2.5.4 uploaded to unstable.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Lunar)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1995247
Title:
: Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
Status: In Progress
** Affects: apt (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: High
Assignee: Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
Status: Triaged
** Affects: apt (Ubuntu Kinetic)
Importance: High
Assignee: Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
Status
I think it's a bug where update-manager installs those additional
packages which stems from its implementation of phased updates, but it's
also not a priority to work on because this only happens when an SRU
introduces a new dependency which does not happen all that often.
** Package changed: apt
Really the workaround is to set MODULES=dep in /etc/initramfs-
tools/initramfs.conf, this yields a much smaller initramfs (but you
can't take out the disk and boot it in another machine), disabling
secure boot or sgx should not be doing anything.
** Also affects: grub2-unsigned (Ubuntu)
** Tags removed: foundations-triage-discuss
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992513
Title:
apt will not install
Impact:
I miss new events because I no longer get calendar notifications because
the calendar does not sync anymore when that happens.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gnome-online-accounts in
Ubuntu.
It does yeah, and obviously that's a solver bug that's going to need
some more work to root cause.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Triaged
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973830
Title:
Error upgrading from Ubuntu 20.04 to 22.04
Status
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Importance: Medium => High
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
--
** Tags removed: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990684
Title:
grub-efi-arm64-signed : Depends: grub-efi-arm64 (= 2.06-2ubuntu7) but
** Tags added: foundation-triage-discuss
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982583
Title:
Fix for zlib CRC32 optimization for s390x
Status in Ubuntu on IBM z
Your /boot partition ran out of space, consider increasing its size or
cleaning it up
** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1992246 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992246
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1992246
package linux-firmware 20220329.git681281e4-0ubuntu3.5 failed to
install/upgrade: installed linux-firmware package post-installation script
Sponsored.
** Changed in: bash (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bash in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992206
Title:
bash: non existent locale
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
As this needs SRUing presumably, as it's broken in kinetic, this needs a
description of the impact. What does it mean that the state changed, how
does it impact the user?
Is this something security team wants to address, should foundations
address this?
** Also affects: sudo (Ubuntu Jammy)
On my kinetic system, /dev has nosuid, but no noexec.
** Tags added: foundations-triage-discuss
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1991975
Title:
dev file
** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: zram-config (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
Likely same issue as bug 1974196, reassigning to apt for further
investigation.
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => Triaged
** Package changed: ubuntu-release-upgrader
Adding a focal task as bug 1973830 seems to be caused by the same issue.
** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
** Tags removed: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973470
Title:
Ubuntu-bug command can't find Firefox on Lubuntu Kinetic
Status in Apport:
Qt frontend broken, seems to access self.cache[module_packages] where
module_packages is not a string or pair of strings, causing a TypeError.
Don't know if anyone actively maintains that.
** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in:
I cannot reproduce the issue in kinetic's 3.2.5, seems the issue does
not actually exist. If the issue exists in any stable release, I believe
it is minor enough to not warrant a stable release update.
** Changed in: rsync (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug
This does not appear to be an Ubuntu system, but a pop os one. Neither
does it appear to be an upgrade to 21.04 for that matter as the bug
says. It also involves various downgrades. Either way this is all very
unsupported.
** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
Is there anything left to do here?
** Changed in: klibc (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: New => Incomplete
** Changed in: klibc (Ubuntu Cosmic)
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1991771
Title:
[FFe] Update to 3.0.6
Status in openssl
I looked at the queues for focal and jammy but did not find any zlib
uploads as indicated by "in progress" per SRU policy, so reset the
status to "triaged".
** Changed in: zlib (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: In Progress => Triaged
** Changed in: zlib (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: In Progress =>
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Faisol Lutfi (lutfi87) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1979244
Title:
libssl-dev : Depends: libssl3
OK the patch set here is broken, we gotta do this from scratch properly.
So I'm going to start cherry picking the rhboot patches for memory
management. I have applied so far from bug 1989446 the backport of "Try
to pick better locations for kernel and initrd" and cherry-picked from
rhboot the
Our goal should be to merge the entire patch series into kinetic, worst
case, kinetic will not be installable for some users. This means we will
have decent results from people trying that in the next 4 weeks (by Oct
27 the release has been out 1 week).
In the meantime, next week we should push
@Brian Phasing apt is not an issue, it's only when multiple SRUs depend
on each other that the issues being fixed here actually happen.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
This discussion needs to be taken upstream, it's not our place to decide
what is right.
** Tags removed: rls-kk-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bash in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1097467
** Tags removed: rls-jj-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990586
Title:
22.04: python3* mismatched phasing breaks dist-upgrades
Status in apt package
** Tags removed: foundations-triage-discuss
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1991139
Title:
prompted to remove systemd-hwe-hwdb but re-installed via updates
** Tags removed: rls-kk-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990429
Title:
software-properties uses deprecated apt-key
Status in
Tests have passed successfully for 2.4.8 on all architectures (except
i386, which is expected):
(276/290) Testcase test-ubuntu-bug-1990586: W: Ignoring failure of dpkg
--add-architecture as it is likely due to pkg-config-dpkghook (see #824774)
P P
** Tags removed: verification-needed
It seems the autopkgtest runs have finished for 2.4.8 as well, and all
passed, so marking as verified once again.
For those stalking the test logs,
(239/290) Testcase test-phased-updates-upgrade: W: Ignoring failure of dpkg
--add-architecture as it is likely due to pkg-config-dpkghook (see
elatllat no that's non-sense on multiple levels
a) the grub update is not phasing anymore so it's not reproducing the bug, we
bumped it back to proposed. There's no phasing there so it just works anyway
b) setting the option in the config file would work around the bug too. Of
course you added
** Description changed:
+ [Impact]
+ Phased updates with interdependencies can become uninstallable, breaking the
upgrade command (and presumably dist-upgrade), so it cannot upgrade
+ anything anymore
+
+ [Test plan]
+ We cannot reproduce the exact failure here, but we have included a minimal
-extensions (Ubuntu Jammy)
** No longer affects: python3.10 (Ubuntu Jammy)
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Jammy)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) =&g
ub2-signed (Ubuntu Jammy)
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Jammy)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990684
This issue seems to have been a funny bug in the solver, actually, and
not a bug in the phased update code itself.
So what happened is that we kept back grub-efi-amd64-signed, and it was
broken. So now the solver iterates over its dependencies and tries to
keep them back too. Except well, when
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in
I have the fix ready in https://salsa.debian.org/apt-
team/apt/-/merge_requests/262, as well as adding support for phased
updates to EDSP, I'm just working on adding test cases (basically
minimizing the EDSP and dumping it in the dir tbh).
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete =>
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1990586 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990586
The other bug has more info so marking this as a duplicate as it's the
same issue basically, same cause anyway.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1990586
22.04: python3* mismatched phasing
Ken, could you perhaps attach the /etc/machine-id or just comment the
string in it? I can't find a machine-id that would trigger the bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
** No longer affects: hobbit-plugins (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => Triaged
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
I've been thinking about both some more and I believe we can fix this
more easily than I thought earlier, but I'd still like the data to be
able to reproduce this.
Because obviously no such issues occured during testing.
In the meantime could SRU team please pull the python3.10 update, or
phase
Same issue as [Bug 1990525] [NEW] E: Internal Error, AutoRemover broke
stuff. See the comment there.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in
Sorry, "E: External solver failed with: I am too dumb, i can just dump!"
is the expected output, this means it created the file.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
@jeremyszu (os369510) Did you see #90, it seems your patch would cause
boot failures on older system unable to handle this memory range.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
I want to say I agree with avih and had the same idea but I had no
chance to update the bug yet. Currently sorting out actual upgrade
failures that might be regressions from the new phasing though.
It remains to be seen if we can do this safely. We need to add a new
flag "PhasedKeep" or something
Sorry wrong package
** Package changed: software-properties (Ubuntu) => python-apt (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python-apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990546
Title:
apt.auth
Public bug reported:
apt.auth needs to be deprecated or ported to work with the new regime.
** Affects: python-apt (Ubuntu)
Importance: High
Status: Triaged
** Tags: foundations-todo
** Tags added: foundations-todo
** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu)
Importance:
Thank you for your bug report. Please run
APT_EDSP_DUMP_FILENAME=/tmp/lp1990525.edsp apt dist-upgrade --solver
dump and attach /tmp/lp1990525.edsp to the bug (if that works).
If that does not work, please pass
-o Debug::pkgDepCache::Marker=1
-o Debug::pkgDepCache::AutoInstall=1
-o
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1988819 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1988819
The behavior is expected at the moment as part of the phased updates
rework. These packages are not kept back due to broken dependencies, but
due to not yet being available for your system as they are still
Reverified for 1.6.17 as per #23
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-bionic
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
We can't really store reasons for why something is kept back. And if we
managed to do that, we'd end up with an untranslated line in the middle
of the output for every non-English locale until it's translated and apt
updated (it does not use language packs).
--
You received this bug notification
Reverting the systemd SRU broke existing images.
** Package changed: apt (Ubuntu) => systemd (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1988563
Title:
Closing this as invalid. The analysis is flawed, the configuration file
is created by user _apt, not root, the call is literally just mkstemp()
with the path given in the error message, or rather a template, so there
is no bug in apt here.
It's more likely to be wrong permissions on /tmp
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1988145
Title:
Couldn't create temporary file /tmp/apt.conf.fsIutr
** Tags removed: rls-kk-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1981109
Title:
server image pulls in ModemManager via fwupd, consumes 25MiB RAM in
We believe the kernel handles RAs itself, adding a task for it.
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
With systemd-networkd on the 20.04 server, the /64 prefix does not
bounce between 0s and 1s, but stays at 0s, but is not removed (nor is
the /128).
** Tags added: rls-kk-incoming
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu)
I can reproduce this on kinetic. I get sent a 2a02:908:2812:7d20::/64
prefix via RA with "valid lifetime" and ""preferred lifetime" set to 0,
every 3s. Instead of the prefix being deleted from the interface, it's
lifetime is set to 1s and then expires every second, causing regular
"connection
Reassigning to correct package, and confirmed. So while [arch=amd64]
works fine [signed-by=...] does not which is odd. Neither are *properly*
supported in software-properties: sources.list options are not exposed
at all; it's unclear what happens if you modify them.
** Package changed:
Yeah many options are not really for end users though so it's not all
encompassing.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1986660
Title:
Phased update configuration
Just to be clear: apt.conf(5) is not the definitive source, that is
(fsvo reference) in /use/share/doc/examples/configure-index. The manual
page only documents popular options whereas the index lists them all
(apt test suite type checks against it).
Phased updates are documented in
Wondering where the symlink went
** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
** Package changed: grub2 (Ubuntu) => systemd (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
So I held back fdroidserver and squid on my system. apt update tells me:
49 packages can be upgraded. Run 'apt list --upgradable' to see
them.
When I run dist-upgrade I get:
The following packages have been kept back:
fdroidserver python-apt-dev python3-apt squid
The following
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1983730
Title:
opt out of phased updates - still shown
@Jarno OK I was wrong, new apt pulls in new libapt-pkg5.0. What happens
instead is that the cache built by the old version does not include
information about available kernels, we essentially need to bump the
cache minor version, if we can do that, I don't know, I lost track of
what major version
Deleted the apt task instead so comments don't go apt subscribers for
all eternity.
** No longer affects: apt (Ubuntu)
** No longer affects: apt (Ubuntu Focal)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1976233 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976233
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1976233
"File has unexpected size" error on Focal ddebs repository
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded
But I do believe it's simply the wrong package being upgraded here. The
new apt package removes the conffiles the old library version needs, so
it doesn't protect anything, so we need to make sure that apt Breaks
libapt-pkg6.0 (<< 1.6.15) [or Depends on >= 1.6.15, whatever ends up
nicer).
--
You
Jarno, you do realize that you need to upgrade libapt-pkg6.0, not apt?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1615381
Title:
apt-get autoremove may
Note for reader: The wrong version is in the list of packages to be
removed.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages,
Verified.
For bionic I ran
mmdebstrap -v --keyring /usr/share/keyrings/ubuntu-archive-keyring.gpg
--aptopt='Acquire::http::proxy "http://localhost:8000/;;' bionic bionic-
proposed http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu 'deb
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ bionic-proposed main'
to enable proposed
Will have a look at the normal hold situation, but would like to know
where you see the disagreement in numbers - is it apt update and apt
full-upgrade?
What does motd / update-notifier say?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is
I assume this is for the new implementation in 2.4.6. This is
unfortunately not feasible as the code works the same way as upgrades
held back for other reasons.
Some hacks could be added that improve this in most situations but that
also requires significant refactoring and does not solve all the
This string does not exist in apt or any of the other Ubuntu code I have
checked out. If you can reproduce it, do check where it is coming from
and reassign it there.
** Package changed: apt (Ubuntu) => ubuntu
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug
** Package changed: apt (Ubuntu) => ddeb-retriever
** Changed in: ddeb-retriever
Status: Invalid => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976233
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976233
Title:
"File has unexpected size" error on Focal ddebs
To make it clear, my suggestion for a workaround for jammy would be to
have
_config->CndSet("APT::Get::Phase-Policy", true);
somewhere in the aptitude code. It is unclear to me if aptitude will
break then as phased versions get their pin limited to 1, apt certainly
does if there's a mismatch as
I have added an aptitude task and set the tasks accordingly to indicate
that this is a feature request for aptitude. The needed API will surface
at some point in APT due to some refactoring, likely in the 23.04 cycle.
aptitude could then consume that API in its resolver and make choices to
keep
I recall/see again a mention of aptitude:
aptitude and aptitude-robot are not supported components. They are
packages provided by the community as part of the universe repository.
While the implementation of phased updates in apt versions prior to
2.4.6 would work there, the current version does
It's documented in the discourse thread (Discourse is where Ubuntu
documentation lives) You have not provided evidence that it does not
work for you. APT itself has test cases that proof that *it does* work.
Note that newer apt versions (2.4.6, 2.5.1) will install more phased
updates
- as
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1981672
Title:
apt phased out broken code, missing
Yes, grub will be fixed eventually, but we are blocked by the security
update not being out yet. This is not a blocker for enabling upgrades to
22.04.1, as it only affects a small number of systems and grub fixes
itself by using the previous kernel version if the new one fails.
--
You received
Overloaded server is not a bug in apt. There are no mirrors for ddebs,
so the overload is not very surprising. You should not have any need to
download ddebs, and you certainly don't want to abuse the resources with
automatic repeated downloads.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1979244 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1979244
As you can see in your output a newer version of apt is available. It
fixes this bug.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1979244
libssl-dev : Depends: libssl3 (= 3.0.2-0ubuntu1.1) but
Please note that this is not the test plan documented in the bug. But
glad this worked for you, I was not sure it was still reproducible,
hence why there's a solver dump based test case in the regression test
suite.
But your test is valid too, the test suite still needs to pass, but
failure to
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Jammy)
Milestone: None => ubuntu-22.04.1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1974196
Title:
Installing libudev1 on a new Jammy
** No longer affects: apt (Ubuntu Impish)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1978125
Title:
apt ignoring pin/block/hold files in preferences.d for snapd
Status
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
** Description changed:
- On an Ubuntu 22.04 desktop system created using the current installation
- image without enabling package updates over the network, installing the
- package libudev1 results in a large number of
In your libmysqlclient21 example everything seems to be working
correctly so I don't understand why you post that.
- you are eligible for 8.0.29-0ubuntu0.22.04.3
- you force downgrade to 8.0.29-0ubuntu0.22.04.2
- you upgrade once again to 8.0.29-0ubuntu0.22.04.3
- no higher version available in
For concrete details:
1) Which command would install these updates
2) Please attached `apt policy ...names of affected packages...` output
3) Attach your sources.list and sources.list.d files
4) Attach your preferences and preferences.d files
Maybe just throw all the files into a tarball.
--
The apt update is from kinetic, the development release. What are you
doing?
The question is what installs them. Certainly it's not apt itself doing
that unless you have very weird pinning in place.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages,
I do not believe there is a bug in apt here. APT literally is too strict
now, it fails to install packages. It will get more relaxed in the
coming weeks.
Anyway, if you find out where those get upgraded, please reopen the bug
and reassign to the correct package.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
** Tags added: rls-jj-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970449
Title:
GPG keys are not shown in Software and Updates
Status in
301 - 400 of 2451 matches
Mail list logo
