[Touch-packages] [Bug 1964494] Re: Setting DuplicateAddressDetection=none doesn't disable DAD for link-local IPs

2022-06-14 Thread Dan Streetman
marked verified per comment 10 ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-jammy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1964494] Re: Setting DuplicateAddressDetection=none doesn't disable DAD for link-local IPs

2022-05-31 Thread Dan Streetman
** Description changed: - A customer reported network disconnections on their storage + [impact] + + manual disabling of ipv4 DAD (IACD) for static link-local address does + not work in jammy + + [test case] + + see 'Reproducer' in original description below + + [regression potential] + +

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1940715] Re: systemd-resolved restricts edns0 advertised max size to 512

2022-05-22 Thread Dan Streetman
** Description changed: [impact] when talking to upstream nameservers, systemd-resolved limits its advertised max packet size as 512 in its edns0 opt. However, one of the primary benefits of edns0 is to allow using packet sizes larger than 512, which is the pre-edns0 max packet size.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1940715] Re: systemd-resolved restricts edns0 advertised max size to 512

2022-05-22 Thread Dan Streetman
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Hirsute) Status: In Progress => Won't Fix ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1881207] Re: systemd-networkd brings eno1 up and down repeatedly

2022-05-22 Thread Dan Streetman
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Assignee: Dan Streetman (ddstreet) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Bionic) Assignee: Dan Streetman (ddstreet) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Eoan) Assignee: Dan Streetman (ddstreet) => (unassigned) *

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1961833] Re: openssh 8.8 breaks login to Canonical servers

2022-05-12 Thread Dan Streetman
interestingly, paramiko is also broken when connecting to older servers, but not for the same reason as this bug. See bug 1973241 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1961833] Re: openssh 8.8 breaks login to Canonical servers

2022-05-12 Thread Dan Streetman
For reference to anyone coming here with this problem, when connecting to a remote sshd server you can find what host key algorithms the remote host uses by using -vv and check the debug output; look first for the *peer* server KEXINIT proposal (not the earlier *local client* KEXINIT proposal):

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1940141] Re: OpenSSL servers can send a non-empty status_request in a CertificateRequest

2022-05-10 Thread Dan Streetman
** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu) Assignee: Nicolas Bock (nicolasbock) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu Bionic) Assignee: Nicolas Bock (nicolasbock) => Bruce Elrick (virtuous-sloth) ** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: Fix Committed => In Progress ** Tags

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1906331] Re: systemd-resolve crashes fairly often (and reports various assertions)

2022-04-25 Thread Dan Streetman
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Assignee: Dan Streetman (ddstreet) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Hirsute) Assignee: Dan Streetman (ddstreet) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1928733] Re: Starting systemd Network Service fails with "Invalid argument"

2022-04-25 Thread Dan Streetman
per comment 6, this should be fixed in jammy, so marking fixed released there. ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1939255] Re: dhclient triggers systemd-resolved start limit when processing more than 5 interfaces at once

2022-04-18 Thread Dan Streetman
> It seems this issue may occur not only when receiving addresses on multiple interfaces, but also when dhcp requests on multiple interfaces times out and the hook script was called with 'reason' == FAIL. yep, the try-reload-or-restart is done for those as well and this should be fixed for those

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1966381] Re: applications crash that never crashed under Ubuntu-20.04

2022-04-01 Thread Dan Streetman
> I think you have a problem there too. oh I'm certainly not claiming a 1g default swap is appropriate, that does seem far, far too small to me and will likely cause widespread issues beyond just this, I was only saying that tweaking the systemd- oomd swap % full setting would IMHO not be likely

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1966381] Re: applications crash that never crashed under Ubuntu-20.04

2022-03-31 Thread Dan Streetman
> it's going to be hard to get around the core issue of oomd counting pagecache as memory pressure assuming my quick 10-minute assessment of this bug is correct, of course...maybe i'm totally wrong about what the problem is ;-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1966381] Re: applications crash that never crashed under Ubuntu-20.04

2022-03-31 Thread Dan Streetman
> So, maybe the default SwapUsedLimit is not appropriate for Ubuntu I don't think tweaking that will help much if at all, it's going to be hard to get around the core issue of oomd counting pagecache as memory pressure -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1966381] Re: applications crash that never crashed under Ubuntu-20.04

2022-03-31 Thread Dan Streetman
wow, looking at the systemd code (even upstream), oomd is counting pagecache as 'used' memory which is massively unfair as the kernel is responsible for pagecache use, not userspace, and it's not even accurate (from a OOM perspective) since the kernel will drop pagecache as memory pressure

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1965180] Re: apt-add-repository requires --login for private repos, breaking automated workflows

2022-03-30 Thread Dan Streetman
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~ddstreet/software-properties/+git/software-properties/+merge/417981 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1940141] Re: OpenSSL servers can send a non-empty status_request in a CertificateRequest

2022-03-23 Thread Dan Streetman
uploaded to bionic queue, thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940141 Title: OpenSSL servers can send a non-empty status_request in a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1940141] Re: OpenSSL servers can send a non-empty status_request in a CertificateRequest

2022-03-23 Thread Dan Streetman
If you'd rather remove the opt-in part, that's fine with me; I can sponsor the debdiff then with the opt-in parts left out, if that works for you Bruce and Nicolas. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1940141] Re: OpenSSL servers can send a non-empty status_request in a CertificateRequest

2022-03-23 Thread Dan Streetman
@ubuntu-security since this is openssl, could you give the debdiff a review? I can sponsor it as a normal SRU if you have no objections (and the changes look ok to you), as it doesn't really seem like it would specifically need to go to the -security pocket. -- You received this bug notification

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1940141] Re: OpenSSL servers can send a non-empty status_request in a CertificateRequest

2022-03-23 Thread Dan Streetman
> It's not needed for actual functionality of the backport but that assumes that any future backports or fixes don't break this backport yes i get that, my comment is about whether or not the patch changes any code *outside* of the self-tests, e.g. the TLSProxy perl code changes. If that's *only*

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1940141] Re: OpenSSL servers can send a non-empty status_request in a CertificateRequest

2022-03-23 Thread Dan Streetman
The 2nd upstream patch appears to add new functionality, for actually parsing a certificate request; is that actually needed (outside of the self-tests)? If not, it shouldn't be included in the backport. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1962332] Re: xenial systemd fails to start if cgroup2 is mounted

2022-03-14 Thread Dan Streetman
> I have update ongoing on esm-infa-staging for it just to clarify, if the systemd patch isn't added to the actual main (currently closed) xenial-updates repo, it won't be very much help to anyone wanting to create new xenial containers on jammy. So, just patching systemd in the esm repo likely

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1964494] Re: Setting DuplicateAddressDetection=none doesn't disable DAD for link-local IPs

2022-03-10 Thread Dan Streetman
> I think this commit [1] may be related (landed in systemd v249) yeah, that commit seems to be intentionally forcing ACD on for statically configured ipv4, i'm not sure quite why, it seems like a user-configured setting should be honored; but possibly Yu was trying to default it to on instead of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1962038] Re: wrong sysrq value in /usr/lib/sysctl.d/50-default.conf

2022-03-01 Thread Dan Streetman
> systemd should drop its setting to defer to the file that we have been carrying in procps for a very long time. at some point it would be a better idea to drop the procps files and adjust the systemd defaults where/if needed. The sysctl configuration hasn't been applied by procps since upstart;

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1962332] Re: xenial systemd fails to start if cgroup2 is mounted

2022-02-28 Thread Dan Streetman
> "so this is fixed already in f and later" - think you mean "b and later" here? yes sorry, fixed in b and later ** Description changed: [impact] now that jammy has moved to using unified cgroup2, containers started on jammy must also use unified cgroup2 (since the cgroup subsystems

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1962332] [NEW] xenial systemd fails to start if cgroup2 is mounted

2022-02-25 Thread Dan Streetman
Public bug reported: [impact] now that jammy has moved to using unified cgroup2, containers started on jammy must also use unified cgroup2 (since the cgroup subsystems can only be mounted as v1 or v2 throughout the entire system, including inside containers). However, the systemd in xenial does

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1945225] Re: udev produces unpredictable net names when PCI device is a bridge

2022-01-19 Thread Dan Streetman
did you find any alternate way to handle this? If not we should probably review/merge the 247 naming approach, if @slyon approves -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1950508] Re: unified cgroup incorrectly used in container on host with legacy/hybrid cgroup

2022-01-12 Thread Dan Streetman
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Impish) Assignee: Dan Streetman (ddstreet) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Impish) Status: In Progress => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to s

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1934147] Re: systemd leaks abandoned session scopes

2022-01-12 Thread Dan Streetman
per comment 5, released for impish ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Impish) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1949970] Re: attempt to dlopen nonexistent pam_kwallet.so spams log

2022-01-11 Thread Dan Streetman
I think we should ignore hirsute since it reaches EOL next week. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1949970 Title: attempt to dlopen nonexistent

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1949970] Re: attempt to dlopen nonexistent pam_kwallet.so spams log

2022-01-11 Thread Dan Streetman
ubuntu@lp1949970-f:~$ dpkg -l lightdm|grep lightdm ii lightdm1.30.0-0ubuntu4~20.04.1 amd64Display Manager ubuntu@lp1949970-f:~$ journalctl -b -g 'unable to dlopen' -- Logs begin at Tue 2022-01-11 17:28:51 UTC, end at Tue 2022-01-11 18:02:33 UTC. -- Jan 11 17:58:09 lp1949970-f

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1949970] Re: attempt to dlopen nonexistent pam_kwallet.so spams log

2022-01-11 Thread Dan Streetman
ubuntu@lp1949970-i:~$ dpkg -l lightdm|grep lightdm ii lightdm 1.30.0-0ubuntu4 amd64Display Manager ubuntu@lp1949970-i:~$ journalctl -b -g 'unable to dlopen' -- Journal begins at Tue 2022-01-11 17:28:57 UTC, ends at Tue 2022-01-11 17:59:05

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1950496] Re: networkd doesn't provide DNS to nspawn containers

2022-01-04 Thread Dan Streetman
Also for future reference I think upstream commit fb3aec45a0de7f71aa6418bd4f9d5f314efb4eb5 fixes this, but I never got a chance to test it before upgrading. ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => Incomplete ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1950496] Re: networkd doesn't provide DNS to nspawn containers

2022-01-04 Thread Dan Streetman
it's no longer a problem for me as I've upgraded to impish, I'm dropping ownership of this, but if anyone else has this problem (i.e. can reproduce it) please reopen the bug and/or add a comment. ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: Dan Streetman (ddstreet) => (unassigned) ** Chan

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1946388] Re: Journalctl -f --file some.journal causes coredump

2022-01-04 Thread Dan Streetman
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dan Streetman (ddstreet) ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification be

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1946388] Re: Journalctl -f --file some.journal causes coredump

2022-01-04 Thread Dan Streetman
** Bug watch added: github.com/systemd/systemd/issues #15528 https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/15528 ** Also affects: systemd via https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/15528 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu Focal) Importance:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1950794] Re: DHCPv4 (IAID+DUID) networking broken in LXC containers

2021-11-23 Thread Dan Streetman
> Reverting this upstream commit seems to fix the problem: > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/0299deab53d2a087727a5d04c1500c322c48b63e lxd and systemd have what I can only describe euphemistically as a horrible relationship. Instead of carrying another patch on systemd to get it working

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1950520] Re: systemd-resolved delivers SOA information when it should not

2021-11-19 Thread Dan Streetman
> Is there a ppa with a more recent systemd-resolved to try on focal yes, https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-support-team/+archive/ubuntu/systemd however that includes the entire upstream systemd code, not only systemd-resolved; i'd suggest you test inside a VM and not on your main system. -- You

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1949089] Re: systemd randomly fails to activate mount units in Ubuntu Core 18

2021-11-19 Thread Dan Streetman
> It's not something that snapd writes out, it's curious where this comes from it's not written out, it's internally handled/added by pid1, and it *should* be there, because you do want (for example) the mount to be stopped if its backing device is removed. However when the mount is stopped, the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1949089] Re: systemd randomly fails to activate mount units in Ubuntu Core 18

2021-11-18 Thread Dan Streetman
Sorry to clarify that, the dep is added to the mount over a daemon- reload, but only on core: ddstreet@localhost:~$ systemctl list-dependencies snap-hello\\x2dworld-29.mount snap-hello\x2dworld-29.mount ● ├─-.mount ● ├─snap.mount ● ├─system.slice ● └─var-lib-snapd.mount ddstreet@localhost:~$

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1949089] Re: systemd randomly fails to activate mount units in Ubuntu Core 18

2021-11-18 Thread Dan Streetman
This added BindsTo is what's causing the problem: ddstreet@localhost:~$ systemctl show -p BindsTo snap-hello\\x2dworld-29.mount BindsTo= ddstreet@localhost:~$ sudo systemctl daemon-reload ddstreet@localhost:~$ systemctl show -p BindsTo snap-hello\\x2dworld-29.mount BindsTo=dev-loop6.device

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1949089] Re: systemd randomly fails to activate mount units in Ubuntu Core 18

2021-11-18 Thread Dan Streetman
Note one interesting point is that in a core18 system, a squashfs mount (any loop-based mount, really) includes a dep from the mount to its loop device, while the non-core system does not: ddstreet@localhost:~$ cat /etc/issue Ubuntu Core 18 on \4 (\l) ddstreet@localhost:~$ systemctl

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1949089] Re: systemd randomly fails to activate mount units in Ubuntu Core 18

2021-11-17 Thread Dan Streetman
> @slyon you might want to see if commit 918e6f1c0151429f5095355f4f3f74f16e79724a fixes this (and there are a couple follow on commits to this) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1949089] Re: systemd randomly fails to activate mount units in Ubuntu Core 18

2021-11-17 Thread Dan Streetman
@slyon you might want to see if commit 918e6f1c0151429f5095355f4f3f74f16e79724a fixes this -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1949089 Title: systemd randomly

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1591490] Re: Please backport apt 1.0.9.2ubuntu2 from utopic (to fix do-release-upgrade)

2021-11-16 Thread Dan Streetman
** Changed in: trusty-backports Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1591490 Title: Please backport apt 1.0.9.2ubuntu2 from utopic

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1285783] Re: Right panel has a transparent background

2021-11-16 Thread Dan Streetman
** Changed in: trusty-backports Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-themes in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1285783 Title: Right panel has a transparent

[Touch-packages] [Bug 326217] Re: QT libraries in hardy broken because of backports

2021-11-16 Thread Dan Streetman
** Changed in: hardy-backports Status: Incomplete => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to qt4-x11 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326217 Title: QT libraries in hardy broken because of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 313960] Re: Please update dnsmasq hardy packages to version 2.46

2021-11-16 Thread Dan Streetman
** Changed in: hardy-backports Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/313960 Title: Please update dnsmasq hardy packages to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 792301] Re: Ericsson F5521gw 3G module for Lenovo not using optimal kernel module

2021-11-16 Thread Dan Streetman
** Changed in: lucid-backports Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to modemmanager in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/792301 Title: Ericsson F5521gw 3G module for Lenovo not

[Touch-packages] [Bug 865907] Re: Please backport tracker to Oneiric

2021-11-16 Thread Dan Streetman
** Changed in: oneiric-backports Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to tracker in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/865907 Title: Please backport tracker to Oneiric Status

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1791958] Re: iptables-restore is missing -w option

2021-11-16 Thread Dan Streetman
Hello, the backports process has recently been updated, please see the new documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBackports I'm closing this bug, but please feel free to open a new bug (or reopen this bug) using the new process, if appropriate. ** Changed in: bionic-backports

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1950511] [NEW] FTBFS due to meson disallowing + for bools

2021-11-10 Thread Dan Streetman
Public bug reported: FTBFS with new meson: ../meson.build:46:3: ERROR: Object <[BooleanHolder] holds [bool]: False> of type bool does not support the `+` operator. ** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: High Assignee: Dan Streetman (ddstreet) Status: In Progress ** A

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1950508] Re: unified cgroup incorrectly used in container on host with legacy/hybrid cgroup

2021-11-10 Thread Dan Streetman
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dan Streetman (ddstreet) ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Impish) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dan Streetman (ddstreet) ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: system

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1950508] [NEW] unified cgroup incorrectly used in container on host with legacy/hybrid cgroup

2021-11-10 Thread Dan Streetman
Public bug reported: [impact] after systemd was changed to default to cgroupv2, any container started on a host that still uses legacy or hybrid cgroup mounts will result in a container that attempts to use unified cgroup but can't due to all the controllers being used as v1 in the host kernel.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1950496] [NEW] networkd doesn't provide DNS to nspawn containers

2021-11-10 Thread Dan Streetman
: Medium Assignee: Dan Streetman (ddstreet) Status: In Progress ** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dan Streetman (ddstreet) ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Fo

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1949089] Re: systemd randomly fails to activate mount units in Ubuntu Core 18

2021-11-09 Thread Dan Streetman
> and in QEMU it seems that this bug is not reproducible can you provide steps on how this is reproducable then? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1949089

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1949970] Re: attempt to dlopen nonexistent pam_kwallet.so spams log

2021-11-05 Thread Dan Streetman
** Also affects: lightdm (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: lightdm (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided => Low -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1949970] Re: attempt to dlopen nonexistent pam_kwallet.so spams log

2021-11-05 Thread Dan Streetman
** Description changed: [impact] lightdm's pam.d config includes an attempt to dlopen pam_kwallet.so as well as pam_kwallet5.so, however pam_wallet.so comes from pam-kwallet which died around Trusty (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam- kwallet) while pam_kwallet5.so comes from

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1949970] [NEW] attempt to dlopen nonexistent pam_kwallet.so spams log

2021-11-05 Thread Dan Streetman
Public bug reported: [impact] lightdm's pam.d config includes an attempt to dlopen pam_kwallet.so as well as pam_kwallet5.so, however pam_wallet.so comes from pam-kwallet which died around Trusty (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam- kwallet) while pam_kwallet5.so comes from kwallet-pam

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1940141] Re: OpenSSL servers can send a non-empty status_request in a CertificateRequest

2021-11-03 Thread Dan Streetman
> the additional information contains valid data. then I think SRU'ing this would cause a behavior change that could possibly break someone, which isn't something we should do. I'd suggest putting the fix behind some opt-in mechanism, so anyone who is affected can opt-in to the fixed behavior,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1948538] Re: USB serial devices not available in /dev/serial/by-id/ after upgrade

2021-10-25 Thread Dan Streetman
> /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/90-pi-bluetooth.rules:14 Invalid value ... rules provided by pi-bluetooth package, not systemd. ** Package changed: systemd (Ubuntu) => pi-bluetooth (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1947708] Re: Cannot configure suspend-then-hibernate

2021-10-19 Thread Dan Streetman
> [ 82.230208] Lockdown: systemd-logind: hibernation is restricted; see man kernel_lockdown.7 you're using UEFI secure boot, which puts the system into 'lockdown', which disallows (unencrypted) hibernation. So this isn't a problem with systemd, this requires the kernel to handle encrypted

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1947617] Re: Cannot configure suspend-then-hibernate

2021-10-18 Thread Dan Streetman
You have 16G of memory: > [0.081527] Memory: 15609664K/16134968K available But you only seem to have 2G of swap: [2.770354] Adding 2097148k swap on /swapfile There is no way hibernation is possible on your system with this setup. ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: New =>

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1934393] Re: systemd-logind network access is blocked, and breaks remote authentication configurations

2021-10-14 Thread Dan Streetman
Ok let's go with option #1 then, just open up systemd-logind to network access directly by editing the service file. @mbiebl, do you want to patch this in Debian too, should I open a merge request in salsa? Obviously if Debian is patched first, that's ideal. Assuming you're ok with directly

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1945225] Re: udev produces unpredictable net names when PCI device is a bridge

2021-10-14 Thread Dan Streetman
> I like the idea of the kernel command line argument because it is easy to apply and consistent across install types. I agree the kernel boot param is absolutely easier, especially in the context of maas. TL;DR from me is: I think it's at least worth looking at using a link file, or some other

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1945225] Re: udev produces unpredictable net names when PCI device is a bridge

2021-10-13 Thread Dan Streetman
> how would one insert such a file during (and early enough) in the commissioning process? well, i'll leave that one up to the maas team to answer properly, but i think there are ways to use custom commissioning scripts: https://maas.io/docs/commissioning-scripts-reference or even custom

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1945225] Re: udev produces unpredictable net names when PCI device is a bridge

2021-10-13 Thread Dan Streetman
> udev can produce unpredictable network interface names by default when multiple devices map to the same slot due to an intermediate bridge. so, if I understand it right, the MR won't actually fix this for anyone without additional per-system work, right? specifically, any system with this

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1940715] Re: systemd-resolved restricts edns0 advertised max size to 512

2021-10-13 Thread Dan Streetman
** Bug watch added: github.com/systemd/systemd/issues #20993 https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/20993 ** Also affects: systemd via https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/20993 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1946086] Re: systemd user daemon fails with Permission denied when creating transient scope

2021-10-05 Thread Dan Streetman
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1742804 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1742804 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1742804 Failed to add PIDs to scope's control group -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1940141] Re: OpenSSL servers can send a non-empty status_request in a CertificateRequest

2021-10-01 Thread Dan Streetman
for later reference, i'd discussed this with nick and asked him to check if the 'status_request' reply contained any kind of valid data in the specific cases where this patch will disable it; my concern is if there is valid data in it, it's possible there are applications out there that might

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1945066] Re: package udev 245.4-4ubuntu3.11 failed to install/upgrade: installed udev package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2021-09-27 Thread Dan Streetman
your system has kernel warnings and hung task errors, and you appear to be using an unsupported 5.9 kernel, it seems the problem is there, not with systemd/udevd. ** Package changed: systemd (Ubuntu) => linux (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1944459] Re: systemd-udevd NamePolicy= warning issue

2021-09-23 Thread Dan Streetman
> "ubuntu systemd-udevd[911]: Network interface NamePolicy= disabled on kernel command line, ignoring." yes..you have disabled it on the kernel command line. I don't understand what the bug is here? ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1910769] Re: systemd-logind: loss of input devices when logging in after restart

2021-09-23 Thread Dan Streetman
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1944711 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1944711 I suspect this is due to bug 1944711, which i'll dup this one to; i know your bug is far older, but since i couldn't reproduce your bug and i'm not sure if it's the same, i didn't want to take it over with

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1944711] Re: restarting systemd-logind loses all existing sessions

2021-09-23 Thread Dan Streetman
ded in v246, so this is fixed in h and later already. + + in b, the function used to parse the /run/systemd/users/* files allows + either usernames or uids, so this bug does not exist there ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dan Streetman (ddstreet) ** C

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1944711] [NEW] restarting systemd-logind loses all existing sessions

2021-09-23 Thread Dan Streetman
Public bug reported: [impact] restarting the systemd-logind service loses all existing sessions [test case] ubuntu@test-f:~$ loginctl list-sessions SESSION UID USER SEAT TTY 3789 1000 ubuntu pts/0 1 sessions listed. ubuntu@test-f:~$ journalctl -b -u systemd-logind -- Logs begin

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1934393] Re: systemd-logind network access is blocked, and breaks remote authentication configurations

2021-09-22 Thread Dan Streetman
One good point in favor of including systemd-userdbd in Debian/Ubuntu would be that we only need to adjust the restrictions for that service; all other systemd-provided services would use (or at least, *should* use...) systemd-userdbd to get user records. I'm not sure if that is actually worth

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1934393] Re: systemd-logind network access is blocked, and breaks remote authentication configurations

2021-09-22 Thread Dan Streetman
** Description changed: [impact] starting in focal, systemd-logind runs sandboxed without any network access, which breaks any configuration that uses remote servers for user data, e.g. ldap, nis, etc A more full discussion is available in the upstream bug report as well as the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1934393] Re: systemd-logind network access is blocked, and breaks remote authentication configurations

2021-09-22 Thread Dan Streetman
> @Dan: have you actually confirmed, that building and running userdbd solves those issues with NIS and LDAP? sorry for the delay in getting back to this. So, you're correct, userdb doesn't actually help this, it only moves the problem. While systemd-userdbd.service does (currently, at least)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1943990] Re: After updating systemd packages to 245.4-4ubuntu3.13 and libvirt packages to 6.0.0-0ubuntu8.14, it is no longer possible to start kvm virtual machines

2021-09-17 Thread Dan Streetman
you state you have systemd version 245.4-4ubuntu3.13 installed, but your description shows otherwise: Package: systemd-container 245.4-4ubuntu3.11 ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1938259] Re: Add ACCEL_LOCATION=base property for Dell clamshell models

2021-09-15 Thread Dan Streetman
this was marked fix-released for f/h just due to the tooling matching the bug number; this was actually reverted as shown in the changelogs posted in the above comments. I'll just correct f/h to indicate this is wontfix, and a new bug will or has been opened to fix this correctly. ** Changed in:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1939255] Re: dhclient triggers systemd-resolved start limit when processing more than 5 interfaces at once

2021-09-09 Thread Dan Streetman
as systemd was respun (for focal) due to bug 1942899, and only the one udev (hwdb) patch was reverted which shouldn't affect this at all, I'm remarking this as verified still based on testing for the previous version above. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal ** Tags

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1937238] Re: systemd-time-wait-sync.service stuck in "activating" state after boot, blocks timers from starting

2021-09-09 Thread Dan Streetman
as systemd was respun due to bug 1942899, and only the one udev (hwdb) patch was reverted which shouldn't affect this at all, I'm remarking this as verified still based on testing for the previous version above. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal ** Tags added:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1853164] Re: systemd: /etc/dhcp/dhclient-enter-hooks.d/resolved error

2021-09-09 Thread Dan Streetman
root@lp1853164-b:~# dpkg -l systemd|grep systemd ii systemd237-3ubuntu10.51 amd64system and service manager root@lp1853164-b:~# dpkg -l | grep -E 'ifupdown|resolvconf' ii ifupdown 0.8.17ubuntu1.1 amd64 high level tools to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1853164] Re: systemd: /etc/dhcp/dhclient-enter-hooks.d/resolved error

2021-09-09 Thread Dan Streetman
as systemd was respun due to bug 1942899, and only the one udev (hwdb) patch was reverted which shouldn't affect this at all, I'm remarking this as verified still based on testing for the previous version above. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1853164] Re: systemd: /etc/dhcp/dhclient-enter-hooks.d/resolved error

2021-09-09 Thread Dan Streetman
heh, please ignore the above comment, the current focal systemd was respun, but the fix for this was already released for focal, this only needs bionic verified now :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1942899] Re: Revert Add ACCEL_LOCATION=base property for Dell clamshell models

2021-09-09 Thread Dan Streetman
for the verifications above, i also updated the 'udev' package to the same version as systemd ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal verification-needed-hirsute ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-focal verification-done-hirsute -- You received this bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1942899] Re: Revert Add ACCEL_LOCATION=base property for Dell clamshell models

2021-09-09 Thread Dan Streetman
commit to focal that needed reverting: https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu/+source/systemd/commit/?h=ubuntu-focal=5c1be33900edee94da0dc9a4ade8edcd079b4c85 ubuntu@lp1942899-f:~$ dpkg -l systemd|grep systemd ii systemd245.4-4ubuntu3.11 amd64system and service manager

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1942899] Re: Revert Add ACCEL_LOCATION=base property for Dell clamshell models

2021-09-09 Thread Dan Streetman
commit to hirsute that needed reverting: https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu/+source/systemd/commit/?id=a21edd743408b5603b0177e9c230c6d6b919e589 ubuntu@lp1942899-h:~$ dpkg -l systemd|grep systemd ii systemd247.3-3ubuntu3.4 amd64system and service manager

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1942899] Re: Revert Add ACCEL_LOCATION=base property for Dell clamshell models

2021-09-09 Thread Dan Streetman
** Description changed: [impact] initial patch for LP: #1938259 was incorrect. [test case] this bug is only to revert the previous patch + + the upstream commit + is:https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/20314/commits/55b29d8f130684bf1fd9fdfaef3bcca64b66930e + + checking for

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1934981] Re: systemctl suspend-then-hibernate attempts hybrid-sleep instead

2021-09-09 Thread Dan Streetman
ubuntu@lp1934981-f:~$ dpkg -l systemd|grep systemd ii systemd245.4-4ubuntu3.11 amd64system and service manager ubuntu@lp1934981-f:~$ grep -E '^Allow' /etc/systemd/sleep.conf AllowSuspendThenHibernate=yes AllowHybridSleep=no ubuntu@lp1934981-f:~$ sudo systemctl

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1934981] Re: systemctl suspend-then-hibernate attempts hybrid-sleep instead

2021-09-09 Thread Dan Streetman
ubuntu@lp1934981-h:~$ dpkg -l systemd|grep systemd ii systemd247.3-3ubuntu3.4 amd64system and service manager ubuntu@lp1934981-h:~$ grep -E '^Allow' /etc/systemd/sleep.conf AllowSuspendThenHibernate=yes AllowHybridSleep=no ubuntu@lp1934981-h:~$ sudo systemctl

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1934147] Re: systemd leaks abandoned session scopes

2021-09-09 Thread Dan Streetman
ubuntu@lp1934147-f:~$ dpkg -l systemd|grep systemd ii systemd245.4-4ubuntu3.11 amd64system and service manager ubuntu@lp1934147-f:~$ loginctl list-sessions SESSION UID USER SEAT TTY 1 1000 ubuntu ttyS0 1 sessions listed. ubuntu@lp1934147-f:~$ for i in {1..100}; do

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1934147] Re: systemd leaks abandoned session scopes

2021-09-09 Thread Dan Streetman
ubuntu@lp1934147-h:~$ dpkg -l systemd|grep systemd ii systemd247.3-3ubuntu3.4 amd64system and service manager ubuntu@lp1934147-h:~$ loginctl list-sessions SESSION UID USER SEAT TTY 1 1000 ubuntu ttyS0 1 sessions listed. ubuntu@lp1934147-h:~$ for i in {1..100}; do

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1934393] Re: systemd-logind network access is blocked, and breaks remote authentication configurations

2021-09-09 Thread Dan Streetman
Just to summarize the specific flow of this bug: 1. an application is started for a user session, e.g. sshd handles a user connecting. 2. the application uses pam for authentication, which by default includes pam_systemd as an (optional) module. 3. pam invokes pam_systemd as part of session

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1938259] Re: Add ACCEL_LOCATION=base property for Dell clamshell models

2021-09-07 Thread Dan Streetman
opened bug 1942899 to revert your patch please open a new bug to track adding your correct patch in to later systemd uploads ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Impish) Status: In Progress => Won't Fix ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Hirsute) Status: In Progress => Won't Fix ** Changed

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1942899] Re: Revert Add ACCEL_LOCATION=base property for Dell clamshell models

2021-09-07 Thread Dan Streetman
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dan Streetman (ddstreet) ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Hirsute) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dan Streetman (ddstreet) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1942899] Re: Revert Add ACCEL_LOCATION=base property for Dell clamshell models

2021-09-07 Thread Dan Streetman
pushed to git repo for impish https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu/+source/systemd/commit/?id=f34e9c33209ad9bf3ec807e3b7b9cd22dc8d155d -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1942899] [NEW] Revert Add ACCEL_LOCATION=base property for Dell clamshell models

2021-09-07 Thread Dan Streetman
Public bug reported: [impact] initial patch for LP: #1938259 was incorrect. [test case] this bug is only to revert the previous patch [regression potential] any regression would likely be restricted to dell clamshell models matching the modified config settings [scope] the incorrect patch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1938259] Re: Add ACCEL_LOCATION=base property for Dell clamshell models

2021-09-07 Thread Dan Streetman
> We found that Dell Latitude 7420 is not actually fixed, and may cause Impish to have regression due to the removal of the product name modalias. ok, well i guess we have to revert your patch and respin all the releases then. please, next time, test your change before things get into -proposed.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1785383] Re: missing EDNS0 record confuses systemd-resolved

2021-09-06 Thread Dan Streetman
> This is related to the ubuntu server (bug) maintenance ah, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam#Daily_Bug_Expiration just part of the internal canonical server team bug tracking, got it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >