[Touch-packages] [Bug 1197754] Re: print lxc-start-ephemeral container name in a machine-readable way

2024-03-15 Thread Paride Legovini
With 0b4c5056925e7358374874c8bf4767290157e903 (in autopkgtest 5.33) lxc- start-ephemeral is not called anymore. ** Changed in: autopkgtest (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Paride Legovini (paride) ** Changed in: autopkgtest (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2052482] Re: Bad packet length 2424479189 Connection corrupted

2024-03-11 Thread Paride Legovini
I am not sure I fully understand the latest comment. Does it mean that 8.0p1-19.0.1 just works? What about 8.0p1-19.0.1.2, mentioned in [1]? [1] https://linux.oracle.com/errata/ELSA-2024-12164.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054908] Re: gpg-wks-server pulls in postfix

2024-03-01 Thread Paride Legovini
** Changed in: auto-package-testing Assignee: (unassigned) => Paride Legovini (paride) ** Changed in: auto-package-testing Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054916] Re: CVE-2022-44640 affects the version of heimdal on ubuntu 22.04 - could it be updated?

2024-02-29 Thread Paride Legovini
** Also affects: heimdal (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: heimdal (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: heimdal (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: heimdal (Ubuntu Jammy) Status:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054683] Re: Please merge lvm2 2.03.16-3 from Debian unstable.

2024-02-27 Thread Paride Legovini
Uploaded and accepted: == OK: lvm2_2.03.16.orig.tar.xz OK: lvm2_2.03.16-3ubuntu1.debian.tar.xz OK: lvm2_2.03.16-3ubuntu1.dsc -> Component: main Section: admin ** Changed in: lvm2 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dave Jones (waveform) -- You received this bug notification

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054620] Re: libdm returns wrong error code when dm-verity key cannot be found

2024-02-27 Thread Paride Legovini
I just sponsored lvm2 2.03.16-3ubuntu1 which should fix the FTBFS. On including libdm-propagate-ioctl-errors-back-to-caller.patch: I am not sure this bug is important enough to grant that. The patch may apply cleanly to 2.03.16, but still it comes from 2.03.23, which is not a trivial change in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054683] Re: Please merge lvm2 2.03.16-3 from Debian unstable.

2024-02-27 Thread Paride Legovini
** Changed in: lvm2 (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lvm2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054683 Title: Please merge lvm2 2.03.16-3 from Debian

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054716] Re: package polkitd 124-1 failed to install/upgrade: installed polkitd package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2024-02-26 Thread Paride Legovini
** Changed in: policykit-1 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to policykit-1 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054716 Title: package polkitd 124-1 failed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054823] Re: Sync klibc 2.0.13-4 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2024-02-23 Thread Paride Legovini
klibc (2.0.13-4) unstable; urgency=medium [ Sven Joachim ] * debian/initramfs-tools/hooks/klibc-utils: Avoid the use of "cp -n" (Closes: #1055694). [ Salvatore Bonaccorso ] * debian/control: Add myself to Uploaders Date: 2024-02-21 22:32:43.744541+00:00 Signed-By: Parid

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054823] Re: Sync klibc 2.0.13-4 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

2024-02-23 Thread Paride Legovini
** Changed in: klibc (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Paride Legovini (paride) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to klibc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054823 Title: Sync klibc 2.0.1

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2052482] Re: Bad packet length 2424479189 Connection corrupted

2024-02-22 Thread Paride Legovini
Thanks for the additional information. By reading the pages Sergio linked to I found one user writing: Downgrading openssh-server to version 8.0p1-19.el8_8 will revert the update and SSH will work again, although this probably not advisable. That's definitely not advisable, but I think

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2019026] Re: systemd /tmp cleaning is suboptimal

2024-02-19 Thread Paride Legovini
Looks like the experiment worked: having e /tmp 1777 root root 30d deleted a test directory which has mtime and atime >30d old (done via: touch -d '29 days ago', and then left to age over the weekend). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2019026] Re: systemd /tmp cleaning is suboptimal

2024-02-16 Thread Paride Legovini
AIUI he suggests keeping the boot time cleanup, and that it could be nice to have the 30d behavior back. In any case that's what I'd prefer. I know we're speaking of file age; certainly not of blindly deleting everything every month or so :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2019026] Re: systemd /tmp cleaning is suboptimal

2024-02-16 Thread Paride Legovini
FWIW I agree with Nick's preference (clean at boot && clean files older than 30d). Maybe we could make that 40d, as 30d is likely to be a time interval at which a lot of periodic things happen (e.g. an off-site backup). A retention period >30d is less likely be synchronized with it in an unlucky

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2053146] Re: openssh 8.9p1 for Jammy auth2-gss patch for gssapi-keyex method is slightly wrong

2024-02-15 Thread Paride Legovini
Hello and thanks for this bug report. The analysis looks sensible to me, but I'm not really familiar with gss. To better understand the situation I have a couple of questions: - Does this mean that gss is unusable in Jammy at the moment? AFAICT this is the only bug report about it, so I would be

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2052618] Re: Missing sftp-server argument -m force_file_perms

2024-02-08 Thread Paride Legovini
This is a duplicate of LP: #1922130, marking it as such. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2052618 Title: Missing sftp-server argument -m force_file_perms

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2049318] Re: [SRU] free(): double free detected in tcache 2

2024-01-16 Thread Paride Legovini
Hi and thanks for working at this SRU. I have some comments on the debdiff: - Please specify the patch Author in the DEP-3 headers. See [1] for more info on the header format. - The patch description should not be "apply upstream patch", because the patch is just the patch, it contains no

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1833322] Re: Consider removing irqbalance from default install on desktop images

2024-01-10 Thread Paride Legovini
Hi, adding a couple of extra pointers here (I'm the Debian irqbalance maintainer). This the Debian bug where the discussion on removing irqbalance from the kernel Recommends happened: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=926967 In Debian irqbalance is not installed anymore by

[Touch-packages] [Bug 406397] Re: init: job stuck with expect fork/daemon when parent reaps child

2024-01-10 Thread Paride Legovini
** Changed in: pld-linux Status: New => Incomplete ** Changed in: irqbalance (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to upstart in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1984107] Re: Printer SSL certificates are added but never removed, resulting in "no suitable destination host found by cups-browsed"

2023-12-29 Thread Paride Legovini
Hello Valentijn and thanks for this bug report, it really helped me figure out an otherwise obscure printing issue. However I don't agree with the suggested solution: the security model of cups for ipps is TOFU (trust on first use): the certificate is accepted the first time and then expected to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1984107] Re: Printer SSL certificates are added but never removed, resulting in "no suitable destination host found by cups-browsed"

2023-12-29 Thread Paride Legovini
Hello Valentijn and thanks for this bug report, it really helped me figure out an otherwise obscure printing issue. However I don't agree with the suggested solution: the security model of cups for ipps is TOFU (trust on first use): the certificate is accepted the first time and then expected to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1097467] Re: bash does not fulfill --rcfile option properly

2023-11-14 Thread Paride Legovini
Actually, it would be nice if the new patch had some dep-3 headers (see [1], `quilt --dep3` and maybe dep3changelog). In particular I think we miss bug references an a description of the patch. Do you think you could add the relevant ones? Thanks! [1] https://dep-team.pages.debian.net/deps/dep3/

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1097467] Re: bash does not fulfill --rcfile option properly

2023-11-14 Thread Paride Legovini
Thanks for digging into this issue and updating the relevant Debian bug, refreshing the debdiff. This LGTM, tested locally, the manpage renders fine. I am going to sponsor this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2038561] Re: Requesting Ubuntu package manager to release openssh updates to focal and jammy

2023-10-13 Thread Paride Legovini
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2038561 Title: Requesting Ubuntu package manager to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2038561] Re: Requesting Ubuntu package manager to release openssh updates to focal and jammy

2023-10-12 Thread Paride Legovini
Hello, while [1] by itself is a straightforward patch, I don't think we can acknowledge this to be a bug in in Ubuntu, given that you are trying to use an Ubuntu packaged software using a manually compiled version of a library it depends on. This is not a supported use case, so the prerequisites

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2026757] Re: dnsmasq on Ubuntu Jammy/Lunar crashes on neutron-dhcp-agent updates

2023-10-06 Thread Paride Legovini
The bug description says "dnsmasq on Ubuntu Jammy/Lunar crashes [...]", but IIUC it's actually only the Jammy one that crashes (the lunar-on- jammy one maybe has other issues, but doesn't exhibit the crash). Am I right? In this case please update the bug description accordingly. Thanks! Edit: I

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2026757] Re: dnsmasq on Ubuntu Jammy/Lunar crashes on neutron-dhcp-agent updates

2023-10-06 Thread Paride Legovini
Hello, I verified that Sergio's PPA contains the candidate upstream patch (upstream commit d290630d31f4517ab26392d00753d1397f9a4114). If the crash is still happening that probably wasn't the issue after all. I see two possible ways forward here. One is classic git based debugging: 1. compile

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1958676] Re: error: too early for operation, device not yet seeded or device model not acknowledged Install failed

2023-09-29 Thread Paride Legovini
Stumbled on this in triage. The bug description writes about "added functionality for systemd v250 which ubuntu does not have yet", which is not the case anymore. The bug report didn't have any significant activity in >1 year. Is this still an issue? ** Changed in: launchpad-buildd

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2036611] Re: FFe: Mesa 23.2.0

2023-09-22 Thread Paride Legovini
Given that this is required for hardware support, rc3 is tested already in Debian and other distros, Mantic is an interim release, and also taking into account Timo's familiarity with the package (see d/changelog), I'm +1 with this request. I also tested the PPA packages and they worked fine for

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2035061] Re: uptime -p reports incorrect output after 52 weeks

2023-09-12 Thread Paride Legovini
Hello, I had a look at the debdiffs and they look good (clean upstream cherry-picks). I think the packages are ready for sponsoring, but before doing so I have a couple of questions. 1. The issue only happens *exactly* after 52 weeks, or something like that, am I right? as I have systems that

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2019010] Re: environment variable SSH_ORIGINAL_COMMAND on server side set with wrong value

2023-05-11 Thread Paride Legovini
Hello Andrey, that's expected as from openssh 9.0 scp actually uses sftp. From the release notes [1]: This release switches scp(1) from using the legacy scp/rcp protocol to using the SFTP protocol by default. The release notes then shortly elaborate on why legacy scp was problematic. I'm

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871465] Re: ssh_config(5) contains outdated information

2023-04-13 Thread Paride Legovini
This popped up in triage as a stale bug, but looks like everything looks good here: openssh 1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.6 is in focal-proposed, verification is done, migration is blocked by the block-proposed-focal tag (staged SRU). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2012298] Re: PasswordAuthenticaion in sshd_config.d

2023-03-30 Thread Paride Legovini
I think I found a relevant upstream bug [0], fixed by [1]. If the patch applies fairly cleanly to the version in Focal this could be good SRU material. [0] https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3122 [1]

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2002918] Re: ERROR: rejecting excluded file-list name

2023-03-02 Thread Paride Legovini
Hello, I didn't go into the specifics of the bug, but according to LP: #2007837 the security team (Cc: mdeslaur) is going to release rsync 3.2.7 to jammy and kinetic as a security update, so this bug should get fixed too. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2002918] Re: ERROR: rejecting excluded file-list name

2023-03-02 Thread Paride Legovini
** Bug watch added: github.com/WayneD/rsync/issues #375 https://github.com/WayneD/rsync/issues/375 ** Also affects: rsync via https://github.com/WayneD/rsync/issues/375 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2007837] Re: 22.04: Backport request from 3.2.4 for fix of 3.2.3 regression

2023-02-23 Thread Paride Legovini
Thanks. According to the package versions the bug is not present in >= Kinetic, so setting the devel release task as Fix Released. ** Changed in: rsync (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: rsync (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: Incomplete => Triaged ** Tags added: server-todo

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2004101] Re: package libsasl2-2:amd64 2.1.27+dfsg2-3ubuntu1.1 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting c

2023-02-09 Thread Paride Legovini
Hello Atharva and thanks for this bug report. Since there isn't enough information in your report to differentiate between a problem specific to your system and a bug in Ubuntu, I'm marking this bug as Incomplete. If you believe that this is really a bug, please provide some extra context on

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2003845] Re: updating NSS on 18.04

2023-01-27 Thread Paride Legovini
Hello Vijay and thanks for this bug report. The ca-certificates package is periodically upgraded in stable releases. The package changelog [1] will tell you which CAs are added/removed with the past updates. If you still believe you spotted an issue with missing certificate please specify: 1.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1971932] Re: error in rsync protocol data stream

2023-01-12 Thread Paride Legovini
That's consistent with the comments above as the USB->SSD transfer doesn't use the rsync protocol. What we need to move this forward is a verification that applying [1] to the version of rsync in Bionic (3.1.2) or Focal (3.1.3) fixes the issue. If any of you affected users is available for

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1965076] Re: rsync --update incorrectly reports file "is newer" than itself

2022-11-08 Thread Paride Legovini
Uploading rsync_3.2.3-8ubuntu3.1.dsc Uploading rsync_3.2.3-8ubuntu3.1.debian.tar.xz Uploading rsync_3.2.3-8ubuntu3.1_source.buildinfo Uploading rsync_3.2.3-8ubuntu3.1_source.changes -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1965076] Re: rsync --update incorrectly reports file "is newer" than itself

2022-10-28 Thread Paride Legovini
Assigning this to myself to do the sponsoring. ** Changed in: rsync (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Paride Legovini (paride) ** Changed in: rsync (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: Triaged => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1993081] Re: Installing samba-dev:i386 breaks Ubuntu 22.04.1.

2022-10-20 Thread Paride Legovini
Looks like the culprit here is python3, as doing apt install python3:i386 causes the removal of several important packages. This in a Jammy LXD container and after doing `dpkg --add-architecture i386`. The python3 package is marked Multi-Arch: allowed, so I would expect the i386 package to be

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1993081] Re: Installing samba-dev:i386 breaks Ubuntu 22.04.1.

2022-10-20 Thread Paride Legovini
** Also affects: python3-defaults (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python3-defaults in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1993081 Title: Installing

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1965076] Re: rsync --update incorrectly reports file "is newer" than itself

2022-10-13 Thread Paride Legovini
Thanks! I didn't test it, but formally it LGTM. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsync in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965076 Title: rsync --update incorrectly reports file "is newer" than itself

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1965076] Re: rsync --update incorrectly reports file "is newer" than itself

2022-10-13 Thread Paride Legovini
Stumbled on this in Triage and I did a quick review of the debdiff (thanks for preparin it!). The patch cherry-picking LGTM, but I think we want ubuntu3.1 in the d/changelog version string. Also the DEP-3 headers could have a Bug: line pointing to the upstream bug [1]. [1]

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1991427] Re: ssh doesn't offer identity files in the right order

2022-10-03 Thread Paride Legovini
Hello and thanks for this bug report. In my understanding, when ssh- agent is in use, what matters is the order in which identities are added to the agent. While I agree this is not clearly documented it's likely that openssh is just working as expected. The new agent restrictions feature of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1764044] Re: ssh-add asks about passphrases for keys already unlocked in the keychain

2022-09-30 Thread Paride Legovini
I am a bit confused by the bug report. I think ssh-add is correctly adding the DSA key to the agent, and the fact that running ssh-add again requests the password again is normal and expected. Looks Trusty behaves the same: ubuntu@paride-t:~$ eval $(ssh-agent -s) Agent pid 2406

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1971932] Re: error in rsync protocol data stream

2022-09-01 Thread Paride Legovini
Looks like there' also an openSUSE bug about this issue: https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1175854 As I understand it the culprit is the old rsync (3.1.3). Upstream suggests recompiling it with -with-included-zlib=yes, which I doubt we're going to do, especially in stable releases.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1988290] [NEW] NO_PROXY doesn't work for IPv6 literals

2022-08-31 Thread Paride Legovini
Public bug reported: [Partial copypaste from the linked upstream bug.] Setting   NO_PROXY=localhost,127.0.0.1,::1 enables connections to http://localhost and http://127.0.0.1 and does not work for http://[::1] at all. Apparently the problem is caused by an assumption [1] that a hostname cannot

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1988290] Re: NO_PROXY doesn't work for IPv6 literals

2022-08-31 Thread Paride Legovini
Fixed upstream and in >= Focal by: https://github.com/curl/curl/commit/b7f90470be9b75f57167abbcd63aadb2e3b33958 ** Description changed: + [Partial copypaste from the linked upstream bug.] + Setting - NO_PROXY=localhost,127.0.0.1,::1 +   NO_PROXY=localhost,127.0.0.1,::1 enables

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1979879] Re: Apparmor profile in 22.04 jammy - fails to start when printing enabled

2022-08-01 Thread Paride Legovini
I see your point, and I find the one about "fixing it the Kinetic way" especially convincing, it may save us headaches in the future, and may help with backports. My concern is that other packages or scripts users wrote and tested on Jammy systems refer to the "wrong" path

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1974483] Re: autoinstall ssh:install-server:false is misleading in 22.04

2022-07-19 Thread Paride Legovini
Confirmed still happening on the Jammy 20220719 daily. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1974483 Title: autoinstall ssh:install-server:false is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1978816] Re: sshd: ClientAliveCountMax=0 not honoured as expected

2022-06-16 Thread Paride Legovini
Hello James and thanks for your bug report. The "Make ClientAliveCountMax=0 have sensible semantics" change you refer to is actually an upstream change, see the OpenSSH bugfixes here: https://www.openssh.com/releasenotes.html the upstream bug being:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1923845] Re: Please compress packages with zstd by default

2022-06-06 Thread Paride Legovini
aptly is Fix Release in Kinetic in: aptly (1.4.0+ds1-7) unstable; urgency=medium * Team upload. * Add support for zstd compression (Closes: #1010465) ** Changed in: aptly (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1971932] Re: error in rsync protocol data stream

2022-05-12 Thread Paride Legovini
Well, "large" can span orders of magnitude, depending who you ask. :-) Can you please try to identify some steps to reproduce that include the big file generation? For example: # 100MB file, random data (difficult to compress) head -c 100M /dev/urandom > foo # 100MB file, all 0s (easy to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1966886] Re: ssh-copy-id and Dropbear Server

2022-05-09 Thread Paride Legovini
** Tags added: server-todo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1966886 Title: ssh-copy-id and Dropbear Server Status in openssh package in Ubuntu: Triaged

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1966886] Re: ssh-copy-id and Dropbear Server

2022-05-09 Thread Paride Legovini
I found a (somehow stale) upstream PR that addresses this: https://github.com/openssh/openssh-portable/pull/250 We could include this as an Ubuntu patch, but it would be better to first see it merged upstream. It may be worth pinging there. ** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu) Status: New

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1971932] Re: error in rsync protocol data stream

2022-05-09 Thread Paride Legovini
Hello and thanks for this bug report. I tried to reproduce this locally but I failed. We're certainly willing to investigate this, but first we need some steps to reproduce the problem. Could you please try to identify a somehow reliable way to reproduce the issue and share your findings? Thanks!

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1957104] Re: updating openssh-server fails, because port 22 is in use by systemd

2022-05-09 Thread Paride Legovini
Hello Thomas. You filed this bug against: DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.10 Package: openssh-server 1:8.4p1-6ubuntu2.1 By "Solved by a later version of systemd and sshd". Do you mean that you found you can't reproduce the issue on Jammy (22.04 LTS)? Can you still reproruce the issue on Impish?

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1971888] Re: Can not ssh to github.com or gitlab.com when upgrading to 22.04

2022-05-09 Thread Paride Legovini
Hello Alvaro and thanks for this bug report. We have many systems running Jammy and they're able to connect to GitHub with no issues. I also tried with GitLab.com and it works just fine. This is not to dismiss your report, but there's clearly something else involved in the problem you're hitting.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1971523] Re: Static build does not work for libmnl (-lmnl)

2022-05-05 Thread Paride Legovini
Hello Lars and thanks for this bug report. I can confirm this: libmnl- dev 1.0.4-2 installs /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libmnl.a while libmnl-dev 1.0.4-3 does not. I tracked this down to this Debian packaging change (see the debian/libmnl-dev.install diff):

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1969960] [NEW] Jammy's /etc/os-release missing LTS string in VERSION

2022-04-22 Thread Paride Legovini
. ** Affects: base-files (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Paride Legovini (paride) Status: Triaged ** Changed in: base-files (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Paride Legovini (paride) ** Changed in: base-files (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1968876] Re: ssh-agent: Error connecting to agent: Connection refused

2022-04-19 Thread Paride Legovini
I tried reproducing the issue on a Rpi4, cloning a repository via ssh using pubkey authentication with a rsa2048 key stored in ssh-agent, it worked fine. If you believe there's actually a bug here please provide some steps we can follow to reproduce the issue from a clean Jammy system, and we'll

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1968876] Re: ssh-agent: Error connecting to agent: Connection refused

2022-04-14 Thread Paride Legovini
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968876 Title: ssh-agent: Error connecting to agent:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1968876] Re: ssh-agent: Error connecting to agent: Connection refused

2022-04-14 Thread Paride Legovini
Also: you mention that "ssh agent crashes". What do you see exactly to be able to tell it's a crash and not some other authentication or key handling issue? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1968876] Re: ssh-agent: Error connecting to agent: Connection refused

2022-04-14 Thread Paride Legovini
Hello testpi and thanks for this bug report. Can you reproduce this issue from a fresh install on the Raspberry, and attempting a simple ssh login instead of a git clone? Something on these lines: - ssh-keygen cp ~/.ssh/id_rsa.pub ~/.ssh/authorized_keys killall ssh-agent || true eval

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1712223] Re: open-vm-tools does not work under wayland

2022-03-21 Thread Paride Legovini
Hello Alexander, note that Xorg is available in Jammy both as the native graphical session and via xwayland. On this bug report: could you please elaborate more on what exactly happens? In particular could you guide us into reproducing the problem on a clean Jammy install, making clear "what

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1872145] Re: explicit key offered after all agent keys, auth can fail before explicit key used

2022-03-21 Thread Paride Legovini
Still no activity in the upstream issue, however I think OpenSSH 8.9 offers a mechanism that can help avoiding hitting MaxAuthTries in some cases: "destination constraints", see documentation for -h in ssh- add(1). AIUI constraining should limit the number of keys tried against a given host,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1965076] Re: rsync --update incorrectly reports file "is newer" than itself

2022-03-17 Thread Paride Legovini
I see your point; my suggestion here is to file a bug upstream with your findings: https://github.com/WayneD/rsync/issues I don't think this should be tackled on the Ubuntu side, especially given that the issue is really minor and unlikely to affect a significant amount of users. As you say

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1965076] Re: rsync --update incorrectly reports file "is newer" than itself

2022-03-17 Thread Paride Legovini
Hello Ian and thanks for this bug report. My question here is: is this actually a bug? The manpage for --update says: This forces rsync to skip any files which exist on the destination and have a modified time that is newer It seems sensible to me to make this a '>=' comparison, and not a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1964642] Re: Packer virtualbox ssh can't connect to unattended Ubuntu 20.04.1/2/3/4 but can connect to Ubuntu 20.4

2022-03-17 Thread Paride Legovini
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964642 Title: Packer virtualbox ssh can't connect to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1964642] Re: Packer virtualbox ssh can't connect to unattended Ubuntu 20.04.1/2/3/4 but can connect to Ubuntu 20.4

2022-03-17 Thread Paride Legovini
Hello Barto, If I understand it correctly you can create working images using 20.04 ISOs *right now*, but with the exact same tooling images created with 20.04.x ISOs do not work. I think you have been clear about this, but it is of course very important to know that the only moving part is the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1778073] Re: dnsmasq and resolvconf hangs on start

2022-03-03 Thread Paride Legovini
** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu) Assignee: Paride Legovini (paride) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1778073 Title: dnsm

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1931104] Re: Test of dogtag-pki is failing on s390x due to LTO

2022-02-18 Thread Paride Legovini
I reviewed this issue again and I don't think we're ready to drop the "Disable LTO on s390x" delta for now. There are newer NSS upstream versions worth testing but in Ubuntu we're still at 3.68 for now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1959365] Re: openssh-client tab completion faills if shopt failglob is set

2022-01-31 Thread Paride Legovini
I can reproduce this: $ shopt -s failglob $ ssh bash: no match: /etc/ssh/ssh_config.d/*.conf but I believe the bugs belongs to the bash-completion package. ** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed **

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1959488] Re: Error loading key ".../id_ed25519.pub": error in libcrypto

2022-01-31 Thread Paride Legovini
Hello Thomas and thanks for your bug report. I have no problems adding ed25519 keys to ssh-agent on a Jammy system. Could you please try the following steps, which may help identifying where the problem is? Thanks! $ mkdir /tmp/ed25519test $ cd /tmp/ed25519test $ echo $SSH_AUTH_SOCK

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1938144] Re: monitor_read: unpermitted request 48 on server while attempting GSSAPI key exchange

2022-01-27 Thread Paride Legovini
That PR is still pending review, no movements there unfortunately. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1938144 Title: monitor_read: unpermitted request 48 on

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1956954] Re: Can't load seccomp filter

2022-01-24 Thread Paride Legovini
Hi, glad to know it worked. There is some heuristics behind the default bpf_jit_limit [1], it isn't a simple hardcoded value. We may discuss bumping the default in Ubuntu, but I don't think that's a good idea: the in-kernel heuristics has certainly been well thought, and just bumping the number is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1958453] Re: clamav-freshclam does not upgrade successfuly

2022-01-20 Thread Paride Legovini
Hello and thanks for your bug report. While you hit this issue while upgrading clamav-freshclam, those hashfiles are owned by ucf(1), so I'm reassigning the bug to the ucf package. There isn't really enough information here for a developer to confirm this issue is a bug, or to begin working on

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1956954] Re: Can't load seccomp filter

2022-01-13 Thread Paride Legovini
If you want to change the value without rebooting that's: sudo sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_limit=264241152 Add it to /etc/sysctl.conf if you want to set it automatically at boot, but it's more meaningful to test as you said: wait for the issue to happen and then change the value while the system

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1956954] Re: Can't load seccomp filter

2022-01-13 Thread Paride Legovini
Hi Nino, I found a RedHat bug [1] that describes a similar situation (affected is dhclient on ppc64le, but the error is the same). The suggested workaround is setting net.core.bpf_jit_limit = 262144000 via sysctl. I checked and on amd64 I find net.core.bpf_jit_limit = 264241152 while on

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1946213] Re: strongswan: Fail to build against OpenSSL 3.0

2021-12-08 Thread Paride Legovini
The upstream commit [1] included as a patch in strongswan (5.9.4-1ubuntu2) should be released in strongswan 5.9.5 [2]. [1] https://github.com/strongswan/strongswan/commit/b158c08c4b919b878ded10bb57e969ed7b3cabc3 [2] https://github.com/strongswan/strongswan/milestone/3?closed=1 -- You received

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1952918] Re: Please temporarely pull fluidsynth 2.2.4-2 from jammy-proposed

2021-12-01 Thread Paride Legovini
** Description changed: fluidsynth 2.2.4-2 (currently in jammy-proposed) has a SONAME bump:   libfluidsynth2 -> libfluidsynth3 which is a fairly large transition: $ reverse-depends -b -l src:fluidsynth | wc -l 30 This list of reverse-dependencies has exactly one package in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1952918] [NEW] Please temporarely pull fluidsynth 2.2.4-2 from jammy-proposed

2021-12-01 Thread Paride Legovini
Public bug reported: fluidsynth 2.2.4-2 (currently in jammy-proposed) has a SONAME bump:   libfluidsynth2 -> libfluidsynth3 which is a fairly large transition: $ reverse-depends -b -l src:fluidsynth | wc -l 30 This list of reverse-dependencies has exactly one package in common with other two

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871465] Re: ssh_config(5) contains outdated information

2021-11-18 Thread Paride Legovini
As the fix is in Jammy I think we can mark the devel task as Fix Released. I doubt this is SRU material as the impact of the bug is really low; maybe it could be done with a staged upload [1]. I'm marking the SRU tasks as Triaged as the bug is well understood. [1]

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1946213] Re: strongswan: Fail to build against OpenSSL 3.0

2021-11-17 Thread Paride Legovini
** Changed in: strongswan (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946213 Title: strongswan: Fail to build against

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1946213] Re: strongswan: Fail to build against OpenSSL 3.0

2021-11-16 Thread Paride Legovini
Issue #735 has been closed as it's actually an OpenSSL bug (and we already have a task for that). I'm making this track #759 instead. ** Changed in: strongswan Status: New => Unknown ** Changed in: strongswan Remote watch: github.com/strongswan/strongswan/issues #753 =>

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1946213] Re: strongswan: Fail to build against OpenSSL 3.0

2021-11-16 Thread Paride Legovini
With openssl 3.0.0-1ubuntu1~ppa2 the ed25519_fail issue is fixed, but we then hit another (unrelated) test failure. I reported it upstream here: https://github.com/strongswan/strongswan/issues/759 ** Bug watch added: github.com/strongswan/strongswan/issues #759

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1946213] Re: strongswan: Fail to build against OpenSSL 3.0

2021-11-15 Thread Paride Legovini
Thanks! I'll re-test the strongswan build once 3.0.0-1ubuntu1~ppa2 gets published in the PPA. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946213 Title: strongswan:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1946213] Re: strongswan: Fail to build against OpenSSL 3.0

2021-11-15 Thread Paride Legovini
Apparently this is an OpenSSL 3 bug uncovered by the strongswan testsuite: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/17017 It's actively being worked on upstream. ** Also affects: openssl (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Bug watch added: github.com/openssl/openssl/issues

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1778073] Re: dnsmasq and resolvconf hangs on start

2021-11-10 Thread Paride Legovini
** Tags removed: server-next -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1778073 Title: dnsmasq and resolvconf hangs on start Status in dnsmasq package in Ubuntu:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1949535] Re: X-forwarding no longer works

2021-11-08 Thread Paride Legovini
Hello Robert and thanks for your bug report. You wrote: > I recently upgraded my debian shell server to Bullet but I'm not sure I get what you mean. Is it a Debian system or an Ubuntu system? If it's upgrading a Debian system that broke your setup then there's nothing I can see that points to a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1785383] Re: missing EDNS0 record confuses systemd-resolved

2021-10-14 Thread Paride Legovini
Bionic verification done according to the [Test Plan]. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1896251] Re: rsync --delete-missing-args fails with "error: protocol incompatibility"

2021-10-14 Thread Paride Legovini
** Tags added: server-todo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsync in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896251 Title: rsync --delete-missing-args fails with "error: protocol incompatibility" Status

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1896251] Re: rsync --delete-missing-args fails with "error: protocol incompatibility"

2021-10-14 Thread Paride Legovini
Still a valid bug for Bionic and Focal, updating the other tasks. ** Changed in: rsync (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: rsync (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: Triaged => Won't Fix ** Changed in: rsync (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in: rsync

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1785383] Re: missing EDNS0 record confuses systemd-resolved

2021-10-14 Thread Paride Legovini
I retriggered those two tests and they passed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1785383 Title: missing EDNS0 record confuses systemd-resolved Status in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1641919] Re: hibernation has stopped working in 16.10 Yakkety Yak

2021-10-13 Thread Paride Legovini
This bug was last reported happening in Ubuntu 17.10, which is EOL, while Ubuntu 16.04 reached end of standard support, and this bug doesn't qualify for it. I'm marking this bug report as Incomplete for the moment; if anybody can confirm that Ubuntu >= Bionic is still affected by this please

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1659950] Re: rsync -u --inplace --partial -a can't resume transfer

2021-10-07 Thread Paride Legovini
Thanks Nahuel! We're doing some retriage and cleanup of old bugs, and I stumbled on this one :-) I linked your upstream bug report to this bug, Launchpad will keep its status in sync. You may have noticed that I didn't set the status of this bug to Wontfix but to Opinion ("Doesn't fit with the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1659950] Re: rsync -u --inplace --partial -a can't resume transfer

2021-10-06 Thread Paride Legovini
** Also affects: rsync via https://github.com/WayneD/rsync/issues/236 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsync in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1659950

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1659950] Re: rsync -u --inplace --partial -a can't resume transfer

2021-10-06 Thread Paride Legovini
Hello Nahuel, According to your reasoning I assume the "root" issue should still affect the versions of rsync shipped with the newer Ubuntu releases. I agree it would be nice for the behavior you describe to be documented, but I don't think it's worth patching the Ubuntu package for it. I

  1   2   >