[Touch-packages] [Bug 1946860] Re: Merge heimdal from Debian unstable for 22.04

2021-10-14 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Changed in: heimdal (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to heimdal in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946860 Title: Merge heim

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1943530] Re: link libkrb5 with openssl

2021-09-14 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Do we even know for sure this krb5-k5tls is enough for fips compliance, and that it replaces *all* crypto code in kerberos with openssl calls? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to krb5 in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1791958] Re: iptables-restore is missing -w option

2021-07-19 Thread Andreas Hasenack
For backports, a straight build of 1.6.2 would perhaps be enough. Might not seem a version change big enough for backports, but as we have seen, it does introduce a change of behavior that impacts existing firewall scripts. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895302] Re: groovy debootstrap leaves /e/d/motd-news.wasremoved around

2021-07-16 Thread Andreas Hasenack
: In Progress => Confirmed ** Changed in: base-files (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: In Progress => Confirmed ** Changed in: base-files (Ubuntu Focal) Status: In Progress => Confirmed ** Changed in: base-files (Ubuntu Xenial) Assignee: Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) =>

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1791958] Re: iptables-restore is missing -w option

2021-07-08 Thread Andreas Hasenack
I tested this last change, and it does exactly what we wanted for iptables, the tool. And since that behavior is shared with all tools of the iptables suite, it means iptables-restore got that fix too (good!), but it also introduces a change in behavior for iptables-restore (bad!). When compared

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1791958] Re: iptables-restore is missing -w option

2021-07-07 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Excellent progress Eric, thanks! I'll give it a try. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iptables in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1791958 Title: iptables-restore is missing -w option Status in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1791958] Re: iptables-restore is missing -w option

2021-06-29 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Thanks for the b3 version! It restores the bionic implicit lock behavior (as if -w was given), but when given a specific value, in the end it ignores that it couldn't acquire the lock and moves on: In all these tests, I have a lock held. We have a chain called "andreas". See how -L waits 1

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1791958] Re: iptables-restore is missing -w option

2021-06-28 Thread Andreas Hasenack
+1 for a backport, I don't think 1.6.2 is suitable for an SRU, specifically about one change I noticed with test packages that I think can break existing firewall scripts. The locking code is shared between tools, so in 1.6.2, not only do we get iptables-{save,restore} with -w support, but

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1913810] Re: restart doesn't test for syntax errors

2021-05-03 Thread Andreas Hasenack
yeah, it's specifically restart that we want to check -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1913810 Title: restart doesn't test for syntax errors Status in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 388605] Re: [MIR] rsyslog

2021-03-30 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Actually, Christian didn't explicitly ack the stable releases in that comment (but he did in the MPs I raised for the seed changes). I'll ask him tomorrow to flip the statuses. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 388605] Re: [MIR] rsyslog

2021-03-30 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Given Christian's comments in comment #6, and the fact that the seed changes were done, I'm going to mark the tasks for the stable releases as "fix committed" -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsyslog in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 388605] Re: [MIR] rsyslog

2021-03-25 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Meeting minutes: https://new.ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu- meeting/2021/ubuntu-meeting.2021-03-25-15.00.moin.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsyslog in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/388605

[Touch-packages] [Bug 388605] Re: [MIR] rsyslog

2021-03-25 Thread Andreas Hasenack
I'll provide MPs for bionic, focal and groovy to change the seeds to pull rsyslog-gnutls into main, as discussed in #ubuntu-meeting with Foundations today, and then ping an archive admin. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 388605] Re: [MIR] rsyslog

2021-03-23 Thread Andreas Hasenack
We would like to retroactively promote rsyslog-gnutls, a binary package built from src:rsyslog (subject of this completed MIR), into main. rsyslog-gnutls provides a gnutls plugin which allows rsyslog to encrypt the data it sends to log servers. We believe this is a common scenario, and very much

[Touch-packages] [Bug 388605] Re: [MIR] rsyslog

2021-03-23 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Also affects: rsyslog (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: rsyslog (Ubuntu Groovy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: rsyslog (Ubuntu Hirsute) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Kees Cook (kees) Status: Fix Released

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1913187] Re: iproute2 segfaults when filtering sockets

2021-02-25 Thread Andreas Hasenack
postgresql-common amd64 and i386: passed after a retry ubuntu-fan: see previous comment, known flaky test, and analysis of the test output shows that the test actually passed. I retried both amd64 and s390x, but I ask the SRU team to consider those runs green if they failed again (update: amd64

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1913187] Re: iproute2 segfaults when filtering sockets

2021-02-25 Thread Andreas Hasenack
ubuntu-fan dep8 failures are due to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-fan/+bug/1830180. It was fixed in focal+, but in bionic it remains flaky. Explanation is in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu- fan/+bug/1830180/comments/1 I'll retry it once or twice, but we can

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1913810] [NEW] restart doesn't test for syntax errors

2021-01-29 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Public bug reported: Tested openssh on bionic and groovy, same issue. The switch to systemd lost the ability to do a sanity check on the config file (via sshd -t) before attempting to restart sshd. This was originally bug #624361 in the SySV days, fixed in the initscript back then. The sysv

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1899218] Re: Incorrect warning from apparmor_parser on force complained profiles

2021-01-27 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Just saw this in bionic, I guess it's not important enough for an SRU? # apparmor_parser -r -T -W --Complain /etc/apparmor.d/pam_roles /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.sshd Warning failed to create cache: pam_roles Warning failed to create cache: usr.sbin.sshd -- You received this bug notification

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1848330] Re: Installing auditd sometimes fails in post-inst

2021-01-25 Thread Andreas Hasenack
TL;DR verification-succeeded Ok, so here are the details. I have two vms: one called orig-audit-bionic, the other called sru- audit-bionic, where I ran the script from comment #23 over the weekend in multiple scenarios. With auditd-1:2.8.2-1ubuntu1, the bug is reproduced after a few hours,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1848330] Re: Installing auditd sometimes fails in post-inst

2021-01-23 Thread Andreas Hasenack
I prepared two bionic instances to run over the weekend. One is running auditd from bionic, and the other is running the SRU proposed package. I have auditd being restarted via this script in both (just the email message is different, to say which package it was): #!/bin/bash result=0 while

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1848330] Re: Installing auditd sometimes fails in post-inst

2021-01-22 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Dr. Harbott, would you be able to test the new audit packages in bionic- proposed? The SRU team is reluctant to approve this update without some sort of confirmation that it fixes the bug, and I haven't been able to reproduce it myself. -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1848330] Re: Installing auditd sometimes fails in post-inst

2021-01-18 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Since it's difficult to reproduce the bug, what I'm going to do is setup a system with the previous auditd, setup some rules, confirm they are working, then upgrade, and confirm it keeps working, also after a reboot. # Bionic verification auditd from bionic: auditd: Installed:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1848330] Re: Installing auditd sometimes fails in post-inst

2021-01-16 Thread Andreas Hasenack
All regressions have been resolved after some retries. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to audit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1848330 Title: Installing auditd sometimes fails in post-inst Status

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1848330] Re: Installing auditd sometimes fails in post-inst

2021-01-14 Thread Andreas Hasenack
I'm going over the DEP8 failures -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to audit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1848330 Title: Installing auditd sometimes fails in post-inst Status in audit package in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1848330] Re: Installing auditd sometimes fails in post-inst

2021-01-11 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Package uploaded to the SRU queue ** Changed in: audit (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to audit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1848330 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1848330] Re: Installing auditd sometimes fails in post-inst

2021-01-11 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Description changed: [Impact] Sometimes, auditd will get stuck when starting up, causing systemd to kill it after a while since it (systemd) never got the start notification. Upstream troubleshooted this to be caused by calling a syslog() function inside a signal handler.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1848330] Re: Installing auditd sometimes fails in post-inst

2021-01-08 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Description changed: [Impact] - * An explanation of the effects of the bug on users and + Sometimes, auditd will get stuck when starting up, causing systemd to + kill it after a while since it (systemd) never got the start + notification. - * justification for backporting the fix to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1848330] Re: Installing auditd sometimes fails in post-inst

2021-01-08 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Yikes @Kodiak, sounds painful :( -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to audit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1848330 Title: Installing auditd sometimes fails in post-inst Status in audit package in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1848330] Re: Installing auditd sometimes fails in post-inst

2021-01-08 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Description changed: - This happens sometimes when installing auditd on Ubuntu 18.04.2, most - installations work successfully, though. Re-running the install also - fixes the issue, but the failure breaks our automation. The log from the - failure looks like this: + [Impact] + + * An

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1848330] Re: Installing auditd sometimes fails in post-inst

2021-01-08 Thread Andreas Hasenack
I'm having difficulties reproducing the bug, to validate the patch. I build bionic test packages with the patch mentioned earlier, if someone wants to test: https://launchpad.net/~ahasenack/+archive/ubuntu/audit- startup-hang-1848330 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1848330] Re: Installing auditd sometimes fails in post-inst

2021-01-08 Thread Andreas Hasenack
correct source package name is audit, not auditd (apparently we have/had both) ** Changed in: auditd (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #962451 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=962451 ** Also affe

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1898593] [NEW] Fix sphinx doc building

2020-10-05 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Public bug reported: This basically the same bug as #1894907, but there I decided to disable docs rebuilding, after checking that none of the patches were against the docs source. Furthermore, we should probably fix these lintian issues: E: cyrus-sasl2-doc: privacy-breach-uses-embedded-file

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1894907] Re: FTBFS with sphinx 3.2

2020-10-05 Thread Andreas Hasenack
I filed https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cyrus- sasl2/+bug/1898593 to properly fix the doc building with sphinx. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1894907] Re: FTBFS with sphinx 3.2

2020-09-30 Thread Andreas Hasenack
I got as far as this collection of patches: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/wvRzpByDXT/ : --- a/docsrc/exts/sphinxlocal/writers/manpage.py +++ b/docsrc/exts/sphinxlocal/writers/manpage.py @@ -14,7 +14,6 @@ from docutils import nodes from sphinx.writers.manpage import ( -MACRO_DEF,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895302] Re: groovy debootstrap leaves /e/d/motd-news.wasremoved around

2020-09-23 Thread Andreas Hasenack
I think the remaining scenario is (b) (look up in the bug description), and (c) is just a wildcard scenario ("anything else I didn't think of"). For (b), I think the more likely case would be another base-files SRU without the fix from this bug here, and where the user would have: - base-files

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1888575] Re: Split motd-news config into a new package

2020-09-22 Thread Andreas Hasenack
I meant, see *also* https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1895302, no idea yet if it's related. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to base-files in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1888575 Title: Split motd-news

Re: [Touch-packages] [Bug 1888575] Re: Split motd-news config into a new package

2020-09-22 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Bug: distribution=ubuntu; distroseries=focal; > sourcepackage=livecd-rootfs; component=main; status=Invalid; > importance=Undecided; assignee=None; > Launchpad-Bug: distribution=ubuntu; distroseries=focal; > sourcepackage=ubuntu-meta; component=main; status=Fix Released; > importance=Undecide

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1888575] Re: Split motd-news config into a new package

2020-09-21 Thread Andreas Hasenack
root@xenial-base-files:~# apt-cache policy ubuntu-server ubuntu-server: Installed: 1.361.6 Candidate: 1.361.6 Version table: *** 1.361.6 500 500 http://br.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-proposed/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 1.361.5 500 500

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1888575] Re: Split motd-news config into a new package

2020-09-21 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Sorry again, I jumped he gun. I don't know how to do k-ii and k-iii, I thought (k) was one of the original test cases. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to base-files in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1888575] Re: Split motd-news config into a new package

2020-09-21 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Sorry, I wasn't clear. I'll re-run (k) with ubuntu-meta from xenial proposed now, with base-files from xenial-updates. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to base-files in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1888575] Re: Split motd-news config into a new package

2020-09-21 Thread Andreas Hasenack
I have another upload for base-files, for bug #1895302 (see comment #23). I can re-run the (k) test case, and of course the testcase for that bug specifically. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to base-files in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895302] Re: groovy debootstrap leaves /e/d/motd-news.wasremoved around

2020-09-16 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Description changed: [Impact] A fresh install of base-files, like done when using debootstrap, using the base-files from the -updates repository (in the case of ubuntu stable releases), will leave an empty /etc/default/motd-news.wasremoved file. This file is an artifact of the mechanism

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895302] Re: groovy debootstrap leaves /e/d/motd-news.wasremoved around

2020-09-16 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Description changed: [Impact] A fresh install of base-files, like done when using debootstrap, using the base-files from the -updates repository (in the case of ubuntu stable releases), will leave an empty /etc/default/motd-news.wasremoved file. This file is an artifact of the mechanism

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895302] Re: groovy debootstrap leaves /e/d/motd-news.wasremoved around

2020-09-16 Thread Andreas Hasenack
base-files (Ubuntu Xenial) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) ** Changed in: base-files (Ubuntu Bionic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) ** Changed in: base-files (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: base-files

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895302] Re: groovy debootstrap leaves /e/d/motd-news.wasremoved around

2020-09-16 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Description changed: [Impact] A fresh install of base-files, like done when using debootstrap, using the base-files from the -updates repository (in the case of ubuntu stable releases), will leave an empty /etc/default/motd-news.wasremoved file. This file is an artifact of the mechanism

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895302] Re: groovy debootstrap leaves /e/d/motd-news.wasremoved around

2020-09-16 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Description changed: [Impact] - A fresh install of base-files, like done when using debootstrap, using the base-files from the -updates repository (in the case of ubuntu stable releases), will leave an empty /etc/default/motd-news.wasremoved file. This file is an artifact of the mechanism

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895302] Re: groovy debootstrap leaves /e/d/motd-news.wasremoved around

2020-09-16 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Description changed: [Impact] A fresh install of base-files, like done when using debootstrap, using the base-files from the -updates repository (in the case of ubuntu stable releases), will leave an empty /etc/default/motd-news.wasremoved file. This file is an artifact of the mechanism

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895302] Re: groovy debootstrap leaves /e/d/motd-news.wasremoved around

2020-09-16 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Description changed: [Impact] + A fresh install of base-files, like done when using debootstrap, using the base-files from the -updates repository (in the case of ubuntu stable releases), will leave an empty /etc/default/motd-news.wasremoved file. This file is an artifact of the mechanism

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895302] Re: groovy debootstrap leaves /e/d/motd-news.wasremoved around

2020-09-16 Thread Andreas Hasenack
-files (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) ** Changed in: base-files (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to base-files in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895302] Re: groovy debootstrap leaves /e/d/motd-news.wasremoved around

2020-09-16 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu/+source/base-files/+git/base-files/+merge/390766 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to base-files in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1894838] Re: FFe: update to 2.4.53, fixing crash bugs

2020-09-15 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Thanks for the review laney I did run the sssd dep8 tests, which exercise openldap, but not a replication. So I followed the server guide on setting up replication with TLS (https://ubuntu.com/server/docs/service-ldap-replication and https://ubuntu.com/server/docs/service-ldap-with-tls) and

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895302] Re: groovy debootstrap leaves /e/d/motd-news.wasremoved around

2020-09-11 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Nor the upgrade after that, ugh. Fixing. ** Changed in: base-files (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: base-files (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) ** Changed in: base-files (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1888575] Re: Split motd-news config into a new package

2020-09-11 Thread Andreas Hasenack
I filed https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/base- files/+bug/1895302 for that. Do you happen to know a good way to test the first-time installation of base-files with debootstrap? It would be awesome if I could give it a ppa to consider, in addition to the archive, and it would then just

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895302] Re: groovy debootstrap leaves /e/d/motd-news.wasremoved around

2020-09-11 Thread Andreas Hasenack
I think this postinst bit never considered the fresh install case: # special case of having /etc/default/motd-news removed by hand # signal the motd-news-config package that this happened, so that # it does not put back the file with default contents which would # re-enable motd-news

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1894907] Re: FTBFS with sphinx 2.4

2020-09-11 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Summary changed: - FTBFS with sphinx 2.4: cannot import name 'NoUri' + FTBFS with sphinx 2.4 ** Description changed: - Getting this failure to build on groovy: + cyrus-sasl2 ships with a sphinx extension to build its documentation, + and this extension was based on a very old sphinx version.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895006] Re: FTBFS with sphinx 2.4: cannot import name 'MACRO_DEF'

2020-09-11 Thread Andreas Hasenack
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1894907 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894907 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1894907 FTBFS with sphinx 2.4: cannot import name 'NoUri' -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895302] [NEW] groovy debootstrap leaves /e/d/motd-news.wasremoved around

2020-09-11 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Public bug reported: When debootstrapping groovy, we see an empty /etc/default/motd- news.wasremoved file. - groovy: base-files 11ubuntu12 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 set 11 10:20 /etc/default/motd-news.wasremoved If motd-news-config is later installed, maybe via ubuntu-server, then the presence

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1894838] Re: FFe: update to 2.4.53, fixing crash bugs

2020-09-09 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Switched bug to "New" so it can be considered by the release team. ** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895006] [NEW] FTBFS with sphinx 2.4: cannot import name 'MACRO_DEF'

2020-09-09 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Public bug reported: sed -e 's,[@]LIB_DOOR[@],,g' -e 's,[@]SASL_DL_LIB[@],-ldl,g' -e 's,[@]LIBS[@],-lresolv ,g' -e 's,[@]VERSION[@],2.1.27,g' -e 's,[@]libdir[@],/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu,g' -e 's,[@]prefix[@],/usr,g' -e 's,[@]exec_prefix[@],/usr,g' -e 's,[@]includedir[@],/usr/include,g' <

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1894907] Re: FTBFS with sphinx 2.4: cannot import name 'NoUri'

2020-09-09 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #955095 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=955095 ** Also affects: cyrus-sasl2 (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=955095 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1888575] Re: Split motd-news config into a new package

2020-09-09 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hmm, the impact of having that file there in this situation is that if you *then* install the motd-news-config package, it will see that file, remove it, and install /etc/default/motd-news with ENABLED=0 instead of ENABLED=1. Can you easily remove /etc/default/motd-news.wasremoved manually in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1894838] Re: FFe: update to 2.4.53, fixing crash bugs

2020-09-09 Thread Andreas Hasenack
The sssd DEP8 tests, which exercise the ldap server a bit, passed locally: ... autopkgtest [09:48:35]: summary ldap-user-group-ldap-auth PASS ldap-user-group-krb5-auth PASS -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1894907] [NEW] FTBFS with sphinx 2.4: cannot import name 'NoUri'

2020-09-08 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Public bug reported: Getting this failure to build on groovy: Extension error: Could not import extension sphinxlocal.builders.manpage (exception: cannot import name 'NoUri' from 'sphinx.environment' (/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/sphinx/environment/__init__.py)) make[2]: *** [Makefile:1166:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1894838] Re: FFe: update to 2.4.53, fixing crash bugs

2020-09-08 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Description changed: - To be filled + Groovy has openldap 2.4.51 + + Upstream made two quick new releases after that: 2.4.52 and 2.4.53. A + crash was reported in the mailing list: https://lists.openldap.org/hyperkitty/list/openldap-

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1894838] [NEW] FFe: update to 2.4.53, fixing crash bugs

2020-09-08 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Public bug reported: To be filled https://lists.openldap.org/hyperkitty/list/openldap- techni...@openldap.org/thread/NKOM6DI7RQY6FDLRZGSGYJSGONKIRFEP/ ** Affects: openldap (Ubuntu) Importance: High Assignee: Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) Status: In Progress ** Description

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1888575] Re: Split motd-news config into a new package

2020-08-25 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Xenial verification Versions we are handling: base-files 9.4ubuntu4.12 -> 9.4ubuntu4.13 ubuntu-server 1.361.4-> 1.361.5 motd-news-config n/a -> 9.4ubuntu4.13 Note that in xenial, at the moment, ubuntu-server is not pre-installed in the images. This verification is quite long, given the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1888575] Re: Split motd-news config into a new package

2020-08-25 Thread Andreas Hasenack
For the focal verification, I added a secondary test (j2) like I did for bionic, and that is a release upgrade from an updated focal non-server system to groovy, using the base-files package from focal-proposed, thus simulating the release upgrade once this SRU is complete. Result is correct as

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1888575] Re: Split motd-news config into a new package

2020-08-25 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Bionic verification This verification is quite long, given the amount of tests involved. TL;DR All tests from (a) to (j) passed as required. bionic verification succeeded. Latest updates from bionic: base-files: *** 10.1ubuntu2.9 500 500 http://br.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1888575] Re: Split motd-news config into a new package

2020-08-25 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Focal verification This verification is quite long, given the amount of tests involved. TL;DR All tests from (a) to (j) passed as required. focal verification succeeded. Details below. a) base-files installed, ubuntu-server installed, unmodified /e/d/motd-news apt install base-files -

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1888575] Re: Split motd-news config into a new package

2020-08-25 Thread Andreas Hasenack
This is fixed in groovy already. ** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu Groovy) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to base-files in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1888572] Re: motd-news: use wget instead of curl

2020-08-25 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Xenial verification Test (a) Current base-files and curl installed (no ubuntu-server out-of-the-box on xenial lxd images): ii base-files 9.4ubuntu4.12 amd64Debian base system miscellaneous files ii curl 7.47.0-1ubuntu2.16 amd64command line tool for

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1888572] Re: motd-news: use wget instead of curl

2020-08-25 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Bionic verification Test (a) Current base-files, ubuntu-server and curl installed: ii base-files 10.1ubuntu2.9 amd64Debian base system miscellaneous files ii curl 7.58.0-2ubuntu3.10 amd64command line tool for transferring data with URL syntax ii

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1888572] Re: motd-news: use wget instead of curl

2020-08-25 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Focal verification Test (a) Current base-files, ubuntu-server and curl installed: ii base-files 11ubuntu5.1 amd64Debian base system miscellaneous files ii curl 7.68.0-1ubuntu2.2 amd64command line tool for transferring data with URL syntax ii ubuntu-server

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1886572] Re: Remove uptime from the motd-news user agent

2020-08-25 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Xenial verification Current version: ubuntu@xenial-motd-news-no-uptime:~$ apt-cache policy

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1886572] Re: Remove uptime from the motd-news user agent

2020-08-25 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Focal verification Current focal version: Version table:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1886572] Re: Remove uptime from the motd-news user agent

2020-08-25 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Bionic verification Current version: $ apt-cache policy base-files

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1886572] Re: Remove uptime from the motd-news user agent

2020-08-21 Thread Andreas Hasenack
The NEW package (motd-news-config) needs to be accepted, and needs to go into main. I believe an archive admin needs to intervene. Also, ubuntu- meta needs to be accepted together with this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1888575] Re: Split motd-news config into a new package

2020-08-21 Thread Andreas Hasenack
There are two things missing for this to be testable: a) the motd-news-config NEW package needs to be accepted b) it needs to be moved into main c) ubuntu-meta needs to be accepted as well (my mistake there, I missed the bug number in d/changelog in the xenial and bionic uploads) -- You

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1888575] Re: Split motd-news config into a new package

2020-08-14 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Description changed: [Impact] The motd-news script is largely useless for desktop users, as they rarely login via a text console. It makes more sense for server users. We can use package dependencies to have the motd-news script enabled on servers, but disabled on desktops, and

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1888575] Re: Split motd-news config into a new package

2020-08-14 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Description changed: [Impact] The motd-news script is largely useless for desktop users, as they rarely login via a text console. It makes more sense for server users. We can use package dependencies to have the motd-news script enabled on servers, but disabled on desktops, and

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1886572] Re: Remove uptime from the motd-news user agent

2020-08-13 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu/+source/base-files/+git/base-files/+merge/389300 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to base-files in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1888572] Re: motd-news: use wget instead of curl

2020-08-13 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Description changed: - The motd-news script is using curl, but since that is an optional - package, there is no guarantee that it will be installed. The script - correctly checks for its presence before trying to use it, though, so it - won't fail. As we don't want to add such a dependency to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1886572] Re: Remove uptime from the motd-news user agent

2020-08-13 Thread Andreas Hasenack
se-files (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: base-files (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: base-files (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: base-files (Ubuntu Xenial) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andre

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1888575] Re: Split motd-news config into a new package

2020-08-12 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Description changed: [Impact] The motd-news script is largely useless for desktop users, as they rarely login via a text console. It makes more sense for server users. We can use package dependencies to have the motd-news script enabled on servers, but disabled on desktops, and

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1888575] Re: Split motd-news config into a new package

2020-08-12 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Description changed: [Impact] The motd-news script is largely useless for desktop users, as they rarely login via a text console. It makes more sense for server users. We can use package dependencies to have the motd-news script enabled on servers, but disabled on desktops, and

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1888575] Re: Split motd-news config into a new package

2020-08-12 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Description changed: [Impact] The motd-news script is largely useless for desktop users, as they rarely login via a text console. It makes more sense for server users. We can use package dependencies to have the motd-news script enabled on servers, but disabled on desktops, and

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1888575] Re: Split motd-news config into a new package

2020-08-12 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Description changed: - The motd-news script is largely useless for desktop users, as they - rarely login via a text console. It makes more sense for server users. + [Impact] + The motd-news script is largely useless for desktop users, as they rarely login via a text console. It makes more

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1872118] Re: [SRU] DHCP Cluster crashes after a few hours

2020-08-11 Thread Andreas Hasenack
bind9 in focal uses the 9.16.x versions of these libraries, packaged separately. It's just 9.11.x that was packaged as bind9-libs because of legacy applications like isc-dhcp that do not work with the 9.16 version of bind9. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1889117] [NEW] switch to wget results in no motd-news in clouds

2020-07-27 Thread Andreas Hasenack
mportance: Undecided Assignee: Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) Status: In Progress ** Changed in: base-files (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) ** Changed in: base-files (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notificatio

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1887577] Re: DEP8: Invalid capability setuid

2020-07-27 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hm, not sure, it works for me on a focal host: $ cat Makefile # emits defined capabilities in a simple list, e.g. "CAP_NAME CAP_NAME2" CAPABILITIES=$(shell echo "\#include " | cpp -dM | LC_ALL=C sed -n -e '/CAP_EMPTY_SET/d' -e 's/^\#define[ \t]\+CAP_\([A-Z0-9_]\+\)[

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1888575] [NEW] Split motd-news config into a new package

2020-07-22 Thread Andreas Hasenack
and upgrades to the new base-files and ubuntu-server, and gets the new motd-config-news package, ENABLED=0 must remain set. ** Affects: base-files (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) Status: In Progress ** Affects: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) Importance

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1888572] Re: motd-news: use wget instead of curl

2020-07-22 Thread Andreas Hasenack
This was fixed for groovy in https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/base- files/11ubuntu9 ** Changed in: base-files (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to base-files

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1888572] [NEW] motd-news: use wget instead of curl

2020-07-22 Thread Andreas Hasenack
-files package, we should switch to wget, which is standard. ** Affects: base-files (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Fix Released ** Affects: base-files (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) Status: In Progress ** Affects

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1887577] Re: DEP8: Invalid capability setuid

2020-07-20 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Tags added: update-excuses ** Tags added: update-excuse -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887577 Title: DEP8: Invalid capability setuid Status in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1887577] [NEW] DEP8: Invalid capability setuid

2020-07-14 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Public bug reported: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac /autopkgtest- groovy/groovy/amd64/a/apparmor/20200713_202347_dd214@/log.gz Excuses is showing apparmor failing dep8 tests when they are triggered by another package. last time apparmor

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1557157] Re: apparmor profile denied for saslauthd: /run/saslauthd/mux

2020-07-09 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Kopanocore armhf is the only persistent red, but this test/package is known to be flaky on armhf. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1557157 Title: apparmor

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1866303] Re: slapd crash with pwdAccountLockedTime and stacked overlays

2020-07-09 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Kopanocore armhf is the only persistent red, but this test/package is known to be flaky on armhf. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1866303 Title: slapd

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1557157] Re: apparmor profile denied for saslauthd: /run/saslauthd/mux

2020-07-08 Thread Andreas Hasenack
The asterisk DEP8 armhf test was retried and is now green. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1557157 Title: apparmor profile denied for saslauthd:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1866303] Re: slapd crash with pwdAccountLockedTime and stacked overlays

2020-07-08 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Eoan verification Reproducing the problem: Version table: *** 2.4.48+dfsg-1ubuntu1.1 500 500 http://br.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu eoan-updates/main amd64 Packages 500 http://br.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu eoan-security/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >