[Touch-packages] [Bug 2077940] [NEW] setuptools v72 removed the test command

2024-08-27 Thread Matthias Klose
Public bug reported: the autopkg tests fail with setuptools v72: v72.0.0 === Deprecations and Removals - - The test command has been removed. Users relying on 'setup.py test' will need to migrate to another test runner or pin setuptools before this version. (#931)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2076340] Re: SRU: no-change rebuild to pick up changed build flags on ppc64el and s390x

2024-08-20 Thread Matthias Klose
The packages are now all built, and passing autopkg tests (the failing software-properties test is unrelated). Packages, that are not yet ready: - atlas (ftbfs) - s390-tools, s390-tools-signed (not yet uploaded) - postgresql-16 (superseded by security upload, new upload in the unapproved queu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2075567] Re: zlib fails to build on s390x on oracular with gcc 14

2024-08-19 Thread Matthias Klose
fixed in gcc-14 14.2.0-3ubuntu1 ** Changed in: gcc-14 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: gcc-14 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Matthias Klose (doko) ** Changed in: zlib (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Invalid -- You received this bug notificatio

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2076340] Re: SRU: no-change rebuild to pick up changed build flags on ppc64el and s390x

2024-08-12 Thread Matthias Klose
** Description changed: SRU: no-change rebuild to pick up changed build flags on ppc64el and s390x This is batch of packages that we want to rebuild to pick up the changed build flags on ppc64el (LP: #2064539) and s390x (LP: #2064538). Impact: These are no change uploads on archite

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2076340] Re: SRU: no-change rebuild to pick up changed build flags on ppc64el and s390x

2024-08-08 Thread Matthias Klose
** Description changed: SRU: no-change rebuild to pick up changed build flags on ppc64el and s390x + + This is batch of packages that we want to rebuild to pick up the changed + build flags on ppc64el (LP: #2064539) and s390x (LP: #2064538). + + Impact: These are no change uploads on archite

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2076340] Re: SRU: no-change rebuild to pick up changed build flags on ppc64el and s390x

2024-08-08 Thread Matthias Klose
** Also affects: util-linux (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: bzip2 (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: curl (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: dbus (Ubuntu Noble) Import

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2076340] Re: SRU: no-change rebuild to pick up changed build flags on ppc64el and s390x

2024-08-08 Thread Matthias Klose
** Also affects: postgresql-common (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: p11-kit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: openssl (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: openssh (Ubuntu) Importance: Und

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2076340] Re: SRU: no-change rebuild to pick up changed build flags on ppc64el and s390x

2024-08-08 Thread Matthias Klose
** Also affects: s390-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: rustc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: runc-app (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: qemu (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2076340] Re: SRU: no-change rebuild to pick up changed build flags on ppc64el and s390x

2024-08-08 Thread Matthias Klose
** Also affects: xz-utils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: util-linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a m

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2076340] [NEW] SRU: no-change rebuild to pick up changed build flags on ppc64el and s390x

2024-08-08 Thread Matthias Klose
Public bug reported: SRU: no-change rebuild to pick up changed build flags on ppc64el and s390x ** Affects: zlib (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib i

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2074113] Re: pymdown-extensions: FTBFS: AssertionError: False is not true

2024-08-07 Thread Matthias Klose
** Changed in: python3-defaults (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: pymdown-extensions (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python3-defaults in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2071468] Re: ELF package metadata failure: environment variable ‘DEB_HOST_ARCH’ not defined

2024-08-06 Thread Matthias Klose
dpkg 1.22.11ubuntu1 stops passing the --specs option. It will be replaced by - dpkg-buildpackage setting ELF_PACKAGE_METADATA in the environment, which gets picked up GCC and clang, and added as a linker option. - the linkers ld.bfd, gold, mold and lld picking up ELF_PACKAGE_METADATA if t

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2074191] Re: Binary RM of 32-bit binaries on s390x

2024-08-05 Thread Matthias Klose
** Changed in: zlib (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2074191 Title: Binary RM of 32-bit binaries on s390x Status in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2075337] Re: py3clean fails when using alternate character set

2024-08-05 Thread Matthias Klose
the fallback dpkg -L call in dh-python's autoscripts/prerm-py3clean should also set the env var. ** Also affects: dh-python (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2074191] Re: Binary RM of 32-bit binaries on s390x

2024-08-05 Thread Matthias Klose
updated zlib not to build the 32bit binaries, but it currently ftbfs the gcc packages should be all done now, not building the s390x multilibs anymore. ** Also affects: zlib (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of U

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2076024] [NEW] SRU: build with -fno-omit-frame-pointer

2024-08-05 Thread Matthias Klose
Public bug reported: SRU: build with -fno-omit-frame-pointer, if it's enabled in dpkg- buildflags. ** Affects: binutils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2075337] Re: py3clean fails when using alternate character set

2024-08-05 Thread Matthias Klose
ta, I'll merge that for oracular together with the python 3.12.5 updates -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dh-python in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075337 Title: py3clean fails when using alternat

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2075337] Re: py3clean fails when using alternate character set

2024-08-05 Thread Matthias Klose
** Also affects: python3-defaults (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: dh-python (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: python3-defaults (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Matthias Klose (doko) -- You received t

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2061834] [NEW] apt build-dep . fails to parse build dependencies

2024-04-16 Thread Matthias Klose
Public bug reported: seen in trantor 1.5.12+ds-1ubuntu3: Build-Depends: cmake, debhelper-compat (=13), dh-cmake, dh-cmake-compat (=1) replacing (=1) with (= 1) lets the parsing succeed. $ sudo apt build-dep . Note, using directory '.' to get the build dependencies Reading package lists... Done

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2058242] Re: Demote isc-dhcp to universe

2024-03-27 Thread Matthias Klose
that doesn't show up in component-mismatches yet. something in main still depending on it ** Changed in: isc-dhcp (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to isc-dhcp in Ubuntu. h

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2057836] Re: gst-python1.0 fails to build: test failures

2024-03-25 Thread Matthias Klose
same test failures with pygobject 3.48.1-1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pygobject in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057836 Title: gst-python1.0 fails to build: test failures Status in pygobject

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2057836] Re: gst-python1.0 fails to build: test failures

2024-03-25 Thread Matthias Klose
Debian added a b-d on pygobject >= 3.48.1, which we don't have -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pygobject in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057836 Title: gst-python1.0 fails to build: test failures

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1982336] Re: [24.04 FEAT] GDB: Support for new IBM Z Hardware (IBM z16)

2024-02-21 Thread Matthias Klose
** Changed in: gdb (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdb in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982336 Title: [24.04 FEAT] GDB: Support for new IBM Z H

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054351] [NEW] nux ftbfs on armhf (tests segfaulting)

2024-02-19 Thread Matthias Klose
Public bug reported: [--] 8 tests from TestScrollView [ RUN ] TestScrollView.TestQueueDrawScrollDownNoScrollbars [ OK ] TestScrollView.TestQueueDrawScrollDownNoScrollbars (434 ms) [ RUN ] TestScrollView.TestQueueDrawScrollUpNoScrollbars [ OK ] TestScrollView.TestQueue

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054350] Re: nux ftbfs from source, failing test

2024-02-19 Thread Matthias Klose
** Changed in: nux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to nux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054350 Title: nux ftbfs from source, failing test Status in nux pa

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054350] [NEW] nux ftbfs from source, failing test

2024-02-19 Thread Matthias Klose
Public bug reported: seen in noble, all architectures: [--] 1 test from TestLoggingWriter [ RUN ] TestLoggingWriter.TestWriteMessage gtest-nuxcore-logger.cpp:171: Failure Value of: result Expected: is equal to 0x5d40f0 pointing to "ERROR 2010-09-10 06:34:45 test.module testfile.cpp:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1815094] Re: [FTBFS] cast between incompatible function types from ‘bool (*)(nux::TextEntry*)’ to ‘GSourceFunc’ gcc >= 8.1 (Disco)

2024-02-19 Thread Matthias Klose
disco is EOL ** Changed in: nux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to nux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1815094 Title: [FTBFS] cast between incompatible f

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1570894] Re: s390x build failure

2024-02-19 Thread Matthias Klose
builds ** Changed in: nux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to nux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1570894 Title: s390x build failure Status in nux p

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2051997] Re: bdebstrap fails to build with python3-defaults 3.12

2024-02-07 Thread Matthias Klose
** Changed in: python3-defaults (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python3-defaults in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051997 Title: bdebstrap fails to build with

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2051990] Re: python3-defaults 3.12 causes aubio to fail to build from source

2024-02-07 Thread Matthias Klose
** Changed in: python3-defaults (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python3-defaults in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051990 Title: python3-defaults 3.12 causes

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2051540] Re: ufw ftbfs with Python 3.12 as default

2024-02-07 Thread Matthias Klose
better, but still not complete: 1186s autopkgtest [04:54:38]: test root-unittest: [--- 1186s Interpreter: python3 1186s 1186s rm -rf ./build 1186s rm -rf ./staging 1186s rm -rf ./tests/testarea ./tests/unit/tmp 1186s rm -rf ./tmp 1186s rm -rf ./snap-build 1186s rm -rf ./parts

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2051997] Re: bdebstrap fails to build with python3-defaults 3.12

2024-02-06 Thread Matthias Klose
NMUed ** Changed in: bdebstrap (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python3-defaults in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051997 Title: bdebstrap fails to build

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2051990] Re: python3-defaults 3.12 causes aubio to fail to build from source

2024-02-06 Thread Matthias Klose
NMUed in Debian ** Changed in: aubio (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python3-defaults in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051990 Title: python3-defaults 3.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2051997] Re: bdebstrap fails to build with python3-defaults 3.12

2024-02-06 Thread Matthias Klose
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1061735 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061735 ** Also affects: bdebstrap (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061735 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification be

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2051540] Re: ufw ftbfs with Python 3.12 as default

2024-01-31 Thread Matthias Klose
** Changed in: ufw (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ufw in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051540 Title: ufw ftbfs with Python 3.12 as default Status

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2051541] [NEW] unattended-upgrades ftbfs with Python 3.12 as default

2024-01-29 Thread Matthias Klose
Public bug reported: [...] Running ./test_pep484.py with python3 s -- Ran 0 tests in 0.000s NO TESTS RAN (skipped=1) make[2]: *** [Makefile:9: check] Error 5 make[2]: Leaving directory '/<>/test' make[1]: *** [debian/rules:16: ov

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2051540] [NEW] ufw ftbfs with Python 3.12 as default

2024-01-29 Thread Matthias Klose
Public bug reported: == ERROR: test_ufwcommand_parse (tests.unit.test_parser.ParserTestCase.test_ufwcommand_parse) Test UFWCommand.parse() -- Traceback (most rec

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2051512] [NEW] apport ftbfs with Python 3.12 as the default

2024-01-29 Thread Matthias Klose
Public bug reported: debian/rules override_dh_auto_test make[1]: Entering directory '/<>' tests/run-linters --errors-only Skipping mypy tests, mypy is not installed Running pylint... * Module apport-retrace bin/apport-retrace:577:44: E0601: Using variable 'crashid' before assignment

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2015243] Re: py3versions doesn't follow symlinks (like realpath)

2024-01-15 Thread Matthias Klose
The python3 symlink is not meant to be handled by alternatives. ** Changed in: python3-defaults (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python3-defaults in Ubuntu. https://bugs.l

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2049369] [NEW] autopkg tests ignored for migration of python3-defaults adding 3.12

2024-01-15 Thread Matthias Klose
Public bug reported: autopkg tests ignored for migration of python3-defaults adding 3.12: These are the autopkg tests for packages, which we'll ignore for the initial migration of python3-defaults adding 3.12. ** Affects: python3-defaults (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1775994] Re: package libbinutils:amd64 2.30-20ubuntu2~18.04 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting con

2023-12-06 Thread Matthias Klose
not a binutils issue, please reinstall, as the error message says ** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/b

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1918462] Re: package libbinutils:amd64 2.34-6ubuntu1.1 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configur

2023-12-06 Thread Matthias Klose
this is not a binutils issue, please reinstall as the error message suggests ** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.laun

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1977958] Re: binutils: addr2line: getting error "DWARF error: section .debug_str is larger than its filesize" when building Android 8.1 on Ubuntu 20.04

2023-12-06 Thread Matthias Klose
closing as won't fix for 20.04 LTS ** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1977958 Title: binutil

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1824249] Re: package binutils-multiarch (not installed) [modified: usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-addr2line usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-ar usr/bin/x86_64-linux-gnu-gprof usr/bin/x86_64-li

2023-12-06 Thread Matthias Klose
please remove the package, and re-install it ** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1824249 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2025564] Re: package binutils-common 2.40-2ubuntu4.1 failed to install/upgrade: dpkg-deb --fsys-tarfile subprocess returned error exit status 2

2023-12-06 Thread Matthias Klose
this is not a binutils issue. try to re-donwload your updates ** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2029525] Re: binutils-i686-linux-gnu not provided for riscv64

2023-12-06 Thread Matthias Klose
we currently don't build cross compilers on riscv64, because it slows down the toolchain updates. That might change, if we have native hardware for our buildds. ** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2039149] Re: readelf riscv unknown

2023-12-06 Thread Matthias Klose
please provide a test case ** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2039149 Title: readelf riscv

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2044506] [NEW] issues on armhf with -fstack-clash-protection

2023-11-24 Thread Matthias Klose
Public bug reported: TBD ** Affects: gnutls28 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: libarchive (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: libselinux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: libxml2 (Ubuntu)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2037205] Re: setuptools: FTBFS in mantic

2023-10-04 Thread Matthias Klose
** Changed in: setuptools (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dh-python in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037205 Title: setuptools: FTBFS in mantic Status

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1943818] Re: mesa built with -O3 on ppc64el has broken EGL

2023-09-04 Thread Matthias Klose
is that still the case with recent compiler versions? ** Changed in: gcc-11 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943818 Ti

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2022845] Re: SRU: update binutils to the 2.38 branch and ignore lto-wrapper warnings

2023-07-24 Thread Matthias Klose
after retries, all the autopkg tests pass, binutils test results don't show regressions. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2025458] Re: SRU: rebuild libunwind with GCC 11.4

2023-07-06 Thread Matthias Klose
the package successfully built. All the autopkg tests from the previous comment have been retried and succeeded. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2025458] Re: SRU: rebuild libunwind with GCC 11.4

2023-06-30 Thread Matthias Klose
** No longer affects: libunwind (Ubuntu Lunar) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libunwind in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2025458 Title: SRU: rebuild libunwind with GCC 11.4 Status in libunwind pa

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1997161] Re: libunwind-dev has wrong LTO data

2023-06-30 Thread Matthias Klose
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1039962 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1039962 ** Also affects: libunwind (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1039962 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification be

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2025458] [NEW] SRU: rebuild libunwind with GCC 11.4

2023-06-30 Thread Matthias Klose
Public bug reported: Reported in LP: #1997161 after updating GCC 11 in 22.04 LTS to 11.3, and now to 11.4, linking with the static libraries provided by libunwind-dev fails with: lto1: fatal error: bytecode stream in file '/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux- gnu/11/../../../x86_64-linux-gnu/libunwind-x86

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1997161] Re: libunwind-dev has wrong LTO data

2023-06-30 Thread Matthias Klose
The real issue is, that the .a files in the libunwind-dev package are not stripped, and therefore the LTO information is kept in these files. This is done by intent in the packaging. Trying to figure why ... In the meantime the least invasive thing to do is to just rebuild with GCC 11.4. ** Also

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2022845] [NEW] SRU: update binutils to the 2.38 branch and ignore lto-wrapper warnings

2023-06-04 Thread Matthias Klose
Public bug reported: The tests sometimes fail with spurious lto-wrapper warnings and let the build fail. Ignore these warnings, they don't matter for the test outcome. Also apply four fixes from the binutils 2.38 branch: * SRU: LP: #1982105. Update from the binutils 2.38 branch: - Fix PR l

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1982105] Re: update binutils to the 2.38 branch in 22.04 LTS

2022-10-25 Thread Matthias Klose
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982105 Title: update binutils to the 2.38 branch in 22.04 L

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1982105] Re: update binutils to the 2.38 branch in 22.04 LTS

2022-10-24 Thread Matthias Klose
** Summary changed: - update binutils to the 2.38 branch in 20.04 LTS + update binutils to the 2.38 branch in 22.04 LTS ** Description changed: - SRU: update binutils to the 2.38 branch in 20.04 LTS. + SRU: update binutils to the 2.38 branch in 22.04 LTS. The new build will be validated by

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1971474] Re: SRU: Update gdb to the final 12.1 release in 22.04 LTS

2022-10-24 Thread Matthias Klose
tested together with the binutils and GCC SRUs. No regressions. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscri

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1982105] Re: update binutils to the 2.38 branch in 20.04 LTS

2022-10-24 Thread Matthias Klose
all autopkg tests passed now ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy ** Tags added: verification-done verification-needed-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https:/

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1969856] Re: bash --version does not correspond to package name

2022-08-31 Thread Matthias Klose
bash upstream encodes the patchlevel into the version number, while patches and security fixes in Ubuntu are applied on top of the upstream version. That's expected behavior. ** Changed in: bash (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a mem

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1971474] Re: SRU: Update gdb to the final 12.1 release in 22.04 LTS

2022-08-22 Thread Matthias Klose
** Description changed: Update gdb to the final 12.1 release in 22.04 LTS. jammy ships with the gdb 12.1 release candidate, taken from the gdb-12 branch. Changes up to the final release are: - - updated gnulib library - - Fix for PR mi/29002 (Windows only) - - gdb: fix 'remote show FOO

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1982108] Re: SRU: update python3.10 to the 3.10.5 release in 22.04 LTS

2022-08-22 Thread Matthias Klose
** Also affects: python3-defaults (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python3-defaults in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982108 Title: SRU: update p

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1982105] Re: update binutils to the 2.38 branch in 20.04 LTS

2022-08-22 Thread Matthias Klose
** Description changed: SRU: update binutils to the 2.38 branch in 20.04 LTS. The new build will be validated by the main component on all architectures. + + test rebuilds at + https://people.canonical.com/~ginggs/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20220728-jammy-jammy.html + https://people.can

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1982105] Re: update binutils to the 2.38 branch in 20.04 LTS

2022-07-19 Thread Matthias Klose
** Also affects: binutils (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982105 Title: update binutils to the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1974115] Re: [UBUNTU 22.04] BINUTILS: Adding new platform name IBM z16

2022-07-19 Thread Matthias Klose
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu Kinetic) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: Canonical Foundations Team (canonical-foundations) => Matthias Klose (doko)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1982105] [NEW] update binutils to the 2.38 branch in 20.04 LTS

2022-07-19 Thread Matthias Klose
Public bug reported: SRU: update binutils to the 2.38 branch in 20.04 LTS. The new build will be validated by the main component on all architectures. ** Affects: binutils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1978129] Re: Incomplete support for DT_RELR relocations on Ubuntu 22.04

2022-07-19 Thread Matthias Klose
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu Kinetic) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: Canonical Foundations Team (canonical-foundations) => Matthias Klose (doko)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1976258] [NEW] icu ftbfs in the jammy release pocket

2022-05-30 Thread Matthias Klose
Public bug reported: as seen in a test rebuild, this package fails to build in the jammy release pocket (note the log behind the link might go away): https://launchpadlibrarian.net/604216394/buildlog_ubuntu-jammy- amd64.icu_70.1-2_BUILDING.txt.gz [...] make[4]: Leaving directory '/<>/source/test

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1976259] [NEW] librsvg ftbfs in the jammy release pocket

2022-05-30 Thread Matthias Klose
Public bug reported: as seen in a test rebuild, this package fails to build in the jammy release pocket (note the log behind the link might go away): https://launchpadlibrarian.net/604216345/buildlog_ubuntu- jammy-i386.librsvg_2.52.5+dfsg-3_BUILDING.txt.gz test url_resolver::tests::allows_relati

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1976255] [NEW] accountsservice ftbfs in the jammy release pocket

2022-05-30 Thread Matthias Klose
Public bug reported: as seen in a test rebuild, this package fails to build in the jammy release pocket (note the log behind the link might go away): https://launchpadlibrarian.net/604216054/buildlog_ubuntu-jammy- amd64.accountsservice_22.07.5-2ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz Ok: 2 Ex

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1971474] [NEW] SRU: Update gdb to the final 12.1 release in 22.04 LTS

2022-05-03 Thread Matthias Klose
Public bug reported: Update gdb to the final 12.1 release in 22.04 LTS. jammy ships with the gdb 12.1 release candidate, taken from the gdb-12 branch. Changes up to the final release are: - updated gnulib library - Fix for PR mi/29002 (Windows only) - gdb: fix 'remote show FOO-packet' aliases

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1953200] Re: [jammy] FTBFS, gcc ICE?

2022-03-25 Thread Matthias Klose
mir builds with the recent gcc-11 in jammy, closing ** Changed in: mir (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: gcc-11 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mir i

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1452115] Re: Python interpreter binary is not compiled as PIE

2022-03-24 Thread Matthias Klose
** Changed in: python3.10 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python2.7 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1452115 Title: Python interpreter binary is not com

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1965112] Re: cupsd crashed with SIGSEGV in __strcmp_evex()

2022-03-16 Thread Matthias Klose
$ cupsctl _debug_logging=1 _remote_admin=0 _remote_any=0 _share_printers=0 _user_cancel_any=0 BrowseLocalProtocols=dnssd DefaultAuthType=Basic ErrorPolicy=retry-job IdleExitTimeout=60 JobPrivateAccess=default JobPrivateValues=default MaxLogSize=0 PageLogFormat= SubscriptionPrivateAccess=default Su

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1965112] Re: cupsd crashed with SIGSEGV in __strcmp_evex()

2022-03-16 Thread Matthias Klose
doko@xe1:~$ driverless ipp://HP%20LaserJet%20500%20colorMFP%20M570dw%20(6C84AD)._ipp._tcp.local/ doko@xe1:~$ driverless --std-ipp-uris ipp://NPI6C84AD.local:631/ipp/printer doko@xe1:~$ lpstat -v lpstat: No destinations added. $ ps aux | grep cups-browsed root 94786 0.0 0.0 172744 11908 ?

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1960608] Re: python-pip >= 21.3.1+dfsg-3 fails pip3-root.sh autopkgtest with python3.10

2022-02-26 Thread Matthias Klose
python3.10 now in -proposed ** Changed in: python3.10 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dh-python in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960608 Title: p

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1958720] Re: python3-yaml and python3-six are not co-installable with python-is-python2 in jammy

2022-02-10 Thread Matthias Klose
there is no python-is-python2 in jammy anymore -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to six in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958720 Title: python3-yaml and python3-six are not co-installable with python-is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1959325] Re: New binutils causes build failures for many RISC-V packages

2022-01-30 Thread Matthias Klose
we will not change the ISA for the upcoming 22.04 LTS release, but do the change not before the GCC 12 defaults change planned for 22.10. ** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1959325] Re: New binutils causes build failures for many RISC-V packages

2022-01-28 Thread Matthias Klose
adding exact references from IRC logs ... please provide these in the first place. https://launchpadlibrarian.net/582482377/buildlog_ubuntu-jammy- riscv64.ktexteditor_5.90.0-0ubuntu2_BUILDING.txt.gz" -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1958389] Re: Jammy builds of xen segfault, but only on launchpad x86 builders

2022-01-27 Thread Matthias Klose
** Bug watch added: Sourceware.org Bugzilla #28826 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28826 ** Also affects: binutils via https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28826 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1004269 https

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1946965] Re: python3-defaults: py3versions -i does not list python3.10 when it is installed

2021-11-05 Thread Matthias Klose
Removing packages from impish-proposed: python3-defaults 3.9.4-1ubuntu1 in impish 2to3 3.9.4-1ubuntu1 in impish amd64 2to3 3.9.4-1ubuntu1 in impish arm64 2to3 3.9.4-1ubuntu1 in impish armhf 2to3 3.9.4-1ubuntu1 in impish i386

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1943818] Re: mesa built with -O3 on ppc64el has broken EGL

2021-09-16 Thread Matthias Klose
** Tags added: ppc64el -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943818 Title: mesa built with -O3 on ppc64el has broken EGL Status in Mesa: Unknown Status in gcc-11

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1939413] Re: /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libprotobuf.a’ generated with LTO version 9.2 instead of the expected 11.0

2021-08-26 Thread Matthias Klose
3.12.4-1ubuntu1 using binutils 2.36 OK 3.12.4-1ubuntu2 BAD -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to protobuf in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939413 Title: /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libprotobuf.a’ gener

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1939413] Re: /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libprotobuf.a’ generated with LTO version 9.2 instead of the expected 11.0

2021-08-26 Thread Matthias Klose
correctly stripped on other architectures, also not stripped in hirsute, so not a regression in impish. ** Tags removed: ftbfs ** Tags added: rls-ii-incoming ** Changed in: protobuf (Ubuntu) Assignee: Matthias Klose (doko) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification beca

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1939413] Re: /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libprotobuf.a’ generated with LTO version 9.2 instead of the expected 11.0

2021-08-26 Thread Matthias Klose
the real problem here is that the package is not stripped at all on arm64. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to protobuf in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939413 Title: /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libpro

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1939973] Re: make 4.3-4.1 triggers build failures

2021-08-15 Thread Matthias Klose
copied the binary packages to https://launchpad.net/~doko/+archive/ubuntu/toolchain and removed them from impish-proposed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to make-dfsg in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/19

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1939973] [NEW] make 4.3-4.1 triggers build failures

2021-08-15 Thread Matthias Klose
Public bug reported: trying to rebuild cross-toolchain-base from https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-toolchain-r/+archive/ubuntu/volatile/+packages triggers a build failure: [...] START stamp-dir/init-binutils tar -x -f /usr/src/binutils/binutils-2.37.tar.xz set -e; cd binutils-2.37 ; cp -a /usr/src/

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1939413] Re: /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libprotobuf.a’ generated with LTO version 9.2 instead of the expected 11.0

2021-08-13 Thread Matthias Klose
** Changed in: protobuf (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => New ** Changed in: protobuf (Ubuntu) Assignee: Gunnar Hjalmarsson (gunnarhj) => Matthias Klose (doko) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscri

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1939413] Re: /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libprotobuf.a’ generated with LTO version 9.2 instead of the expected 11.0

2021-08-12 Thread Matthias Klose
rebuilding just hides the issue. need to find out why the lto sections are in the archive. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to protobuf in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939413 Title: /usr/lib/aarch64-

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1934505]

2021-07-07 Thread Matthias Klose
looking at a 20210706 build, the fix seems to work. Unsure what I did wrong yesterday. So the fix would be needed on the trunk and the branch. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdb in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launc

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1934505]

2021-07-07 Thread Matthias Klose
yes, double checked, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdb/11.0.90.20210705-0ubuntu2/+build/21752179 Ubuntu's compiler enables a few hardening flags by default, -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security but that's unchanged from the gdb 10.2 build. -- You r

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1934505] Re: gdb 11 doesn't work on impish/s390x: internal-error: displaced_step_prepare_status linux_displaced_step_prepare(gdbarch*, thread_info*, CORE_ADDR&): Assertion `gdbar

2021-07-07 Thread Matthias Klose
fixed in 11.0.90.20210705-0ubuntu2 ** Changed in: gdb (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdb in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1934505 Title: gdb 11 d

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1934505]

2021-07-06 Thread Matthias Klose
no, that patch doesn't help. the gdb 10.2 build was fine, working correctly. gdb: configured with: --build=s390x-linux-gnu --host=s390x-linux-gnu --prefix=/usr --libexecdir=${prefix}/lib/gdb --disable-werror --disable-maintainer-mode --disable

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1934505]

2021-07-06 Thread Matthias Klose
for a s390x setup, maybe see https://developer.ibm.com/components/ibm-linuxone/gettingstarted/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdb in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1934505 Title: gdb 11 doesn't wor

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1934505] Re: gdb 11 doesn't work on impish: internal-error: displaced_step_prepare_status linux_displaced_step_prepare(gdbarch*, thread_info*, CORE_ADDR&): Assertion `gdbarch_dat

2021-07-05 Thread Matthias Klose
** Bug watch added: Sourceware.org Bugzilla #28056 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28056 ** Also affects: gdb via https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28056 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Changed in: gdb (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1933775]

2021-06-29 Thread Matthias Klose
No, the gcc packages don't depend on any tbb package. Probably tbb needs an update to a new upstream version in the distro. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to tbb in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/193377

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1933775] Re: libgcc-s1 and libstdc++6 depend on broken libtbb2 package

2021-06-28 Thread Matthias Klose
No gcc package depends on libtbb2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to tbb in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1933775 Title: libgcc-s1 and libstdc++6 depend on broken libtbb2 package Status in gcc: Con

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1933775] Re: libgcc-s1 and libstdc++6 depend on broken libtbb2 package

2021-06-28 Thread Matthias Klose
No, see the upstream issue. A new tbb upstream version is needed. ** Package changed: gcc-11 (Ubuntu) => tbb (Ubuntu) ** Tags removed: deprecated execution gcc intel libstdc++ pragma tbb warning ** Tags added: rls-ii-incoming -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >