[Touch-packages] [Bug 2044034] Re: /etc/security/limits.conf memlock changes have no effect

2023-11-23 Thread David Favor
This ticket can be closed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pam in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2044034 Title: /etc/security/limits.conf memlock changes have no effect Status in pam package in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2044034] Re: /etc/security/limits.conf memlock changes have no effect

2023-11-23 Thread David Favor
Looks like the problem was UsePAM=yes in /etc/ssh/sshd_config. So system wide memlock is effected + ssh logins only effected if PAM is enabled to set limits. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pam in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2044034] Re: /etc/security/limits.conf memlock changes have no effect

2023-11-21 Thread David Favor
This also fails... meaning... ulimit -l as root still shows 64... *- memlock unlimited root - memlock unlimited -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pam in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2044034] [NEW] /etc/security/limits.conf memlock changes have no effect

2023-11-20 Thread David Favor
Public bug reported: APT reports package as libpam-modules + launchpad says pam is the closest package. Please change package name, if required. Summary says it all. Default of memlock seems to be 64 (which limits.conf suggests means 64k). Changing this setting seems to have no effect. The

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1700382] [NEW] Boot times slow when LXD installed, due to poorly crafted systemd dependency chain

2017-06-25 Thread David Favor
Public bug reported: Notice the time spent inside lxd-containers.service + lxd.service which require network + disk subsystems to work before they can work. This behavior can be recreated by installing + configuring LXD, with no containers. Both lxd-containers.service + lxd.service should be

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1522675] Re: Warning messages about unsandboxed downloads

2017-06-24 Thread David Favor
This bug has been hanging round for over a year now. While packages seem to install when this diagnostic emits, users always have questions about this. Be great if someone could fix this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1595619] [NEW] lxc-clone fails with no useful information

2016-06-23 Thread David Favor
Public bug reported: root@net8-rmt:~# lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 15.10 Release:15.10 Codename: wily root@net8-rmt:~# uname -a Linux net8-rmt.bizcooker.com 4.2.0-34-generic #39-Ubuntu SMP Thu Mar 10 22:13:01 UTC 2016

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1492837] Re: iptables nat prerouting slight problem with adapter aliases

2016-01-05 Thread David Favor
Still broken in ubuntu-15.10-wily + causes all manner of headaches debugging. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iptables in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1492837 Title: iptables nat prerouting

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1240757] Re: Bridge not created if bind9 is on

2015-12-26 Thread David Favor
Having bind use .d mechanism seems like the cleanest way to handle this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1240757 Title: Bridge not created if bind9 is on

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1528655] Re: Wily/15.10 - systemd hangs reboot + shutdown for long periods of time

2015-12-23 Thread David Favor
The systemd facility changes sysvinit behavior considerably, especially sending no SIGKILL after SIGTERM. Suggested solution, send SIGKILL after timeout, following SIGTERM. Primary difference is systemd defers forever to underlying processes, rather than shooting them in the head

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1374759] Re: >>>WARNING<<< Wrong ufstype may corrupt your filesystem, default is ufstype=old

2015-12-22 Thread David Favor
I see this bug is tagged xenial. Please post a fix which can be added to Wily, to escape the long shudown delay. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1374759] Re: >>>WARNING<<< Wrong ufstype may corrupt your filesystem, default is ufstype=old

2015-12-22 Thread David Favor
This is a very ugly bug. Sometimes this causes reboots to hang for long periods. Just timed it on a Wily system with all upgrades installed. Takes 157 seconds, to shutdown system. Above comments only mention 3.19 (Vivid) kernels. This problem persists in Wily... net4-dev# lsb_release -a No LSB

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1528655] [NEW] Wily/15.10 - systemd hangs reboot + shutdown for long periods of time

2015-12-22 Thread David Favor
Public bug reported: Yet another horrible bug related to systemd which delays shutdowns by minutes. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1374759 surfaces this problem + the bug I'm reporting here is a separate issue. Neither reboot or shutdown -r now work sensibly any

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1528655] Re: Wily/15.10 - systemd hangs reboot + shutdown for long periods of time

2015-12-22 Thread David Favor
It appears - reboot -f - still works. And this is a harsh way to reboot a system. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1528655 Title: Wily/15.10 - systemd

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1492837] Re: iptables nat prerouting slight problem with adapter aliases

2015-09-26 Thread David Favor
Still broken on Vivid as of Sept 26 2015. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iptables in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1492837 Title: iptables nat prerouting slight problem with adapter aliases

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1492837] [NEW] iptables nat prerouting slight problem with adapter aliases

2015-09-06 Thread David Favor
Public bug reported: There seems to be a slight problem with iptables + adapter aliases. Take the alias eth0:1 for example... ifconfig eth0:1 eth0:1Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:25:90:eb:cb:ae inet addr:158.69.167.64 Bcast:158.69.255.255 Mask:255.255.0.0 UP

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1492837] Re: iptables nat prerouting slight problem with adapter aliases

2015-09-06 Thread David Favor
By "works" I mean packets forward correctly only when base adapter is used (no :\d+) so aliases quietly drop packets. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iptables in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1492837

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1413193] Re: [vivid] Failed to reset devices.list

2015-09-05 Thread David Favor
Still broken in systemd 219. If someone knows how to fix this, please update this ticket. Thanks. rmt-net8# lxc-create --version 1.1.2 rmt-net8# lxcfs --version FUSE library version: 2.9.2 fusermount version: 2.9.2 using FUSE kernel interface version 7.19 rmt-net8# psall | grep lxcfs root

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1452601] Re: vivid container's networking.service fails on boot with signal=PIPE

2015-09-05 Thread David Favor
I had to remove both lines, in my case. And this is likely a less than correct fix. I'm under the gun to get a client machine I'm hosting setup to run many of their sites in LXC containers, so time I invested looking at this fix was minimal. Likely the entire stop function is best revisited, to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1452601] Re: vivid container's networking.service fails on boot with signal=PIPE

2015-09-05 Thread David Favor
Just setting up a fresh Vivid LXC host machine + I was incorrect above. There's no requirement for /etc/dnsmasq.conf to exist for lxc-net to start correctly. There is a requirement though for /etc/resolv.conf to reference at least one valid name server. -- You received this bug notification

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1452601] Re: vivid container's networking.service fails on boot with signal=PIPE

2015-08-29 Thread David Favor
Oh, I see... I was using OOM as an example. I this case, it appears the missing /etc/dnsmasq.conf file might be the culprit. So first start of lxc-net, dnsmasq never starts. After that, it will never start, unless a hard reboot is done. -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1452601] Re: vivid container's networking.service fails on boot with signal=PIPE

2015-08-28 Thread David Favor
IMHO, systemd seems to be the root of all evil. touch /etc/dnsmasq.conf has no effect. net4-dev# systemctl restart lxc-net net4-dev# systemctl status lxc-net ● lxc-net.service - LXC network bridge setup Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/lxc-net.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1452601] Re: vivid container's networking.service fails on boot with signal=PIPE

2015-08-28 Thread David Favor
Okay, a simple fix that seems to work (at least in my case), is to comment out the first two guards in the stop function. So... #[ x$USE_LXC_BRIDGE = xtrue ] || { exit 0; } #[ -f ${varrun}/network_up ] || { exit 0; } Once these are skipped, the code seems to work. -- You received this bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1452601] Re: vivid container's networking.service fails on boot with signal=PIPE

2015-08-28 Thread David Favor
Oh... and - touch /etc/dnsmasq.conf - is still required, so this is another bug to be fixed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1452601 Title: vivid container's

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1471358] Re: lxc-checkconfig shows Mainline PPA Wily-4.0.7 kernel missing memory controller

2015-07-31 Thread David Favor
I've removed the patch tag + removed the patch file as LXC already has this bug open + fix will likely come from there. ** Tags removed: patch ** Patch removed: Unified diff patch file

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1458173] Re: Vivid + LXC autostart not working

2015-05-29 Thread David Favor
for discussion about this bug mkdir -p /var/log/drftools /david-favor/tools/lxc-autostart-boothack /var/log/drftools/lxc-autostart-boothack.log 21 ** Attachment added: lxc-autostart-boothack https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/1458173/+attachment/4406621/+files/lxc-autostart

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1458063] Re: Vivid /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/lxc/lxc-net fails at boot time because named listening to UDP on LXC address

2015-05-28 Thread David Favor
I believe this is a duplicate of bug 1240757. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1458063 Title: Vivid /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/lxc/lxc-net fails at boot time

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1459751] [NEW] lxc-attach runs in wrong container directory

2015-05-28 Thread David Favor
Public bug reported: net8-rmt# lxc-attach -n test -- bash -c 'id egrep ^root /etc/passwd echo ~ echo $HOME pwd' uid=0(root) gid=0(root) groups=0(root) root:x:0:0:root:/root:/bin/bash /root /root / Notice pwd show / instead of /root which is incorrect + causes all manner of confusion when

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1458170] Re: Vivid + bootchart quietly fails

2015-05-23 Thread David Favor
This should be assigned to bsdtools as the package. ** Package changed: lxc (Ubuntu) = bootchart (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1458170 Title: Vivid

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1458170] [NEW] Vivid + bootchart quietly fails

2015-05-23 Thread David Favor
Public bug reported: Nothing shown via journalctl -k -b | grep bootchart after boot. /var/log/bootchart does exist + is empty after boot. net8-rmt# uname -a Linux ns515383.ip-167-114-159.net 3.19.0-18-generic #18-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 19 18:31:35 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1458170] Re: Vivid + bootchart quietly fails

2015-05-23 Thread David Favor
I'd have thought /etc/default/grub should have some directive about bootchart + there is none. Maybe this is the problem. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1458170

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1458180] [NEW] Vivid + wall badly broken

2015-05-23 Thread David Favor
Public bug reported: The wall command should write a message to all users. Issuing the command - wall foo - appears to dump dmesg to all users w/o the message 'foo'. ** Affects: lxc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1458063] Re: Vivid /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/lxc/lxc-net fails at boot time because named listening to UDP on LXC address

2015-05-23 Thread David Favor
This does appear to relate to initial installs + some type of ordering change, of how services start. All other machines I manage had updates, rather than fresh installs + all the updated machines work. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1458170] Re: Vivid + bootchart quietly fails

2015-05-23 Thread David Favor
Removed + Reinstalled... Looks like all's well... net8-rmt# apt-get install bootchart Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following NEW packages will be installed: bootchart 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1458170] Re: Vivid + bootchart quietly fails

2015-05-23 Thread David Favor
This looks suspicious... net8-rmt# service bootstart start Failed to start bootstart.service: Unit bootstart.service failed to load: No such file or directory. net8-rmt# systemctl restart bootstart.service Failed to restart bootstart.service: Unit bootstart.service failed to load: No such file

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1458173] [NEW] Vivid + LXC autostart not working

2015-05-23 Thread David Favor
Public bug reported: In previous Ubuntu versions + current Ubuntu docs, boot time autostart is accomplished by: 1) setting /etc/default/lxc LXC_AUTO=false 2) adding lxc.start.auto = 1 to config of containers to be started at boot time This no longer works. ___ net8-rmt# uname -a Linux

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1458173] Re: Vivid + LXC autostart not working

2015-05-23 Thread David Favor
lxc-autostart after boot works. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1458173 Title: Vivid + LXC autostart not working Status in lxc package in Ubuntu: New Bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1458063] Re: Vivid /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/lxc/lxc-net fails at boot time because named listening to UDP on LXC address

2015-05-22 Thread David Favor
Oh... Maybe the problem is lxcbr0 is up'ed before named starts. Then if named listens on 0.0.0.0 makes sense it would glom onto the lxcbr0 address too. I'll modify named's config files + reboot + see if this fixes the problem. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1458063] [NEW] Vivid /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/lxc/lxc-net fails at boot time because named listening to UDP on LXC address

2015-05-22 Thread David Favor
Public bug reported: This is a clean Vivid install (rather than upgrade). Maybe I munged something + for the life of me nothing comes to mind. /var/log/syslog shows somehow bind is polluted with dnsmasq addresses? All packages updated. net8-rmt# lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1458063] Re: Vivid /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/lxc/lxc-net fails at boot time because named listening to UDP on LXC address

2015-05-22 Thread David Favor
Adding the following to /etc/named/named.conf.options seems to have fixed this problem: listen-on { 127.0.0.1; 167.114.159.29; }; This seems like a bug to me. Maybe switching to systemd created a subtle change in order of network config + named + lxc-net start. This is the first time I've had