[Touch-packages] [Bug 1861177] Re: seccomp_rule_add is very slow

2020-07-20 Thread Ioanna Alifieraki
# autopkgtest regression in EOAN There is an autopkgtest regression in EOAN on ppc64el for systemd package. The regression is caused by the 'upstream' test. As it's shown here http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/s/systemd/eoan/ppc64el this test has always been failing since systemd version

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1861177] Re: seccomp_rule_add is very slow

2020-07-20 Thread Ioanna Alifieraki
#VERIFICATION EOAN ---> Old version # dpkg -l | grep libseccomp ii libseccomp2:amd64 2.4.3-1ubuntu3.19.10.2amd64 high level interface to Linux seccomp filter # for i in `seq 1 40`; do (time sudo docker exec test_seccomp true &); done MAX TIME : 9.374s ---> New version # dpkg -l | grep

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1861177] Re: seccomp_rule_add is very slow

2020-07-17 Thread Ioanna Alifieraki
#VERIFICATION BIONIC ---> Old version # dpkg -l | grep libseccomp ii libseccomp2:amd64 2.4.3-1ubuntu3.18.04.2 amd64 high level interface to Linux seccomp filter # for i in `seq 1 40`; do (time sudo docker exec test_seccomp true &); done MAX TIME : 8.148s ---> New version # dpkg -l | grep

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1861177] Re: seccomp_rule_add is very slow

2020-07-16 Thread Ioanna Alifieraki
#VERIFICATION FOCAL ---> Old version # dpkg -l | grep libseccomp ii libseccomp2:amd642.4.3-1ubuntu3.20.04.2 amd64high level interface to Linux seccomp filter # for i in `seq 1 40`; do (time sudo docker exec test_seccomp true &); done MAX TIME : 10.176s

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1861177] Re: seccomp_rule_add is very slow

2020-07-16 Thread Ioanna Alifieraki
#VERIFICATION XENIAL ---> Old version # dpkg -l | grep libseccomp ii libseccomp2:amd64 2.4.3-1ubuntu3.16.04.2 amd64high level interface to Linux seccomp filte # for i in `seq 1 40`; do (time sudo docker exec test_seccomp true &); done MAX TIME

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1861177] Re: seccomp_rule_add is very slow

2020-07-06 Thread Ioanna Alifieraki
Currently, there are autopkgtest regressions on Groovy for the docker.io package : https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/groovy/update_excuses.html#libseccomp These regressions are not due to the new libseccomp (can be reproduced with previous libseccomp version). They

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1861177] Re: seccomp_rule_add is very slow

2020-06-29 Thread Ioanna Alifieraki
Debdiff for Xenial. ** Patch added: "lp1861177_xenial.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libseccomp/+bug/1861177/+attachment/5388142/+files/lp1861177_xenial.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1861177] Re: seccomp_rule_add is very slow

2020-06-29 Thread Ioanna Alifieraki
Debdiff for Bionic. ** Patch added: "lp1861177_bionic.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libseccomp/+bug/1861177/+attachment/5388141/+files/lp1861177_bionic.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1861177] Re: seccomp_rule_add is very slow

2020-06-29 Thread Ioanna Alifieraki
Debdiff for Focal. ** Patch added: "lp1861177_focal.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libseccomp/+bug/1861177/+attachment/5388139/+files/lp1861177_focal.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1861177] Re: seccomp_rule_add is very slow

2020-06-29 Thread Ioanna Alifieraki
Debdiff for Eoan. ** Patch added: "lp1861177_eoan.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libseccomp/+bug/1861177/+attachment/5388140/+files/lp1861177_eoan.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1861177] Re: seccomp_rule_add is very slow

2020-06-22 Thread Ioanna Alifieraki
Debdiff for Groovy. Currently, there is an ongoing sru of libseccomp for F,E,B and X stuck in proposed. Once it is released in updates, I'll sru this one for F,E,B and X. ** Description changed: - There is a known and patched issue with version 2.4 of libseccomp where - certain operations

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1861177] Re: seccomp_rule_add is very slow

2020-06-22 Thread Ioanna Alifieraki
ance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: libseccomp (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: libseccomp (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: libseccomp (Ubuntu Xenial) Assignee: (unassigned) => Ioanna Alifieraki (joalif) ** Cha

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1860548] Re: systemd crashes when logging long message

2020-02-07 Thread Ioanna Alifieraki
RE-VERIFICATION ON BIONIC Installed systemd from -proposed : # dpkg -l | grep systemd ii libnss-systemd:amd64 237-3ubuntu10.39 amd64nss module providing dynamic user and group name resolution ii libpam-systemd:amd64

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1860548] Re: systemd crashes when logging long message

2020-02-04 Thread Ioanna Alifieraki
VERIFICATION ON BIONIC Installed systemd from -proposed : # dpkg -l | grep systemd ii libnss-systemd:amd64 237-3ubuntu10.34 amd64nss module providing dynamic user and group name resolution ii libsystemd0:amd64

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1860548] Re: systemd crashes when logging long message

2020-01-22 Thread Ioanna Alifieraki
** Patch added: "debdiff for bionic" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1860548/+attachment/5322196/+files/lp1860548_bionic.debdiff ** Tags added: sts sts-sponsor-ddstreet -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1860548] [NEW] systemd crashes when logging long message

2020-01-22 Thread Ioanna Alifieraki
/systemd/commit/e68eedbbdc98fa13449756b7fee3bed689d76493 [3] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/574432f889ce3de126bbc6736bcbd22ee170ff82 ** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium Assignee: Ioanna Alifieraki (joalif) Status: Confirmed ** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1841058] Re: kernel version 4.4.0-1090-aws docker file system issue

2020-01-08 Thread Ioanna Alifieraki
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1851243 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1851243 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1851243 overlayfs : broken access to r/w files -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1591411] Re: systemd-logind must be restarted every ~1000 SSH logins to prevent a ~25 second delay

2019-08-21 Thread Ioanna Alifieraki
@Nick What symptoms do you observe? Delays when ssh? Could you please share your reproducer or describe in which circumstances you hit the bug? Do you see any leaking scopes "ls -ld /run/systemd/transient/session-*.scope*" ? Lastly what version of systemd do you run? Thanks. -- You received

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1828892] Re: systemctl - alias service reports inactive while aliased is active

2019-07-01 Thread Ioanna Alifieraki
Verification on Xenial. Repeating test case from description. - Test case 1 - libvirtd alias service : libvirtd aliased service : libvirt-bin # ls -la libvirtd.service lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 39 Mar 21 16:27 libvirtd.service -> /lib/systemd/system/libvirt-bin.service # systemctl is-active

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1650740] Re: dhclient depends on fstab 16.04LTS

2019-06-04 Thread Ioanna Alifieraki
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1632405 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1632405 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1632405 virt-customize enters infinite loop: dhclient-script: cannot open /etc/fstab -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1828892] Re: systemctl - alias service reports inactive while aliased is active

2019-05-17 Thread Ioanna Alifieraki
@ddstreet There is no need to include the manpage correction (commit 71c9f49d730c8e) since it reverts commit c7612b2 which does not exist in xenial systemd. Initially issue #7875 was classified as feature request and not as a bug. Upstream added modified the manpage

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1828892] Re: systemctl - alias service reports inactive while aliased is active

2019-05-16 Thread Ioanna Alifieraki
Debdiff for Xenial. ** Patch added: "lp1828892_xenial.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1828892/+attachment/5264308/+files/lp1828892_xenial.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1828892] Re: systemctl - alias service reports inactive while aliased is active

2019-05-15 Thread Ioanna Alifieraki
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1806012] Re: set-cpufreq: 'powersave' governor configuration sanity on ubuntu server

2019-05-15 Thread Ioanna Alifieraki
Just opened a MP against systemd to make the 'ondemand' service configurable through /etc/default/cpufrequtils file. This change has two purposes : 1) Make 'onedmand' service configurable. It is important for the 'ondemand' service to be configurable because depending on the use case and the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1806012] Re: set-cpufreq: 'powersave' governor configuration sanity on ubuntu server

2019-05-15 Thread Ioanna Alifieraki
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~joalif/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+git/systemd/+merge/367469 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1806012

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1828892] [NEW] systemctl - alias service reports inactive while aliased is active

2019-05-13 Thread Ioanna Alifieraki
ffects: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium Assignee: Ioanna Alifieraki (joalif) Status: Confirmed ** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Medium Assignee: Ioanna Alifieraki (joalif) Status: Confirmed ** Tags: sts ** Changed in: systemd (

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1818282] Re: systemd-networkd - RoutingPolicyRule does not apply correctly

2019-04-09 Thread Ioanna Alifieraki
VERIFICATION Cosmic - Using configuration file from description $ dpkg -l | grep systemd ii systemd 239-7ubuntu10.12 amd64system and service manager $ ip rule 0: from all lookup local 0: from

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1818282] Re: systemd-networkd - RoutingPolicyRule does not apply correctly

2019-04-09 Thread Ioanna Alifieraki
** Tags removed: verification-needed-bionic ** Tags added: verification-done-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1818282 Title: systemd-networkd -

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1818282] Re: systemd-networkd - RoutingPolicyRule does not apply correctly

2019-04-09 Thread Ioanna Alifieraki
VERIFICATION Bionic - Using configuration file from description $ dpkg -l | grep systemd ii systemd 237-3ubuntu10.19 amd64system and service manager $ ip rule 0: from all lookup local 0: from 172.31.24.153 lookup 1000 0:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1806012] Re: set-cpufreq: 'powersave' governor configuration sanity on ubuntu server

2019-04-03 Thread Ioanna Alifieraki
@james-page What was the the BIOS setting before setting it to "OS control"? Also what do you mean by "we've just stuck with the default ondmand behaviour" ? You mean that you let systemd ondemand service do whatever it does by default or that you use the ondemand governor ? -- You received this

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1818282] Re: systemd-networkd - RoutingPolicyRule does not apply correctly

2019-03-21 Thread Ioanna Alifieraki
Debdiff for Bionic. ** Patch added: "lp1818282_bionic.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/bionic/+source/systemd/+bug/1818282/+attachment/5248233/+files/lp1818282_bionic.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1818282] Re: systemd-networkd - RoutingPolicyRule does not apply correctly

2019-03-20 Thread Ioanna Alifieraki
Debdiff for cosmic. ** Patch added: "lp1818282_cosmic.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1818282/+attachment/5247821/+files/lp1818282_cosmic.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1818282] Re: systemd-networkd - RoutingPolicyRule does not apply correctly

2019-03-13 Thread Ioanna Alifieraki
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #924406 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=924406 ** Also affects: systemd (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=924406 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1818282] Re: systemd-networkd - RoutingPolicyRule does not apply correctly

2019-03-08 Thread Ioanna Alifieraki
: systemd (Ubuntu Cosmic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Cosmic) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Cosmic) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Cosmic) Assignee: (unassigned) =&g

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1818282] Re: systemd-networkd - RoutingPolicyRule does not apply correctly

2019-03-04 Thread Ioanna Alifieraki
** Tags added: sts-sponsor -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1818282 Title: systemd-networkd - RoutingPolicyRule does not apply correctly Status in systemd

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1818282] Re: systemd-networkd - RoutingPolicyRule does not apply correctly

2019-03-04 Thread Ioanna Alifieraki
debdiff for Disco ** Patch added: "lp1818282_disco.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1818282/+attachment/5243370/+files/lp1818282_disco.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1818282] Re: systemd-networkd - RoutingPolicyRule does not apply correctly

2019-03-04 Thread Ioanna Alifieraki
tus: New => In Progress ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Disco) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Disco) Assignee: (unassigned) => Ioanna Alifieraki (joalif) ** Changed in:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1818282] [NEW] systemd-networkd - RoutingPolicyRule does not apply correctly

2019-03-01 Thread Ioanna Alifieraki
Public bug reported: [Description] When attaching multiple IPs on secondary interface the routing policy rules do not apply for all IPs. The rules that are applied after restarting networkd are random. The issue has been reported and addressed upstream. [Test Case] Attach multiple IPs to