Joy,
Great work on the debdiff, specially on the DEP3 headers in the patch,
and on the steps to reproduce, which are concise and clear.
I slightly modified the changelog entry to include the d/p/file.patch
path, and clarified its purpose. I also ran 'quilt refresh' to remove
offsets when applying
** Patch added: "lp1865504_bionic_util-linux.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-linux/+bug/1865504/+attachment/5335834/+files/lp1865504_bionic_util-linux.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subsc
Test/Eoan:
===
$ lsb_release -cs
eoan
$ sudo apt update
$ sudo apt install -y auditd
Before: (audit.log has res=failed)
---
$ dpkg -s util-linux | grep ^Version:
Version: 2.34-0.1ubuntu2.3
$ sudo hwclock --set --date "1/1/2000 00:00:00"
$ echo $?
0
$ sudo hwclock --utc --systohc
$ echo $?
0
** Description changed:
- [IMPACT]
- hwclock reports incrorect status in audit message
+ [Impact]
- hwclock calls audit_log_user_message(3) to create an audit entry.
- audit_log_user_message(3) result 1 is "success" and 0 is
- "failed", hwclock use standard EXIT_{SUCCESS,FAILURE} macros with re
Working on the stable releases E/B as discussed w/ Marc on IRC.
** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu Bionic)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mauricio Faria de Oliveira (mfo)
** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu
Hi Joy, Marc,
Nice catch on this bug.
I see the debdiff made focal-proposed just now; cool
I'd be happy to review/sponsor for Eoan and Bionic, if you're OK with
it.
I currently have an SRU in eoan-proposed, which should be promoted next
week, so I'm already keeping an eye out for when it's done
Setting the bug as Invalid; temporary issue on mirrors as initially
suspected.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1863189
Title:
package libuuid1:amd64 2.34
Obrigado por confirmar.
** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1863189
Title:
package l
Hi Nagendra,
Please provide the output of this command:
$ systemctl status -- -.mount
Did you happen to run 'sudo systemctl mask' on the -.mount unit ?
The problem in package install/update is caused because that unit is masked,
but it's not on my Eoan system.
So currently wondering if that ha
Hi Lukasz, thanks! Sure thing, I'll add it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862846
Title:
Crash and failure installing focal
Status in subiquity:
New
$ lsb_release -cs
eoan
Test device: partition (sdb1) in removable / USB flash disk (sdb)
$ ls -1d /sys/block/sdb/sdb1
/sys/block/sdb/sdb1
$ cat /sys/block/sdb/removable
1
eoan-proposed:
---
- PKNAME shows partition's parent/wholedisk.
- RM shows 1 for removable disk's partition.
$ dpkg -s
@slashd, thanks for uploading util-linux to Focal.
I've added the SRU template and uploaded to Eoan.
** Description changed:
+ [Impact]
+
+ * lsblk no longer prints a partition's parent
+kernel device name (the wholedisk).
+(i.e., 'lsblk -no PKNAME /dev/partition')
+
+ * Another impa
** Tags added: sts-sponsor-mfo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862846
Title:
Crash and failure installing focal
Status in subiquity:
New
Status in cu
** Patch added: "lp1862846_focal_util-linux.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/subiquity/+bug/1862846/+attachment/5329790/+files/lp1862846_focal_util-linux.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linu
@ltrager, Indeed, I see the refactor in curtin. :)
Absolutely agree w/ you, it's a regression in util-linux,
and after following up with you on IRC yesterday that it
is OK for me to submit the fix to Ubuntu, I worked on it.
I've tested the patch today, and it's currently building
on all architect
util-linux / test steps
===
Bionic
---
No regression: parent kernel device name
$ dpkg -s util-linux | grep ^Version:
Version: 2.31.1-0.4ubuntu3.5
$ lsblk -no pkname /dev/vda1
vda
Eoan
---
Before: empty string
$ dpkg -s util-linux | grep ^Version:
Version: 2.34-0.1ubuntu2.2
$ lsblk -no pkn
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu Eoan)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mauricio Faria de Oliveira (mfo)
** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided => Me
Hi Brett,
It seems this bug should be targeted to the 'e2fsprogs' package instead
of 'util-linux' as the problem happens with 'mkfs.ext4' command?
$ dpkg -S $(which mkfs.ext4)
e2fsprogs: /sbin/mkfs.ext4
Please provide the output of the mkfs.ext4 command you're running with
the additional '-v' op
And after you plug the unrecognized standard USB external drives, can
you please collect and upload a sosreport file? (the tool tells you the
filename it generates.)
$ sudo sosreport --all-logs --batch --case-id 1863396
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Tou
@ltrager
I'd be happy to handle the patch for util-linux on Ubuntu E/F if that helps;
just let me know.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1862846
Title:
** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1863189
Title:
package libuuid1:amd64 2.34-0.1ubuntu2
(falo português, se ajudar.)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1863189
Title:
package libuuid1:amd64 2.34-0.1ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade: O
pacot
And if that works, please run sudo apt install -f to try to fix up
packages (libblkid1 reported).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1863189
Title:
package
Can you try sudo apt update again?
It looks like a temporary issue in mirrors.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1863189
Title:
package libuuid1:amd64 2.34
bionic:
- lxcfs/3.0.3-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 (s390x)
- 3.0.3-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 util-linux/2.31.1-0.4ubuntu3.5 2020-01-28
11:07:15 UTC 0h 02m 02s mfo pass
- gnocchi/4.2.5-0ubuntu1 (armhf)
- (same failure in -updates too, not a regression introduced in -proposed)
- 4.2.5-0ubu
xenial:
- nplan/0.32~16.04.7 (amd64)
- 0.32~16.04.7util-linux/2.27.1-6ubuntu3.10 2020-01-28 11:12:12 UTC
0h 24m 52s mfo pass
- mysql-5.7/5.7.28-0ubuntu0.16.04.2 (i386, ppc64el, amd64)
- (new version in -updates fixed issues.)
- 5.7.29-0ubuntu0.16.04.1 util-li
eoan:
- tracker/2.3.0-1 (armhf)
- 2.3.0-1 util-linux/2.34-0.1ubuntu2.22020-01-28 13:29:26 UTC
0h 09m 34s mfo pass
- kopanocore/8.7.0-3build2 (armhf)
- 8.7.0-3build2 util-linux/2.34-0.1ubuntu2.22020-01-28 11:22:03 UTC
0h 09m 49s mfo pass
-
SRU team,
The autopkgtests regressions reported for the three releases
(xenial/bionic/eoan)
were all* transient issues resolved with re-runs (see 'pass' status records
below).
(*) The only the exception (not a transient issue) is gnocchi/bionic/armhf,
which is _not_ a regression either as the s
Verification done on bionic-proposed.
Now libblkid1 detects only the bcache superblock and prints udev/uuid variables.
$ lsb_release -cs
bionic
$ DISK_IMG=disk.img
$ rm -f $DISK_IMG
$ dd if=/dev/zero of=$DISK_IMG bs=1G count=0 seek=1
$ BACKING_DEV=$(sudo losetup --find --show $DISK_IMG)
$ sudo ma
Verification done on eoan-proposed.
Now libblkid1 detects only the bcache superblock and prints udev/uuid variables.
$ lsb_release -cs
eoan
$ DISK_IMG=disk.img
$ rm -f $DISK_IMG
$ dd if=/dev/zero of=$DISK_IMG bs=1G count=0 seek=1
$ BACKING_DEV=$(sudo losetup --find --show $DISK_IMG)
$ sudo make-b
Verification done on xenial-proposed.
Now libblkid1 detects only the bcache superblock and prints udev/uuid variables.
$ lsb_release -cs
xenial
$ DISK_IMG=disk.img
$ rm -f $DISK_IMG
$ dd if=/dev/zero of=$DISK_IMG bs=1G count=0 seek=1
$ BACKING_DEV=$(sudo losetup --find --show $DISK_IMG)
$ sudo ma
LP#1845529 is now fix released (thanks @sil2100), and the SRUs for E/B/X have
been uploaded.
(The SRU for D is skipped as D will be EOL in 7 days, the time needed to stay
in -proposed.)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subs
Update on autopkgtests.
The only failure left was gfs2-utils, which is unrelated.
I just confirmed it's indeed unrelated (passes on i386 kernel, fails on amd64
kernel, same version), and reported bug 1859827 to work on it.
The failure started to happen because the i386 kernels are no longer
bui
The autopkgtest failures for focal are unrelated to this upload.
- piuparts/1.1.0:
There's changes from piuparts 1.1.0 to 1.1.1 (released a few hours ago)
that resolved the issues, as seen in the autopkgtests page for piuparts.
Requested re-runs.
- openjdk:
The failing test timed-out on armhf a
The uploads to stable releases are blocked on LP#1845529 currently in
eoan-proposed.
It was pending analysis of autopkgtest failures as well, and I provided those
today.
(cyphermox removed the tag 'verification-needed' from that bug, so maybe it'll
move.)
--
You received this bug notification
Looked at the remaining autopkgtest failures for util-linux/eoan [1]:
util-linux
Regression in autopkgtest for sbd (i386): test log
Regression in autopkgtest for gfs2-utils (i386): test log
Regression in autopkgtest for network-manager (ppc64el): test log
- sbd/i386:
passed with retries [2]
-
Autopkgtests triggered against the PPA.
Results/Exit-codes (all zero)
focal
$ curl -s
'https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal-mfo-lp1858802-sru/focal/amd64/u/util-linux/20200109_132227_94cc9@/result.tar'
| tar x --to-stdout e
Test :: bionic
$ lsb_release -cs
bionic
$ uname -rv
4.15.0-72-generic #81-Ubuntu SMP Tue Nov 26 12:20:02 UTC 2019
$ dpkg -s bcache-tools xfsprogs | grep -i version
Version: 1.0.8-2build1
Version: 4.9.0+nmu1ubuntu2
$ sudo hexdump -C $BACKING_DEV | grep -m2 -e XFSB -e 'fe ed ba be'
2000 58
Test :: xenial
$ lsb_release -cs
xenial
$ uname -rv
4.4.0-171-generic #200-Ubuntu SMP Tue Dec 3 11:04:55 UTC 2019
$ dpkg -s bcache-tools xfsprogs | grep -i version
Version: 1.0.8-2
Version: 4.3.0+nmu1ubuntu1.1
$ sudo hexdump -C $BACKING_DEV | grep -m2 -e XFSB -e 'fe ed ba be'
2000 58 46 5
Test :: disco
$ lsb_release -cs
disco
$ uname -rv
5.0.0-37-generic #40-Ubuntu SMP Thu Nov 14 00:14:01 UTC 2019
$ dpkg -s bcache-tools xfsprogs | grep -i version
Version: 1.0.8-3
Version: 4.15.1-1ubuntu1
$ sudo hexdump -C $BACKING_DEV | grep -m2 -e XFSB -e 'fe ed ba be'
2000 58 46 53 42 00
Test :: focal
$ lsb_release -cs
focal
$ uname -rv
5.4.0-9-generic #12-Ubuntu SMP Mon Dec 16 22:34:19 UTC 2019
$ dpkg -s bcache-tools xfsprogs | grep -i version
Version: 1.0.8-3
Version: 5.2.1-1ubuntu1
$ sudo hexdump -C $BACKING_DEV | grep -m2 -e XFSB -e 'fe ed ba be'
2000 58 46 53 42 00 0
** Patch added: "lp1858802_xenial.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+source/util-linux/+bug/1858802/+attachment/5318919/+files/lp1858802_xenial.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in
Test :: eoan
$ lsb_release -cs
eoan
$ uname -rv
5.3.0-26-generic #28-Ubuntu SMP Wed Dec 18 05:37:46 UTC 2019
$ dpkg -s bcache-tools xfsprogs | grep -i version
Version: 1.0.8-3
Version: 5.0.0-1ubuntu1
$ sudo hexdump -C $BACKING_DEV | grep -m2 -e XFSB -e 'fe ed ba be'
2000 58 46 53 42 00 00
** Patch added: "lp1858802_disco.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+source/util-linux/+bug/1858802/+attachment/5318917/+files/lp1858802_disco.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in U
** Patch added: "lp1858802_focal.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+source/util-linux/+bug/1858802/+attachment/5318915/+files/lp1858802_focal.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in U
** Patch added: "lp1858802_eoan.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+source/util-linux/+bug/1858802/+attachment/5318916/+files/lp1858802_eoan.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubu
** Patch added: "lp1858802_bionic.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+source/util-linux/+bug/1858802/+attachment/5318918/+files/lp1858802_bionic.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in
Test Steps:
---
# Document versions
lsb_release -cs
uname -rv
dpkg -s bcache-tools xfsprogs | grep -i version
# Create disk image
DISK_IMG=disk.img
rm -f $DISK_IMG
dd if=/dev/zero of=$DISK_IMG bs=1G count=0 seek=1
# Create bcache backing device from disk image
BACKING_DEV=$(sudo losetup --find
Attaching the debdiffs for X/B/D/E/F for reference.
The package built successfully on all architectures
for all releases considered (X/B/D/E/F) in PPA [1].
The test results are positive: (see next comments)
- the latest version in -updates (X/B/D/F) or -proposed (E) fails
with ambivalent resul
** Description changed:
- description/debdiffs to be provided.
+ [Impact]
- upstream commit:
-
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/util-linux/util-linux.git/commit/?id=d756af7d640c51ce8d1414607bd3f17eeecf2424
+ * Users with an XFS filesystem on top of bcache
+(this is seen on some ceph,
** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu Disco)
Status: Invalid => In Progress
** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu Disco)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu Disco)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mauricio Faria de Oliveira (mfo)
--
You received
(Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira (mfo)
Status: In Progress
** Also affects: util-linux (Ubuntu Eoan)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: u
Public bug reported:
description/debdiffs to be provided.
upstream commit:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/util-linux/util-linux.git/commit/?id=d756af7d640c51ce8d1414607bd3f17eeecf2424
** Affects: util-linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira (mfo
For documentation purposes, the (unrelated) autopkgtest failure on
docker.io is reported/worked on bug 1855481.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1846787
Title:
For documentation purposes,
The systemd upload for this LP bug also resolves LP bug 1847512
(xenial: leftover scope units for Kubernetes transient mounts).
Verification steps posted on that bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, whic
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1846787 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1846787
Verification done with fix for bug 1846787 on xenial-proposed (systemd
229-4ubuntu21.23).
With the new systemd packages there are no leaked scope units for
transient mounts.
cheers,
Mauricio
Setup
---
$
Verification done on xenial-proposed.
With the new systemd and dbus packages, there are no leaked sessions
after the test-case of ssh loop.
The autopkgtests regressions reported previously are unrelated to this
change (comments #11 to #16).
cheers,
Mauricio
Setup
---
$ sudo snap install --beta
The remaining autopkgtests regressions (nplan/amd64 and gvfs/s390x) are
also unrelated to this change.
- nplan/amd64 passed with 3 retests:
Before:
test_mix_bridge_on_bond (__main__.TestNetworkManager) ... FAIL
...
integration.py FAIL non-zero exit status 1
After:
test_mix_bridge
The autopkgtests regression on docker.io are unrelated to this change.
The failure is on debian/tests/basic-smoke; it happens because
'debootstrap stable ' fails the gpg verification of the Release
file -- the keys used for the Buster stable release are not found in
Xenial's debian-archive-keyring
Summary of autopkg regressions
systemd:
- most tests passed on retest (thanks ddstreet)
- still failing: gvfs/s390x, docker.io/all archs but armhf, nplan/amd64
dbus:
- no new failures.
Looking at the pending failures/regressions.
systemd
--
umockdev/0.8.11-2 (i386)
passed on retest.
a
Verification done with xenial-proposed.
# dpkg -s libblkid1 | grep -i version
Version: 2.27.1-6ubuntu3.9
# apt-cache madison libblkid1 | grep xenial-proposed
libblkid1 | 2.27.1-6ubuntu3.9 | http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu
xenial-proposed/main amd64 Packages
Test steps are described in comment
No problems with the autopkgtest results for this SRU:
- nplan xenial/s390x [1] is failing since September 1st
- nplan xenial/armhf [2] is failing since May 14th
- systemd xenial/amd [3] passed with a re-run [4] (thanks ddstret)
cheers,
Mauricio
[1] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/nplan/
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1846787 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1846787
** Tags added: sts
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847512
Title:
The reported failures for autopkgtest are unrelated
to this change on the probe of the nilfs filesystem.
Two are apparently failures in handling test reboot,
and another is lack of a kernel module.
I'll ask for retries on these, and do a quick check
on this module error.
Details:
---
nplan:armh
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1846787 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1846787
Marking this bug as a duplicate of bug 1846787 for the systemd fix.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1846787
systemd-logind leaves leftover sessions and scope files
--
You received this b
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1846787 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1846787
The systemd fix commit/from LP bug 1846787 has been verified
to resolve the problem with test packages in ppa:mfo/sf219578 [1],
- no scope units are left over after the pods complete.
It's also been verifi
ount for
/var/snap/microk8s/common/var/lib/kubelet/pods/2e942cf5-3b1d-48f2-8758-5f1875dc05f7/volumes/kubernetes.io~secret/default-token-24k4f
$
[1] https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/64137
[2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1846787
** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu)
Importance:
And this debdiff / util-linux on xenial builds fine again!
Built on all architectures on PPA [1].
cheers,
Mauricio
[1] https://launchpad.net/~mfo/+archive/ubuntu/lp1842437
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util
Eric,
The fix to xenial livecd-rootfs / launchpad buildd chroot has been
rolled out.
I just confirmed that /dev/ptmx is OK with a test package build on
Launchpad PPA.
...
dh_clean
# Check /dev/ptmx|pts/
ls -l /dev/ptmx
crw-rw-rw- 1 root root 5, 2 Oct 4 08:13 /dev/ptmx
ls -l /dev/pts/
Eric, thanks! Really appreciate your help debugging this issue.
Per Colin's comment, he mentions on #launchpad-ops (internal)
when there are launchpad chroot changes -- so we can confirm
it's been updated after the package becomes Fix Released.
--
You received this bug notification because you
The real fix for the openpty() problem on Launchpad xenial buildd
is in livecd-rootfs currently in xenial-proposed, and is verified.
(LP 1844504 comment 15)
Once the Launchpad builders are updated with that, we can proceed
with another build attempt, and hopefully move this SRU forward.
Thanks to
Workaround of disabling the 4 tests in the 'script' component
(which calls openpty() upfront and thus cause the failure)
makes the test-suite finish successfully.
$ ./tests/run.sh \
--srcdir=/build/util-linux-kzgHhT/util-linux-2.27.1 \
--builddir=/build/util-linux-kzgHhT/util-linux-2.27.1 \
s/this is bug/this is _similar_ to/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1842437
Title:
Xenial: libblkid: fix false-positive/misdetection of nilfs2 filesystem
Ah, this is bug 1843674, checking for similar fixes.
(thanks Matthew Ruffell for pointing it out on IRC.)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1842437
Title:
The problem is reproducible in the sbuild-launchpad-chroot for xenial/amd64,
using the source package for util-linux currently in xenial-updates
(i.e., no regression from debdiff, as expected since changes/error are
unrelated)
The minimal command-line for that is:
$ /build/util-linux-kzgHhT/uti
Eric, thanks for reporting that.
I couldn't reproduce the build failure on LXC with apt dist-upgrade on
xenial-updates nor xenial-proposed, and it built successfully on PPAs a
while ago (for the test packages), so it seems something changed in the
PPA builders.
I'll investigate this as per our di
The reporter confirmed the boot problem doesn't happen anymore.
Moving forward with the SRU.
** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu Xenial)
Assignee: Guilherme G. Piccoli (gpiccoli) => Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
(mfo)
** Tags added: sts
--
You received this bug notification because y
at needs it.
Bionic is v2.31.1, so all post-Xenial supported releases have it.
** Patch added: "lp1842437_util-linux.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-linux/+bug/1842437/+attachment/5287043/+files/lp1842437_util-linux.debdiff
** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu
This problem can be reproduced with a synthetic test case.
Essentially,
1) create a zero-filled disk image with one partition.
2) format it as ext4.
3) insert the nilfs2 magic bytes at the right position.
4) insert the nilfs2 bytes field at the right position.
--
Step 1)
# dd if=/dev/z
modified package:
# dpkg -s libblkid1 | grep ^Version:
Version: 2.27.1-6ubuntu3.8+test20190903b1
# LIBBLKID_DEBUG=all udevadm test-builtin blkid /sys/block/loop0/loop0p1
...
7289: libblkid: LOWPROBE: [28] ext4:
7289: libblkid: LOWPROBE:
udev builtin blkid ignores the checksum error:
nilfs_valid_sb() @ nilfs.c:96
return blkid_probe_verify_csum(pr, crc, le32_to_cpu(sb->s_sum));
blkid_probe_verify_csum() @ probe.c:1576-1687
if (csum != expected) {
...
DBG(LOWPROBE, ul_debug(
with debug we could confirm that other fields in the backup superblock are
invalid,
such as the device size, which was not checked for not being a whole-disk
device,
and the bytes length, which is greater than the superblock structure size (8243
vs 1024).
so, the fix to check for the bytes fiel
original package:
# dpkg -s libblkid1 | grep ^Version:
Version: 2.27.1-6ubuntu3.8
# LIBBLKID_DEBUG=all udevadm test-builtin blkid /sys/block/loop0/loop0p1
...
4924: libblkid: LOWPROBE: [28] ext4:
4924: libblkid: LOWPROBE: reuse buffe
Problem:
- the ext4 filesystem is detected correctly at the beginning of the partition.
- the nilfs2 filesystem is detected incorrectly at the end of the partition.
- the nilfs2 checksum is invalid, but that is ignored by udev builtin blkid.
- the detection of more than one filesystems causes an e
atus: Fix Released
** Affects: util-linux (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Medium
Assignee: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira (mfo)
Status: In Progress
** Also affects: util-linux (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu)
Status: N
Verification :: disco-proposed
---
Okay, not strictly required as not yet a Stable Release, but doing anyway.
Successful.
$ wget http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/disco-proposed/main
/installer-amd64/20101020ubuntu560/images/netboot/ubuntu-
installer/amd64/{linux,
Verification :: cosmic-proposed
---
Successful.
$ wget
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/cosmic-proposed/main/installer-amd64/20101020ubuntu557.1/images/netboot/ubuntu-installer/amd64/{linux,initrd.gz}
$ virt-install \
--name cosmic \
--vcpus 2 \
--memory
Verification :: bionic-proposed
---
Successful.
$ wget http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/bionic-proposed/main
/installer-amd64/20101020ubuntu543.4/images/netboot/ubuntu-
installer/amd64/{linux,initrd.gz}
$ virt-install \
--name bionic \
--vcpus 2 \
--memory
** Patch added: "lp1807023-ca-certificates-xenial.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/1807023/+attachment/5220173/+files/lp1807023-ca-certificates-xenial.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages
** Patch added: "lp1807023-ca-certificates-trusty.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/1807023/+attachment/5220172/+files/lp1807023-ca-certificates-trusty.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages
The ca-certificates fix for Xenial and Trusty
include the changes to build the (new) udeb.
The normal deb package has been verified for
regressions (next comments) and it is correct,
with no functional changes whatsoever.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
T
Package Contents :: Xenial
==
No regressions in ca-certificate DEB file
after the changes to build the UDEB file.
The only difference is due to the changes
in changelog file and package version.
dpkg-deb -c (content listing)
---
$ dpkg-deb -c ca-certificates_201
Package Contents :: Trusty
==
No regressions in ca-certificate DEB file
after the changes to build the UDEB file.
The only difference is due to the changes
in changelog file and package version.
dpkg-deb -c (content listing)
---
$ dpkg-deb -c ca-certificates_201
** Description changed:
[Impact]
* The installer stock images fail to validate any HTTPS
certificates because ca-certificates is not available
in the installer environment.
* This causes wget/download errors for preseed files on
HTTPS servers (or HTTP servers that redi
** Patch added: "lp1807023-debian-installer-xenial.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/1807023/+attachment/5220102/+files/lp1807023-debian-installer-xenial.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packag
** Patch added: "lp1807023-debian-installer-trusty.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/1807023/+attachment/5220104/+files/lp1807023-debian-installer-trusty.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packag
Testing :: Trusty
=
original
wget http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/trusty-updates/main
/installer-amd64/20101020ubuntu318.44/images/netboot/ubuntu-
installer/amd64/{linux,initrd.gz}
~ # cat /etc/default-release
trusty
~ # ls -d /usr/lib/ssl/certs
ls: /usr/lib/s
Testing :: Xenial
=
original
wget http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/xenial-updates/main
/installer-amd64/20101020ubuntu451.26/images/netboot/ubuntu-
installer/amd64/{linux,initrd.gz}
~ # cat /etc/default-release
xenial
~ # ls -d /usr/lib/ssl/certs
ls: /usr/lib/ssl
** Patch added: "lp1807023-ca-certificates-xenial.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/1807023/+attachment/5220101/+files/lp1807023-ca-certificates-xenial.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages
** Patch added: "lp1807023-ca-certificates-trusty.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/1807023/+attachment/5220103/+files/lp1807023-ca-certificates-trusty.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages
301 - 400 of 457 matches
Mail list logo
