-Range on 416 and 206 responses This

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1030471] Re: software-properties-gtk crashed with UnicodeDecodeError in record(): 'utf-8' codec can't decode byte 0x92 in position 1017: invalid start byte

Locale wrongly configured. Needs to be UTF-8. ** Changed in: python-apt (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python-apt in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1636049] Re: apt-daily timer should run after networking is available

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1667769 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1667769 Marking as duplicate of bug #1667769, that one has more details. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1667769 apt-daily.service running too early in boot process -- You received this bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1667769] Re: apt-daily.service running too early in boot process

Unfortunately for us, systemd provides no good interface to improve things. There's the ability to wait on network, but AFAIUI that does not really help much, as it does not deal with resume. Also waiting on the network could time out, and the service would then be marked as failed and also run 12

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1649959] Re: unattended upgrade of apt kills running apt-daily job

This has been released in zesty too, but seems we forgot to close it. Doing so now. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1667797] Re: Need manual control over apt update schedule

Add a systemd drop-in if you want to constraint times. Note that it schedules a random time, not 6 and 18:00 (it is randomized by 12 hours). ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1645815] Re: apt install of local debs does not tab-complete

Queued for 1.2.20: https://github.com/Debian/apt/compare/1.2.19...julian- klode:1.2.y?expand=1 Queued for 1.3.5: https://github.com/Debian/apt/compare/1.3.4...julian- klode:1.3.y?expand=1 ** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu Yakkety) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: apt

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1657567] Re: "Content-Range: */" on non-416 responses considered invalid

Queued for 1.2.20: https://github.com/Debian/apt/compare/1.2.19...julian- klode:1.2.y?expand=1 Queued for 1.3.5: https://github.com/Debian/apt/compare/1.3.4...julian- klode:1.3.y?expand=1 ** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu Yakkety) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1657440] Re: apt won't redownload Release.gpg after inconsistent cache updates made while UCA is being updated

Queued for 1.2.20: https://github.com/Debian/apt/compare/1.2.19...julian- klode:1.2.y?expand=1 Queued for 1.3.5: https://github.com/Debian/apt/compare/1.3.4...julian- klode:1.3.y?expand=1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1666957] [NEW] Errors in the operating system

Public bug reported: Errors when running xdiagnose. Errors when playing audio and sound player. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.10 Package: xorg 1:7.7+13ubuntu4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.8.0-37.39-generic 4.8.16 Uname: Linux 4.8.0-37-generic i686 .tmp.unity_support_test.0:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1657440] Re: apt won't redownload Release.gpg after inconsistent cache updates made while UCA is being updated

@Samuel Matzek (smatzek) Your comment is far too long, I did not read that. I only read the first sentence, and thus conclude that you believe the patch fixes this issue. If you want to help, provide a *concise* instructions to test this by editing the bug report using the guidelines specified in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1657440] Re: apt won't redownload Release.gpg after inconsistent cache updates made while UCA is being updated

Fixed in 1.4~beta1. This will be cherry picked into the 1.3 and 1.2 (yakkety and xenial) branches in the next weeks. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released ** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu Yakkety) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: apt

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1654573] Re: dowload of ttf-mscorefonts-installer failed

Did you upgrade libapt-pkg5.0? No? This bug has been fixed. If you already have a partial file, it fails due to bug 1657567 - but the space -> %20 encoding in the redirect *has* been fixed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1664303] Re: Merge packagekit 1.1.5-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to packagekit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1664303 Title: Merge packagekit 1.1.5-1 (main)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1651923] Re: apt https method decodes redirect locations and sends them to the destination undecoded.

Releases uploaded. The fix is exactly the same as in zesty, I just added an additional test case based on the new 1.4~beta4 release (the test case also needed some porting because the framework between 1.4 and 1.3 is a bit different). ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: Triaged =>

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1651923] Re: apt https method decodes redirect locations and sends them to the destination undecoded.

@llucax there are two versions (and two calls for testing). 1.2.19 for xenial and 1.3.4 for yakkety. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1651923 Title: apt https

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1651923] Re: apt https method decodes redirect locations and sends them to the destination undecoded.

Could you provide logs with -o debug::acquire::https=1 and debug::acquire::http=1 Maybe thw redirect changed and the test case this started working again? I'll check soon. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1651923] Re: apt https method decodes redirect locations and sends them to the destination undecoded.

Another test case is downloading "https://people.debian.org/~jak/a b/c" with apt-helper. That fails in 1.2.18 and succeeds in 1.2.19. ** Description changed: [Impact] - Downloads via HTTPS fail if the URL contains a space. This breaks packages like ttf-mscorefonts-installer and various

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1651923] Re: apt https method decodes redirect locations and sends them to the destination undecoded.

Again: You need to install apt-transport-https, not apt. Nobody cares about your version of the apt package, the fix is in apt-transport- https. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1651923] Re: apt https method decodes redirect locations and sends them to the destination undecoded.

@Robin: I just confirmed that apt 1.2.19 fixes the corefonts issue: All fonts downloaded and installed. Setting up ttf-mscorefonts-installer (3.4+nmu1ubuntu2) ... Did you really upgrade apt-transport-https or only apt? But bdmurray is right, the ardour thing works fine in 1.2.18. In xenial

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1651923] Re: apt https method decodes redirect locations and sends them to the destination undecoded.

The first log looks entirely correct. The server is broken, vorboss does not support partial requests, but instead of responding correctly with all the content, it just redirects to another location. That other location is http, so unencrypted which we do not allow for security reasons. Re the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1651923] Re: apt https method decodes redirect locations and sends them to the destination undecoded.

And note that the redirect from vorboss is to a site that indicates a failure, not the file. Or in short: Sourceforge sucks, don't use it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1651923] Re: apt https method decodes redirect locations and sends them to the destination undecoded.

This problem does not occur with that file on xenial, as it first redirects to an https URI without a space which then redirects to an HTTPS uri with a space (http w/o space -> https w/o space -> https w/ space). In xenial, https->https redirects where handled internally by curl. Another test

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1657567] [NEW] "Content-Range: */" on non-416 responses considered invalid

Public bug reported: APT only allows Content-Range: */ to be specified on a 416 response. Sourceforge sometimes replies with that in a 302 redirect. We should probably just accept and silently ignore that content-range field for other values. ** Affects: apt (Ubuntu) Importance: Low

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1651923] Re: apt https method decodes redirect locations and sends them to the destination undecoded.

The Content-Range issue with partial downloads on SF is tracked in bug 1657567 now. That's less urgent though, so we may just want to roll that one out when I do the next "scheduled" bugfix update. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1651923] Re: apt https method decodes redirect locations and sends them to the destination undecoded.

OK. We now have comments of success from yakkety and xenial, and I have also checked both, so marking it verified-done. I'll open up a new bug for the partial download issue. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1657567] Re: "Content-Range: */" on non-416 responses considered invalid

** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1657567 Title: "Conte

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1651923] Re: apt https method decodes redirect locations and sends them to the destination undecoded.

Fix has been committed upstream with an additional test case: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/apt/apt.git/commit/?id=994515e689dcc5f963f5fed58284831750a5da03 I'll sync the new version from Debian unstable once I have uploaded and it is known by Launchpad. I will also upload SRUs tomorrow - the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1651923] Re: apt https method decodes redirect locations and sends them to the destination undecoded.

** Description changed: + [Impact] + Downloads via HTTPS fail if the URL contains a space. This breaks packages like ttf-mscorefonts-installer and various third party hosters. + + [Test case] + Check that /usr/lib/apt/apt-helper download-file

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1645815] Re: apt install of local debs does not tab-complete

** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: Triaged => In Progress ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Yakkety) Status: Triaged => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1657567] Re: "Content-Range: */" on non-416 responses considered invalid

** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: Triaged => In Progress ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Yakkety) Status: Triaged => In Progress ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Yakkety) Importance: Undecided => Low -- You

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1657440] Re: apt won't redownload Release.gpg after inconsistent cache updates made while UCA is being updated

** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: Triaged => In Progress ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Yakkety) Status: Triaged => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1657567] Re: "Content-Range: */" on non-416 responses considered invalid

Oh, sorry, did not notice that it did not have one. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1657567 Title: "Content-Range: */" on non-416 responses considered invalid

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1657567] Re: "Content-Range: */" on non-416 responses considered invalid

Seems like sourceforge is fixed now, so we need to come up with a new test. ** Description changed: APT only allows Content-Range: */ to be specified on a 416 response. Sourceforge sometimes replies with that in a 302 redirect. We should probably just accept and silently ignore that

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1668280] Re: [SRU] Update apt/yakkety to1.3.5

** Summary changed: - New upstream microrelease 1.3.5 + [SRU] Update apt/yakkety to1.3.5 ** Summary changed: - [SRU] Update apt/yakkety to1.3.5 + [SRU] Update apt/yakkety to 1.3.5 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1668285] [NEW] [SRU] Update apt/xenial to 1.2.20

kasz Kawczynski ] * Honour Acquire::ForceIPv4/6 in the https transport [ Julian Andres Klode ] * basehttp: Only read Content-Range on 416 and 206 responses (LP: #1657567) * Only merge acquire items with the same meta key (Closes: #838441) * Do not package names representing .dsc/.deb/... f

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1668280] Re: [SRU] Update apt/yakkety to 1.3.5

Also see #1668285 for the xenial bug. ** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu Yakkety) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Yakkety) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1668285] Re: [SRU] Update apt/xenial to 1.2.20

Only complete understood file paths for install (LP: #1645815) [ Lukasz Kawczynski ] * Honour Acquire::ForceIPv4/6 in the https transport [ Julian Andres Klode ] * basehttp: Only read Content-Range on 416 and 206 responses (LP: #1657567) * Only merge acquire items with

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1668280] Re: [SRU] Update apt/yakkety to 1.3.5

Uploaded now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1668280 Title: [SRU] Update apt/yakkety to 1.3.5 Status in apt package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in apt

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1668280] [NEW] [SRU] Update apt/yakkety to 1.3.5

Public bug reported: [Impact] This collects several bug fixes from the 1.4 branch. Most of the stuff has been in Debian since 20 days, and in testing since Feb 12. Fixes in the acquire system - mostly error cases. * basehttp: Only read Content-Range on 416 and 206 responses (LP: #1657567) *

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1522675] Re: Can't drop privileges for downloading : _apt user not allowed

Michael and I don't have any different opinion here at all. You are complaining about root/.synaptic/tmp//tmp_cl - which is owned by synaptics - not about the /var/cache/apt/archives/partial or another apt owned directory. A directory inside your (well, root's) home directory is a different case

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1595177] Re: [SRU] Update apt/xenial to 1.2.14

We should probably drop the 1.2.14 SRU - there is a regression in the proxy autodetection code in which it now reads output scripts write on stderr. Fix is: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/apt/apt.git/commit/?id=0ecceb5bb9cc8727c117195945b7116aceb984fe This is already fixed in 1.3.1, and I'll

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1625667] Re: Trusty: apt does not try next mirror if index file download fails with mirror:// source

Notably, there has been no related change of the mirror method since the trusty release. So if it started working later, than that is related to the reworked acquire system. As such, I'd like this bug to be closed as invalid, as it's not worth it. The pre 1.1 acquire system cannot really deal

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1625667] Re: Trusty: apt does not try next mirror if index file download fails with mirror:// source

"Marking dev + xenial as Invalid since it works from Xenial onward" You marked trusty and dev as invalid, and kept xenial open? Unfortunately, there have been huge changes in the acquire system in 1.1, so there is likely no way to fix this in trusty. -- You received this bug notification

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1624681] Re: "Important" control field is a bit confusing

Essential packages not installed will be installed automatically by APT, packages with the Important field will not be. Important also does not have the same ordering requirements as Essential. It's main use case is building configuration metapackages:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1624681] Re: "Important" control field is a bit confusing

