** Changed in: ubuntu-cdimage
Assignee: alvaro (alvariturituro) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871268
Title:
Installation fails due to us
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Assignee: star hvh (starhvh) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871268
Title:
Installation fails due to useless i
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Groovy)
Status: Incomplete => Triaged
** Changed in: ubuntu-cdimage
Assignee: ahmedtarek (ahmedtarek156) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Bionic)
Assignee: ahmedtarek (ahmedtarek156) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Assignee:
** Tags removed: regression-update
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909791
Title:
Pulseaudio profiles not available (analouge stereo) so no sound
Status
** Changed in: ubuntu-cdimage
Assignee: Pedro Tavares (cantattore) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871268
Title:
Installation fails due to
> So there should not have been any 32/64-bit conflict; something appears to
> have
> happened on your system to corrupt the changelog.Debian.gz file, or maybe
> mismatched versions of your 32 and 64 libudev1 packages were installed.
Apt should be enforcing that the versions of the i386 and amd64
Hello Tw1ce, or anyone else affected,
Accepted tzdata into groovy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/2020f-
0ubuntu0.20.10 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https
Hello Tw1ce, or anyone else affected,
Accepted tzdata into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/2020f-
0ubuntu0.20.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https:
Hello Tw1ce, or anyone else affected,
Accepted tzdata into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/2020f-
0ubuntu0.18.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https
Hello Tw1ce, or anyone else affected,
Accepted tzdata into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/2020f-
0ubuntu0.16.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https
The verification of the Stable Release Update for tzdata has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a r
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: Fix Released => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871268
Title:
Installation fails due to useless
Hello bugproxy, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gzip into groovy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gzip/1.10-2ubuntu1.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki
** Changed in: ubuntu-cdimage
Assignee: Daham Soysa (dahamsoysa) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871268
Title:
Installation fails due to u
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Hunter Temple (xdieagainx) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871268
Title:
Installation fails due to u
On January 24, 2021 12:12:19 AM PST, rew <1871...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
>Guys. What I don't get is that it is 2021 now, this bug has been
>reported (in 2019)
It was not reported in 2019, it was reported in 2020.
The bug did not affect Ubuntu 20.04 at GA release time. The bug was
noticed
** Changed in: ubuntu-cdimage
Assignee: Thanh Nguyen (32nguyen) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871268
Title:
Installation fails due to us
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Hamid Heravi (hamid-heravi) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871268
Title:
Installation fails due to
** Changed in: ubuntu-cdimage
Assignee: davi gouvea santos (davi33) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871268
Title:
Installation fails due t
If the target you're bootstrapping is Debian, and the failure is inside
the chroot, this wouldn't be a bug in the Ubuntu pam package. It might
be a bug in the Ubuntu version of fakechroot, which is where the Debian
bug you linked you was assigned.
--
You received this bug notification because yo
** Changed in: ubuntu-cdimage
Assignee: jacqueline fairgrieve (jac9) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871268
Title:
Installation fails due
Hello errors.ubuntu.com, or anyone else affected,
Accepted software-properties into groovy-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source
/software-properties/0.99.3.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing th
Hello errors.ubuntu.com, or anyone else affected,
Accepted software-properties into focal-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-
properties/0.98.9.4 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing thi
This is not the wrong place. This is where resolv.conf is expected to
point on recent versions of Ubuntu.
** Changed in: resolvconf (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to resol
The error in your log is:
Preparing to unpack .../base-files_11ubuntu5.3_amd64.deb ...
Warning: Stopping motd-news.service, but it can still be activated by:
motd-news.timer
mv: error while loading shared libraries:
+��g�ԇm^L:s�0��^Sš�p�^O�^G�{|��UTd���f�^S�z�"�-{��hk�
0^W&^LR�p�@�^GZ��y^X� Inc
** Project changed: ubuntubudgie => ubuntu-cdimage
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871268
Title:
Installation fails due to useless immediate configuration erro
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Assignee: metin bağdat (metinbagdat) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871268
Title:
Installation fails due to u
The names of the timezones as presented in the installer aren't managed
by ubiquity, they're inherited from the tzdata upstream. Reassigning to
the correct package for this bug; however, this is not something Ubuntu
is likely to deviate from the upstream on, so discussion regarding the
preferred E
It's fine for us to disallow fully-numeric usernames (including octal
and hex syntax).
It would be inappropriate, especially in SRU, to change the policy to
restrict other usernames that happen to begin with a digit.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch
Override component to main
systemd-container 237-3ubuntu10.48 in bionic amd64:
universe/admin/optional/100% -> main
systemd-container 237-3ubuntu10.48 in bionic arm64:
universe/admin/optional/100% -> main
systemd-container 237-3ubuntu10.48 in bionic armhf:
universe/admin/optional/100% -> main
sy
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: Fix Committed => In Progress
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Hirsute)
Status: Fix Committed => In Progress
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Impish)
Status: Fix Committed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because
** Tags removed: regression-update
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ibus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1937922
Title:
gtk4 not built for i386
Status in ibus package in Ubuntu:
Incomplete
Bug
"regression-update" is a tag for SRUs, not appropriate here.
Otherwise, nothing in this bug report has flagged it to the attention of
the ubuntu-archive team, who are the only people that can add packages
to the i386 whitelist. The general process we've been using is to ask
folks on #ubuntu-relea
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pam in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1659719
Title:
ssh can't call a binary from a snap without t
Hello bugproxy, or anyone else affected,
Accepted openssl into hirsute-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/1.1.1j-1ubuntu3.2 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
htt
Hello Dan, or anyone else affected,
Accepted openssl into hirsute-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/1.1.1j-1ubuntu3.2 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://
Hello bugproxy, or anyone else affected,
Accepted openssl into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.5 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https
Hello bugproxy, or anyone else affected,
Accepted openssl into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.10
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Hello Dimitri, or anyone else affected,
Accepted openssl into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.20 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
http
The verification of the Stable Release Update for openssl has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
Public bug reported:
50-motd-news is shipped in base-files and uses curl but cannot depend on
it. curl is not included by default on desktop installs. It'd be better
if wget was used instead of curl to get the news from motd.ubuntu.com.
This is not trivial to implement, the script uses several ad
You should not be installing use packages on an Ubuntu system. These
packages are only for use in the debian-installer environment.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net
*udeb, not use, thanks autocorrect
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1921518
Title:
OpenSSL "double free" error
Status in openssl package in Ubuntu:
Incomp
Ubuntu does not use shutdown from sysvinit. If this is a bug in
sysvinit's implementation of shutdown, then it is invalid in Ubuntu.
Are you in fact using this shutdown, or are you using the one from
systemd?
** Changed in: sysvinit (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this
** Changed in: netplan.io (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Simon Chopin (schopin)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940635
Title:
systemd-networkd fai
unity-control-center depends on indicator-sound. Either:
- indicator-sound needs its build-dependency fixed; or
- unity-control-center needs to drop its dependency on indicator-sound; or
- both of these packages need to be removed for impish.
** Also affects: unity-control-center (Ubuntu)
Impo
I've reviewed the history here; libffi8 has been in impish-proposed
since June 30. So this is not something that requires a freeze
exception, just follow-through on the migration.
** Changed in: libffi (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you
working on fixing this, but please note that libffi8 is only in impish-
proposed. You should not be installing packages from impish-proposed.
** Changed in: libffi (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Critical
** Changed in: libffi (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Steve Langasek (
Assignee: Steve Langasek (vorlon) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libffi in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943312
Title:
dependency problems of version 3.4.2-1ubuntu3
Status in lib
We are in feature freeze so won't be getting libxcrypt this cycle, and
we should be merging pam at the start of the next cycle. So there
doesn't appear to be a reason to cherry-pick here.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is sub
> recieved the dpkg error messages above.
Which dpkg error messages, specifically?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libffi in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943312
Title:
dependency problems of ver
ssage.
> Dpkg (via root shell) finds nothing end exits.
> apt --fix-broken finds nothing and shows all packages up to date as of
> 0700 (US, Central) this morning.
> Thanks for trying to help.
Ok, then the remaining issues are unrelated to the package dependency
problem that was
Ok so it turns out I misread this: the upload to Debian was in June, but
this was only synced to impish on Sep 10. And while it's not an soname
transition in the usual sense, it is a new upstream version, which we
have reports of regressing the desktop. Yes this needs to be reviewed
with respect
Currently nothing to be sponsored, so unsubscribing the team. Tony, if
you want to provide a matching patch for SRU to the stable series,
please feel free to resubscribe ubuntu-sponsors once it's available.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded pac
I have confirmed that the updated evince, without an updated apparmor,
fails in lunar with this error on stderr from evince:
internal error, please report: running "chromium" failed: open
/var/lib/snapd/inhibit/chromium.lock: permission denied
that looks sufficient to me to move forward with this
Hello Olivier, or anyone else affected,
Accepted apparmor into lunar-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/3.0.8-1ubuntu2.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https
Hello dm, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cups into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/2.4.1op1-1ubuntu4.5 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.ub
Hello Timo, or anyone else affected,
Accepted mesa-amber into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa-
amber/21.3.9-0ubuntu1~22.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Hello wieczyk, or anyone else affected,
Accepted distro-info into focal-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/distro-
info/0.23ubuntu1.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
h
Mauricio, this SRU is still waiting for an answer to
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-
linux/+bug/2019856/comments/17
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.n
An upload of gstreamer-editing-services1.0 to jammy-proposed has been
rejected from the upload queue for the following reason: "not covered by
GNOME exception; includes distro changes not documented in changelog".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seed
Thanks, I will mark these SRUs as block-proposed-$release and accept
them now.
> It'd be interesting to set a time frame - if we don't have any of those
> happening in, let's say, 6 months, would it be fair to re-consider the SRU?
In my view this would still not be an SRU that should be released
Hello Joao, or anyone else affected,
Accepted util-linux into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-
linux/2.37.2-4ubuntu3.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
ht
Hello Joao, or anyone else affected,
Accepted util-linux into lunar-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-
linux/2.38.1-4ubuntu1.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
ht
Hello Roxana, or anyone else affected,
Accepted initramfs-tools into lunar-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-
tools/0.142ubuntu2.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package
Hello Roxana, or anyone else affected,
Accepted initramfs-tools into jammy-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-
tools/0.140ubuntu13.3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new packag
Hello Loïc, or anyone else affected,
Accepted initramfs-tools into lunar-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-
tools/0.142ubuntu2.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Hello Loïc, or anyone else affected,
Accepted initramfs-tools into jammy-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-
tools/0.140ubuntu13.3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Hello Sergio, or anyone else affected,
Accepted openldap into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/2.5.15+dfsg-0ubuntu0.22.04.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Reviewing this as part of the Sponsor process, but with my SRU Team hat
on.
The only releases python2.7 is present in which are still eligible for
SRUs are focal, jammy, and kinetic.
All of these releases post-date the demotion of python2.7 to universe.
No one should be deploying new code on pyt
ining changes:
- d/rules: Disable lto, to regain dep on roken, otherwise
dependencies on amd64 are different than i386 resulting in
different files on amd64 and i386.
-- Steve Langasek Tue, 02 May 2023
09:56:10 +0200
heimdal (7.8.git20221117.28daf24+dfsg-1ubuntu1) lunar;
It is a legitimate bug.
"Legitimate bug" is not the threshold for an SRU. There are many
legitimate bugs that we decline to fix.
> Stable release updates are automatically recommended to a very large number
> of users, and so it is critically important to treat them with great caution.
> Therefo
** Tags added: regression-security
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsyslog in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2011574
Title:
rsyslogd: /dev/console permission errors
Status in rsyslog package in Ubu
I can confirm this behavior here.
I've found I can work around it by unsetting KRB5CCNAME in the client
environment.
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you
The purpose of the size check in u-r-u is to ensure that we don't fail
mid-upgrade due to lack of disk space on /boot.
But AIUI that's not what happened here to the bug submitter; this is an
upgrade within an Ubuntu series between individual kernel packages.
We should NOT have a check in u-r-u th
Hello caleb, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ufw into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ufw/0.36.1-4ubuntu0.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.ubu
Hello caleb, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ufw into lunar-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ufw/0.36.1-4.1ubuntu0.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.u
Hello caleb, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ufw into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ufw/0.36-6ubuntu1.1 in
a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.ubunt
Hello dm, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cups into lunar-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/2.4.2-3ubuntu2.3
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.ubunt
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 07:24:37AM -, Moritz Carmesin wrote:
> Unsetting KRB5CCNAME breaks the Kerbreros based login, so it is really
> just an emergency workaround.
You can unset it for just the ssh process that needs non-Kerberos login.
--
You received this bug notification because you are
This bubbled back up in the sponsorship queue due to the recent comment
activity. However, you say:
> this "fix" just eliminates harmless warnings, which is not worth
backporting to old releases.
It appears there is nothing here to be sponsored currently, so I am
unsubscribing the ubuntu-sponsor
Actually, it popped back up in our queue because Christian had targeted
the bug to the stable releases - not because of the comment activity.
In any case, nothing currently here for sponsorship.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which
> Shall we assume on both desktops and servers that an openssl update always
> requires
> a reboot? At least until we do anything related to needrestart.
For server we should not assume this, because needrestart is already
integrated in the server.
--
You received this bug notification because
There has been a discussion between the several engineering teams
involved regarding a path forward on this bug. It's acknowledged that
this is a regression which breaks the statement of user intent expressed
by setting the Unattended-Upgrade::Automatic-Reboot option. However,
this is an uncommon
the zfs dependency in question is systemd-udev-settle.
Sep 1 17:49:20 xubuntu udevadm[1064]: systemd-udev-settle.service is
deprecated. Please fix zfs-load-module.service, zfs-import-cache.service
not to pull it in.
(heh)
Sep 1 17:49:20 xubuntu systemd[1]: systemd-udev-settle.service: start
o
** Package changed: console-setup (Ubuntu) => initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2034065
Title:
package linux-image-6.2.0-32-g
Public bug reported:
We have been having very frequent image build failures in the livecd-
rootfs autopkgtests, due to a 'debugging output' invocation of blkid.
It's not clear when these started - they started before the merge of the
new version of util-linux, so it doesn't appear to be a blkid re
Well no, Ubuntu is not undecided. We use the systemd implementation of
the resolvconf interfaces now, which works directly with resolved. If
there are features missing there, a task should be opened against
systemd to discuss.
** Changed in: resolvconf (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invali
The error in the logs is:
Use of uninitialized value in string eq at
/usr/share/perl5/Debconf/FrontEnd/Passthrough.pm line 227, line 19.
Use of uninitialized value $ret in string eq at
/usr/share/perl5/Debconf/FrontEnd/Passthrough.pm line 237, line 19.
Use of uninitialized value $_[1] in join
The release of this SRU has been rolled back in jammy because of bug
#2035406 which appears to be a regression introduced in the new version
of systemd.
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Fix Released => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
The release of this SRU has been rolled back in jammy because of bug
#2035406 which appears to be a regression introduced in the new version
of systemd.
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Fix Released => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
The release of this SRU has been rolled back in jammy because of bug
#2035406 which appears to be a regression introduced in the new version
of systemd.
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Fix Released => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
The release of this SRU has been rolled back in jammy because of bug
#2035406 which appears to be a regression introduced in the new version
of systemd.
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Fix Released => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
The release of this SRU has been rolled back in jammy because of bug
#2035406 which appears to be a regression introduced in the new version
of systemd.
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Fix Released => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
The release of this SRU has been rolled back in jammy because of bug
#2035406 which appears to be a regression introduced in the new version
of systemd.
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Fix Released => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
The release of this SRU has been rolled back in jammy because of bug
#2035406 which appears to be a regression introduced in the new version
of systemd.
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Fix Released => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
The release of this SRU has been rolled back in jammy because of bug
#2035406 which appears to be a regression introduced in the new version
of systemd.
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Fix Released => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
The release of this SRU has been rolled back in jammy because of bug
#2035406 which appears to be a regression introduced in the new version
of systemd.
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Fix Released => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
The release of this SRU has been rolled back in jammy because of bug
#2035406 which appears to be a regression introduced in the new version
of systemd.
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Fix Released => Triaged
** Tags removed: verification-done-jammy
** Tags added: verificatio
Marking verification-failed for jammy as this is the only patch touching
udev rules in this SRU and the likely source of the regression
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.
801 - 900 of 3358 matches
Mail list logo
