[Touch-packages] [Bug 1872106] Re: isc-dhcp-server crashing constantly [Ubuntu 20.04]

2020-11-04 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
Hello Karsten, Can you check comments https://bugs.launchpad.net/dhcp/+bug/1872118/comments/62 and https://bugs.launchpad.net/dhcp/+bug/1872118/comments/63 and validate the versions? * Also, could be possible to upload the crash report here? and the output of dpkg -l Thanks, Jorge -- You

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1872118] Re: [SRU] DHCP Cluster crashes after a few hours

2020-08-17 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
** No longer affects: isc-dhcp (Ubuntu) ** No longer affects: isc-dhcp (Ubuntu Focal) ** No longer affects: isc-dhcp (Ubuntu Groovy) ** Changed in: bind9-libs (Ubuntu Groovy) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1872118] Re: [SRU] DHCP Cluster crashes after a few hours

2020-08-11 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
** Patch added: "lp-1872118-focal.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/isc-dhcp/+bug/1872118/+attachment/5400761/+files/lp-1872118-focal.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to isc-dhcp in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1872118] Re: [SRU] DHCP Cluster crashes after a few hours

2020-08-11 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
** Patch added: "lp-1872118-groovy.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/isc-dhcp/+bug/1872118/+attachment/5400760/+files/lp-1872118-groovy.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to isc-dhcp in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1872118] Re: [SRU] DHCP Cluster crashes after a few hours

2020-08-11 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
Uploaded debdiff(s) for groovy and focal. This will require a follow up rebuild change for isc-dhcp, once the library change lands. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to isc-dhcp in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1872118] Re: [SRU] DHCP Cluster crashes after a few hours

2020-08-11 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
** Description changed: + [Description] - I have a pair of DHCP serevrs running in a cluster on ubuntu 20.04, All worked perfectly until recently, when they started stopping with code=killed, status=6/ABRT. - This is being fixed by + isc-dhcp-server uses libisc-export (coming from bin9-libs

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1872118] Re: [SRU] DHCP Cluster crashes after a few hours

2020-08-11 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
** Summary changed: - DHCP Cluster crashes after a few hours + [SRU] DHCP Cluster crashes after a few hours -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to isc-dhcp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872118 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1872118] Re: DHCP Cluster crashes after a few hours

2020-08-11 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
Confirmed => In Progress ** Changed in: bind9-libs (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Jorge Niedbalski (niedbalski) ** Changed in: bind9-libs (Ubuntu Groovy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Jorge Niedbalski (niedbalski) ** Changed in: isc-dhcp (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (un

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1872118] Re: DHCP Cluster crashes after a few hours

2020-08-06 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
Hello @Andrew, @rlaager, Any crashes to report before I propose this patch? my env is running this patch for close to 3 days without any failures. Thanks, -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to isc-dhcp in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1872118] Re: DHCP Cluster crashes after a few hours

2020-08-06 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
Hello Andrew, I just reviewed the core file that you provided. Thread 1 is the thread that panics on assertion because sock.pending_send is already set. This is the condition I prevented in the PPA, so *shouldn't* be hitting the frame 3 In my test systems I don't hit this condition,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1872118] Re: DHCP Cluster crashes after a few hours

2020-08-05 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
OK, I have no crashes to report for the last 24 hours with the PPA included here. ‚óŹ isc-dhcp-server.service - ISC DHCP IPv4 server Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/isc-dhcp-server.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled) Active: active (running) since Tue 2020-08-04 14:58:11 UTC; 1

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1872118] Re: DHCP Cluster crashes after a few hours

2020-08-04 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
Andrew, Thank you for your input. ** Do you have any logs or a crash report to take a look after you upgraded these systems? On my test lab , I am counting for 3+ hours without a crash. root@dhcpd1:/home/ubuntu# dpkg -l | grep ppa1 ii isc-dhcp-server4.4.1-2.1ubuntu6~ppa1

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1872118] Re: DHCP Cluster crashes after a few hours

2020-08-04 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
(shapely-peccary) via ens4 I'll leave this running until I can reproduce the crash or assume that the fix works. Please let me know if you can reproduce with those packages. Thanks, Jorge Niedbalski -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1872118] Re: DHCP Cluster crashes after a few hours

2020-08-04 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
Hello Andrew, The fix is on the libisc-export1105 library (check dependencies on: https://launchpad.net/~niedbalski/+archive/ubuntu/fix-1872118/+packages), just replacing the dhcpd binary won't be enough. If you can install isc-dhcp-server and its dependencies from the PPA and test, would be

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1872118] Re: DHCP Cluster crashes after a few hours

2020-08-03 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
** Follow up from my previous comment, I've built a PPA with a fix similar to the one pointed in 430065. https://launchpad.net/~niedbalski/+archive/ubuntu/fix-1872118 * I'd appreciate if anyone can test that PPA with focal and report back if the problem keeps reproducible with that version. In

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1872118] Re: DHCP Cluster crashes after a few hours

2020-08-03 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
Hello, I checked the backtrace of a crashed dhcpd running on 4.4.1-2.1ubuntu5. (gdb) info threads Id Target Id Frame * 1 Thread 0x7fb4ddecb700 (LWP 3170) __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:50 2 Thread 0x7fb4dd6ca700 (LWP 3171) __lll_lock_wait

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1888926] Re: tls.tlscfgcmd not recognized; rebuild rsyslog against librelp 1.5.0

2020-08-03 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
Hello, I checked the backtrace of a crashed dhcpd running on 4.4.1-2.1ubuntu5. (gdb) info threads Id Target IdFrame * 1Thread 0x7fb4ddecb700 (LWP 3170) __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:50 2Thread 0x7fb4dd6ca700 (LWP 3171)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1872118] Re: DHCP Cluster crashes after a few hours

2020-08-03 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
** Also affects: isc-dhcp (Ubuntu Groovy) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed ** Also affects: isc-dhcp (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: bind9-libs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1872118] Re: DHCP Cluster crashes after a few hours

2020-08-03 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
Hello, I am trying to setup a reproducer for the mentioned issue. I have 2 machines acting as peers with the following versions: # lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS Release:20.04 Codename: focal # dpkg -l |grep

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1888926] Re: tls.tlscfgcmd not recognized; rebuild rsyslog against librelp 1.5.0

2020-08-03 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
** Patch added: "lp1888926-focal.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rsyslog/+bug/1888926/+attachment/5398376/+files/lp1888926-focal.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsyslog in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1888926] Re: tls.tlscfgcmd not recognized; rebuild rsyslog against librelp 1.5.0

2020-08-03 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
** Tags added: sts-sru-needed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsyslog in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1888926 Title: tls.tlscfgcmd not recognized; rebuild rsyslog against librelp 1.5.0 Status in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1888926] Re: tls.tlscfgcmd not recognized; rebuild rsyslog against librelp 1.5.0

2020-08-03 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
brelp-dev (>= 1.5.0). + + [Risk potential] + + * No identified as this is a rebuild that should have been done on all + reverse dependencies of librelp-dev when upgraded from 1.4.0 to 1.5.0 + + + [Fix] + + Provide a rebuild SRU for focal. ** Changed in: rsyslog (Ubuntu Groovy) Status

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1888926] Re: tls.tlscfgcmd not recognized; rebuild rsyslog against librelp 1.5.0

2020-08-03 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
** Also affects: rsyslog (Ubuntu Groovy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: rsyslog (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsyslog

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1822416] Re: resolve: do not hit CNAME or DNAME entry in NODATA cache

2020-01-21 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu Eoan) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed ** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1815101] Re: [master] Restarting systemd-networkd breaks keepalived clusters

2019-08-21 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
For reference: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/12511 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1815101 Title: [master] Restarting systemd-networkd breaks

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1835581] Re: networkd-dhcp4 does not set prefsrc for dhcp-provided classless or static routes

2019-08-05 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
I've also verified that bionic-updates fixes the described issue root@bionic-test:/home/ubuntu# ip route default via 172.16.0.1 dev ens3 proto dhcp metric 1024 172.16.0.0/24 dev ens3 proto kernel scope link src 172.16.0.50 root@bionic-test:/home/ubuntu# ip r default via 172.16.0.1 dev ens3

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1835581] Re: networkd-dhcp4 does not set prefsrc for dhcp-provided classless or static routes

2019-08-05 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
Hello, I've verified this with disco-updates. /etc/systemd/network/80-ens3.network :: [Match] Name=ens3 [Network] DHCP=ipv4 LinkLocalAddressing=ipv6 Address=172.16.0.5/24 root@disco-test:/home/ubuntu# ip -4 a show ens3 2: ens3: mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel state UP group default

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1668771] Re: [SRU] systemd-resolved negative caching for extended period of time

2019-07-26 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
Without the patch for LP: #1668771 resolved caches the SERVFAIL answer on disco. oot@disco:/home/multipass# host www.montemar.cl Host www.montemar.cl not found: 2(SERVFAIL) (reverse-i-search)`': ^C root@disco:/home/multipass# journalctl -u systemd-resolved -f -- Logs begin at Fri 2019-07-26

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1668771] Re: [SRU] systemd-resolved negative caching for extended period of time

2019-07-26 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
Without the patch for LP: #1668771 resolved caches the SERVFAIL answer. root@bionic:/home/multipass# host www.montemar.cl Host www.montemar.cl not found: 2(SERVFAIL) root@bionic:/home/multipass# journalctl -u systemd-resolved -f -- Logs begin at Fri 2019-07-26 13:10:01 -04. -- Jul 26 13:13:12

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1668771] Re: [SRU] systemd-resolved negative caching for extended period of time

2019-07-26 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
** No longer affects: systemd (Ubuntu Xenial) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1668771 Title: [SRU] systemd-resolved negative caching for extended period of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1668771] Re: [SRU] systemd-resolved negative caching for extended period of time

2019-07-23 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
** Patch added: "lp1668771-disco.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/systemd/+bug/1668771/+attachment/5278759/+files/lp1668771-disco.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1668771] Re: systemd-resolved negative caching for extended period of time

2019-07-23 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
** Patch added: "lp1668771-bionic.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/systemd/+bug/1668771/+attachment/5278752/+files/lp1668771-bionic.debdiff ** Summary changed: - systemd-resolved negative caching for extended period of time + [SRU] systemd-resolved negative caching for extended period of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1668771] Re: systemd-resolved negative caching for extended period of time

2019-07-23 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
** Description changed: - 231-9ubuntu3 + [Impact] - If a DNS lookup returns SERVFAIL, systemd-resolved seems to cache the + * If a DNS lookup returns SERVFAIL, systemd-resolved seems to cache the result for very long (infinity?). I have to restart systemd-resolved to have the negative

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1668771] Re: systemd-resolved negative caching for extended period of time

2019-07-22 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
** Tags added: sts sts-sru-needed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1668771 Title: systemd-resolved negative caching for extended period of time Status in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1668771] Re: systemd-resolved negative caching for extended period of time

2019-07-19 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1668771 Title: systemd-resolved negative caching for extended period of time Status in systemd: New Status in systemd

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1668771] Re: systemd-resolved negative caching for extended period of time

2019-07-19 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
** Patch added: "lp1668771-eoan.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/systemd/+bug/1668771/+attachment/5278115/+files/lp1668771-eoan.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1668771] Re: systemd-resolved negative caching for extended period of time

2019-07-19 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Disco) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1668771] Re: systemd-resolved negative caching for extended period of time

2019-07-19 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Disco) Assignee: (unassigned) => Jorge Niedbalski (niedbalski) ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Bionic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Jorge Niedbalski (niedbalski) ** C

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1668771] Re: systemd-resolved negative caching for extended period of time

2019-07-17 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
The proposal to extend the 'cache' option with 'no-negative' has been merged upstream. I will proceed with the backports to Ubuntu on the affected LTS releases. [0] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/13047 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1668771] Re: systemd-resolved negative caching for extended period of time

2019-07-12 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
I've made a proposal to change the resolved.conf Cache option to a tri- state "no, no-negative, yes" values. [0] If a lookup returns SERVFAIL systemd-resolved will cache the result for 30s (See 201d995), however, there are several use cases on which this condition is not acceptable (See #5552

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1668771] Re: systemd-resolved negative caching for extended period of time

2019-07-08 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Jorge Niedbalski (niedbalski) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1668771 Title: syst

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1641272] Re: Debug symbols package doesnt exist

2017-07-31 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
** Description changed: - On Yakkery with ddebs repos enabled there is no debug packages for + On Yakkety with ddebs repos enabled there is no debug packages for dnsmasq -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1686036] Re: mountpoint remains in use after restore snapshot

2017-05-31 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
** Summary changed: - strange behavior after restore snapshot + mountpoint remains in use after restore snapshot ** Also affects: lxd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** No longer affects: lxc (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: lxd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed **

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1641272] Re: Debug symbols package doesnt exist

2017-05-09 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Jorge Niedbalski (niedbalski) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1641272 Title: Debug symb

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1638695] Re: Python 2.7.12 performance regression

2017-01-13 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
Hello, I have been working to track down the origin of the performance penalty exposed by this bug. All the tests that I am performing are made on top of a locally compiled version of python 2.7.12 (from upstream sources, not applying any ubuntu patch on it) built with different versions of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1638695] Re: Python 2.7.12 performance regression

2017-01-13 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
** Changed in: python2.7 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: python2.7 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Jorge Niedbalski (niedbalski) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pyt

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1638695] Re: Python 2.7.12 performance regression

2016-11-17 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
Hello, I am in the process of verifying this performance regression on a 16.04 Xenial machine using the kernel Linux-4.4.0-38. I ran a locally compiled python 2.7.12 version built with different versions of GCC, 5.3.1 (current) and 4.8.0 both coming from the Ubuntu archives. The benchmark suite

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1567578] Re: libnl should be updated to support up to 63 VFs per single PF

2016-11-02 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
** No longer affects: libnl3 (Ubuntu Precise) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libnl3 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1567578 Title: libnl should be updated to support up to 63 VFs per single PF

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1567578] Re: libnl should be updated to support up to 63 VFs per single PF

2016-10-24 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
Hello Bryan, After installing the -proposed version the error presented on this bug is not reproducible anymore and the guest starts correctly. You can follow the reproduction steps that I added to the bug's description. Without -proposed: $ sudo virsh destroy guest1 Domain guest1 destroyed $

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1567578] Re: libnl should be updated to support up to 63 VFs per single PF

2016-10-24 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
** Patch added: "fix-1567578-trusty.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libnl3/+bug/1567578/+attachment/4766476/+files/fix-1567578-trusty.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libnl3 in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1567578] Re: libnl should be updated to support up to 63 VFs per single PF

2016-10-24 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
Hello, After running a bisect between tags libnl3_2_21 and libnl3_2_22 I identified the fixer commit to be 807fddc nl: Increase receive buffer size to 4 pages commit 807fddc4cd9ecb12ba64e1b7fa26d86b6c2f19b0 Author: Thomas Graf Date: Wed May 8 13:52:27 2013 +0200 nl:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1567578] Re: libnl should be updated to support up to 63 VFs per single PF

2016-10-24 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
Hello, I am able to reproduce this bug consistently on a Trusty (3.19.0-73-generic) machine equipped with 2 ixgbe 10GbE cards: 04:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation Ethernet Controller 10-Gigabit X540-AT2 (rev 01) 04:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation Ethernet Controller

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1567578] Re: libnl should be updated to support up to 63 VFs per single PF

2016-10-21 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
** Changed in: libnl3 (Ubuntu Trusty) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: libnl3 (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libnl3 in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1567578] Re: libnl should be updated to support up to 63 VFs per single PF

2016-10-21 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
** Changed in: libnl3 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released ** Changed in: libnl3 (Ubuntu) Assignee: Jorge Niedbalski (niedbalski) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: libnl3 (Ubuntu Trusty) Assignee: (unassigned) => Jorge Niedbalski (niedbalski) ** Changed in: libnl

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1567578] Re: libnl should be updated to support up to 63 VFs per single PF

2016-10-20 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
** Changed in: libnl3 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Jorge Niedbalski (niedbalski) ** Changed in: libnl3 (Ubuntu) Importance: Low => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libnl3 in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1628687] [NEW] Assertion failure when PID 1 receives a zero-length message over notify socket

2016-09-28 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
Public bug reported: Environment: Xenial 16.04.1 Amd64 Description. Systemd fails an assertion in manager_invoke_notify_message when a zero- length message is received over /run/systemd/notify. This allows a local user to perform a denial-of-service attack against PID 1. How to trigger the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1403955] Re: DHCP's "Option interface-mtu 9000" is being ignored on bridge interface br0

2016-08-11 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
** Tags removed: sts sts-needs-review -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to isc-dhcp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1403955 Title: DHCP's "Option interface-mtu 9000" is being ignored on bridge

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1568485] Re: kernel: audit: type=1400 audit(1460259033.648:34): apparmor="DENIED" operation="sendmsg" info="Failed name lookup - disconnected path" error=-13

2016-04-15 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
** Changed in: isc-dhcp (Ubuntu Trusty) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: isc-dhcp (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: isc-dhcp (Ubuntu Trusty) Assignee: (unassigned) => Jorge Niedbalski (niedbalski) ** Patch added: "Trusty Pa

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1006898] Re: [SRU] dnsmasq fails at leasing issues when using vlan mode

2016-03-04 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu Precise) Assignee: Jorge Niedbalski (niedbalski) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006898 Title: [

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1403955] Re: DHCP's "Option interface-mtu 9000" is being ignored on bridge interface br0

2016-02-08 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
** Tags added: sts-needs-review -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to isc-dhcp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1403955 Title: DHCP's "Option interface-mtu 9000" is being ignored on bridge interface

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1382054] Re: Add support for configuring VLAN interfaces in the initrd

2015-08-05 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
** Tags added: sts -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1382054 Title: Add support for configuring VLAN interfaces in the initrd Status in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1244578] Re: lightdm-session runs xrdb with -nocpp option

2015-06-15 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
Niedbalski (niedbalski) ** Changed in: lightdm (Ubuntu Utopic) Assignee: (unassigned) = Jorge Niedbalski (niedbalski) ** Changed in: lightdm (Ubuntu Vivid) Assignee: (unassigned) = Jorge Niedbalski (niedbalski) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1244578] Re: lightdm-session runs xrdb with -nocpp option

2015-06-15 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
** Patch removed: Vivid Patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1244578/+attachment/4415158/+files/fix-lp-1244578-vivid.patch ** Patch added: Vivid Patch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1244578] Re: lightdm-session runs xrdb with -nocpp option

2015-06-15 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
** Patch added: Trusty Patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1244578/+attachment/4415160/+files/fix-lp-1244578-trusty.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1244578] Re: lightdm-session runs xrdb with -nocpp option

2015-06-15 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
** Patch added: Vivid Patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1244578/+attachment/4415158/+files/fix-lp-1244578-vivid.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1244578] Re: lightdm-session runs xrdb with -nocpp option

2015-06-15 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
This is fixed on Wily, I am attaching the Vivid, Utopic and Trusty patches. ** Description changed: + [Impact] + lightdm-session runs xrdb for .Xresources file with the -nocpp option (Line 37 and 43), which prevents the xrdb from preprocessing the .Xresources file. Many configurations

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1244578] Re: lightdm-session runs xrdb with -nocpp option

2015-06-15 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
** Patch added: Utopic Patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1244578/+attachment/4415159/+files/fix-lp-1244578-utopic.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1403955] Re: DHCP's Option interface-mtu 9000 is being ignored on bridge interface br0

2015-06-15 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
The fix should check if the phys interface MTU lxc-default-mtu, then enforce the MTU on the phys interface or apply the 'post-up /sbin/ip link set eth0 mtu 9000', entry on the juju-br0 config. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1244578] Re: lightdm-session runs xrdb with -nocpp option

2015-06-15 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
** Patch added: Precise Patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1244578/+attachment/4415201/+files/fix-lp-1244578-precise.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1006898] Re: [SRU] dnsmasq fails at leasing issues when using vlan mode

2015-05-18 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1006898/+attachment/4363091/+files/lp1006898-set-so-bindtodevice-on-dhcp.patch ** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu Precise) Assignee: Chuck Short (zulcss) = Jorge Niedbalski (niedbalski) ** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu Precise) Status: Triaged = In Progress -- You

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1006898] Re: [SRU] dnsmasq fails at leasing issues when using vlan mode

2015-05-18 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
@arges, I re-uploaded the patch, rebasing with current -updates and fixing the issue you detected. Please sponsor. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1006898] Re: [SRU] dnsmasq fails at leasing issues when using vlan mode

2015-04-01 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
The attached patch, applies upstream 9380ba70d67db6b69f817d8e318de5ba1e990b12 into precise. ** Patch added: lp1006898-set-so-bindtodevice-on-dhcp.patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/1006898/+attachment/4363091/+files/lp1006898-set-so-bindtodevice-on-dhcp.patch --

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1382054] [NEW] Add support for configuring VLAN interfaces in the initrd

2014-10-16 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
Public bug reported: It would be helpful to be able to create VLAN network interfaces in initrd images provided by Ubuntu, based on kernel command line parameters. (i.e. VLAN=eth0.100, ) Some use cases for this feature addition are MAAS users trying to boot machines using a specific VLAN

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1257082] Re: MAAS does not use NTP servers specified in DHCPD options

2014-10-10 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
** Tags added: cts -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to isc-dhcp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1257082 Title: MAAS does not use NTP servers specified in DHCPD options Status in MAAS: Invalid

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1337873] Re: Precise, Trusty, Utopic - ifupdown initialization problems caused by race condition

2014-10-10 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
** Tags added: cts -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ifupdown in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1337873 Title: Precise, Trusty, Utopic - ifupdown initialization problems caused by race condition

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1257082] Re: MAAS does not use NTP servers specified in DHCPD options

2014-09-11 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
** Patch added: lp1257082_prefers_dhcp_ntp_servers_trusty.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/maas/+bug/1257082/+attachment/4201542/+files/lp1257082_prefers_dhcp_ntp_servers_trusty.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1257082] Re: MAAS does not use NTP servers specified in DHCPD options

2014-09-11 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
** Patch added: lp1257082_prefers_dhcp_ntp_servers_precise.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/maas/+bug/1257082/+attachment/4201543/+files/lp1257082_prefers_dhcp_ntp_servers_precise.debdiff ** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu Precise) Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1257082] Re: MAAS does not use NTP servers specified in DHCPD options

2014-09-11 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
Hello, Since there is no consensus on the definitive solution , I am proposing a simple fix for prefers dhcp provided NTP servers if one is found as also @elmo pointed here. Please review the test-case and description for further details. ** Description changed: [Impact] MAAS-deployed

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1257082] Re: MAAS does not use NTP servers specified in DHCPD options

2014-09-11 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
** Patch added: lp1257082_prefers_dhcp_ntp_servers_utopic.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/maas/+bug/1257082/+attachment/4201541/+files/lp1257082_prefers_dhcp_ntp_servers_utopic.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 427775] Re: ntpdate.dhcp always ignored

2014-09-04 Thread Jorge Niedbalski
For MAAS users. A quick workaround that you can use for this, is to setting NTPDATE_USE_NTP_CONF to NO via the generic preseed file. Edit /etc/maas/preseeds/generic, add a late_command into the file d-i preseed/late_command string true \ in-target sed -i