[Touch-packages] [Bug 2062667] Re: Fails on (and should be removed from) raspi desktop

2024-04-29 Thread Juerg Haefliger
We should drop it from the seed since we're not building ARM ISOs anymore. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062667 Title: Fails on (and should be

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2055200] Re: tests-in-lxd is broken with latest autopkgtest version

2024-04-06 Thread Juerg Haefliger
Why is Mantic won't fix? This could potentially break a lot of kernel ADT testing for Mantic. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055200 Title: tests-in-lxd

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2038433] Re: systemd autopkgtest regression on arm64 and s390x on mantic

2023-11-30 Thread Juerg Haefliger
A couple of retries and the test finally passes. There's some flakiness. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2038433 Title: systemd autopkgtest regression on

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2038433] Re: systemd autopkgtest regression on arm64 and s390x on mantic

2023-11-29 Thread Juerg Haefliger
The first container reboot fails because seeding takes too long (which is bug 1878225). Then the hack kicks in and a second image build is attempted with also fails. The hack masks the problematic services 9811s Created symlink /etc/systemd/system/snapd.service → /dev/null. 9817s Created symlink

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2038433] Re: systemd autopkgtest regression on arm64 and s390x on mantic

2023-11-29 Thread Juerg Haefliger
2023-11-29T11:00:34.713689+00:00 mantic-test systemd[1]: Reached target cloud-init.target - Cloud-init target. 2023-11-29T11:00:34.713731+00:00 mantic-test systemd[1]: Startup finished in 5.934s. 2023-11-29T11:00:34.766612+00:00 mantic-test systemd[1]: dmesg.service: Deactivated successfully.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2038433] Re: systemd autopkgtest regression on arm64 and s390x on mantic

2023-11-29 Thread Juerg Haefliger
Ok that's not it. It looks like a container reboot takes longer than 1 min with newer kernels resulting in a timeout error and subsequent failure. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2038433] Re: systemd autopkgtest regression on arm64 and s390x on mantic

2023-11-29 Thread Juerg Haefliger
>From my limited testing, it looks like it was introduced in 6.5.0-10.10. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2038433 Title: systemd autopkgtest regression on

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2038433] Re: systemd autopkgtest regression on arm64 and s390x on mantic

2023-11-29 Thread Juerg Haefliger
So the workaround for the above in systemd/debian/tests/tests-in-lxd is problematic? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2038433 Title: systemd autopkgtest

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2038433] Re: systemd autopkgtest regression on arm64 and s390x on mantic

2023-11-29 Thread Juerg Haefliger
Oh -> bug 1878225 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2038433 Title: systemd autopkgtest regression on arm64 and s390x on mantic Status in linux package in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2038433] Re: systemd autopkgtest regression on arm64 and s390x on mantic

2023-11-29 Thread Juerg Haefliger
Is seems the container fails to boot. From a bad run: 9109s autopkgtest [10:39:17]: test tests-in-lxd: [--- 9145s 2023-11-28T10:39:50Z INFO Waiting for automatic snapd restart... 9259s lxd 5.19-8635f82 from Canonical** installed 9288s Creating autopkgtest-prepare-jhI 9475s

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2041496] Re: btmgmt --index broken in Mantic

2023-11-14 Thread Juerg Haefliger
This has landed in upstream bluez now: https://github.com/bluez/bluez/commit/303925b28110469ad002ac19ce0eb9c84d6aceb2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bluez in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2041496

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2018128] Re: Apport does not collect all logs when the package is HWE kernel

2023-11-07 Thread Juerg Haefliger
I don't think that is sufficient for all possible source, meta and binary kernel package incarnations. I need to do some testing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2037642] Re: [FFe] Raspberry Pi 5 support

2023-11-01 Thread Juerg Haefliger
** No longer affects: libcamera (Ubuntu Noble) ** No longer affects: linux-meta-raspi (Ubuntu Noble) ** No longer affects: linux-raspi (Ubuntu Noble) ** No longer affects: mesa (Ubuntu Noble) ** No longer affects: pipewire (Ubuntu Noble) ** No longer affects: rpi-eeprom (Ubuntu Noble) ** No

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2041496] Re: btmgmt --index broken in Mantic

2023-10-27 Thread Juerg Haefliger
https://lore.kernel.org/linux- bluetooth/20231026182426.032a776d@gollum/#t Proposed patch: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-bluetooth/20231027055423.13617-1-juerg.haefli...@canonical.com/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2041496] [NEW] btmgmt --index broken in Mantic

2023-10-27 Thread Juerg Haefliger
Public bug reported: On Mantic: $ btmgmt --index 1 info Unable to open 1: No such file or directory (2) Index list with 1 item hci0: Primary controller  addr B8:27:EB:CB:F8:8D version 9 manufacturer 305 class 0x6c  supported settings: powered connectable fast-connectable discoverable

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2018128] Re: Apport does not collect all logs when the package is HWE kernel

2023-10-24 Thread Juerg Haefliger
Maybe something like this? https://git.launchpad.net/~juergh/+git/apport/log/?h=juergh/ubuntu/devel Move and rename source_linux.py to general-hooks/zz-kernel.pi, ensure it runs last (because it wants properties that are set by other general hooks) and only for kernel and related (firmware and

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2018128] Re: Apport does not collect all logs when the package is HWE kernel

2023-10-23 Thread Juerg Haefliger
Maybe it doesn't matter if the kernel hook is triggered for those since they never get bug reports anyways :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2018128 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2018128] Re: Apport does not collect all logs when the package is HWE kernel

2023-10-23 Thread Juerg Haefliger
List of kernel source packages as of 2023/10/23. ** Attachment added: "ubuntu-kernels.list" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2018128/+attachment/5712664/+files/ubuntu-kernels.list -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2018128] Re: Apport does not collect all logs when the package is HWE kernel

2023-10-23 Thread Juerg Haefliger
I don't think we can do this with a regex. There are linux- package that are not kernels. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2018128 Title: Apport does not

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2018128] Re: Apport does not collect all logs when the package is HWE kernel

2023-10-23 Thread Juerg Haefliger
Or the kernel package itself needs to provide the symlink. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2018128 Title: Apport does not collect all logs when the package

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2018128] Re: Apport does not collect all logs when the package is HWE kernel

2023-10-23 Thread Juerg Haefliger
This needs some rework. Kernel source package names change a lot and with every release so static symlinks will not work. We might have to query LP to get up-to-date kernel source information. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2018128] Re: Apport does not collect all logs when the package is HWE kernel

2023-10-23 Thread Juerg Haefliger
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2018128 Title: Apport does not collect all logs when the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2036358] Re: systemd wait-online now times out after jammy and lunar upgrade

2023-10-17 Thread Juerg Haefliger
This introduces an unacceptable regression on Raspberry Pis. An interface that is *not* listed must not cause a 2 min timeout. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2039358] Re: Audio via bluetooth gets intermitent when a browser is started

2023-10-16 Thread Juerg Haefliger
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2038539 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2038539 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2038539 bluetooth connections are unstable with linux-image-6.5.0-7-generic (MANTIC) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2039278] Re: Consistent naming of onboard NIC on all Pi on all Ubuntu

2023-10-16 Thread Juerg Haefliger
** Tags added: kern-8255 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2039278 Title: Consistent naming of onboard NIC on all Pi on all Ubuntu Status in linux-raspi

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2038964] Re: raspi ethernet rename is racy

2023-10-11 Thread Juerg Haefliger
FWIW, this works correctly with a 6.2 lunar kernel and mantic userspace. ** Attachment added: "udev-6-2-3b+.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-settings/+bug/2038964/+attachment/5708655/+files/udev-6-2-3b+.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2038964] Re: raspi ethernet rename is racy

2023-10-11 Thread Juerg Haefliger
udev debug log from a 3B ** Attachment added: "udev-3b.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-settings/+bug/2038964/+attachment/5708641/+files/udev-3b.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2038964] Re: raspi ethernet rename is racy

2023-10-11 Thread Juerg Haefliger
udev debug log from a 3B+ ** Attachment added: "udev-3b+.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-settings/+bug/2038964/+attachment/5708640/+files/udev-3b+.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2037642] Re: [FFe] Raspberry Pi 5 support

2023-10-03 Thread Juerg Haefliger
** Changed in: linux-meta-raspi (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released ** Changed in: linux-raspi (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-settings in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2037642] Re: [FFe] Raspberry Pi 5 support

2023-09-29 Thread Juerg Haefliger
Debdiff with squash of https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/25450 Briefly tested on Pi 5, 4 and 400. Desktop comes up and glx and vulkan are accelerated. ** Patch added: "mesa_23.2.1-1ubuntu2.debdiff"

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2037642] Re: [FFe] Raspberry Pi 5 support

2023-09-29 Thread Juerg Haefliger
** Changed in: libcamera (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Juerg Haefliger (juergh) ** Changed in: linux-meta-raspi (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Juerg Haefliger (juergh) ** Changed in: linux-raspi (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Juerg Haefliger (juergh) *

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2037635] [NEW] Add support for Pi 5

2023-09-28 Thread Juerg Haefliger
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2037642 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037642 Public bug reported: Backport support for new BCM2712 HW (used on Pi 5) to Mantic mesa. Upstream MR: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/25450 ** Affects: mesa (Ubuntu)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2037425] [NEW] ubuntu-server pulls in ZFS userspace

2023-09-26 Thread Juerg Haefliger
Public bug reported: ubuntu-server in Mantic pulls in zfs userspace packages and systemd services are automatically enabled, which means zfs kernel modules are automatically loaded at boot, for everybody. On Raspberry Pi, this results in +5MB of additional memory consumption which is not

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2031352] Re: Nouveau driver crash - Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS stuck on power-off/reboot screen

2023-09-04 Thread Juerg Haefliger
** Description changed: + [Impact] + After updating to Kernel 6.2 a few days ago, I have been experiencing issues with my system's shutdown and reboot functions. During these processes, the system becomes unresponsive and hangs on a black screen, which displays both the Dell and Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2031352] Re: Nouveau driver crash - Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS stuck on power-off/reboot screen

2023-09-04 Thread Juerg Haefliger
Thanks for the confirmation, will send the patch to our mailing list. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2031352 Title: Nouveau driver crash - Ubuntu 22.04.3

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2031352] Re: Nouveau driver crash - Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS stuck on power-off/reboot screen

2023-09-01 Thread Juerg Haefliger
I've builtt a test kernel with the above patch: https://kernel.ubuntu.com/~juergh/lp2031352/ Can someone give it a try, please? Note that the kernel is not signed so you need to disable SecureBoot to be able to boot it. Install linux- image-unsigned, linux-modules and maybe linux-modules-extra.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2031352] Re: Nouveau driver crash - Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS stuck on power-off/reboot screen

2023-09-01 Thread Juerg Haefliger
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Lunar) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu Lunar) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-hwe-6.2 (Ubuntu Lunar)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2031352] Re: Nouveau driver crash - Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS stuck on power-off/reboot screen

2023-09-01 Thread Juerg Haefliger
Without digging too deep, maybe this: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cacavsv6-aj4ehg7pnuwgsncn0cyro8gwd3nr8pu32a-wxso...@mail.gmail.com/T/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2031352] Re: Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS stuck on power-off/reboot screen (nouveau driver crash)

2023-09-01 Thread Juerg Haefliger
** Summary changed: - Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS stuck on power-off/reboot screen + Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS stuck on power-off/reboot screen (nouveau driver crash) ** Summary changed: - Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS stuck on power-off/reboot screen (nouveau driver crash) + Nouveau driver crash - Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2031352] Re: Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS stuck on power-off/reboot screen

2023-09-01 Thread Juerg Haefliger
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2031352 Title: Nouveau driver crash - Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS stuck on power-off/reboot screen Status in linux-hwe-6.2 package

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2031352] Re: Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS stuck on power-off/reboot screen

2023-09-01 Thread Juerg Haefliger
@steffel et al. I believe there are two different problems here. 1) A generic reboot/suspend/halt issue. When powering off or suspending, the machine doesn't fully turn off. The fan is still spinning and it can only be revived by pulling the plug. This is what this bug is about. 2) A similarly

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2031352] Re: Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS stuck on power-off/reboot screen

2023-08-28 Thread Juerg Haefliger
@ianrussel your log shows: Aug 22 09:57:02 ianrussel kernel: nouveau :01:00.0: fb: VPR locked, but no scrubber binary! Aug 22 09:57:02 ianrussel kernel: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: Aug 22 09:57:02 ianrussel kernel: #PF: supervisor instruction fetch in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2031352] Re: Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS stuck on power-off/reboot screen

2023-08-28 Thread Juerg Haefliger
It's not trivial since it happens so infrequently. I need to think about this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2031352 Title: Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS stuck on

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2031352] Re: Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS stuck on power-off/reboot screen

2023-08-28 Thread Juerg Haefliger
It's not a systemd issue. ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2031352 Title: Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2031352] Re: Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS stuck on power-off/reboot screen

2023-08-28 Thread Juerg Haefliger
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2031352 Title: Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS stuck on

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2017209] Re: [Raspberry Pi/lunar] systemd-oomd fails with "ConditionControlGroupController=memory was not met"

2023-05-12 Thread Juerg Haefliger
ubuntu@rpi-4b-rev1d2-164b:~$ cat /etc/apt/preferences.d/proposed-updates Package: * Pin: release a=lunar-proposed Pin-Priority: 500 ubuntu@rpi-4b-rev1d2-164b:~$ apt-cache policy linux-raspi linux-raspi: Installed: 6.2.0.1004.6 Candidate: 6.2.0.1005.8 Version table: 6.2.0.1005.8 500

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2017209] Re: [Raspberry Pi/lunar] systemd-oomd fails with "ConditionControlGroupController=memory was not met"

2023-05-12 Thread Juerg Haefliger
Thanks for the verification. > there is also a non-existent version 6.2.0.1005.8 that causes conflict. That's a valid meta package version and the meta packages should be available from lunar-proposed. http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports/pool/main/l/linux-meta-raspi/ -- You received this bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2017209] Re: [Raspberry Pi/lunar] systemd-oomd fails with "ConditionControlGroupController=memory was not met"

2023-04-24 Thread Juerg Haefliger
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu Lunar) Importance: Undecided Status: Invalid ** Also affects: linux-raspi (Ubuntu Lunar) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: linux-raspi (Ubuntu Lunar) Status:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2017209] Re: [Raspberry Pi/lunar] systemd-oomd fails with "ConditionControlGroupController=memory was not met"

2023-04-24 Thread Juerg Haefliger
Sigh. I missed to forward-port the revert of that commit from kinetic to lunar. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2017209 Title: [Raspberry Pi/lunar]

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2017209] Re: [Raspberry Pi/lunar] systemd-oomd fails with "ConditionControlGroupController=memory was not met"

2023-04-24 Thread Juerg Haefliger
** Tags added: kern-6572 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2017209 Title: [Raspberry Pi/lunar] systemd-oomd fails with

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2015182] Re: Add support for Adreno a690

2023-04-04 Thread Juerg Haefliger
Test packages: https://launchpad.net/~juergh/+archive/ubuntu/mesa ** Description changed: - The Lenovo X13s ARM laptop contains an Ardeno a690 GPU. Please add Mesa + The Lenovo X13s ARM laptop contains an Adreno a690 GPU. Please add Mesa support for this GPU. This landed in upstream Mesa here:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2015182] Re: Add support for Adreno a690

2023-04-04 Thread Juerg Haefliger
** Attachment added: "mesa_23.0.1-1ubuntu1_23.0.1-1ubuntu2.diff.gz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/2015182/+attachment/5660728/+files/mesa_23.0.1-1ubuntu1_23.0.1-1ubuntu2.diff.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2015182] [NEW] Add support for Adreno a690

2023-04-04 Thread Juerg Haefliger
Public bug reported: The Lenovo X13s ARM laptop contains an Adreno a690 GPU. Please add Mesa support for this GPU. This landed in upstream Mesa here: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/21573 ** Affects: mesa (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New --

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2002918] Re: ERROR: rejecting excluded file-list name

2023-02-28 Thread Juerg Haefliger
Yes, it's horribly broken :-( ** Changed in: rsync (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsync in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2002918 Title: ERROR: rejecting

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1930082] Re: systemd/247.3-3ubuntu3 ADT test failure with linux-raspi H/G/F

2022-11-11 Thread Juerg Haefliger
Clarification: The raspi kernel contains a bunch of downstream HW specific patches pulled primarily from the raspberrypi kernel. These code modifications are never exercised in an OpenStack VM or LXD container so it's rather pointless to do so. -- You received this bug notification because you

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1930082] Re: systemd/247.3-3ubuntu3 ADT test failure with linux-raspi H/G/F

2022-11-08 Thread Juerg Haefliger
Time to turn off ADT testing for raspi kernels since it adds no real value. ** Changed in: linux-raspi (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1930082] Re: systemd/247.3-3ubuntu3 ADT test failure with linux-raspi H/G/F

2022-11-08 Thread Juerg Haefliger
This is a general problem when running any raspi kernel in ADT since the raspi kernels don't support ACPI. Software configuration seems to be different across different arm64 host HW in the ADT OpenStack cloud. Older HW has older qemu-efi installed which presents both ACPI *and* a DT to the guest

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1930082] Re: systemd/247.3-3ubuntu3 ADT test failure with linux-raspi H/G/F

2022-11-08 Thread Juerg Haefliger
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930082 Title: systemd/247.3-3ubuntu3 ADT test failure with

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1971712] Re: Add support for Intel DG2

2022-10-17 Thread Juerg Haefliger
** Tags added: kern-4615 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971712 Title: Add support for Intel DG2 Status in linux-firmware package in Ubuntu: Fix Released

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1991285] Re: systemd/245.4-4ubuntu3.18 ADT test failure with linux/5.4.0-128.144

2022-10-10 Thread Juerg Haefliger
Log entries from failure: == FAIL: test_no_failed (__main__.ServicesTest) No failed units -- Traceback (most recent call last): File

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1954716] Re: rpi nfsroot vers=4 not supported anymore?

2022-08-10 Thread Juerg Haefliger
Upstream is aware since 2007 [1] :-) But apparently lacking NFSv4 support is not painful enough to get some traction. I'm currently digging through the code. [1] https://lists.zytor.com/archives/klibc/2007-February/002062.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1954716] Re: rpi nfsroot vers=4 not supported anymore?

2022-08-09 Thread Juerg Haefliger
Please do test the work-around. If indeed NFSv4 solves your overlayfs problem then that would be another reason for fixing nfsmount. We can carry Ubuntu specific fixes if for some reason Debian doesn't want them but the preferred way is obviously to fix it in Debian so that it tickles down

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1954716] Re: rpi nfsroot vers=4 not supported anymore?

2022-08-09 Thread Juerg Haefliger
It simply means that the ticket has been acknowledged as a bug/issue, nothing more. As you might have noticed it's been reported in Debian in 2007, so it doesn't seem to be that important. I know that doesn't help you but the fact that there's a work-around makes it even less important. I'll take

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1954716] Re: rpi nfsroot vers=4 not supported anymore?

2022-08-08 Thread Juerg Haefliger
See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=409272#14 for a work-around which replaces nfsmount in the initrd with /sbin/mount.nfs. But that probably pulls in dependencies and blows up the size of the initrd. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1954716] Re: rpi nfsroot vers=4 not supported anymore?

2022-08-08 Thread Juerg Haefliger
Debian 11 is also broken if an intird is being used but Raspberry Pi OS is *not* using an initrd hence not using nfsmount. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to klibc in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1977764] Re: kernel modules "zstd" and "z3fold" missing.

2022-06-15 Thread Juerg Haefliger
** Changed in: linux-raspi (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: linux-raspi (Ubuntu Kinetic) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-settings in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1947311] Re: Unexpected partition growth on first boot on impish for raspberry pi

2022-04-11 Thread Juerg Haefliger
Ah never mind I looked at the amd64 image manifest, not raspi :-( -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947311 Title: Unexpected partition growth on first

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1947311] Re: Unexpected partition growth on first boot on impish for raspberry pi

2022-04-11 Thread Juerg Haefliger
Did you disable it in user-data? cloud-initramfs-growroot is no longer installed per the manifest https://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-server/daily- preinstalled/current/jammy-preinstalled-server-amd64.manifest -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1928393] Re: linux-firmware 1.197 causes kernel to report error "amdgpu: [gfxhub0] retry page fault"

2022-02-15 Thread Juerg Haefliger
Hirsute is EOL so closing this bug. Please open a new one if the problem still persists with one of the supported series. ** Changed in: linux-firmware (Ubuntu Hirsute) Status: Incomplete => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1928393] Re: linux-firmware 1.197 causes kernel to report error "amdgpu: [gfxhub0] retry page fault"

2022-01-20 Thread Juerg Haefliger
If you want this fixed in Ubuntu I need to know what series are affected. Hirsute goes EOL at the end of the month. Are Impish and/or Jammy working or affected as well? ** Changed in: linux-firmware (Ubuntu Hirsute) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1928393] Re: linux-firmware 1.197 causes kernel to report error "amdgpu: [gfxhub0] retry page fault"

2021-11-29 Thread Juerg Haefliger
@antonio-petricca, What series? What kernel? I can produce a hirsute linux-firmware package with the reverted sdma firmware but need someone to verify it on hirsute with the hirsute kernel. Any takers? Or have you all moved on to impish? -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1928393] Re: linux-firmware 1.197 causes kernel to report error "amdgpu: [gfxhub0] retry page fault"

2021-11-29 Thread Juerg Haefliger
lid ** Changed in: linux-firmware (Ubuntu Hirsute) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: linux-firmware (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid ** Changed in: linux-firmware (Ubuntu Hirsute) Assignee: (unassigned) => Juerg Haefliger (juergh) -- You received this bug notifica

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1928393] Re: linux-firmware 1.197 causes kernel to report error "amdgpu: [gfxhub0] retry page fault"

2021-11-29 Thread Juerg Haefliger
@antonio-petricca, sorry but 5.15.2 is not a supported Ubuntu kernel and especially not on Bionic with (old) Bionic firmware. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1939986] Re: Missing firmware files, in Ubuntu 20.04 LTS, for initramfs, when it loads i915

2021-11-17 Thread Juerg Haefliger
** Also affects: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-firmware (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: linux-firmware (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Juerg Haefliger (juergh) ** Chan

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1938983] Re: missing modules after 5.11.0-25-generic update

2021-11-16 Thread Juerg Haefliger
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1939986 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939986 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1939986 Missing firmware files, in Ubuntu 20.04 LTS, for initramfs, when it loads i915 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1939986] Re: Missing firmware files, in Ubuntu 20.04 LTS, for initramfs, when it loads i915

2021-11-16 Thread Juerg Haefliger
** Changed in: linux-firmware (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Juerg Haefliger (juergh) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939986 Ti

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1939986] Re: Missing firmware files, in Ubuntu 20.04 LTS, for initramfs, when it loads i915

2021-11-16 Thread Juerg Haefliger
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939986 Title: Missing firmware files, in Ubuntu 20.04 LTS, for initramfs, when it loads i915 Status in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1928393] Re: linux-firmware 1.197 causes kernel to report error "amdgpu: [gfxhub0] retry page fault"

2021-10-27 Thread Juerg Haefliger
Hi. I'm picking up this ticket from Seth. Reading through the history it seems it's still an open issue? My understanding is that upstream 'fixed' this by reverting fw blobs in version 20210818. I can produce a linux-firmware test package for hirsute 20.04 with these reverts if necessary. Just let

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1901272] Re: Can't connect Bluetooth devices after reboot - Ubuntu 20.10 on Raspberry Pi 4

2020-10-27 Thread Juerg Haefliger
** Package changed: linux-raspi2 (Ubuntu) => linux-raspi (Ubuntu) ** Also affects: bluez (Ubuntu Groovy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: pi-bluetooth (Ubuntu Groovy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: linux-raspi (Ubuntu Groovy)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1884281] Re: UC20 images do not use predictable interface names on RPi4

2020-06-25 Thread Juerg Haefliger
The default for both core20 and server is 'net.ifnames=0' which disables persistent network interface names so it's expected to see eth0 and wlan0. cat /proc/cmdline coherent_pool=1M 8250.nr_uarts=1 bcm2708_fb.fbwidth=1280 bcm2708_fb.fbheight=1024 bcm2708_fb.fbswap=1

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1648267] Re: Regression with Zesty binutils building u-boot

2020-03-24 Thread Juerg Haefliger
** Changed in: u-boot (Ubuntu) Status: Won't Fix => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1648267 Title: Regression with Zesty binutils building

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1648267] Re: Regression with Zesty binutils building u-boot

2020-03-24 Thread Juerg Haefliger
Zesty is long gone. ** Changed in: u-boot (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1648267 Title: Regression with Zesty

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1864992] Re: depmod: ERROR: ../libkmod/libkmod.c:515 lookup_builtin_file() could not open builtin file '/lib/modules/5.4.0-14-generic/modules.builtin.bin'

2020-03-11 Thread Juerg Haefliger
There seem to be multiple issues related to these benign errors: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=948257 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=949444 Just to be clear, it's not a kernel (linux) package problem. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #948257

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1858801] [NEW] lxd ADT failure on Bionic with linux-raspi2-5.3 arm64

2020-01-08 Thread Juerg Haefliger
Public bug reported: On Bionic with linux-raspi2-5.3 arm64: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac /autopkgtest-bionic/bionic/arm64/l/lxd/20191219_143544_26c78@/log.gz ** Affects: lxd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New **

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1858799] Re: lxc ADT test failure on Bionic with linux-raspi2-5.3 arm64

2020-01-08 Thread Juerg Haefliger
Above log is from an Eoan run. Here is Bionic: https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-bionic/bionic/arm64/l/lxc/20191219_142612_71881@/log.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1858799] Re: lxc ADT test failure on Bionic with linux-raspi2-5.3 arm64

2020-01-08 Thread Juerg Haefliger
https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac /autopkgtest-eoan/eoan/arm64/l/lxc/20191216_204800_eb922@/log.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1858799] [NEW] lxc ADT test failure on Bionic with linux-raspi2-5.3 arm64

2020-01-08 Thread Juerg Haefliger
Public bug reported: On Bionic with linux-raspi2-5.3 arm64: PASS: lxc-tests: lxc-test-api-reboot (78s) PASS: lxc-tests: lxc-test-apparmor (1s) PASS: lxc-tests: lxc-test-apparmor-mount (52s) PASS: lxc-tests: lxc-test-attach (3s) PASS: lxc-tests: lxc-test-autostart (68s) PASS: lxc-tests:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1817302] Re: growpart changes diskid of mbr disks

2019-02-22 Thread Juerg Haefliger
On 32-bit sfdisk fails to parse the label-id if the MSB is set and thus generates a new one. We happen to be unlucky with our (i386) cloud image in that the original label-id has the MSB set. So when growpart run (which calls sfdisk), the disk ID is regenerated and subsequent boots fail because

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1817302] Re: growpart changes diskid of mbr disks

2019-02-22 Thread Juerg Haefliger
https://lore.kernel.org/util- linux/20190222160412.26652-1-jue...@canonical.com -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1817302 Title: growpart changes diskid

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1696710] Re: Ubuntu 16.04.02: depmod: WARNING: needs unknown symbol .TOC.

2018-05-03 Thread Juerg Haefliger
Verified that the new package fixes the issue. ** Tags removed: verification-needed-trusty ** Tags added: verification-done-trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to kmod in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1712491] Re: Add backported bnxt driver to the initramfs

2017-09-06 Thread Juerg Haefliger
This is looking great so far. Instance booted nicely, no signs of a kernel panic. The driver was happily picked up in the initramfs. I'm going to run it through some stress-ng tests to make sure everything is fine but we're off to a good start. ** Tags removed: verification-needed-xenial **

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1712491] Re: Add backported bnxt driver to the initramfs

2017-08-29 Thread Juerg Haefliger
The following patch has been tested succesfully: --- hook-functions.orig 2017-08-21 08:00:47.303094616 + +++ hook-functions 2017-08-23 07:43:56.893817027 + @@ -519,6 +519,9 @@ auto_add_modules() macvtap.ko pcmcia sb1000.ko team tokenring \

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1712491] Re: Add backported bnxt driver to the initramfs

2017-08-29 Thread Juerg Haefliger
** Description changed: - We're adding a backported bnxt driver to Xenial (LP #1711056). It's an - alternate for the regular Xenial driver that only manages NICs that are - not supported by the regular Xenial driver. But it's a boot-critical - driver so it needs to be added to the initramfs. +

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1712491] [NEW] Add backported bnxt driver to the initramfs

2017-08-23 Thread Juerg Haefliger
Public bug reported: We're adding a backported bnxt driver to Xenial (LP #1711056). It's an alternate for the regular Xenial driver that only manages NICs that are not supported by the regular Xenial driver. But it's a boot-critical driver so it needs to be added to the initramfs. ---