[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871268] Re: Installation fails when "Install Third-Party Drivers" is selected

2020-10-20 Thread Balint Reczey
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #953260 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=953260 ** Also affects: apt (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=953260 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1898418] Re: imagehash python library won't install due to libffi dependency

2020-10-13 Thread Balint Reczey
This report has very little to do with systemd or with other packaged software. ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871268] Re: Installation fails when "Install Third-Party Drivers" is selected

2020-10-09 Thread Balint Reczey
The update of the gcc-10 packages have made APT take a different installation path avoiding hitting this bug. The APT bug is still not resolved, but it does not affect any installation methods in 20.04 anymore. ** Description changed: - Please use the latest daily installer images if you would

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1898869] Re: System slow on booting

2020-10-08 Thread Balint Reczey
I'm not sure what the expectation is here. This is a slow laptop with a spinning disk and 4G RAM. The critical chain shows that waiting for network adds quite some time. Also teamviewer is installed adding +5s. ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871268] Re: Installation fails when "Install Third-Party Drivers" is selected

2020-10-07 Thread Balint Reczey
@mahdish The daily image as recommended at the first line of the bug description? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871268 Title: Installation fails when

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871268] Re: Installation fails when "Install Third-Party Drivers" is selected

2020-10-07 Thread Balint Reczey
@errantscientist Please read the first line of the bug description... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871268 Title: Installation fails when "Install

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871268] Re: Installation fails when "Install Third-Party Drivers" is selected with Could not configure 'libc6:i386'. , E:Could not perform immediate configuration on 'libgcc-s1:

2020-10-02 Thread Balint Reczey
** Summary changed: - Installation fails with Could not configure 'libc6:i386'. , E:Could not perform immediate configuration on 'libgcc-s1:i386' + Installation fails when "Install Third-Party Drivers" is selected with Could not configure 'libc6:i386'. , E:Could not perform immediate

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871268] Re: Installation fails with Could not configure 'libc6:i386'. , E:Could not perform immediate configuration on 'libgcc-s1:i386'

2020-10-01 Thread Balint Reczey
It does not seem possible to fix the bug in glibc, please use the daily installer images at http://www.cdimage.ubuntu.com/focal/daily- live/current/ until APT gets fixed on the release image. The daily installer images has the latest libc6 packages already thus the i386 version can be safely

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871268] Re: Installation fails with Could not configure 'libc6:i386'. , E:Could not perform immediate configuration on 'libgcc-s1:i386'

2020-10-01 Thread Balint Reczey
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: Balint Reczey (rbalint) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu Focal) Status: In Progress => Invalid ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided => High ** Description changed: - Test Case + Please use t

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871268] Re: Installation fails with Could not configure 'libc6:i386'. , E:Could not perform immediate configuration on 'libgcc-s1:i386'

2020-10-01 Thread Balint Reczey
: Fix Committed => Invalid ** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Invalid => In Progress ** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Balint Reczey (rbalint) ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Confirmed ** Changed in: apt (U

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1897620] Re: ABI breakage: paths changed for sysusers.d/sysctl.d/binfmt/modules-load.d

2020-09-28 Thread Balint Reczey
** Tags removed: block-proposed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1897620 Title: ABI breakage: paths changed for sysusers.d/sysctl.d/binfmt/modules- load.d

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1897620] [NEW] ABI breakage: paths changed for sysusers.d/sysctl.d/binfmt/modules-load.d

2020-09-28 Thread Balint Reczey
Public bug reported: Imported from Debian bug http://bugs.debian.org/971282: Package: systemd Version: 246.6-1 Severity: important Upstream changed the paths in systemd.pc from prefix to rootprefix in v246 for sysusers_dir, sysctl_dir, binfmt_dir and modules-load_dir:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871268] Re: Installation fails with Could not configure 'libc6:i386'. , E:Could not perform immediate configuration on 'libgcc-s1:i386'

2020-09-28 Thread Balint Reczey
@toipon Please don't change the status of the bug to wrong values. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Confirmed ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: Invalid => Confirmed ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Fix Released => Confirmed ** Changed

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871268] Re: Installation fails with Could not configure 'libc6:i386'. , E:Could not perform immediate configuration on 'libgcc-s1:i386'

2020-09-26 Thread Balint Reczey
Adding the regression-update tag because the issue in APT is triggered by the SRU of glibc. It is not a result of a change in glibc, rather than of glibc having been updated. ** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: Balint Reczey (rbalint) => (unassigned) -- You received this

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871268] Re: Installation fails with Could not configure 'libc6:i386'. , E:Could not perform immediate configuration on 'libgcc-s1:i386'

2020-09-26 Thread Balint Reczey
** Tags added: regression-update -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871268 Title: Installation fails with Could not configure 'libc6:i386'. , E:Could not

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1896772] Re: systemd-resolved configures no Current Scopes on start

2020-09-24 Thread Balint Reczey
The latest upload (246.6-1ubuntu1) may have fixed this as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1896772 Title: systemd-resolved configures no Current

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871268] Re: Installation fails with Could not configure 'libc6:i386'. , E:Could not perform immediate configuration on 'libgcc-s1:i386'

2020-09-24 Thread Balint Reczey
At least Bionic's glibc is not affected. ** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: glibc (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New **

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871268] Re: Installation fails with Could not configure 'libc6:i386'. , E:Could not perform immediate configuration on 'libgcc-s1:i386'

2020-09-24 Thread Balint Reczey
Easily reproducible on a system with libc6=2.31-0ubuntu9: # apt install -o Debug::pkgPackageManager=True libc6:i386 ... Do you want to continue? [Y/n] Beginning to order Done ordering SmartUnPack libc6:amd64 (replace version 2.31-0ubuntu9 with 2.31-0ubuntu9.1) immediately Ignore

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895576] Re: boot-and-services in tests-in-lxd autopkgtest fails in groovy on s390x

2020-09-24 Thread Balint Reczey
I can't start s390x VMs to reproduce it for some reason so I'm just disabling this test in the next upload. ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1896736] Re: Black screen after resume from suspend invoked by lid close on Thinkpad

2020-09-24 Thread Balint Reczey
Does not occur on my Thinkpad Yoga X1, probably a driver issue. ** Package changed: systemd (Ubuntu) => linux (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1896772] Re: systemd-resolved configures no Current Scopes on start

2020-09-24 Thread Balint Reczey
I can't reproduce that on an up to date 20.10 laptop with wifi connection only. Could you please add some more details that could help in reproduction? If you downgrade to systemd 246.4-1ubuntu1 do you still observe this bug? . ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete --

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895293] Re: After last upgrade systemd uses 100% CPU

2020-09-22 Thread Balint Reczey
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1891657 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891657 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1890913 init is using 100% of processor ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1891657 systemd 100% cpu usage apport-autoreport.service: Failed

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895631] Re: systemd at 100% handling apport failures

2020-09-22 Thread Balint Reczey
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1891657 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891657 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1890913 init is using 100% of processor ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1891657 systemd 100% cpu usage apport-autoreport.service: Failed

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1890913] Re: init is using 100% of processor

2020-09-22 Thread Balint Reczey
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1891657 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891657 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1891657 systemd 100% cpu usage apport-autoreport.service: Failed with result 'start-limit-hit' -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1891657] Re: systemd 100% cpu usage apport-autoreport.service: Failed with result 'start-limit-hit'

2020-09-22 Thread Balint Reczey
Will be fixed in next systemd upload, in 246.6-1ubuntu1, at least for the systemd part. https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/16669 ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Groovy) Status: Confirmed => In Progress ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Groovy) Importance: Undecided => High ** Bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1890913] Re: init is using 100% of processor

2020-09-22 Thread Balint Reczey
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1891657 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891657 Will be fixed in next upload, in 246.6-1ubuntu1 https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/16669 ** Bug watch added: github.com/systemd/systemd/issues #16669

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895293] Re: After last upgrade systemd uses 100% CPU

2020-09-22 Thread Balint Reczey
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1891657 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891657 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1890913 init is using 100% of processor -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895631] Re: systemd at 100% handling apport failures

2020-09-22 Thread Balint Reczey
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1891657 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891657 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1890913 init is using 100% of processor -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1891657] Re: systemd 100% cpu usage apport-autoreport.service: Failed with result 'start-limit-hit'

2020-09-18 Thread Balint Reczey
Apport keeps reshooting apport-autoreport.service as long as there are files like /var/crash/*.crash: # cat /lib/systemd/system/apport-autoreport.path [Unit] Description=Process error reports when automatic reporting is enabled (file watch) ConditionPathExists=/var/lib/apport/autoreport [Path]

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1894195] Re: FFe: Merge iptables 1.8.5-3 (main) from Debian sid (main)

2020-09-17 Thread Balint Reczey
I've attached the upstream changelog. The upstream release contains a lot of fixes for nftables but also rewrites and fixes in other areas. Landing the merge does have risks, but IMO it would be better ship it in 20.10 than the current version. I've asked the Security Team in June if they could

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1894195] Re: FFe: Merge iptables 1.8.5-3 (main) from Debian sid (main)

2020-09-17 Thread Balint Reczey
** Attachment added: "changes-iptables-1.8.5.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iptables/+bug/1894195/+attachment/5411820/+files/changes-iptables-1.8.5.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1891657] Re: systemd 100% cpu usage apport-autoreport.service: Failed with result 'start-limit-hit'

2020-09-17 Thread Balint Reczey
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Groovy) Status: In Progress => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891657 Title: systemd 100% cpu usage

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1891657] Re: systemd 100% cpu usage apport-autoreport.service: Failed with result 'start-limit-hit'

2020-09-17 Thread Balint Reczey
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Groovy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Balint Reczey (rbalint) ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Groovy) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to s

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895576] Re: boot-and-services in tests-in-lxd autopkgtest fails in groovy on s390x

2020-09-17 Thread Balint Reczey
OK, the next upload passes on s390x, so this will likely be resolved. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1895576 Title: boot-and-services in tests-in-lxd

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892358] Re: autopkgtest success rate dropped inhibiting proposed migration

2020-09-14 Thread Balint Reczey
@paelzer To correct myself this (s390x) regression is not due to the snapd seeding issue, but LP: #1895576 which may have been already fixed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1895576] [NEW] boot-and-services in tests-in-lxd autopkgtest fails in groovy on s390x

2020-09-14 Thread Balint Reczey
Public bug reported: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac /autopkgtest-groovy/groovy/s390x/s/systemd/20200903_184028_2bbdf@/log.gz ... test_rsyslog (__main__.ServicesTest) ... FAIL test_tmp_cleanup (__main__.ServicesTest) ... ok test_tmp_mount

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892358] Re: autopkgtest success rate dropped inhibiting proposed migration

2020-09-14 Thread Balint Reczey
@paelzer I agree that the fact, i.e. that systemd autpkgtest is failing in Groovy/s390x, but this is a real regression which is not due to flakiness of tests-in-lxd. Please don't reopen this bug, but file a new one or find one already opened. As I see this is still LP: #1878225. I'm filing a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1877078] Re: Please ship empty /etc/fstab in LXD images

2020-09-04 Thread Balint Reczey
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1877078 Title: Please ship empty /etc/fstab in LXD images

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1893958] Re: [FFe] Please accept iptables 1.8.4-3ubuntu3 switching to nftables backend

2020-09-04 Thread Balint Reczey
** Changed in: iptables (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iptables in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1893958 Title: [FFe] Please accept iptables

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1893899] Re: update alsa/audio related infomation collection code in apport

2020-09-03 Thread Balint Reczey
** Summary changed: - update alsa/audio realted infomation collection code in apport + update alsa/audio related infomation collection code in apport -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1893958] Re: [FFe] Please accept iptables 1.8.4-3ubuntu3 switching to nftables backend

2020-09-03 Thread Balint Reczey
@laney I've sent the email to ubuntu-devel@ a week ago and it also made it to https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item=Ubuntu-20.10-Nftables so I believe every interested party must be aware of that, but I've now pinged stgraber on #ubuntu-release. -- You received this bug notification

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1843468] Re: nftables based iptables wrapper break userspace

2020-09-03 Thread Balint Reczey
switching to nftables (again) is tracked in LP: #1887186 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iptables in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1843468 Title: nftables based iptables wrapper break userspace

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1893958] Re: [FFe] Please accept iptables 1.8.4-3ubuntu3 switching to nftables backend

2020-09-03 Thread Balint Reczey
@oibaf Please open a separate bug for the merge, this one is only for the switch. I agree that the bug fixes would be better to be merged. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iptables in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1893958] [NEW] [FFe] Please accept iptables 1.8.4-3ubuntu3 switching to nftables backend

2020-09-02 Thread Balint Reczey
Public bug reported: The change is a planned change for this development cycle and the fix has been tested as described in LP: #1887186 and https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2020-August/041142.html . Changes: iptables (1.8.4-3ubuntu3) groovy; urgency=medium . * Swap

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1887186] Re: Please switch to nftables as the default backend

2020-09-02 Thread Balint Reczey
FFe: LP: #1893958 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iptables in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887186 Title: Please switch to nftables as the default backend Status in iptables package in Ubuntu:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1893889] Re: unattended-upgrade of nova-common failure due to conffile prompt

2020-09-02 Thread Balint Reczey
As I recall the unattended-upgrades package which hit this bug was not the latest version from bionic-updates. Right? ** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1893675] Re: Autopkgtest failure on latest version of initramfs-tools - lack of partprobe

2020-08-31 Thread Balint Reczey
** Tags added: update-excuse -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1893675 Title: Autopkgtest failure on latest version of initramfs-tools - lack of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1880839] Re: Clock skew on testbeds

2020-08-29 Thread Balint Reczey
We have a few options to fix the issue. The one I'd prefer would be switching to systemd to depend on chrony as the preferred time-daemon because timesynd turns back time and that can cause issues like this one. An other option is disabling systemd-timesyncd in the test VMs, that would make the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1891394] Re: systemd breaks upgrade with useless error if /var is not owned by root

2020-08-26 Thread Balint Reczey
Who owned /var? ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891394 Title: systemd breaks upgrade

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892130] Re: systemd 245.4-4ubuntu3.2 ADT test failure with linux-aws 5.4.0-1022.22

2020-08-26 Thread Balint Reczey
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1892358 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892358 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1892358 autopkgtest success rate dropped inhibiting proposed migration -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892358] Re: autopkgtest success rate dropped inhibiting proposed migration

2020-08-25 Thread Balint Reczey
@paelzer The fstab bug is LP: #1877078, I'm waiting for @vorlon's comment's about what his plan is after his revert. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892358

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1877078] Re: Please ship empty /etc/fstab in LXD images

2020-08-25 Thread Balint Reczey
@vorlon What is your plan regarding this fix? The revert may have helped MAAS, but broke all LXD instances. IMO if MAAS relied on having a broken fstab then MAAS should be fixed and not LXD images should be broken, so I'd prefer having this fix in again. Maybe with /etc/fstab as an empty file

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1877078] Re: Please ship empty /etc/fstab in LXD images

2020-08-21 Thread Balint Reczey
This change got reverted in livecd-rootfs and now breaks systemd autopkgtest. livecd-rootfs (2.683) groovy; urgency=medium * Revert the removal of fstab from squashfs images, which has had knock-on effects and breaks MAAS (ref bug #1890803) -- Steve Langasek Wed, 12 Aug 2020 11:31:12

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892358] Re: autopkgtest success rate dropped inhibiting proposed migration

2020-08-20 Thread Balint Reczey
Tests-in-lxd fails because LXD images ship invalid /etc/fstab again making systemd-remount-fs.service fail. I'm marking systemd-fsckd test as flaky to not block others' work. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1886886] Re: Plymouth 0.9.5 release

2020-08-20 Thread Balint Reczey
I'm testing the fix in Bileto and will upload it if the tests found no regression: https://bileto.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/3801 ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1891716] Re: Networking broken after systemd update

2020-08-20 Thread Balint Reczey
Since this affects only upgrades from pre-246 versions the severity should be High only. I'm testing the fix in Bileto and will upload it if the tests found no regression: https://bileto.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/3801 ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Critical => High -- You received

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1891716] Re: Networking broken after systemd update

2020-08-20 Thread Balint Reczey
https://salsa.debian.org/systemd-team/systemd/-/merge_requests/101 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #968589 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=968589 ** Also affects: systemd (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=968589 Importance: Unknown

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1891716] Re: Networking broken after systemd update

2020-08-19 Thread Balint Reczey
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891716 Title: Networking broken after systemd update

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1790205] Re: systemd journals take up a lot of space, and it's not obvious how much is used, and what the upper limit is.

2020-08-19 Thread Balint Reczey
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1790205 Title: systemd journals take up a lot of space,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1891215] Re: systemd-resolved re-creates /run/systemd/resolve/*resolv.conf for every IPv6 RA received

2020-08-18 Thread Balint Reczey
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891215 Title: systemd-resolved re-creates

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1891527] Re: systemd unit tests need updates for Linux 5.8 and later

2020-08-18 Thread Balint Reczey
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Balint Reczey (rbalint) ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1891716] Re: Networking broken after systemd update

2020-08-18 Thread Balint Reczey
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Critical ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Balint Reczey (rbalint) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1891867] Re: zfs not correctly imported at boot

2020-08-17 Thread Balint Reczey
** Package changed: systemd (Ubuntu) => zsys (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891867 Title: zfs not correctly imported at boot Status in zsys

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1891663] Re: package systemd-timesyncd 245.4-4ubuntu3.2 failed to install/upgrade: package systemd-timesyncd is already installed and configured

2020-08-14 Thread Balint Reczey
There are many similar bugs filed against dpkg, is this an APT issue running dpkg wrong? ** Package changed: dpkg (Ubuntu) => apt (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1882034] Re: cannot start X session with NIS account

2020-08-14 Thread Balint Reczey
Since lightdm works OK there is most likely something that GDM could do differently. I think this is a duplicate of LP: #1745664 . Does installing ncsd resolve the issue with gdm3, too? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1882034] Re: cannot start X session with NIS account

2020-08-14 Thread Balint Reczey
** Also affects: gdm3 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1882034 Title: cannot start X session with NIS

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1891641] Re: package unattended-upgrades 2.3ubuntu0.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed unattended-upgrades package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit sta

2020-08-14 Thread Balint Reczey
Seems like the debconf GTK frontend could not find an icon, needs more investigation. ** Package changed: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu) => debconf (Ubuntu) ** Tags added: rls-ff-incoming -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1886886] Re: Plymouth 0.9.5 release

2020-08-13 Thread Balint Reczey
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886886 Title: Plymouth 0.9.5 release Status in plymouth

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1891332] Re: /usr/bin/unattended-upgrade:apt_pkg.Error:try_to_upgrade:mark_upgrade_adjusted:call_adjusted:clear:/usr/bin/unattended-upgrade@2514:main:run:calculate_upgradable_pkg

2020-08-13 Thread Balint Reczey
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1871145 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871145 ** Description changed: The Ubuntu Error Tracker has been receiving reports about a problem regarding unattended-upgrades. This problem was most recently seen with package version 2.3ubuntu0.1, the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871145] Re: apt.Cache.clear() -> apt.Cache._depcache.init() raises Error

2020-08-13 Thread Balint Reczey
Unattended-upgrades may handle this exception by exiting with failure and not re-raising it to the top. ** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu) Status: Opinion => Triaged ** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low -- You received this bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1890913] Re: init is using 100% of processor

2020-08-10 Thread Balint Reczey
Fastboot is known to cause issues on older CPUs: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/intel_graphics#Fastboot If the i915.fastboot=1 option was _not_ set by you manually then please reopen the bug by settint status to New. ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: High => Undecided **

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1890913] Re: init is using 100% of processor

2020-08-08 Thread Balint Reczey
** Tags added: block-proposed ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1890913 Title: init is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1883447] Re: nspawn on some 32-bit archs blocks _time64 syscalls, breaks upgrade to focal in containers

2020-08-06 Thread Balint Reczey
This commit is already present in Focal and later releases. ** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => Fix Released **

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871641] Re: Ubuntu never finishes booting: A start job is running for Hold until boot process finishes up (3min 7s / no limit) -- removing 'splash' kernel parm fixes it

2020-08-06 Thread Balint Reczey
Is there a reliable way I can reproduce the problem? (I don't face it on my laptops.) Is this happening on any Ubuntu-certified model? This could let our certification team to investigate the issue. How can the systemd help? killing plymouth earlier? ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1832050] Re: chrony autopkgtest "time-sources-from-dhcp-servers" fails (produces stderr)

2020-08-03 Thread Balint Reczey
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1805183 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1805183 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1805183 systemd-resolved constantly restarts on Bionic upgraded from Xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1832053] Re: systemd dhclient hook is causing md5sum cmds in inexistent files

2020-08-03 Thread Balint Reczey
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1805183 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1805183 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1832050 chrony autopkgtest "time-sources-from-dhcp-servers" fails (produces stderr) ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1805183 systemd-resolved

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1885730] Re: Bring back ondemand.service or switch kernel default governor for pstate - pstate now defaults to performance governor

2020-08-03 Thread Balint Reczey
I've added the OEM Solutions Group team for awareness. I'm not sure what the final fix will be since servers' and desktops'/laptops' ideal default seem to be different, but most likely the certification tests should be adjusted if we don't end up restoring the previous behaviour of the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1885730] Re: Bring back ondemand.service or switch kernel default governor for pstate - pstate now defaults to performance governor

2020-08-03 Thread Balint Reczey
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1877769] Re: [SRU] Rewinding cache triggers obsolete adjustments consuming a lot of CPU

2020-07-31 Thread Balint Reczey
Verified 2.3ubuntu0.1 on Focal: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac /autopkgtest-focal/focal/amd64/u/unattended- upgrades/20200722_172955_59a0f@/log.gz : ... Running ./test_rewind.py with python3 INFO:root:Allowed origins are:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1883082] Re: Crash when using Package-Whitelist-Strict

2020-07-31 Thread Balint Reczey
Verified 2.3ubuntu0.1 on Focal (checking reproducibility with buggy version first): root@ff-uu-1-verify:~# apt list --upgradable Listing... Done open-vm-tools/focal-updates 2:11.1.0-2~ubuntu20.04.1 amd64 [upgradable from: 2:11.0.5-4] N: There is 1 additional version. Please use the '-a' switch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1886161] Re: UU should work on roaming laptops

2020-07-22 Thread Balint Reczey
It is actually APT that triggers the u-u runs, so if there is anything that can be fixed around timing that can be done on APT. I agree that it would be desired to download packages even on roaming laptops. ** Package changed: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu) => apt (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: apt

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1888442] Re: upgrade did not go well

2020-07-22 Thread Balint Reczey
You seem to be using ZFS on root (which is EXPERIMENTAL AFAIK). ... update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-5.4.0-41-generic cryptsetup: ERROR: Couldn't resolve device rpool/ROOT/ubuntu cryptsetup: WARNING: Couldn't determine root device ... ** Package changed: systemd (Ubuntu) =>

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1872215] Re: There should be a GUI option to install non-security packages too

2020-07-21 Thread Balint Reczey
** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Opinion -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1887655] Re: unattended-upgrades triggers reboot despite configuration

2020-07-21 Thread Balint Reczey
What is the output of: apt-config dump | grep Reboot ? ** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1886161] Re: UU should work on roaming laptops

2020-07-21 Thread Balint Reczey
Those options can be overridden to match your preference. I for example enable u-u on metered connections because the plan I use allows enough traffic for that. ** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1883082] Re: Crash when using Package-Whitelist-Strict

2020-07-21 Thread Balint Reczey
** Description changed: + [Impact] + + * Unattended-upgrades crashes when strict whitelist is enabled and + there is an update available. + + [Test Case] + + Set up a system with at least one updated package available: + + $ lxc launch ubuntu:focal ff-uu-strict + Creating ff-uu-strict +

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1877769] Re: [SRU] Rewinding cache triggers obsolete adjustments consuming a lot of CPU

2020-07-21 Thread Balint Reczey
** Also affects: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1877769 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1887919] Re: autopkgtest failure with libselinux 3.1

2020-07-17 Thread Balint Reczey
The change in SELinux causing the failures: https://github.com/SELinuxProject/selinux/commit/9eb9c9327563014ad6a807814e7975424642d5b9 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1885730] Re: Bring back ondemand.service or switch kernel default governor for pstate - pstate now defaults to performance governor

2020-07-17 Thread Balint Reczey
I have a freshly installed 20.10 system running on a 2012 MacBook Air (MBA 5,2) and it is completely silent and cold when being idle: rbalint@chaos:~$ sudo cpupower frequency-info analyzing CPU 0: driver: intel_pstate CPUs which run at the same hardware frequency: 0 CPUs which need to have

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1887919] Re: autopkgtest failure with libselinux 3.1

2020-07-17 Thread Balint Reczey
I plan fixing the glibc failure together with other issues early next week. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887919 Title: autopkgtest failure with libselinux

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1887919] [NEW] autopkgtest failure with libselinux 3.1

2020-07-17 Thread Balint Reczey
Public bug reported: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac /autopkgtest-groovy/groovy/amd64/g/glibc/20200717_023434_9a6a8@/log.gz ... x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc-9 nss_files/files-service.c -c -std=gnu11 -fgnu89-inline -pipe -O2 -g -O3 -Wall

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1885755] Re: test-cap-list fails with Linux 5.8 due to new capabilities

2020-07-15 Thread Balint Reczey
Fixed at upstream at: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/16424 ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Balint Reczey (rbalint)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1887186] Re: Please switch to nftables as the default backend

2020-07-15 Thread Balint Reczey
** Description changed: The iptables package in Ubuntu already made the switch but it was reverted in LP: #1843468 due to breaking reverse dependencies and software not packaged in the Ubuntu Archive. The switch of the default backend is also a preparation for making the nftables

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1887191] Re: autopkgtest always fail on i386 for f and later

2020-07-14 Thread Balint Reczey
IMO this should be fixed in hints handling in autopkgtest-cloud and not on per package basis. Obsolete tests should not be run. ** Also affects: autopkgtest-cloud Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Project changed: autopkgtest-cloud => auto-package-testing -- You received this bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1887191] Re: autopkgtest always fail on i386 for f and later

2020-07-14 Thread Balint Reczey
And I agree that this is super annoying - for thousands of packages. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887191 Title: autopkgtest always fail on i386 for f

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1887186] [NEW] Please switch to nftables as the default backend

2020-07-10 Thread Balint Reczey
Public bug reported: The iptables package in Ubuntu already made the switch but it was reverted in LP: #1843468 due to breaking reverse dependencies and software not packaged in the Ubuntu Archive. The switch of the default backend is also a preparation for making the nftables frontend to be the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1883846] Re: hwdb: Mask rfkill event from intel-hid on HP platforms

2020-07-06 Thread Balint Reczey
I'm also uploading to Groovy so the SRU can be accepted according to the process. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1883846 Title: hwdb: Mask rfkill event

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1886430] [NEW] debian/tests/tests-in-lxd fails when /etc/fstab is missing from the LXC container

2020-07-06 Thread Balint Reczey
Public bug reported: In LP: #1877078 /etc/fstab has been removed from LXD images and now the workaround also removing it in the test started failing . :-( ** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1885730] Re: Bring back ondemand.service or switch kernel default governor for pstate - pstate now defaults to performance governor

2020-07-02 Thread Balint Reczey
@xnox @juliank IMO there is no real need for different boot time and post-boot governor. I think where we would like to save power or be less noisy the (possibly) faster boot does not have huge impact on user satisfaction. I agree that fans should not be on all the time in laptops/desktops. If

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1880258] Re: Add trailing dot to make connectivity-check.ubuntu.com. absolute and reduce NXDOMAIN warning noise

2020-07-02 Thread Balint Reczey
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Low => Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1880258 Title: Add trailing dot to make

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >