--- Comment From peter.oberparlei...@de.ibm.com 2024-01-31 04:28 EDT---
(In reply to comment #22)
> Then `/sbin/chzdev --is-author-of-udev-rule "$rules"` should produce the
> correct exit code. The tool that generates the udev rules should be queried
> (is that chzdev or something else?) or
Now? CPUs are faster; if you disable irqtune, you can observe in
/proc/interrupts that various device interrupts are still sent to CPUs
other than CPU0, they just don't go ping-ponging around between all of
them like they do with irqtune. A big difference compared to the early
days, for example f
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2022-05-25 04:39 EDT---
Description by Canonical (LP#1974056):
command17 FAIL stderr: W: [FAILED] ././testcases/nft-only/0009-needless-
bitwise_0: expected 0 but got 1
this can be reproduced with:
pull-lp-source iptables
cd iptables-1.8.7/
chmod +x
--- Comment From pp...@de.ibm.com 2022-06-03 08:33 EDT---
I have already run the command do-release-upgrade. At the end of the upgrade I
could see "upgrade completed" but there were errors. Than I rebooted the system.
I attach the sources.list file an the output of the commands.
root@tux
--- Comment (attachment only) From pp...@de.ibm.com 2022-06-03 08:34
EDT---
** Attachment added: "sources.list file"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1977493/+attachment/5594615/+files/sources.list
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2022-06-15 14:00 EDT---
I don't really remember, so I retested.
20.04: 1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu1.3 fixes the problem (I had to install the .deb file
manually with dpkg).
22.04: 1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu9.1 fixes the problem.
--
You received this bug notification be
--- Comment From mario.h...@de.ibm.com 2022-07-07 07:55 EDT---
(In reply to comment #13)
> We just realized that we had DFLTCC support in 20.04, so we need to put this
> fix there as well.
So this still gets fixed in Focal (20.04).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
An updated test package was created for kinetic and build with the help of this
PPA:
https://launchpad.net/~fheimes/+archive/ubuntu/lp1959469
for the major architectures.
This incl. building and executing the testsuite too, which results in all tests
passed:
...
All 112 test
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin2110
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin20045
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961427
Title:
zlib: compressBound() returns
Due to the fact that now in total 3 packages are involved and two libraries
(zlib and htslib, well and the libraries included in bedtools), this will cause
a bigger transition (especially for htslib in focal, and zlib itself on all
affected Ubuntu releases).
(The transition(s) need to be planned
Default Comment by Bridge
** Attachment added: "reverse dependencies, gathered on focal.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961427/+attachment/5604505/+files/reverse_dependencies%2C_gathered_on_focal.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded
Since the zlib package progressed meanwhile due to a security update, I
created new debdiffs for jammy and kinetic - see debdiffs_J_K.tar.gz.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchp
Default Comment by Bridge
** Attachment added: "zlib debdiffs for jammy and kinetic (latest)"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961427/+attachment/5604516/+files/debdiffs_J_K.tar.gz
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscr
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2022-07-21 05:51 EDT---
Comment on attachment 153124
zlib_1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu7_to_zlib_1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu8 (jammy)
this is obsolete - has been replaced by newer version
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2022-07-21 05:52 EDT---
Comment o
** Tags added: architecture-s39064 bugnameltc-199129 severity-high
targetmilestone-inin---
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982583
Title:
zlib CRC32 optimizati
--- Comment From cdead...@us.ibm.com 2022-07-23 09:55 EDT---
Re-open to move to diff. component.
#=#=# 2015-04-23 10:27:57 (CDT) #=#=#
New Fix_Potential = [GSI_HDW]
#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#
Any updates on this issue? Thanks!
Some "sync" issue between CQ and bugzilla.
Please
(While looking into libbio-samtools-perl and other related packages, I
found that there is yet another htslib bundled in tabix - which is not
great. But this at at least already the needed patch.)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, whic
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2022-09-01 04:48 EDT---
@Canonical: Hi Brian,
the test / verification on our side will be delayed as our SME is out on
vacation.
We should have an answer by the end of next week.
Thanks
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2022-09-05 11:31 EDT---
zlib1g-dev s390x 1:1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu9.1 and zlib1g s390x
1:1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu9.1 pass all of my tests.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib i
--- Comment From andreas.kreb...@de.ibm.com 2022-09-13 10:40 EDT---
I've installed binutils 2.38-4ubuntu2 on jammy. With that the -march=z16 option
is accepted by 'as'. So looks good to me.
No idea about the regressions mentioned above. I don't see how an IBM
zSystems only patch can affec
** Tags added: architecture-s39064 bugnameltc-208023 severity-high
targetmilestone-inin---
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdb in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075204
Title:
gdb on s390x chokes on
** Tags added: architecture-s39064 bugnameltc-208475 severity-high
targetmilestone-inin---
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075567
Title:
zlib fails to build o
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2024-08-07 12:48 EDT---
Thanks Ilya for your quick analysis, finding out that this is a compiler issue.
Stefan will send a patch to the GCC mailing list.
We will post a link here once it's available.
--
You received this bug notification because you
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2024-08-09 05:47 EDT---
Thanks Stefan, for your GCC patch posted at:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-August/659923.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribe
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2024-08-15 04:26 EDT---
Stefan has committed the patches:
master:
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=e8a7142a697c5d2673adea33ba23af82a89c9559
gcc-14:
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=e903ada5e8881acec734eb3f89c3644bbd8da7e9
--
You
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2024-08-15 09:00 EDT---
I don't think the other patch is necessary. Stefan backported only
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=e903ada5e8881acec734eb3f89c3644bbd8da7e9
to gcc-14.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
--- Comment From cha...@us.ibm.com 2024-08-15 16:17 EDT---
What is the status of this bug? Looking at:
> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/25091#issuecomment-1695289642
> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/25091#issuecomment-1398091323
It looks like a couple of commits were
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2024-08-19 11:34 EDT---
Thanks everyone for your work!
With the fix being verified and released, we can close this bug.
==> Changing status to "CLOSED"
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin---
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin2410
--
You received
--- Comment From mario.h...@de.ibm.com 2024-09-05 04:23 EDT---
The problem seems fixed meanwhile for Oracular (24.10) see here
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/s390-tools
Are you thinking of backports for the LTS releases 22.04 and 20.04 ?
--
You received this bug notification becaus
** Tags added: architecture-ppc64le bugnameltc-201628 severity-medium
targetmilestone-inin---
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992178
Title:
autopkgtest: up
--- Comment From cha...@us.ibm.com 2023-02-14 17:28 EDT---
Howdy. Adding developers from KVM on Power and Toolchain to our bug but it
would be good to understand exactly what IBM needs to look at. For example, you
mention a backtrace you see but I don't see that in the bug. Any details yo
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2023-10-17 10:45 EDT---
Fix has been released to Focal, Jammy and Kinetic. With 22.10 being out of
service, we can close the bug.
==> Changing the status to: "CLOSED"
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch se
--- Comment From sthou...@in.ibm.com 2023-11-20 03:40 EDT---
Harsh, This issue/bug is reported on Ubuntu 22.04 Distro and hence we cannot
track behavior reported in other Distro like fedora though internally
Development can check those behaviour.
I will ask Jamie if he can pass the machi
--- Comment From peter.oberparlei...@de.ibm.com 2023-11-22 09:17 EDT---
(In reply to comment #19)
> This was implemented around 2020, mainly to catch any ccw config changes in
> a user friendly way:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892367
> https://i527439087.restricted.launchpadlibrarian
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin---
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin2310
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037569
Title:
udev issues with mantic beta
** Tags added: architecture-s39064 bugnameltc-204450 severity-medium
targetmilestone-inin---
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pam in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045250
Title:
pam_lastlog doesn't
--- Comment From holger.deng...@ibm.com 2023-12-11 02:24 EDT---
Even if the problem can be reproduced easier on 32-bit architectures, the
architecture doesn't matter at all. If you do a syscall in userspace programs,
you have to check the returned value for errors. Period.
In my opinion,
** Tags added: architecture-s39064 bugnameltc-204586 severity-medium
targetmilestone-inin2404
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1833322
Title:
Consider re
--- Comment From holger.deng...@ibm.com 2024-01-11 13:09 EDT---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Holger: I can't pretend speaking for the SRU team, but I'd be willing to bet
> that having "the fix is trivial" as a test plan would result in the SRU
> being trivially rejected :-).
@schopin: The AP
--- Comment From cborn...@de.ibm.com 2024-01-15 06:46 EDT---
Just a statement from s390x/IBM Z. For our platform irqbalance makes no sense
as our interrupt handling works differently. So we do not need it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch see
--- Comment From wint...@de.ibm.com 2024-01-19 05:42 EDT---
@xnox, @Boris,
are there any updates on this?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iptables in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1974056
Ti
--- Comment From grgo.mari...@ibm.com 2024-01-23 03:44 EDT---
The problem is still visible after installing the -proposed package:
root:~# dpkg -l | grep openssl
ii openssl 3.0.2-0ubuntu1.13
s390xSecure Sockets Layer toolkit - c
--- Comment From grgo.mari...@ibm.com 2024-01-23 03:53 EDT---
After upgrading to Ubuntu 22.04.3 the solution is working and the problem is
not visible anymore.
Explicit update of the fix is not valid on the older version (22.04.1).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
--- Comment From grgo.mari...@ibm.com 2024-01-23 05:09 EDT---
# apt-cache policy libssl3 openssl
libssl3:
Installed: 3.0.2-0ubuntu1.13
Candidate: 3.0.2-0ubuntu1.13
Version table:
*** 3.0.2-0ubuntu1.13 400
400 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports jammy-proposed/main s390x Packages
100 /var/l
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2024-01-25 07:28 EDT---
Thanks everyone for your work.
With the fix being released to -updates, I will close this bug as soon as the
status in Launchpad changes to "fix released"
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
--- Comment From s...@de.ibm.com 2021-04-22 07:23 EDT---
Hi,
I've also run some tests on s390x:
On Ubuntu 18.04 (bionic) with libseccomp2 2.5.1-1ubuntu1~18.04.1 and linux
4.15.0.142.129:
In a systemd-nspawn hirsute container:
bash -c "test -x /bin/bash"
returns 1 and strace shows:
faccess
--- Comment From vineeth.vija...@ibm.com 2021-04-23 01:50 EDT---
---snip---
--- a/drivers/s390/cio/device.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/cio/device.c
@@ -1525,8 +1525,7 @@ static int io_subchannel_sch_event(struct subchannel
*sch, int process)
switch (action) {
case IO_SCH_ORPH_UNREG:
case IO_SCH_UN
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-05-03 10:12 EDT---
@Canonical, any updates available here? Many thx in adbvance
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launch
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-05-19 07:18 EDT---
IBM Response:
Yes. this makes sense. Previously Canonical reverted the "s390/cio: remove pm
support from ccw bus driver" patch because of the issue. Right solution is to
unrevert the revert-patch and add "s390/cio: rem
--- Comment From stefan.ra...@de.ibm.com 2021-06-10 03:55 EDT---
Makes me wonder if what we're seeing is a side-effect of
--- Comment From stefan.ra...@de.ibm.com 2021-06-10 03:58 EDT---
Makes me wonder whether this could be a side-effect of the interface name,
indeed.
@Viktor/Nik
--- Comment From stefan.ra...@de.ibm.com 2021-06-11 10:04 EDT---
Talked to Viktor - he didn't think there's much indication that the skewed
interface name has any effect. Especially since the interface gets a LL address
assigned just fine.
--
You received this bug notification because y
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin---
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin2004
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929657
Title:
[Ubuntu 20.4.2] vLan not ge
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-06-14 08:34 EDT---
IBM bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released by all requested distros.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs
--- Comment From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-06-14 11:18 EDT---
Enable udev debug mode:
root@ilabg13:~# cat /etc/systemd/system/systemd-udevd.service.d/override.conf
[Service]
Environment=SYSTEMD_LOG_LEVEL=debug
root@ilabg13:~# systemctl daemon-reload && sudo systemctl restart system
--- Comment (attachment only) From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-06-14
11:21 EDT---
** Attachment added: "journalctl udevadm netplan ip"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929657/+attachment/5504535/+files/journalctl_udevadm_netplan_ip.txt.zip
--
You received this bug notificati
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1924794 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1924794
--- Comment From heinz-werner_se...@de.ibm.com 2021-06-15 03:49 EDT---
IBM Bugzilla status->closed, Fix Released by Canonical
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
--- Comment From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-06-15 11:18 EDT---
Enable udev monitor:
udevadm --debug monitor --property >> udevadm_monitor.txt
Steeps followed to retrieve logs:
- Manually remove the IP
ip addr del 192.168.171.53/24 dev enP53p0s0.171
- Try to assign ip via netplan
r
--- Comment (attachment only) From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-06-15
11:48 EDT---
** Attachment added: "udevadm monitor"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929657/+attachment/5504855/+files/udevadm_monitor.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of U
--- Comment (attachment only) From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-06-15
11:49 EDT---
** Attachment added: "journalctl udev monitor"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929657/+attachment/5504856/+files/journalctl_udev_monitor.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you a
--- Comment (attachment only) From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-06-15
11:50 EDT---
** Attachment added: "network"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929657/+attachment/5504857/+files/network.zip
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seed
** Tags added: architecture-s39064 bugnameltc-193300 severity-high
targetmilestone-inin2004
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1931725
Title:
initramfs
--- Comment From cborn...@de.ibm.com 2021-06-16 07:19 EDT---
FWIW, with Z15 and later we do have a zlib HW accelerator on the chip. So zlib
would also be an option - assuming that z15 will be the most common Z pretty
soon.
>From my checks the HW decompression this was really fast.
How doe
--- Comment From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-06-17 12:14 EDT---
Right now the system is at kernel version:
root@ilabg13:~# uname -a
Linux ilabg13.tuc.stglabs.ibm.com 5.4.0-73-generic #82-Ubuntu SMP Wed Apr 14
17:29:32 UTC 2021 s390x s390x s390x GNU/Linux
And it is a new version ava
--- Comment From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-06-23 18:19 EDT---
Files content:
root@ilabg13:~# cat /etc/systemd/network/10-enP53p0s0.link
[Match]
MACAddress=82:0c:9b:c9:78:f8
[Link]
Name=enP53p0s0
root@ilabg13:~# cat /usr/lib/systemd/network/99-default.link
# SPDX-License-Identifie
--- Comment (attachment only) From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-06-23
18:25 EDT---
** Attachment added: "journalctl delay"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929657/+attachment/5506551/+files/journalctl_udev_monitor_delay.txt.zip
--
You received this bug notification because yo
--- Comment (attachment only) From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-06-23
18:26 EDT---
** Attachment added: "udevadm monitor delay"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929657/+attachment/5506552/+files/udevadm_monitor_delay.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
--- Comment From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-06-24 11:53 EDT---
Giving it a try without the /etc/systemd/network/ files
- Checking that it is empty
root@ilabg13:~# ll /etc/systemd/network/
total 8
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Jun 24 08:41 ./
drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 Jun 17 06:18 .
--- Comment (attachment only) From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-06-24
11:57 EDT---
** Attachment added: "udevadm monitor nofiles"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929657/+attachment/5506750/+files/udevadm_monitor_nofiles.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you a
--- Comment (attachment only) From mario.alberto.gali...@ibm.com 2021-06-24
11:57 EDT---
** Attachment added: "journalctl no files"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929657/+attachment/5506751/+files/journalctl_udev_nofiles.txt.zip
--
You received this bug notification because you a
--- Comment From andreas.kreb...@de.ibm.com 2022-04-07 02:38 EDT---
After the announcement support for the official machine name z16 has been added
to binutils. Please consider picking up the following patch from 2.37 branch:
commit e24d2a2d11008aa363366c1087219f3e3405782a (origin/binutil
--- Comment From mario.h...@de.ibm.com 2022-05-04 05:20 EDT---
It seems there is no progress with this issue for a while. What is next? Is the
reason for the incompatibility found meanwhile?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, w
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2022-05-04 08:51 EDT---
Good that this was pinged - it seems that we hit a deadlock here :-)
I was waiting on Ubuntu to bump the HTSlib version (or cherry-pick
https://github.com/samtools/htslib/pull/1258), where the incompatibility
issue is resolved. The o
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2022-05-06 06:22 EDT---
Here are the originally reported failures:
> But I found in "bedtools":
> bedtools: bgzf.c:351: bgzf_hopen: Assertion
> `compressBound(BGZF_BLOCK_SIZE) < BGZF_MAX_BLOCK_SIZE' failed. test-
> intersect.sh: line 201: 1981 Aborted
Well, that bundled htslib seems to make the situation a bit messy,
So my guess is that this should be fixed in bedtools upstream first...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.n
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2022-05-10 07:14 EDT---
Hi, thanks for looking into this. I'll wait until
https://launchpad.net/~fheimes/+archive/ubuntu/lp1961427 finishes the build and
try it.
In the meantime I've asked the bedtools upstream to cherry-pick the
htslib commit: https://gi
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2022-05-16 06:17 EDT---
With the new combination, bedtools testsuite is green and zlib passes all of my
tests too. So it looks good, thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribe
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2022-05-18 23:07 EDT---
Fix released, hence closing the bug.
Status: -> CLOSED
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2022-05-18 23:17 EDT---
fix verified and released, hence closing the bug.
Staus: => CLOSED.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launch
Default Comment by Bridge
** Attachment added:
"debdiff_zlib_1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu7_to_zlib_1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu8"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961427/+attachment/5569373/+files/debdiff_zlib_1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu7_to_zlib_1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu8_impish.diff
--
You received this bug notification
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2022-03-15 18:41 EDT---
zlib1g s390x 1:1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu1.3 passes all of my tests on focal, thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2021-10-25 05:29 EDT---
Fix is part of impish U21.10, hence closing the bug.
IBM BZ status change:->CLOSED
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
https://
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2021-10-25 05:40 EDT---
Fix landed in impish, hence closing the bug.
IBM BZ status change:->CLOSED
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.
The steps are fine and do not cause a seg. fault on jammy/22.04, impish/21.10
or hirsute/21.04.
But as already assumed it seg. faults on focal/20.04.
(This is not kernel related, a wrong package was
marked as affected, but if it would have been kernel related, we would
have asked to reproduce on
--- Comment From andreas.kreb...@de.ibm.com 2021-11-22 02:30 EDT---
(In reply to comment #10)
> This does not look like an Ubuntu system. Linux kernel has wrong version:
> "Linux 193438490afd 5.8.15-301.fc33.s390x". Are you sure you are testing it
> on Ubuntu image?
I just mechanically cop
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2021-12-01 10:03 EDT---
The bug was fixed in Focal, Impish and Hirsute. Thanks for everybody
contributing to fix and verify.
IBM Bugzilla status change: -> CLOSED
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin---
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin2004
--
Y
--- Comment From pp...@de.ibm.com 2023-05-11 10:35 EDT---
Is there any update on this? I have a request to update Ubuntu 20.04 to 22.04
but currently it is not possible.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
--- Comment From sthou...@in.ibm.com 2023-06-06 01:35 EDT---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Backtraces are on the upstream bug, eg:
>
> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/25091#issuecomment-1401824195
> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/25091#issuecomment-1402425787
>
> It would
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin---
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin2204
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1974115
Title:
[UBUNTU 22.04] BINUTILS: Ad
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-focal
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961427
T
** Tags removed: verification-done verification-done-focal
** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-focal
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961427
T
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2022-09-22 08:10 EDT---
zlib1g s390x 1:1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu1.4 passes all of my tests.
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2022-09-22 08:18 EDT---
@Ilya: thanks a lot for your instant verification on focal!
With that, I am updating the tags / key
However, a chance would be to piggy-back a fix like this with a more
severe zlib update that might come up in future.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990379
Tit
--- Comment From ra...@ca.ibm.com 2022-09-23 13:07 EDT---
Hi, I am Eclipse OpenJ9 developer. This issue was exposed by Java Certification
Kit running on RHEL 9 on z15+ and impacts all JDK versions (8,11,17, etc.)
using system default settings. The JCK failure impacts our ability to certi
--- Comment on attachment From i...@de.ibm.com 2022-09-27 20:08 EDT---
Here is the patch for kinetic. It's just an one liner.
** Attachment added: "kinetic patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990379/+attachment/5619612/+files/410-lp1990379.patch
--
You received this bug notific
--- Comment From manjunath.ma...@ibm.com 2022-09-29 10:33 EDT---
The issue was reproduced on Ubuntu 22.04
---uname output---
Linux 5.15.0-48-generic #54-Ubuntu SMP Fri Aug 26 13:27:34 UTC 2022 ppc64le
ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux
?Steps to recreate ---
install the following packages
dpkg -i
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2022-10-10 19:01 EDT---
Thanks! With
https://ppa.launchpadcontent.net/fheimes/lp1990379+lp1982583/ubuntu
kinetic/main s390x zlib1g s390x 1:1.2.11.dfsg-4.1ubuntu2
the following command:
python3 -c 'import zlib; zlib.crc32(b"X"*50)'
begins to work
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2022-11-22 04:52 EDT---
As a comprehensive test plan I would suggest the following:
* Run zlib-ng testsuite against Ubuntu zlib. This is possible since
https://github.com/zlib-ng/zlib-
ng/commit/e63f36b1cf615a81e2cfa2d97fc54a5f493c9c19, the testsuite is
qui
--- Comment From christian.r...@de.ibm.com 2022-11-24 12:16 EDT---
Hello Frank,
thanks for getting back to me on this. I did freshly install jammy jellyfish on
a z/VM guest system.
I had updated the package definitions before I tried to install the
systemd-coredump package (and attached
--- Comment From christian.r...@de.ibm.com 2022-11-28 12:42 EDT---
Thanks for having a look Frank and Steve.
I am all right with closing.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2021-02-15 09:35 EDT---
To me they all look like intermittent problems (timeouts on arm, 404s when
installing packages on Intel). Is it possible to simply retrigger those?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seed
1 - 100 of 932 matches
Mail list logo
