[Touch-packages] [Bug 2044104] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2024-01-31 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From peter.oberparlei...@de.ibm.com 2024-01-31 04:28 EDT--- (In reply to comment #22) > Then `/sbin/chzdev --is-author-of-udev-rule "$rules"` should produce the > correct exit code. The tool that generates the udev rules should be queried > (is that chzdev or something else?) or

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1833322] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2024-02-17 Thread bugproxy
Now? CPUs are faster; if you disable irqtune, you can observe in /proc/interrupts that various device interrupts are still sent to CPUs other than CPU0, they just don't go ping-ponging around between all of them like they do with irqtune. A big difference compared to the early days, for example f

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1974056] Re: iptables-1.8.7/iptables/tests/shell/testcases/nft-only/0009-needless-bitwise_0 fails on s390x

2022-05-25 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2022-05-25 04:39 EDT--- Description by Canonical (LP#1974056): command17 FAIL stderr: W: [FAILED] ././testcases/nft-only/0009-needless- bitwise_0: expected 0 but got 1 this can be reproduced with: pull-lp-source iptables cd iptables-1.8.7/ chmod +x

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1977493] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2022-06-03 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From pp...@de.ibm.com 2022-06-03 08:33 EDT--- I have already run the command do-release-upgrade. At the end of the upgrade I could see "upgrade completed" but there were errors. Than I rebooted the system. I attach the sources.list file an the output of the commands. root@tux

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1977493] sources.list file

2022-06-03 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment (attachment only) From pp...@de.ibm.com 2022-06-03 08:34 EDT--- ** Attachment added: "sources.list file" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1977493/+attachment/5594615/+files/sources.list -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1961427] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2022-06-15 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2022-06-15 14:00 EDT--- I don't really remember, so I retested. 20.04: 1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu1.3 fixes the problem (I had to install the .deb file manually with dpkg). 22.04: 1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu9.1 fixes the problem. -- You received this bug notification be

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1961427] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2022-07-07 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From mario.h...@de.ibm.com 2022-07-07 07:55 EDT--- (In reply to comment #13) > We just realized that we had DFLTCC support in 20.04, so we need to put this > fix there as well. So this still gets fixed in Focal (20.04). -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1959469] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2022-07-12 Thread bugproxy
An updated test package was created for kinetic and build with the help of this PPA: https://launchpad.net/~fheimes/+archive/ubuntu/lp1959469 for the major architectures. This incl. building and executing the testsuite too, which results in all tests passed: ... All 112 test

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1961427] Re: zlib: compressBound() returns an incorrect result on z15

2022-07-14 Thread bugproxy
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin2110 ** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin20045 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961427 Title: zlib: compressBound() returns

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1961427] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2022-07-20 Thread bugproxy
Due to the fact that now in total 3 packages are involved and two libraries (zlib and htslib, well and the libraries included in bedtools), this will cause a bigger transition (especially for htslib in focal, and zlib itself on all affected Ubuntu releases). (The transition(s) need to be planned

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1961427] reverse dependencies, gathered on focal.txt

2022-07-20 Thread bugproxy
Default Comment by Bridge ** Attachment added: "reverse dependencies, gathered on focal.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961427/+attachment/5604505/+files/reverse_dependencies%2C_gathered_on_focal.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1961427] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2022-07-21 Thread bugproxy
Since the zlib package progressed meanwhile due to a security update, I created new debdiffs for jammy and kinetic - see debdiffs_J_K.tar.gz. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchp

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1961427] zlib debdiffs for jammy and kinetic (latest)

2022-07-21 Thread bugproxy
Default Comment by Bridge ** Attachment added: "zlib debdiffs for jammy and kinetic (latest)" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961427/+attachment/5604516/+files/debdiffs_J_K.tar.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscr

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1961427] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2022-07-21 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2022-07-21 05:51 EDT--- Comment on attachment 153124 zlib_1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu7_to_zlib_1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu8 (jammy) this is obsolete - has been replaced by newer version --- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2022-07-21 05:52 EDT--- Comment o

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1982583] Re: zlib CRC32 optimization for s390x works only in a static library

2022-07-22 Thread bugproxy
** Tags added: architecture-s39064 bugnameltc-199129 severity-high targetmilestone-inin--- -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982583 Title: zlib CRC32 optimizati

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1437375] Re: [udev] Adding "Austin" adapter to Ubuntu partition take over system network interface

2022-07-23 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From cdead...@us.ibm.com 2022-07-23 09:55 EDT--- Re-open to move to diff. component. #=#=# 2015-04-23 10:27:57 (CDT) #=#=# New Fix_Potential = [GSI_HDW] #=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=# Any updates on this issue? Thanks! Some "sync" issue between CQ and bugzilla. Please

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1961427] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2022-08-01 Thread bugproxy
(While looking into libbio-samtools-perl and other related packages, I found that there is yet another htslib bundled in tabix - which is not great. But this at at least already the needed patch.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, whic

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1974115] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2022-09-01 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2022-09-01 04:48 EDT--- @Canonical: Hi Brian, the test / verification on our side will be delayed as our SME is out on vacation. We should have an answer by the end of next week. Thanks -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1961427] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2022-09-05 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2022-09-05 11:31 EDT--- zlib1g-dev s390x 1:1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu9.1 and zlib1g s390x 1:1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu9.1 pass all of my tests. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib i

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1974115] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2022-09-13 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From andreas.kreb...@de.ibm.com 2022-09-13 10:40 EDT--- I've installed binutils 2.38-4ubuntu2 on jammy. With that the -march=z16 option is accepted by 'as'. So looks good to me. No idea about the regressions mentioned above. I don't see how an IBM zSystems only patch can affec

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2075204] Re: gdb on s390x chokes on divide-by-zero from chaos-marmosets

2024-08-05 Thread bugproxy
** Tags added: architecture-s39064 bugnameltc-208023 severity-high targetmilestone-inin--- -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdb in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075204 Title: gdb on s390x chokes on

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2075567] Re: zlib fails to build on s390x on oracular with gcc 14

2024-08-07 Thread bugproxy
** Tags added: architecture-s39064 bugnameltc-208475 severity-high targetmilestone-inin--- -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075567 Title: zlib fails to build o

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2075567] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2024-08-07 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2024-08-07 12:48 EDT--- Thanks Ilya for your quick analysis, finding out that this is a compiler issue. Stefan will send a patch to the GCC mailing list. We will post a link here once it's available. -- You received this bug notification because you

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2075567] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2024-08-09 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2024-08-09 05:47 EDT--- Thanks Stefan, for your GCC patch posted at: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-August/659923.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribe

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2075567] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2024-08-15 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2024-08-15 04:26 EDT--- Stefan has committed the patches: master: https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=e8a7142a697c5d2673adea33ba23af82a89c9559 gcc-14: https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=e903ada5e8881acec734eb3f89c3644bbd8da7e9 -- You

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2075567] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2024-08-15 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2024-08-15 09:00 EDT--- I don't think the other patch is necessary. Stefan backported only https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=e903ada5e8881acec734eb3f89c3644bbd8da7e9 to gcc-14. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992178] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2024-08-15 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From cha...@us.ibm.com 2024-08-15 16:17 EDT--- What is the status of this bug? Looking at: > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/25091#issuecomment-1695289642 > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/25091#issuecomment-1398091323 It looks like a couple of commits were

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2075567] Re: zlib fails to build on s390x on oracular with gcc 14

2024-08-19 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2024-08-19 11:34 EDT--- Thanks everyone for your work! With the fix being verified and released, we can close this bug. ==> Changing status to "CLOSED" ** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin--- ** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin2410 -- You received

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2044104] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2024-09-05 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From mario.h...@de.ibm.com 2024-09-05 04:23 EDT--- The problem seems fixed meanwhile for Oracular (24.10) see here https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/s390-tools Are you thinking of backports for the LTS releases 22.04 and 20.04 ? -- You received this bug notification becaus

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992178] Re: autopkgtest: upstream tests that run in qemu hang on ppc64el

2023-02-14 Thread bugproxy
** Tags added: architecture-ppc64le bugnameltc-201628 severity-medium targetmilestone-inin--- -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992178 Title: autopkgtest: up

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992178] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2023-02-14 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From cha...@us.ibm.com 2023-02-14 17:28 EDT--- Howdy. Adding developers from KVM on Power and Toolchain to our bug but it would be good to understand exactly what IBM needs to look at. For example, you mention a backtrace you see but I don't see that in the bug. Any details yo

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1990379] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2023-10-17 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2023-10-17 10:45 EDT--- Fix has been released to Focal, Jammy and Kinetic. With 22.10 being out of service, we can close the bug. ==> Changing the status to: "CLOSED" -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch se

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992178] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2023-11-20 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From sthou...@in.ibm.com 2023-11-20 03:40 EDT--- Harsh, This issue/bug is reported on Ubuntu 22.04 Distro and hence we cannot track behavior reported in other Distro like fedora though internally Development can check those behaviour. I will ask Jamie if he can pass the machi

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2044104] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2023-11-22 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From peter.oberparlei...@de.ibm.com 2023-11-22 09:17 EDT--- (In reply to comment #19) > This was implemented around 2020, mainly to catch any ccw config changes in > a user friendly way: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892367 > https://i527439087.restricted.launchpadlibrarian

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2037569] Re: udev issues with mantic beta

2023-11-24 Thread bugproxy
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin--- ** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin2310 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037569 Title: udev issues with mantic beta

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2045250] Re: pam_lastlog doesn't handle localtime_r related errors properly

2023-12-05 Thread bugproxy
** Tags added: architecture-s39064 bugnameltc-204450 severity-medium targetmilestone-inin--- -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pam in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045250 Title: pam_lastlog doesn't

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2045250] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2023-12-11 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From holger.deng...@ibm.com 2023-12-11 02:24 EDT--- Even if the problem can be reproduced easier on 32-bit architectures, the architecture doesn't matter at all. If you do a syscall in userspace programs, you have to check the returned value for errors. Period. In my opinion,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1833322] Re: Consider removing irqbalance from default install on desktop images

2024-01-10 Thread bugproxy
** Tags added: architecture-s39064 bugnameltc-204586 severity-medium targetmilestone-inin2404 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1833322 Title: Consider re

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2045250] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2024-01-11 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From holger.deng...@ibm.com 2024-01-11 13:09 EDT--- (In reply to comment #9) > Holger: I can't pretend speaking for the SRU team, but I'd be willing to bet > that having "the fix is trivial" as a test plan would result in the SRU > being trivially rejected :-). @schopin: The AP

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1833322] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2024-01-15 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From cborn...@de.ibm.com 2024-01-15 06:46 EDT--- Just a statement from s390x/IBM Z. For our platform irqbalance makes no sense as our interrupt handling works differently. So we do not need it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch see

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1974056] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2024-01-19 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From wint...@de.ibm.com 2024-01-19 05:42 EDT--- @xnox, @Boris, are there any updates on this? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iptables in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1974056 Ti

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2023545] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2024-01-23 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From grgo.mari...@ibm.com 2024-01-23 03:44 EDT--- The problem is still visible after installing the -proposed package: root:~# dpkg -l | grep openssl ii openssl 3.0.2-0ubuntu1.13 s390xSecure Sockets Layer toolkit - c

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2023545] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2024-01-23 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From grgo.mari...@ibm.com 2024-01-23 03:53 EDT--- After upgrading to Ubuntu 22.04.3 the solution is working and the problem is not visible anymore. Explicit update of the fix is not valid on the older version (22.04.1). -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2023545] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2024-01-23 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From grgo.mari...@ibm.com 2024-01-23 05:09 EDT--- # apt-cache policy libssl3 openssl libssl3: Installed: 3.0.2-0ubuntu1.13 Candidate: 3.0.2-0ubuntu1.13 Version table: *** 3.0.2-0ubuntu1.13 400 400 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports jammy-proposed/main s390x Packages 100 /var/l

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2023545] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2024-01-25 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2024-01-25 07:28 EDT--- Thanks everyone for your work. With the fix being released to -updates, I will close this bug as soon as the status in Launchpad changes to "fix released" -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1916485] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2021-04-22 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From s...@de.ibm.com 2021-04-22 07:23 EDT--- Hi, I've also run some tests on s390x: On Ubuntu 18.04 (bionic) with libseccomp2 2.5.1-1ubuntu1~18.04.1 and linux 4.15.0.142.129: In a systemd-nspawn hirsute container: bash -c "test -x /bin/bash" returns 1 and strace shows: faccess

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1925211] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2021-04-22 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From vineeth.vija...@ibm.com 2021-04-23 01:50 EDT--- ---snip--- --- a/drivers/s390/cio/device.c +++ b/drivers/s390/cio/device.c @@ -1525,8 +1525,7 @@ static int io_subchannel_sch_event(struct subchannel *sch, int process) switch (action) { case IO_SCH_ORPH_UNREG: case IO_SCH_UN

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1916485] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2021-05-03 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-05-03 10:12 EDT--- @Canonical, any updates available here? Many thx in adbvance -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1925211] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2021-05-19 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-05-19 07:18 EDT--- IBM Response: Yes. this makes sense. Previously Canonical reverted the "s390/cio: remove pm support from ccw bus driver" patch because of the issue. Right solution is to unrevert the revert-patch and add "s390/cio: rem

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1929657] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2021-06-10 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From stefan.ra...@de.ibm.com 2021-06-10 03:55 EDT--- Makes me wonder if what we're seeing is a side-effect of --- Comment From stefan.ra...@de.ibm.com 2021-06-10 03:58 EDT--- Makes me wonder whether this could be a side-effect of the interface name, indeed. @Viktor/Nik

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1929657] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2021-06-11 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From stefan.ra...@de.ibm.com 2021-06-11 10:04 EDT--- Talked to Viktor - he didn't think there's much indication that the skewed interface name has any effect. Especially since the interface gets a LL address assigned just fine. -- You received this bug notification because y

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1929657] Re: [Ubuntu 20.4.2] vLan not getting static IP assigned (on s390x)

2021-06-14 Thread bugproxy
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin--- ** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin2004 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929657 Title: [Ubuntu 20.4.2] vLan not ge

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1925211] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2021-06-14 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-06-14 08:34 EDT--- IBM bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released by all requested distros. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1929657] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2021-06-14 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-06-14 11:18 EDT--- Enable udev debug mode: root@ilabg13:~# cat /etc/systemd/system/systemd-udevd.service.d/override.conf [Service] Environment=SYSTEMD_LOG_LEVEL=debug root@ilabg13:~# systemctl daemon-reload && sudo systemctl restart system

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1929657] journalctl udevadm netplan ip

2021-06-14 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment (attachment only) From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-06-14 11:21 EDT--- ** Attachment added: "journalctl udevadm netplan ip" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929657/+attachment/5504535/+files/journalctl_udevadm_netplan_ip.txt.zip -- You received this bug notificati

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1929825] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2021-06-15 Thread bugproxy
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1924794 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1924794 --- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-06-15 03:49 EDT--- IBM Bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released by Canonical -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1929657] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2021-06-15 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-06-15 11:18 EDT--- Enable udev monitor: udevadm --debug monitor --property >> udevadm_monitor.txt Steeps followed to retrieve logs: - Manually remove the IP ip addr del 192.168.171.53/24 dev enP53p0s0.171 - Try to assign ip via netplan r

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1929657] udevadm monitor

2021-06-15 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment (attachment only) From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-06-15 11:48 EDT--- ** Attachment added: "udevadm monitor" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929657/+attachment/5504855/+files/udevadm_monitor.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of U

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1929657] journalctl udev monitor

2021-06-15 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment (attachment only) From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-06-15 11:49 EDT--- ** Attachment added: "journalctl udev monitor" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929657/+attachment/5504856/+files/journalctl_udev_monitor.txt -- You received this bug notification because you a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1929657] network

2021-06-15 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment (attachment only) From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-06-15 11:50 EDT--- ** Attachment added: "network" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929657/+attachment/5504857/+files/network.zip -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seed

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1931725] Re: initramfs-tools & kernel: use zstd as the default compression method

2021-06-16 Thread bugproxy
** Tags added: architecture-s39064 bugnameltc-193300 severity-high targetmilestone-inin2004 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1931725 Title: initramfs

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1931725] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2021-06-16 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From cborn...@de.ibm.com 2021-06-16 07:19 EDT--- FWIW, with Z15 and later we do have a zlib HW accelerator on the chip. So zlib would also be an option - assuming that z15 will be the most common Z pretty soon. >From my checks the HW decompression this was really fast. How doe

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1929657] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2021-06-17 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-06-17 12:14 EDT--- Right now the system is at kernel version: root@ilabg13:~# uname -a Linux ilabg13.tuc.stglabs.ibm.com 5.4.0-73-generic #82-Ubuntu SMP Wed Apr 14 17:29:32 UTC 2021 s390x s390x s390x GNU/Linux And it is a new version ava

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1929657] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2021-06-23 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-06-23 18:19 EDT--- Files content: root@ilabg13:~# cat /etc/systemd/network/10-enP53p0s0.link [Match] MACAddress=82:0c:9b:c9:78:f8 [Link] Name=enP53p0s0 root@ilabg13:~# cat /usr/lib/systemd/network/99-default.link # SPDX-License-Identifie

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1929657] journalctl delay

2021-06-23 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment (attachment only) From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-06-23 18:25 EDT--- ** Attachment added: "journalctl delay" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929657/+attachment/5506551/+files/journalctl_udev_monitor_delay.txt.zip -- You received this bug notification because yo

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1929657] udevadm monitor delay

2021-06-23 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment (attachment only) From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-06-23 18:26 EDT--- ** Attachment added: "udevadm monitor delay" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929657/+attachment/5506552/+files/udevadm_monitor_delay.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1929657] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2021-06-24 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-06-24 11:53 EDT--- Giving it a try without the /etc/systemd/network/ files - Checking that it is empty root@ilabg13:~# ll /etc/systemd/network/ total 8 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Jun 24 08:41 ./ drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 Jun 17 06:18 .

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1929657] udevadm monitor nofiles

2021-06-24 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment (attachment only) From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-06-24 11:57 EDT--- ** Attachment added: "udevadm monitor nofiles" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929657/+attachment/5506750/+files/udevadm_monitor_nofiles.txt -- You received this bug notification because you a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1929657] journalctl no files

2021-06-24 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment (attachment only) From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-06-24 11:57 EDT--- ** Attachment added: "journalctl no files" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929657/+attachment/5506751/+files/journalctl_udev_nofiles.txt.zip -- You received this bug notification because you a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1959408] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2022-04-06 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From andreas.kreb...@de.ibm.com 2022-04-07 02:38 EDT--- After the announcement support for the official machine name z16 has been added to binutils. Please consider picking up the following patch from 2.37 branch: commit e24d2a2d11008aa363366c1087219f3e3405782a (origin/binutil

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1961427] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2022-05-04 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From mario.h...@de.ibm.com 2022-05-04 05:20 EDT--- It seems there is no progress with this issue for a while. What is next? Is the reason for the incompatibility found meanwhile? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, w

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1961427] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2022-05-04 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2022-05-04 08:51 EDT--- Good that this was pinged - it seems that we hit a deadlock here :-) I was waiting on Ubuntu to bump the HTSlib version (or cherry-pick https://github.com/samtools/htslib/pull/1258), where the incompatibility issue is resolved. The o

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1961427] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2022-05-06 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2022-05-06 06:22 EDT--- Here are the originally reported failures: > But I found in "bedtools": > bedtools: bgzf.c:351: bgzf_hopen: Assertion > `compressBound(BGZF_BLOCK_SIZE) < BGZF_MAX_BLOCK_SIZE' failed. test- > intersect.sh: line 201: 1981 Aborted

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1961427] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2022-05-10 Thread bugproxy
Well, that bundled htslib seems to make the situation a bit messy, So my guess is that this should be fixed in bedtools upstream first... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.n

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1961427] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2022-05-10 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2022-05-10 07:14 EDT--- Hi, thanks for looking into this. I'll wait until https://launchpad.net/~fheimes/+archive/ubuntu/lp1961427 finishes the build and try it. In the meantime I've asked the bedtools upstream to cherry-pick the htslib commit: https://gi

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1961427] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2022-05-16 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2022-05-16 06:17 EDT--- With the new combination, bedtools testsuite is green and zlib passes all of my tests too. So it looks good, thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribe

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1959408] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2022-05-18 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2022-05-18 23:07 EDT--- Fix released, hence closing the bug. Status: -> CLOSED -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1959407] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2022-05-18 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2022-05-18 23:17 EDT--- fix verified and released, hence closing the bug. Staus: => CLOSED. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1961427] debdiff_zlib_1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu7_to_zlib_1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu8

2022-03-15 Thread bugproxy
Default Comment by Bridge ** Attachment added: "debdiff_zlib_1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu7_to_zlib_1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu8" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961427/+attachment/5569373/+files/debdiff_zlib_1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu7_to_zlib_1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu8_impish.diff -- You received this bug notification

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1961427] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2022-03-15 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2022-03-15 18:41 EDT--- zlib1g s390x 1:1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu1.3 passes all of my tests on focal, thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launc

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1932010] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2021-10-25 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2021-10-25 05:29 EDT--- Fix is part of impish U21.10, hence closing the bug. IBM BZ status change:->CLOSED -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu. https://

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1929184] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2021-10-25 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2021-10-25 05:40 EDT--- Fix landed in impish, hence closing the bug. IBM BZ status change:->CLOSED -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1951470] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2021-11-19 Thread bugproxy
The steps are fine and do not cause a seg. fault on jammy/22.04, impish/21.10 or hirsute/21.04. But as already assumed it seg. faults on focal/20.04. (This is not kernel related, a wrong package was marked as affected, but if it would have been kernel related, we would have asked to reproduce on

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1951470] Re: webkit javascript segmentation fault

2021-11-21 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From andreas.kreb...@de.ibm.com 2021-11-22 02:30 EDT--- (In reply to comment #10) > This does not look like an Ubuntu system. Linux kernel has wrong version: > "Linux 193438490afd 5.8.15-301.fc33.s390x". Are you sure you are testing it > on Ubuntu image? I just mechanically cop

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1951470] Re: webkit javascript segmentation fault

2021-12-01 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2021-12-01 10:03 EDT--- The bug was fixed in Focal, Impish and Hirsute. Thanks for everybody contributing to fix and verify. IBM Bugzilla status change: -> CLOSED ** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin--- ** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin2004 -- Y

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2017979] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2023-05-11 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From pp...@de.ibm.com 2023-05-11 10:35 EDT--- Is there any update on this? I have a request to update Ubuntu 20.04 to 22.04 but currently it is not possible. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1992178] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2023-06-05 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From sthou...@in.ibm.com 2023-06-06 01:35 EDT--- (In reply to comment #6) > Backtraces are on the upstream bug, eg: > > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/25091#issuecomment-1401824195 > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/25091#issuecomment-1402425787 > > It would

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1974115] Re: [UBUNTU 22.04] BINUTILS: Adding new platform name IBM z16

2022-09-13 Thread bugproxy
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin--- ** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin2204 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1974115 Title: [UBUNTU 22.04] BINUTILS: Ad

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1961427] Re: zlib: compressBound() returns an incorrect result on z15

2022-09-22 Thread bugproxy
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961427 T

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1961427] Re: zlib: compressBound() returns an incorrect result on z15

2022-09-22 Thread bugproxy
** Tags removed: verification-done verification-done-focal ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961427 T

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1961427] Re: zlib: compressBound() returns an incorrect result on z15

2022-09-22 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2022-09-22 08:10 EDT--- zlib1g s390x 1:1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu1.4 passes all of my tests. --- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2022-09-22 08:18 EDT--- @Ilya: thanks a lot for your instant verification on focal! With that, I am updating the tags / key

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1990379] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2022-09-22 Thread bugproxy
However, a chance would be to piggy-back a fix like this with a more severe zlib update that might come up in future. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990379 Tit

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1990379] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2022-09-23 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From ra...@ca.ibm.com 2022-09-23 13:07 EDT--- Hi, I am Eclipse OpenJ9 developer. This issue was exposed by Java Certification Kit running on RHEL 9 on z15+ and impacts all JDK versions (8,11,17, etc.) using system default settings. The JCK failure impacts our ability to certi

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1990379] kinetic patch

2022-09-27 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment on attachment From i...@de.ibm.com 2022-09-27 20:08 EDT--- Here is the patch for kinetic. It's just an one liner. ** Attachment added: "kinetic patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990379/+attachment/5619612/+files/410-lp1990379.patch -- You received this bug notific

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1978129] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2022-09-29 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From manjunath.ma...@ibm.com 2022-09-29 10:33 EDT--- The issue was reproduced on Ubuntu 22.04 ---uname output--- Linux 5.15.0-48-generic #54-Ubuntu SMP Fri Aug 26 13:27:34 UTC 2022 ppc64le ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux ?Steps to recreate --- install the following packages dpkg -i

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1982583] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2022-10-10 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2022-10-10 19:01 EDT--- Thanks! With https://ppa.launchpadcontent.net/fheimes/lp1990379+lp1982583/ubuntu kinetic/main s390x zlib1g s390x 1:1.2.11.dfsg-4.1ubuntu2 the following command: python3 -c 'import zlib; zlib.crc32(b"X"*50)' begins to work

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1982583] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2022-11-22 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2022-11-22 04:52 EDT--- As a comprehensive test plan I would suggest the following: * Run zlib-ng testsuite against Ubuntu zlib. This is possible since https://github.com/zlib-ng/zlib- ng/commit/e63f36b1cf615a81e2cfa2d97fc54a5f493c9c19, the testsuite is qui

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1997579] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2022-11-24 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From christian.r...@de.ibm.com 2022-11-24 12:16 EDT--- Hello Frank, thanks for getting back to me on this. I did freshly install jammy jellyfish on a z/VM guest system. I had updated the package definitions before I tried to install the systemd-coredump package (and attached

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1997579] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2022-11-28 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From christian.r...@de.ibm.com 2022-11-28 12:42 EDT--- Thanks for having a look Frank and Steve. I am all right with closing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1903814] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2021-02-15 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2021-02-15 09:35 EDT--- To me they all look like intermittent problems (timeouts on arm, 404s when installing packages on Intel). Is it possible to simply retrigger those? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seed

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >