Trusty has dnsmasq 2.68-1. Looking at the buildlog I don't see
HAVE_DNSSEC being defined on the compiler command line.
gcc -g -O2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat
-Werror=format-security -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wall -W -DHAVE_DBUS
-DHAVE_CONNTRACK -DLOCALEDIR='"/usr/share/loca
The proper way for the admin to stop /etc/resolv.conf from being updated
by resolvconf is for him or her to remove the symbolic link
/etc/resolv.conf -> ../run/resolvconf/resolv.conf. The resolvconf
program only ever writes to the target of that symlink. Thus, in the
absence of that link, resolvcon
I wrote:
> The proper way for the admin to stop /etc/resolv.conf from
> being updated by resolvconf is for him or her to remove the
> symbolic link /etc/resolv.conf -> ../run/resolvconf/resolv.conf.
HeinMueck wrote:
> what you describe as the proper way will not work at all
>- take a look at /etc/
> Is dnsmasq getting its DNS server information from resolvconf,
> which in turn gets it from /etc/network/interfaces? Or, does
> dnsmasq take what it likes from /etc/network/interfaces directly,
> discarding the rest?
1. If you have only the dnsmasq-base and network-manager packages installed
t
> I see that your change has made it to vivid
\o/
> undesirable behavior: all DNS queries go to the VPN nameservers
That is in most cases the *desired* behavior, since only the VPN
nameservers have name information about both the VPN and the Internet.
Also, under what circumstances do you not t
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1385010 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1385010
> did not know I am stepping on your toe here
No toes being stepped on here.
> had to take care of this, so I generate the resolv.conf from a package
- no link anymore
OK. Leave the resolvconf package ins
>>> undesirable behavior: all DNS queries go to the VPN nameservers
>> That is in most cases the *desired* behavior
> On today's systems, I don't think so. [...] Ubuntu run a dnsmasq instance...
> Rather than overwrite this...
You are right in saying that when there is a local forwarding nameserve
Returning to the main issue...
> Could this fix be considered for trusty-updates?
The patch is very simple and applying it involves little risk, so I'd
say yes.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to resolvconf in U
101 - 108 of 108 matches
Mail list logo