Note that a normal user should never see this: They normally do not remove the init package. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1624681 Title: "Important" control

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1611010] Re: yakkety desktop - non-english installation crashes with /plugininstall.py: ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10: ''

Going to upload a fixed APT shortly. There's also some other broken stuff in installation ordering, and missing large file support that should really be fixed now. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank) -- You received this bug notificat

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1628654] Re: apt-mark's regex matching seems odd

To clarify what happened here: (1) *vcard is an fnmatch() expression matching 2vcard (2) vcard* is an unanchored regular expression matching 2vard. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1628654] Re: apt-mark's regex matching seems odd

There are three types of patterns (1) word (2) fnmatch() style (3) regex They're all intermangled together, so: A bare word only matches a direct match. If it includes a special character like * then it tries matching a fnmatch pattern first, and if that fails, tries to match a regex. And these

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1111882] Re: GnuTLS recv error (-9): A TLS packet with unexpected length was received

Nothing to be done for apt here due to legal reasons. I'm marking this as invalid, but might just remove the task completely later on ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1640267] Re: Softwarecenter there's no Employment

** Package changed: apt (Ubuntu) => gnome-software (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1640267 Title: Softwarecenter there's no Employment Status in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1638021] Re: [SRU] Update apt/xenial to 1.2.15

now. This change also needs the two refactoring commits for the removal methods and the new pretty printers mentioned in the changelog. apt (1.2.15) xenial; urgency=medium   [ Julian Andres Klode ]   * methods/ftp: Cope with weird PASV responses. Thanks to Lukasz Stelmach

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1611010] Re: yakkety desktop - non-english installation crashes with /plugininstall.py: ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10: ''

by then). ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: Triaged => In Progress ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Xenial) Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1635303] Re: GnuTLS bug in https method from apt-1.0.1ubuntu2.15 package

OK, Launchpad lost the comment, so let me repeat it: No, we cannot legally link APT's https method against OpenSSL, the licenses are not compatible. ** Package changed: apt (Ubuntu) => gnutls28 (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1634464] Re: cloudimg apt missing dirmngr

APT recommends gnupg, and gnupg recommends dirmngr, so all is working as intended. If you want to use optional (deprecated) features of apt-key like adv, you have to manually install gnupg. If you want to use optional features depending on key servers, you have to install dirmngr manually. The

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1634234] Re: apt-key leaves files in /dev open after exit

This bug seems to be a duplicate of bug 1633754 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1634234 Title: apt-key leaves files in /dev open after exit Status in apt

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1641303] Re: Wish: apt shouldn't show kept-back packages within the list of upgradable

I get you what you say. But there is a distinction between (manually) upgradeable packages and packages that will be upgraded (automatically). I'm not going to decide whether the status is Opinion, Won't Fix, or Triaged, as I'm not entirely sure what we really want to do. -- You received this

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1633219] Re: Upgrade to yakkety fails due to non-us locale

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1592817 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1592817 Marking this as a duplicate of bug 1592817. This is an APT bug to be fixed in the upcoming 1.2.16, which is hopefully passing CI soon. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1592817 gdebi-gtk

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1422795] Re: bash crashes often if inputrc contains revert-all-at-newline

** Changed in: bash (Ubuntu Trusty) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bash in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1422795 Title: bash crashes often if inputrc

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1641905] [NEW] Minor unit Test regression in 1.2.15

Public bug reported: In 1.2.15 the unit tests (which run at build time) fail with an error message in the atomic files test, because I picked a commit that improved the error handling a bit (a previous error now propagates into further calls). I'll revert that for 1.2.16, as it depends on

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1641905] Re: Minor unit Test regression in 1.2.15

This never affected any other release than xenial ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1641905 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1644048] Re: 4.3-7ubuntu1.6 FTBFS on arm64 only with format-security error

SRU was rejected. See bug 1644363 for the actual cause of the issue (hint: ld crashes during static configure). We might still want to get that fixed in new releases though, but I'm unsure if this needs updates in stable releases (maybe it improves security, who knows...). ** Changed in: bash

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1642386] Re: At least one invalid signature was encountered.

Thanks for verifying. I should have the final update ready within the next 16-48 hours. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1642386 Title: At least one invalid

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1611010] Re: yakkety desktop - non-english installation crashes with /plugininstall.py: ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10: ''

** Description changed: Enviroment: Ubuntu 16.10.5 Yakkety Yak http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily- live/current/ HW: Toshiba portege Z30-A12T | Intel i5+intel graphics | SSD hd Preconditions: W10+Xenial xerus installed, internet connection, 3rd party sw and updates selected

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1644048] Re: 4.3-7ubuntu1.6 FTBFS on arm64 only with format-security error

No, there is no such print() equivalent. You have puts() which just takes a string, but that appends a newline. Or fwrite(), but that requires size and count, which is boring. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1611010] Re: yakkety desktop - non-english installation crashes with /plugininstall.py: ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10: ''

** Description changed: Enviroment: Ubuntu 16.10.5 Yakkety Yak http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily- live/current/ HW: Toshiba portege Z30-A12T | Intel i5+intel graphics | SSD hd Preconditions: W10+Xenial xerus installed, internet connection, 3rd party sw and updates selected +

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1593583] Re: Invalid 'Date' entry in Release file /var/lib/apt/lists/partial/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_yakkety-proposed_InRelease

** Description changed: Continuously get that warning when using synaptic to reload the sources. This happen with apt 1.3-exp2 only. This seems a regression as per that old report: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=809329 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1592817] Re: gdebi-gtk crashed with ValueError in update_interface(): could not convert string to float: '0, 0000'

** Description changed: Errors Bucket - https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/31a80b4c477107c659b93a4277ed46c14a3c8c53 and https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/c349b36522b1d43e2604357f75f0215fdafe1c7a - Gdebi crashed while installing Google Chrome .deb-fil bur the error - didn't

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1644048] [NEW] 4.3-7ubuntu1.6 FTBFS on arm64

Public bug reported: This weirdly only fails on arm64. ../.././builtins/../.././builtins/help.def:130:7: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security] The attached debdiff will be uploaded to trusty-proposed soon. ** Affects: bash (Ubuntu)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1644048] Re: 4.3-7ubuntu1.6 FTBFS on arm64

Apparently zesty has the same code in it, but it weirdly works there. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bash in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644048 Title: 4.3-7ubuntu1.6 FTBFS on arm64 Status in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1422795] Re: bash crashes often if inputrc contains revert-all-at-newline

The build failure on arm64 is tracked in bug 1644048 now. Moving this to in progress again, until we figured out why it fails (or rather why it does not fail on most platforms) and fixed it. ** Changed in: bash (Ubuntu Trusty) Status: Fix Committed => In Progress -- You received this bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1644048] Re: 4.3-7ubuntu1.6 FTBFS on arm64 only with format-security error

** Summary changed: - 4.3-7ubuntu1.6 FTBFS on arm64 + 4.3-7ubuntu1.6 FTBFS on arm64 only with format-security error -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bash in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644048

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1642386] Re: At least one invalid signature was encountered.

Uploaded 1.2.17 to xenial-proposed apt (1.2.17) xenial; urgency=medium [ David Kalnischkies ] * apt-key: warn instead of fail on unreadable keyrings (LP: #1642386) * show apt-key warnings in apt update (Closes: 834973) [ Julian Andres Klode ] * test-releasefile-verification

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1642386] Re: At least one invalid signature was encountered.

Notably the first commit just causes the thing to fail silently, the second one makes apt forward the warning on an update. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1644048] Re: 4.3-7ubuntu1.6 FTBFS on arm64 only with format-security error

** Description changed: - This weirdly only fails on arm64. + [Impact] + Breaks build on arm64 in trusty: ../.././builtins/../.././builtins/help.def:130:7: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security] - The attached debdiff will be uploaded to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1644048] Re: 4.3-7ubuntu1.6 FTBFS on arm64 only with format-security error

** Description changed: [Impact] Breaks build on arm64 in trusty: ../.././builtins/../.././builtins/help.def:130:7: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security] [Test case] Check it builds [Regression potential] - Indefinitely low. +

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1422795] Re: bash crashes often if inputrc contains revert-all-at-newline

Turns out it does not build on arm64 because the internal gettext is used because binutils (ld) crashes during the configure test for the static build. That's tracked in bug 1644363 and this SRU basically has to wait for that to get fixed... -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1422795] Re: bash crashes often if inputrc contains revert-all-at-newline

** Tags removed: verification-done ** Tags added: verification-failed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bash in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1422795 Title: bash crashes often if inputrc contains

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1558331] Re: message "The repository is insufficiently signed by key (weak digest)" is poorly worded

Don't change the assignment on a (fixed) issue please, yon. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Assignee: yon (thornyon) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1642386] Re: At least one invalid signature was encountered.

It works perfectly fine for me. Can you re-run this with: -o Debug::Acquire::gpgv=1 ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1642386] Re: At least one invalid signature was encountered.

Oh, you may also want to try moving lists/ out of the way and running apt update again. And perhaps send me a tarball of /var/lib/apt and /etc/apt - then I might have luck reproducing it. If you want to, you could try bisecting this in the apt git repo, starting with git bisect start git bisect

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1642386] Re: At least one invalid signature was encountered.

Your coworker seems to have caught a crash in appstream, BTW, not in apt. Not sure why the files fail their hashes or have no sections in them, though. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank) -- You received this bug notification because

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1642386] Re: At least one invalid signature was encountered.

** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1642386 Title: At least one invalid signature was encountered.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1642386] Re: At least one invalid signature was encountered.

What we see from your debug output is that gpgv is not returning any sensible information: Summary: Good: Bad: Worthless: SoonWorthless: NoPubKey: You could try running apt-key verify manually on a few InRelease files (like apt-key verify

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1642386] Re: At least one invalid signature was encountered.

First thanks for the files. Unfortunately, I can't reproduce it with the files either. It must be a fairly system-specific bug. > HEAD is now at 235347e... Release 1.2.12 > $ make fast > [... with errors] Whoa, if it happens with the 1.2.12 checkout too, then something else seems wrong. I picked

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1642386] Re: At least one invalid signature was encountered.

Ah, apt-key explains it. We did not catch that in the bisect correctly, as I forgot to specify -o Dir::Bin::apt-key=$PWD/build/bin/apt-key :/ This means it is a regression introduced in: commit b515fe3a0012c1f155dbf6a4199e919fec102578 Author: David Kalnischkies Date:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1642386] Re: At least one invalid signature was encountered.

105503b4b470c124bc0c271bd8a50e25ecbe9133. I cherry-picked that change in my for-1.2/apt-key branch in https://github.com/julian-klode/apt. You should be able to verify this by adding -o Dir::Bin::Apt- Key="$PWD/build/bin/apt-key" to the apt-get invocation in the script and then running it once with the normal 1.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1642386] Re: At least one invalid signature was encountered.

Yeah, valgrind is a bit noisy always because we are building the cache in memory before (1) writing it to the disk and the write includes unused regions and (2) we are hashing the entire thing before writing it, including the uninitialised bytes. So that means while we do have a few uninitialized

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1422795] Re: bash crashes often if inputrc contains revert-all-at-newline

Failed to build on arm64: ../.././builtins/../.././builtins/help.def: In function 'help_builtin': ../.././builtins/../.././builtins/help.def:130:7: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security] -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1642386] Re: At least one invalid signature was encountered.

You can fix your permissions on your trusted.gpg and trusted.gpg.d files in /etc/apt, so that the files are world-readable (chmod ugo+r /etc/apt/trusted.gpg /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d -R) [or give access to root and _apt via acls]. You don't have to do that, though - it will start "working" again in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1642386] Re: At least one invalid signature was encountered.

But of course: If you safely want to get apt 1.2.17 via apt 1.2.15, you have to have correct permissions first - otherwise your old apt won't see the new apt. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >